9/11 > Flight 93

WING TV on Flight 93

<< < (2/2)

MaskedAvatar:
"You couldn't get a bigger bunch of criminals together if you tried!"

Nominations:

1. CIA
2. Bush family
3. Bush administration
4. Carlyle Group
5. Ohio or Florida electoral commissions

paulnotbilly:
Re: SAM's and altitude, prior to the Iraq invasion 2003, U2 flights were suspended due to possible 'flight interefence from SAM which could reach 100,000ft (over twice the altitude of most normal air traffic)'. I would tend to discount the SAM theory due to the noise/smoke-flame produced which would draw atttention to itself. The most likely options which would draw the least attention from ground observers would be a air launched missile from a similar/higher altitude to reduce the attention being drawn away from the airline or a bomb onboard. Both would result in a large scattering of wreckage with a minmal amount of pieces becoming embedded in the ground. For the latter it maybe worthwhile examining the Lockerbie disaster which involved a bomb onboard exploding at altitude and the resulting spread of wreckage. (PS: allegedly a Libyan was behind it although evidence points towards somebody else wanting to engineer a situation where the public's opinion could be moved against Libya/Islam or more recently because allegedly somebody was using Pan-am to smuggle copious amounts of drugs (another red herring?) and it had to be prevented from entering the public domain.

Arlo_usa:
The "cell phone calls" are particularly bizarre.

  Until the introduction of a device known as the "Pico cell", which was patented in 2005, in flight cell phone calls were simply not possible.

  As an aside, the industry is concerned about airborne cell phone etiquette now that cell phone calls may now  be made in flight.  One would expect that this brouhaha would focus attention on the fact that such calls were not possible five years ago, in 2001.

 Which means that  the "cell phone calls" were studio productions.

Puck:
I dont think it crashed at all. I mean, we're dealing with a riddle wrapped in an enigma so they might have actually shot down a smaller plane over New Baltimore AND Shot a missile into the ground in shanksville. It's possible that the plane also landed in chicago. I should do some fact checking on that last one, but its the theory i've perscribed to thus far.

Infact, id go as far to say all the planes were landed, emptied, and drones flew into the "targets". That gives the Secret Gov't ~ 300 more people to experiment with.

Darren:
I can think of a few places in the world where plucking people for experimentation or whatever might go unnoticed if that's what they wanted to do, and that's assuming they don't have access to a "supply" already, so why would they go to all that trouble. Of course, it might be the case that the presence of certain individuals on the flights was planned.

In short, where's the beef in the theory that Flight 93 landed?

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page