The Real World > COINTELPRO and Disinformation

Joseph P. Farrell and the Giza Death Star

<< < (2/3) > >>

LQB:

--- Quote from: Laura on January 15, 2009, 08:43:23 AM ---Has anybody else read any of his stuff, or is anybody interested in taking a look and discussing it?

--- End quote ---

I've read:
SS Brotherhood of the Bell
Secrets of the Unified Field
The Cosmic War
The Giza Death Star
The Giza Death Star Deployed (half way through)

Overall IMO, he is well worth reading, although some of his corroborating evidence I do not agree with.  If nothing else, it is worth the summaries of many other authors in an attempt to tie big parts of the "picture" together.  The books are really all related and they deserve a fair read regardless of how you may feel about some of the references (authors) he uses.  The way I look at that aspect is to examine what part of these author's work he is using, recognizing that some elements of good Cointelpro is true.

From his SS Brotherhood:
"But there is a final potential Kennedy enemy to consider.  In June of 1963, the same year as his assassination, Kennedy took aim at one of the most powerful of the "entrenched interests" of the Establishment:  international mercantile banking.  President Kennedy authorized the printing of approximately four billion dollars of United States Notes and their release for circulation, thereby entirely bypassing the privately-owned Federal Reserve Bank, established by subterfuge and calculated political manipulation after the notorious Jekyll Island meeting.  Kennedy's move clearly portended an end to the bankers' monopolistic hold over the nation's money supply and a return to "constitutional money", money entirely free of interest to private banks.  This aspect of the assassination conspiracy is even less well-known than the Nazi connection, and remains so.

"Careful consideration of the disparate groups connected with the assassination - the military-industrial complex, the "national security "community"" represented by the CIA, FBI, and other agencies, the space program, the Mafia, the military, right wing emigre groups represented by various anti-Castro fronts as well as the Eastern Europeans, and international corporate finance and banking - will indicate many connections between all these elements, as many assassination researchers have pointed out.  But there is one group with connections to all of these organized interests, and that, of course, is the Nazis."

From his Giza Death Star Deployed:
"The terrible clarity of some of the ancient texts highlights a puzzling fact, and shines a spotlight on an entirely different cast of characters and set of anomalous questions regarding the Pyramid.  And writ large over the playbill and plot synopsis is one, looming question:  Why, after the publication of Zecharia Sitchin's The Wars of Gods and Men, has no one except this author stepped forward to investigate the weapon hypothesis?  Surely such a hypothesis, suggested by the ancient texts, is so radical and so pregnant with huge implications for human science, military technology, geopolitics and history, that someone else would have noticed and undertaken an investigation.  It is therefore the deafening silence that puzzles, especially when considered against the backdrop of the rather noisy effort being made to assert that the Pyramid and the Giza compound contain some "ancient wisdom" of benefit to humanity.  Such musings suggest that some sort of deliberate manipulation of opinion might be occurring with the recent Pyramid research.

"And this means that an investigation of the investigators may itself uncover some interesting things, perhaps even things that would directly or indirectly corroborate the weapon hypothesis.  After all, if anyone ever previously considered the Great Pyramid to be of any military significance, then one would expect to find recurring military and intelligence interest in the structure."


Farrell goes on to present some interesting evidence for this.  Of the work that I have studied on the Giza Pyramids, I find Dunn's to be the best for analysis/postulates.  But I think Farrell takes Dunn's work a step further in the right direction.

I would love to hear what Ark has to say about the physics after reading Farrell's material.

LQB:
There is another reason that I have recommended Farrell’s books for at least a top-level read.  I did not include this in my last post since an involved explanation is required to make sense of the reasoning for the recommendation.  So please bear with – this will be a lengthy post.

In 2005 while on business at a military base, I met a Lt Col, who, based on perceived openness of my expression in the areas of technology and physics (Electrical Engineering by profession), related to me his recent experience with an inventor.  His motivation at the time was to solicit my help in analyzing the Inventor’s device, and finding a home for it that would compensate the Inventor for development work over many years.  The Lt Col had exhausted avenues available to himself through the Gov (due to the non-conventional nature of the device) and was trying to help the Inventor by seeking other private/corporate sponsorship capable of outright buying the rights to the device.

A little background on the Inventor:  Currently the Inventor is over 80 years old and believes to be nearing the end of his life.  He has spent over 30 years working in the field of the device which began with a great interest in dowsing.  He is non-technical with a professional background in construction.  He spent much of his life savings on the development of the device, and for the past several years has been trying to sell the rights to it in order to provide something for his surviving children and their families (there may be some guilt feelings involved – understandable).  The problem is that the technology is totally non-conventional and generally draws reactions of disbelief and denial (as many react to dowsing).  Although it has produced amazing results in the hands of the Inventor (as well as myself and a few others), conventional “academics” cannot explain it and generally run a rapid retreat.

While meeting with the Lt Col, he placed a transmitter portion of the device on the floor of the office area and set the device for interrogation of plutonium (in fuel or storage).  He then used dowsing rods (the receiver in this case) to demonstrate lines of bearing to each nuclear power plant within a distance of many 100’s of miles.  At the invitation of the Lt Col, I visited the Inventor in his home to get the story from the horse’s mouth.  I met with the Inventor for several hours and learned much about his history with dowsing and how all this led to a series of devices for the interrogation of the line of bearing to any material compound/element (existing in lump form in some quantity).  [And fun discussions over many “revisionist” themes].  I tried out the device myself with some success locating the bearing to a lump of lead buried in a neighbor’s yard.  The Inventor invited me to take training on the device and I subsequently spend four days developing some consistency and skill in its use.  He then agreed to ship the device to my home for independent testing by myself and a friend. 

On the device:  The “transmitter/receiver” are pulsed at ELF frequencies and operate through monopole and wire coil “antennas”.  I use quotes here to indicate that these are unconventional in the sense that TEM (transverse EM) are not involved due to the fact that the antennas cannot support it, and no high-Q tuning is used.  Thus, to think of the device as a radar of some sort is an error.  The frequencies used depend on the nuclear characteristics of target of interrogation.  The device is placed on the ground (free of rebar, metal, or standing water) and rotated over short circular sections while standing in a particular relation to the device and angular section under interrogation.  A specific two-dimensional wrist motion must be used, and audio output from the “receiver” indicates what I call a line of sympathy between the device and the location of the material under interrogation.  A line of bearing results by reading an analog car compass once the operator has stopped the device at the estimated centroid of the audio response.  This process takes some practice and training before accurate reads result.  According to the Inventor, it sometimes takes a short time to set up these lines of sympathy, and once set up, they can remain for some time afterwards in absence of the device.  These lines can be “cleaned” by use of frequencies associated with the seasonal position of the sun.  Difficulty in the use of the device has contributed to the lack of interest in the “conventional” community. 

The following is a brief list of some of the characteristics of the measurements:
1) Targets in place for long periods work best
2) Gasses and radioactive isotopes can be interrogated over continental size distances if the mass is large
3) Performance can be affected by seasonal position of the sun
4) Any substance can be interrogated if the atomic/molecular makeup is known
5) The minimum amount of the material that can be interrogated is small
6) The greater the amount of material, the greater the range
7) Water content of the ground can affect the measurements

The Inventor’s contention is that all atoms/elements/compounds exhibit a unique spectra of frequency resonance by which they “know each other” and this frequency resonance is determined by the nuclear makeup. [I would add that this frequency resonance is associated with gravity/gravity waves].  When the transmitter pulses the right frequency, and the antenna is swept over the line of bearing to the corresponding target, a sympathetic response is produced by a change in the relationship between transmitter and receiver resulting in audio detection.  In other words, the device is made to “look like” a huge pile of the target material.

Before I met the Lt Col, he was able to attract Gov funds to commission an independent consulting group to analyze the efficacy of the measurements conducted by the Inventor.  Both blind and double blind tests were designed and conducted with the Inventor at the helm of the device.  Fascinating results were obtained since double blind interrogation for formaldehyde resulted in the triangulation of most of the cemeteries and funeral homes in the local area.  Blind tests for small amounts of newly placed material  were also a success.  In the summary words of the consulting group, “The null hypothesis that doubly blind formaldehyde detections to cemeteries within a 10 mile radius was a random occurrence can be rejected with a hypothetical confidence level of at least 99.93 percent...  The null hypothesis that  [the Inventor’s] detection of multiple samples of blindly place hydrochloric acid was a random occurrence or guesses can be rejected with a confidence level of between 92 percent and 97 percent depending on certain assumptions as discussed in the body of this report.”

There are many more fascinating results (including my own) that I could go into, but I don’t think a public forum is the appropriate place.  But I would be willing to give additional info to QFS as long as anonymity of the persons/organizations involved is protected.  I cannot give details on the device since I am bound by a non-disclosure agreement with the Inventor.

Back to the original reason for this lengthy post.  [BTW, the Lt Col is not Bearden.  The folks I refer to, as far as I know, have never heard of Bearden, and they are not the type that would be interested in his books.]  In Farrell’s book The Cosmic War, pg 44:

“Simply put, since every atom and every type of atom consists of particles with charge and/or mass, then every atom has its own peculiar “scalar signature” or “resonance” (recall the diagrams above and imagine the mathematical notations that would describe each in quaternion geometry).  Thus to produce an effect on any one of these systems, one simply has to “work backwards” as it were, and configure its scalar signature, decomposing each of the scalars into its own pair of bi-directional longitudinal pulses and waves”.  …

“More than anything else, it is this ability to configure a template based upon the scalar signature and its long distance resonance effects in the medium that allows one to produce an action at a distance …  It is, indeed, a very sophisticated form of magic, and sympathetic magic at that.” [pg 45]

As far as I know, I am the only one to describe the operation of the device as frequency resonant sympathy (among the many players in this saga).  And this was years prior to my read of Farrell’s material.

In Farrell’s book The Giza Death Star Deployed pg vi:

“Discovering that Tesla speculated that atomic weights or other properties of the elements of the periodic table seemed to be related to his oscillating impulse phenomena drove me to look …”

“That is, quaternion cross products produce non-zero scalar resultants that may be understood as indicating the non-translation stress of the medium itself.  Since this scalar resultant has no electromagnetic translation involved, [here he switches to a quote from Bearden – pg 175]

it does not interact with the electron shells of the atom.  Instead, it passes through the electron-shell ‘Faraday Cage’ surrounding the nucleus and interacts with the highly non-linear nucleus.  What is now oscillating is the electromagnetic potential (charge) of the nucleus itself.  The energy density of the charged nucleus – and hence its electromagnetic potential – is being oscillated as a periodic function of time. …

So now you can see why I had to go through all of the above in order to give meaning to these quotations based on my experience with the Inventor’s device.  For this reason, among others given in my last post, I think Farrell’s books are worth a read for those forum members so inclined regardless of his use of some questionable sources.

Laura:

--- Quote from: LQB ---  I would love to hear what Ark has to say about the physics after reading Farrell's material.
--- End quote ---

Well, I got him to read that part and he chuckled at how thoroughly Tom Bearden has bamboozled people. 

And yes, I agree that Farrell makes some interesting deductions but it is important to remember that most of the authors he cites are the second level disinfo.  Overall, he mainly dismisses the hyperdimensional ultraterrestrial hypothesis and the comet hypothesis for his "weapons" and 3 D space wars ideas, which effectively manages to divert attention away from the two most likely realities.   He writes some strange things for somebody educated at Oral Roberts...

You are also right that it does give one a good synopsis of the books of others - most of whom are the New Age disinfo crowd.

LQB:

--- Quote from: Laura on January 23, 2009, 07:11:32 AM ---
Well, I got him to read that part and he chuckled at how thoroughly Tom Bearden has bamboozled people. 

And yes, I agree that Farrell makes some interesting deductions but it is important to remember that most of the authors he cites are the second level disinfo.  Overall, he mainly dismisses the hyperdimensional ultraterrestrial hypothesis and the comet hypothesis for his "weapons" and 3 D space wars ideas, which effectively manages to divert attention away from the two most likely realities.   He writes some strange things for somebody educated at Oral Roberts...
 

--- End quote ---

Yes, and I find it interesting that he sees an "engineerable" unified physics in the pyramid, and yet relies on Bearden who has not produced anything "engineerable" as far as I know.  [BTW, Igor Witkowski's latest called Axis of the World is a good summary of some of the evidence for Farrell's "Paleoancient Very High Civilization"]

ZeropointNinja:
I have the full range of Farrel books.  I have not finished them all and I loaned out Nazi International and it never came back home.

My favorite read was Cosmic War, so far that is.  As good an explanation of what happened way back when as any I supposed, nobody will know for sure at this point anyway.

The Giza as a weapon hypothesis, I think its plausible as is any hypothesis.  IE anything can be a weapon.  Water can be a weapon if used in a certain way, so can consciousness, so can a device that focuses the consciousness, its all about intent of course.

I have exchanged a number of emails with Farrel over the last 2 years, pretty likable guy.  Short and to the point, busy writing books as far as I can tell.  That is his living after all, and that's how I take his books, as fanciful hypothesis.  At least in regards to the Giza books, the Nazi books seem to be pretty well researched.

I dont doubt his Oxford education, not that it makes him an expert on the paranormal.

I dont recall off hand any specific reference to what ET hypothesis he subscribed to.  

Maybe its here in the Byte Show archives.  Enjoy.

_http://www.thebyteshow.com/JosephPFarrell.html

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page