I have long held a fascination with media and fiction in particular.
Story-telling is an ancient aspect of human culture, seen in the archetype of the tribe gathering around a fire to re-tell the myths and legends and new stories important in their culture. It seems to me that this urge to share in story-telling is one of the most primal and effective ways of learning/teaching how to behave within the workings of the tribe. People have long shown, through their attraction to books and film and television, that they still remain very well tuned to receiving information in this manner in the modern day.
I can easily see why an alien invader might want to hijack this aspect of human behavior to insert subversive messages into the signal. --Or how STO beings might be able to tap into the system as part of an effort to shine knowledge into the world.
As it happens, the C's raised the concept when they brought up the subject of an "Army of Aryan psychic projectors" over a million strong beaming influence at the creative community. When I read this, it REALLY caught my attention. I'm very curious about this whole subject, and I'd be equally curious to read what other people think on the matter.
Now, whenever I've been tempted to write a comment on one of the many films discussed in this section, I find myself wanting to make a reference to the concept of the, 'psychic projector'. It seemed, though, that I would probably end up repeating myself frequently and I thought it might be a good idea to come up with a better way of dealing with things.
So toward that end, I have consolidated the various mentions of 'psychic projectors' made by the C's in this one thread so that it can serve as a sort of master document which can be linked to and from when discussing media in the Movies & Trivia section. --And also where the concept itself might be examined more fully.
I have started with the passage below where the bulk of the idea psychic projectors was presented. I've bolded the areas which I thought were of specific interest, and I've added a couple of my own thoughts between some segments of the transcript where I found myself puzzled. . .
[quote author=C transcripts 960921]
Q: (L) Hello. And who do we have with us this evening?
A: Toyjiia
Q: (L) And where are you transmitting from?
A: Cassiopaea.
Q: (L) All right, last week, when we shut down for the night we had
asked a question about the movie ID4, Independence Day, and we
were told to ask further questions about this, so that gives us a clue
that there might be something significant there. Does anybody
remember what the question was that I asked? (T) Is there any
significance to the ID4 movie?
A: Sure.
Q: (L) What was the primary intention of the makers of this movie?
The primary message that they attempted to convey?
A: Infuse thinking patterns with [planchette swirled a few times here]
concept of aliens.
Q: (L) They intended to infuse thinking patterns with concept of
aliens... was there any particular slant on aliens, per se, that was
seen as desirable in the making of this movie?
A: Slant?
Q: (L) Slant, in other words, did they wish to present them
inaccurately to confuse people, to present them as something to be
feared and fought against, or to make them appear so completely
erroneous, so that when actual aliens do appear, that they will not
be perceived as negative?
A: Infuse.
Q: (L) Infuse. Just the concept, the concept of aliens in general.
OK...
A: Part of a larger project.
Q: (L) And what is this project?
A: Called "Project Awaken."
Q: (L) And who is behind, or in charge of, this project?
A: Many.
Q: (L) Who are the primary group, groups or individuals? I'm sure
you're not going to give us individuals, but just the grouping.
A: Thor's Pantheum.
Q: (L) And what is Thor's Pantheum?
A: Sub-select trainees for transfer of enlightenment frequency
graduation.
Q: (L) What is enlightenment frequency graduation?
A: Think!
Q: (L) Enlightenment frequency graduation... so, sub-select
trainees...
A: Self explanatory.
Q: (L) Well, is this group STS or STO?
A: Both.
Q: (L) OK... (T) Are they working at cross purposes?
A: No.
Q: (T) They're working together? Bipartisan?
A: No.
Q: (J) Are they aware of each other? Working on this?
A: Yes.
[/quote]
This is one spot where I find things a bit confusing. --According to the C's, there are both STO and STS groups involved in "Project Awaken" and they are aware of one another. They are not working at cross purposes. But they are also not working together. There is no bipartisanship. I looked up "Bipartisan" on the Merriam-Webster on-line dictionary just to be clear, --my word-fu wasn't strong on that word
"Bipartisan -- of, relating to, or involving members of two parties ; specifically : marked by or involving cooperation, agreement, and compromise between two major political parties"
So they're not working at cross purposes but they're also not working in a bipartisan arrangement. This seems contradictory and I confess it has me stumped. Perhaps somebody can suggest a scenario where the pieces fit together logically?
I wasn't clear as to whether or not the C's are still talking about the psychic projectors when they bring up Arkadiusz and the grays. The C's, I have noted, sometimes do not answer a question but instead introduce a new subject. If they are still talking about psychic projectors, then this would suggest that grays are part of the scenario in some manner and that part of the project involves tracking specific individuals. This seems likely, (how do you project an idea into somebody without tracking them?), but I wanted to be careful about assuming that this section was indeed linked. --Particularly given this next part. . .
Okay.
So that was the bulk of the primary transcript where psychic projectors were discussed. The concept of projecting ideas and inspiration into people, however, has been brought up in other transcripts. I have clipped the segments I could find and present them here in chronological order. --I find it interesting to note that all but one of these clips date from before the above transcript. . .
[quote author=C transcripts 941102]
Q: (L) If the Nephilim are coming 36 million strong as enforcers for
the Lizzies, does the Confederation have a like amount for defense?
A: We don't operate that way.
Q: (L) Are we just going to have to fight them off ourselves?
A: Think of The Wizard of Oz. It was inspired by us.
Q: (L) Does the witch represent the Lizzies?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) So, is there something we have or can do...
A: Glenda like us.
Q: (L) And who is the Wizard? Is that the Beast or the U.S. Govt.?
A: Close. Illuminati.
Q: (L) Are the monkeys the Nephilim.
A: Close enough.
Q: (L) If water destroyed the witch, and the witch represents the
Lizzies, can we destroy the Lizzies?
A: Knowledge.
[/quote]
[quote author=C transcripts 941119]
Q: (T) Does Commodore Kirk die at the end of the movie? (V) Does
X-files have the Lizzie influence?
A: No.
Q: (T) Does X-files tell the people what they need to hear?
A: Yes.
[/quote]
[quote author=C transcripts 9570329]
Q: (L) OK, is the Quorum the group we're supposed to be looking
for? (T) We have to go back and ask about the Quorum. We've got
so many characters, it's worse than X-Files!
A: No, more interesting.
Q: (T) Yes, it is, definitely!
[/quote]
This next quote doesn't talk about psychic projection, but I thought the use in it of the word "files", and that it had been presented in quotation marks was curious. --That and the fact the X-Files TV series was mentioned later on in the same transcript, also in quotes. It may have nothing to do with psychic projectors, but I thought it was interesting enough to include just in case. (Also, the word "bland" was in quotes earlier. Maybe the C's were offering an opinion as to the artistic merit of the show? Seems like a bit of a stretch, but they wouldn't be far off the mark in my opinion.)
[quote author=C transcripts 951202]
Q: (L) When we did the session on October 21st, we were talking
about robotoid type people, or reanimated humans, and that this is
what is done rather than
cloning and replacing. Then you said I had been in contact with 7 of
these, and we identified one of them. Then, we talked about profiles,
and it was indicated that
a "bland" personality might have something to do with identification.
You also said that you could not identify the others right at that
moment. Can you now do so?
A: Search your "files." Learning is sometimes best accomplished by
study and exploration.
Q: (L) Can I have a couple more clues as to what I am looking for?
You mentioned being in a hospital...
A: Non-emotive. There are other clues which you can discover by
your own study. It would not be advantageous for us to give you
further information on this subject. Speculation about this particular
subject will throw you off track.
[. . .]
Q: (L) Why did the X-Files have an implied Japanese experimental
conspiracy blamed for the UFO/alien activity in the United States?
Why are they presenting the Japanese as the Bad Guys?
A: Remember, the "X-Files" has a fictional basis.
[/quote]
I find it interesting that the C's in both reference to "Independence Day" and "X-Files" seem to suggest that the influenced media in question is not worth spending a lot of time examining. Presumably because it is material designed for the uninitiated general public rather than the seekers around the board.
[quote author=C transcripts 970719]
Q: Well, no. Well, is this reference to Alton Towers that Ark found on
the internet, about psychic projectors? That was the only unusual
thing we have found about this. Are we talking about some sort of
place where they have rotating shifts of psychic projectors?
A: As you know... fiction is often the guise for the deliverance of the
deepest of truths. And, on that note, good night. [/quote]
There is one last item I wanted to include here because it deals with the issue of, "high level creative forces". --I don't know if or how it is linked, but the wording was similar enough to catch my attention. It is, as you will see, in a very different context. . .
[quote author=C transcripts 9 Jan 05] - Link
Q: (L) Regarding the recent earthquake and tsunami, there is a huge buzz on the net that this was not a natural phenomenon. Some say it could have been a meteor; others say it was a US nuke; others say it was India and Israel playing around in deep sea trenches. Then there is the speculation on an EM weapon of some description. The New agers are saying it was the start of the final 'Earth Changes". So what really caused this earthquake that happened one year minus one hour after the earthquake in Iran?
A: Pressure in earth. Not any of the proferred suggestions. But remember that the human cycle mirrors the cycle of catastrophe and human mass consciousness plays a part.
Q: In what way does mass consciousness play a part?
A: When those with higher centers are blocked from full manifestation of creative energy, that energy must go somewhere. If you cannot create "without" you create "within".
Q: (L) In other words the acts of the STS consortium in trying to suppress steal and control the creative energy from those with higher centers may be the cause of their own destruction because that energy is uncontrollable. [. . .]
[/quote]
Okay. That's it for this post!
Like I said earlier, I'd invite people who are so inclined to refer back to this thread if/when they find it useful. --I will be doing that when I comment on some of the items appearing in the Movies & Trivia section.
Cheers!
Story-telling is an ancient aspect of human culture, seen in the archetype of the tribe gathering around a fire to re-tell the myths and legends and new stories important in their culture. It seems to me that this urge to share in story-telling is one of the most primal and effective ways of learning/teaching how to behave within the workings of the tribe. People have long shown, through their attraction to books and film and television, that they still remain very well tuned to receiving information in this manner in the modern day.
I can easily see why an alien invader might want to hijack this aspect of human behavior to insert subversive messages into the signal. --Or how STO beings might be able to tap into the system as part of an effort to shine knowledge into the world.
As it happens, the C's raised the concept when they brought up the subject of an "Army of Aryan psychic projectors" over a million strong beaming influence at the creative community. When I read this, it REALLY caught my attention. I'm very curious about this whole subject, and I'd be equally curious to read what other people think on the matter.
Now, whenever I've been tempted to write a comment on one of the many films discussed in this section, I find myself wanting to make a reference to the concept of the, 'psychic projector'. It seemed, though, that I would probably end up repeating myself frequently and I thought it might be a good idea to come up with a better way of dealing with things.
So toward that end, I have consolidated the various mentions of 'psychic projectors' made by the C's in this one thread so that it can serve as a sort of master document which can be linked to and from when discussing media in the Movies & Trivia section. --And also where the concept itself might be examined more fully.
I have started with the passage below where the bulk of the idea psychic projectors was presented. I've bolded the areas which I thought were of specific interest, and I've added a couple of my own thoughts between some segments of the transcript where I found myself puzzled. . .
[quote author=C transcripts 960921]
Q: (L) Hello. And who do we have with us this evening?
A: Toyjiia
Q: (L) And where are you transmitting from?
A: Cassiopaea.
Q: (L) All right, last week, when we shut down for the night we had
asked a question about the movie ID4, Independence Day, and we
were told to ask further questions about this, so that gives us a clue
that there might be something significant there. Does anybody
remember what the question was that I asked? (T) Is there any
significance to the ID4 movie?
A: Sure.
Q: (L) What was the primary intention of the makers of this movie?
The primary message that they attempted to convey?
A: Infuse thinking patterns with [planchette swirled a few times here]
concept of aliens.
Q: (L) They intended to infuse thinking patterns with concept of
aliens... was there any particular slant on aliens, per se, that was
seen as desirable in the making of this movie?
A: Slant?
Q: (L) Slant, in other words, did they wish to present them
inaccurately to confuse people, to present them as something to be
feared and fought against, or to make them appear so completely
erroneous, so that when actual aliens do appear, that they will not
be perceived as negative?
A: Infuse.
Q: (L) Infuse. Just the concept, the concept of aliens in general.
OK...
A: Part of a larger project.
Q: (L) And what is this project?
A: Called "Project Awaken."
Q: (L) And who is behind, or in charge of, this project?
A: Many.
Q: (L) Who are the primary group, groups or individuals? I'm sure
you're not going to give us individuals, but just the grouping.
A: Thor's Pantheum.
Q: (L) And what is Thor's Pantheum?
A: Sub-select trainees for transfer of enlightenment frequency
graduation.
Q: (L) What is enlightenment frequency graduation?
A: Think!
Q: (L) Enlightenment frequency graduation... so, sub-select
trainees...
A: Self explanatory.
Q: (L) Well, is this group STS or STO?
A: Both.
Q: (L) OK... (T) Are they working at cross purposes?
A: No.
Q: (T) They're working together? Bipartisan?
A: No.
Q: (J) Are they aware of each other? Working on this?
A: Yes.
[/quote]
This is one spot where I find things a bit confusing. --According to the C's, there are both STO and STS groups involved in "Project Awaken" and they are aware of one another. They are not working at cross purposes. But they are also not working together. There is no bipartisanship. I looked up "Bipartisan" on the Merriam-Webster on-line dictionary just to be clear, --my word-fu wasn't strong on that word
"Bipartisan -- of, relating to, or involving members of two parties ; specifically : marked by or involving cooperation, agreement, and compromise between two major political parties"
So they're not working at cross purposes but they're also not working in a bipartisan arrangement. This seems contradictory and I confess it has me stumped. Perhaps somebody can suggest a scenario where the pieces fit together logically?
I wasn't clear as to whether or not the C's are still talking about the psychic projectors when they bring up Arkadiusz and the grays. The C's, I have noted, sometimes do not answer a question but instead introduce a new subject. If they are still talking about psychic projectors, then this would suggest that grays are part of the scenario in some manner and that part of the project involves tracking specific individuals. This seems likely, (how do you project an idea into somebody without tracking them?), but I wanted to be careful about assuming that this section was indeed linked. --Particularly given this next part. . .
Okay.
So that was the bulk of the primary transcript where psychic projectors were discussed. The concept of projecting ideas and inspiration into people, however, has been brought up in other transcripts. I have clipped the segments I could find and present them here in chronological order. --I find it interesting to note that all but one of these clips date from before the above transcript. . .
[quote author=C transcripts 941102]
Q: (L) If the Nephilim are coming 36 million strong as enforcers for
the Lizzies, does the Confederation have a like amount for defense?
A: We don't operate that way.
Q: (L) Are we just going to have to fight them off ourselves?
A: Think of The Wizard of Oz. It was inspired by us.
Q: (L) Does the witch represent the Lizzies?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) So, is there something we have or can do...
A: Glenda like us.
Q: (L) And who is the Wizard? Is that the Beast or the U.S. Govt.?
A: Close. Illuminati.
Q: (L) Are the monkeys the Nephilim.
A: Close enough.
Q: (L) If water destroyed the witch, and the witch represents the
Lizzies, can we destroy the Lizzies?
A: Knowledge.
[/quote]
[quote author=C transcripts 941119]
Q: (T) Does Commodore Kirk die at the end of the movie? (V) Does
X-files have the Lizzie influence?
A: No.
Q: (T) Does X-files tell the people what they need to hear?
A: Yes.
[/quote]
[quote author=C transcripts 9570329]
Q: (L) OK, is the Quorum the group we're supposed to be looking
for? (T) We have to go back and ask about the Quorum. We've got
so many characters, it's worse than X-Files!
A: No, more interesting.
Q: (T) Yes, it is, definitely!
[/quote]
This next quote doesn't talk about psychic projection, but I thought the use in it of the word "files", and that it had been presented in quotation marks was curious. --That and the fact the X-Files TV series was mentioned later on in the same transcript, also in quotes. It may have nothing to do with psychic projectors, but I thought it was interesting enough to include just in case. (Also, the word "bland" was in quotes earlier. Maybe the C's were offering an opinion as to the artistic merit of the show? Seems like a bit of a stretch, but they wouldn't be far off the mark in my opinion.)
[quote author=C transcripts 951202]
Q: (L) When we did the session on October 21st, we were talking
about robotoid type people, or reanimated humans, and that this is
what is done rather than
cloning and replacing. Then you said I had been in contact with 7 of
these, and we identified one of them. Then, we talked about profiles,
and it was indicated that
a "bland" personality might have something to do with identification.
You also said that you could not identify the others right at that
moment. Can you now do so?
A: Search your "files." Learning is sometimes best accomplished by
study and exploration.
Q: (L) Can I have a couple more clues as to what I am looking for?
You mentioned being in a hospital...
A: Non-emotive. There are other clues which you can discover by
your own study. It would not be advantageous for us to give you
further information on this subject. Speculation about this particular
subject will throw you off track.
[. . .]
Q: (L) Why did the X-Files have an implied Japanese experimental
conspiracy blamed for the UFO/alien activity in the United States?
Why are they presenting the Japanese as the Bad Guys?
A: Remember, the "X-Files" has a fictional basis.
[/quote]
I find it interesting that the C's in both reference to "Independence Day" and "X-Files" seem to suggest that the influenced media in question is not worth spending a lot of time examining. Presumably because it is material designed for the uninitiated general public rather than the seekers around the board.
[quote author=C transcripts 970719]
Q: Well, no. Well, is this reference to Alton Towers that Ark found on
the internet, about psychic projectors? That was the only unusual
thing we have found about this. Are we talking about some sort of
place where they have rotating shifts of psychic projectors?
A: As you know... fiction is often the guise for the deliverance of the
deepest of truths. And, on that note, good night. [/quote]
There is one last item I wanted to include here because it deals with the issue of, "high level creative forces". --I don't know if or how it is linked, but the wording was similar enough to catch my attention. It is, as you will see, in a very different context. . .
[quote author=C transcripts 9 Jan 05] - Link
Q: (L) Regarding the recent earthquake and tsunami, there is a huge buzz on the net that this was not a natural phenomenon. Some say it could have been a meteor; others say it was a US nuke; others say it was India and Israel playing around in deep sea trenches. Then there is the speculation on an EM weapon of some description. The New agers are saying it was the start of the final 'Earth Changes". So what really caused this earthquake that happened one year minus one hour after the earthquake in Iran?
A: Pressure in earth. Not any of the proferred suggestions. But remember that the human cycle mirrors the cycle of catastrophe and human mass consciousness plays a part.
Q: In what way does mass consciousness play a part?
A: When those with higher centers are blocked from full manifestation of creative energy, that energy must go somewhere. If you cannot create "without" you create "within".
Q: (L) In other words the acts of the STS consortium in trying to suppress steal and control the creative energy from those with higher centers may be the cause of their own destruction because that energy is uncontrollable. [. . .]
[/quote]
Okay. That's it for this post!
Like I said earlier, I'd invite people who are so inclined to refer back to this thread if/when they find it useful. --I will be doing that when I comment on some of the items appearing in the Movies & Trivia section.
Cheers!
