What is the Cassiopaean Experiment?
The Cassiopaean Experiment is essentially an experiment in superluminal (faster than light) communication. More details on this concept are discussed in the Introduction to the Site.
Who are "the Cassiopaeans"?
After thirty years of study and two years of dedicated experimentation, detailed in Laura's autobiography, Amazing Grace, the Cassiopaean communications began with a source identifying itself as "the Cassiopaeans." This source claimed to Laura that "We are you in the future"- or a "higher self" in popular parlance. The most probable explanation is: it was Laura talking to her subconscious mind, or communicating with what the psychologist and philosopher C.G. Jung called "collective unconscious"
What is important to note at the outset is this: the Cassiopaeans are NOT "aliens," nor are they "discarnate entities."
"We are you in the Future," they said. "We transmit 'through' the opening that is presented in the locator that you represent as Cassiopaea, due to the strong radio pulses aligned from Cassiopaea, which are due to a pulsar from a neutron star 300 light years behind it, as seen from your locator. This facilitates a clear channel transmission from 6th density to 3rd density."
Are the Cassiopaeans "common" to all people in the sense of being a source of information for many people, or just Laura?
Q: So, you
are us in the future, we are you in the past - when you say this, are
you "us" in the future in the sense of ALL mankind, or in the sense of
any particular group of mankind?
Q: When I
post material on the website, those people who resonate to the material
believe that this refers to them also. I have been of the opinion that
Unified Thought Form being must mean a very large group as represented
in this [reality]. I know that we are dealing with limiting terms. But,
is this applied to people who CHOOSE the Cassiopaean option of Service
to Others and preservation of Free Will?
What does it mean to "recognize the application?"
asks] How come I am always the one who gets assigned the job of figuring
Q: (L) Are
you saying that your primary reason is just to teach us? This small group?
As "Us in the Future," the Cassiopaean Experiment addresses certain ontological problems related particularly to quantum theory, suggesting that an "observer" (J. A. Wheeler's "Eye") watching the universe so as to "create it") may need to be included in our consideration. That suggests the necessity for expanding the scope of what is nowadays considered as "physical entities." The answer to "observability of parallel universes" may involve taking into account such an extension.
Now, consider the idea that there are several - maybe even infinite - "probable future yous" as observers. This would be represented as many "eyes" but all of them converging on a single point on the tail - the "now" moment that we perceive, which is the moment of "choice." It is from these probable futures of infinite potential - of "thought centers" as the Cassiopaeans describe themselves as well - that reality is projected. It is through human beings that these energies are transduced and become "real."
From this perspective of "creating the universe" by observing it, the Cassiopaeans are an alternate source of information about the past, present and future. These are not predictions or fortune-telling. The Cassiopaeans often give obscure clues that are the starting points for years of research, forcing us to come to an understanding of the "answer" ourselves. This is necessary in order to avoid paradoxes. Again, please see the Introduction to the Site for fuller details.
Can others contact the Cassiopaeans?
Q: [A guest
at a session asks] Is there any way I can contact you guys directly?
Q: (L) [...]
Is this material being given to others, or is it designed to or intended
to be shared with others?
Q: (L) What
is the 'necessary way?'
Q: (L) Well,
it took all our lives and a LOT of hard work.
Q: (L) Are
you saying that this information will be transmitted in some way to millions
Q: (L) Well,
the only thing I can think of is through books.
I have to say that the writing of this series has been one of the most
educational projects I have ever undertaken. Because, in the writing,
I have had to comb through the transcripts and have had to explain it
to other people and before I can do that, I have to explain it to myself.
It has become a profound mind expansion thing...
Q: It's almost
as much fun to be learning the things I am having to assemble as if I
were reading it. And I'm the one writing it. It's really quite amazing.
Q: (A) We
communicate with many other people via the internet and the question is:
where are the STO people who know more than we know? We look for somebody
who can teach us something and we never seem to be able to do it. What
are we doing wrong?
There are those who suggest that the Cassiopaean Transmissions should "belong" to the people. How do you feel about this?
The Cassiopaean Transcripts are the result of many years of hard work and research. The Cassiopaeans state: "We are YOU in the Future."
The fact that sending information into the past is possible does not necessarily imply that any information that pretends to be sent from the future is such indeed!
Indeed, assuming that the knowledge and technology of the future is (or CAN BE) much more advanced than ours, then it is only natural that any broadcast from the future will be addressed directly into the mind.
Even today there are techniques of acting directly on our minds. (See the Quantum Future School Timeline Project) They are not always used for our benefit; nevertheless they do exist. But if communications from the future are possible, why don't we receive these broadcasts on a daily basis? If our minds can serve as receivers, then why aren't we all aware of the transmissions?
I think that the answer has to do with multiple realities and branching universes, and perhaps any civilization which would receive messages from the future on a daily basis has ceased to exist because communication through time is a very dangerous game. You produce paradoxes and these paradoxes remove the paradoxical universes from the repository of possible universes; if you create a universe with paradoxes, it destroys itself either completely or partially. Perhaps just intelligence is removed from this universe because it is intelligence that creates paradox. Perhaps we are very fortunate that even if we can receive some of these messages from the future, we still continue to exist.
Suppose our civilization were to advance to the point where everyone can communicate with themselves in the past; they have a computer with a special program and peripheral device that does this. It becomes the latest fad: everyone is communicating with themselves in the past to warn of dangers or upcoming calamities or bad choices, or to give lottery numbers or winning horses. But, what is seen as a "bad choice" or "calamity" for one, could be seen to be a "good event" or "benefit" to someone else!
So, the next step would be that "hackers" would begin to break into the systems and send false communications into the past to deliberately create bad choices and calamities for some in order to produce benefits for themselves or others.
Then, the first individual would see that false information has been sent and would go into their system and go back even earlier to warn themselves that false information was going to be sent back by an "imposter" and how to tell that it was false.
Then the hacker would see this, and go back in time to an even earlier moment and give false information that someone was going to send false information (that was really true) that false information (that was really false) was going to be sent, thereby confusing the issue.
This process could go on endlessly with constant and repeated communications into the past, one contradicting the other, one signal cancelling out the other, with the result that it would be exactly the same as if there were NO communication into the past!
There is, also, the very interesting possiblity that the above scenario IS exactly what is taking place in our world.
It is also possible that, whenever a civilization comes to the point that it can manipulate the past and thereby change the present, it would most probably destroy itself, and probably its "branch" of the universe, unless there comes a cataclysmic event before this happens which would act as a kind of "control system" or way of reducing the technological possibilities to zero again, thus obviating the potentials of universal chaos.
In this way, cataclysmic events could be a sort of preventive or pre-emptive strike against such manipulations, and may, in fact, be the result of engineered actions of benevolent selves in the future who see the dangers of communicating with ourselves in the past!
So, the probability is this: if there IS communication from the future, it MAY, in fact, be constantly received by each and every one of us as an ongoing barrage of lies mixed with truth.
Thus, the problem becomes more than just "tuning" to a narrow band signal, because clearly the hackers can imitate the signal and have become VERY clever in delivering their lies disguised as "warm and fuzzy" truths; the problem becomes an altogether different proposition of believing nothing and ACTING as though EVERYTHING is misleading, gathering data from all quarters, and then making the most INFORMED choice possible with full realization that it may be in error!
We repeat: the problem becomes an altogether different proposition of believing nothing and ACTING as though EVERYTHING is misleading, gathering data from all quarters, and then making the most INFORMED choice possible with full realization that it may be in error!
It is in this sense that we assess the Cassiopaean Transmissions as simply raw data that requires research and intense scrutiny in order to determine its validity and the noise to signal ratio. It is NOT "the word of God" nor does it "belong" to those who are incapable of dealing with it as a data set. As we have said many times to those who claim to be better able to "interpret" the Cassiopaeans than Laura is: if that were the case, then obviously the Cassiopaeans would be talking to them and NOT Laura.
The issue of "channeling" as a scientific experiment - utilizing information obtained by such a method - is problematical, to say the least. Again, we wish to reiterate that the "Cassiopaean Source" is NOT, and never has been, a dialogue with so-called "aliens" or "discarnate" beings as they are generally understood. They have clearly stated to Laura, time and again:"We are YOU in the future."
The Cassiopaean Experiment is a form of channeling in which, by an intent, the messenger is as important as the message itself. They are inseparably entangled in a quantum way; an interfering quantum amplitude. They form a oneness, a whole. To separate the message from the messenger would be, in this Cassiopaean quantum experiment, like closing one hole in a double slit experiment. You close one hole, and the whole pattern is different, not just a part of it.
The Cassiopaean channeling has characteristics of a scientific experiment.
Think of us as we actually are: scientists in their lab, working on the great laws of the universe. They perform an important series of experiments. They are trained professionals, they know their stuff, they know their laboratory equipment and its quirks. But they are human beings. Once in a while someone will make some silly joke, once in a while they will have to discard a series of data, because mice have messed up their equipment during the night.
Now, think, what advantage it would be if they would write in their paper the silly joke, include the mice data, the ink blobs etc. etc?
That is not the way of science. And the Cassiopaean experiment will proceed as a scientific one. With scientific standards and a continuous critical attitude in mind.
The Cassiopaean channeling is indeed a Critical Channeling. It is in this respect that it is DIFFERENT from other channeling. And it will stay so.
The difference is in the approach.
And so, the question is: why should anyone consider ANYTHING that is "channeled" as worthy of attention, much less a useful contribution to scientific research into the underlying nature of our reality?
If the claim is made that ALL channeling is "cultic" or "crap," what is the answer to that?
There is a possibility that some (most?) of the channeling TODAY comes via satellites or other means of programming. That IS possible. (See the Quantum Future School Timeline)
The next question is : WHY?
The evident answer is: to twist, to disinform, via New Age-type naive people.
Can the Cassiopaean channeling come the same way?
It is not so easy. We are not naive. We are critical. We think, we analyze. We test and research.
Could SOME of our "communications" have been influenced this way?
YES. There is such a possibility. And this is why we must insist that the Cassiopaean Transmissions are merely a data set to be researched and are not something that "belongs to humanity."
Can ALL, or even 95% be received this way?
NO. Because there are too many instances in which the Cassiopaeans were "answering" questions to which normal "satellite type" of intelligence, without being able to instantly read the minds of everyone on this planet, could not have had access.
Therefore, I think, the statement that ALL channeling is crap and disinformation, and that 95% is via satellites shows that
a) Anyone who says this is either consciously disinforming or not able to think logically,
And this is the main difference between our approach and the approach of the many groups that rightly deserve the label "cult."
While we are ready to question everything, and ALWAYS look for new facts, other individuals declare "WE KNOW THE TRUTH". Here it is! And then we find one or another easily detectable nonsense statement that is claimed to be absolute, and this discredits everything else they say.
ALWAYS we are trying to apply our best logical thinking, our best "judgment". And although logic and judgment as a reality check is NEVER SUFFICIENT when dealing with possible "higher forces," yet it is ALWAYS NECESSARY. Which means, in practical terms:
1) ALWAYS USE IT TO THE MAX.
2) NEVER THINK THAT YOU CAN RELY COMPLETELY ON IT ALONE!
What I want to state clearly is: this "channeling", the Cassiopaean Experiment IS different than other channelings.
It was different from the very beginning, it continues to be so, and it will continue to be different. We may give it a name: Critical Channeling. It is such by an intent, not by a chance.
What are the fundamentals of your research?
Prof Arkadiuz Jadczyk is a world reknowned mathematical physicist. Laura knight-Jadczyk is an author with a scientific approach to metaphysics. Together they developed the Cassiopaea site to present the results of their research.
What do you mean by "networking"?
Networking is the concept of openly sharing information from many and varied sources and individuals with the goal of collectively broadening and deepening our knowledge of the history and possible future of humanity.
What is "The Wave"
"The Wave" forms a fundamental part of the cyclical nature of human experience and the cycle of existence. It is discussed in depth on the site at on the Wave index page.
Are you Political?
Based on our research into world political events we have come to understand that politics, like organised religion, simply serves to divide people. As such it is antithetical to our work. However, understanding the manipulations of the political, economic, and social structures of the world does fall into our areas of research since it is through groups and perspectives propagated by groups that we "view" our reality in terms of Wheeler's Eye.
However, an important distinction needs to be made: we believe that to SEE reality AS IT IS is necessary only in the sense explicated in the story of the Prodigal Son. The Prodigal Son, finally SEEing his true state in the Far Country, made a decision to begin a journey of elightenment. He did NOT make a decision to try to "change" the Far Country.
And thus, our perspective is to SEE and to see clearly, without illusion; but it is not our job to "fix" this world or to interfere in any way with its workings and machinations. It is, of course, true that as our SEEing changes, we are able to make more informed choices about what we do or do not wish to align with. But in all cases, we advocate the idea that the world is perfect as it is - even in its present state of increasing entropy - and that it serves as a perfect school for humanity.
Those who have completed the lessons are, like the Prodigal Son, ready to begin the journey to enlightenment. But the school will continue to exist for those who have just entered. And so, for those who have chosen this reality as a catalyst for their lessons, we believe that it is their right to have those lessons they have chosen.
Is it true that you believe that the world is going to end?
However, what does present itself as a result of painstaking research and networking, is the theory that time is cyclical and repeating and that the earth goes through cyclic catastrophies which mirror human experiential cycles. What is referred to as "the end of the world" may well be the culmination of one of these cycles.
The general concept that "the end of the world" signifies the end of existence or "everything" and that is not something we necessarily consider to be an accurate representation, though there are cosmological models that suggest the existence of multiple universes that "expand" or contract or give birth to "baby universes." Based on research, it seems that cycles may include catastrophic periods possibly involving a cometary shower such as those which killed the dinosaurs, and which represents, more or less, macrocosmic Quantum Jumps.
Are you a Cult?
No. We are a group of independent researchers numbering several hundred spread throughout the planet who share a common interest in uncovering the truth about the reality in which we find ourselves in scientific terms that include "mystical" inspiration as one small part of the experimental platform.
There is no hierarchical structure, there are no leaders. We believe that no one person holds all the answers, rather it is through sharing of ideas that a closer approximation to the truth may be reached.
Are you Anti-Semitic?
No. From research done here and by many other individuals it seems likely that the Jewish people in Israel are being manipulated by extreme Zionist groups. Our goal is to better understand the origin of and reasons for this and the part it plays in the overall unfolding of world events.
Are you a Religion?
No. It is our opinion that organised religion serves as a very effective way to control and manipulate large numbers of human beings and as such is antithetical to our belief that each person is an individual and must choose for themselves.
Do you believe in "God"?
It is our understanding that "God" is another name for the totality of existence or creation. All existence makes up the body of "God" and vice versa. Essentially there are two oppposing "faces of God", one which embodies the creative, expansive, conscious aspect and one which enbodies the contractile "sleeping" aspect. As part of "God" individual humans choose to serve one or other of these aspects thus manifesting the "third force," or the specific situation in which the two polarities interact.
What is your belief concerning UFOs and "Aliens"?
The phenomenon that these ideas speaks to more directly is that of hyperdimensional realities wherein mental energies or consciousness energies are amplified, and can be interactive with the environment in terms of specific technology that suggests not only power for transport that is partly physical, partly "ethereal;" communication that is also partly physical and partly ethereal, as well as powers of "manifestation" that might seem impossible to us in our present state of technology. All of these properties DO belong to hyperdimensional existence, and such a state of being has been being reported for millennia as being the "realm of the gods," including Dragons and Serpents, and critters of all sorts.
As many physicists will tell you, all that really exists are "waveforms" and we are waveforms of reality, and our consciousness is something that "reads waves." We give form and structure to the waves we "read" according to some agreed upon convention.
And so, theoretically, certain denizens of hyperdimensional space are "read" as more or less "reptilian" because that is the "essence" of their being, the frequency of their "wave form." And so, we call 'em "Lizzies" for short. They are not necessarily physical as we understand the term, nor are they necessarily "alien" as we understand the term either. We theorize that the perceptions of these levels of reality and their "consciousness units" are what is behind many religious conceptions and mythological representations of "gods and goddesses and creatures of all sorts.
You are visitor number .