9/11 > The Pentagon Strike

The Pentagon on 911... a cruise missile struck the building!

(1/10) > >>

Martin Timothy:
The Pentagon, only minutes after the strike... no sign of a plane at all!!



An engine rotor recovered at the Pentagon.



This video shows a cruise missile strike the building at +25 seconds...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Vnu_yiUzls

Ask yourselves if it resembles the cruiser pictured below, and whether the nose cone highlighted in the small pic, which is the first frame in the only officially released footage of the Pentagon strike...



Resembles both... I reckon it does!!


Above is a shot of an aerial launch of a Russian CH 55 cruise missile, from a TU 160 aircraft.

Now we must consider whether the plane climbing above the Pentagon, similarly launched the missile that hit that building!!



It seems it did!!



A cruise missile on the test range... looks exactly like the Pentagon strike!!



Above N644AA2 Flght 77, the aircraft "they" say struck the building!!



This is the latest mystery plane, it is thought to be the same aircraft seen climbing over the Pentagon, pictured during its approach!!


--- Quote --- The previous mystery plane pictured here, is no longer a mystery...



9:44 am correspondent John King, who was standing near the White House, reported that there was "a white jet circling overhead," in the area over the White House, which is restricted air space. Shortly after, another CNN correspondent, Kate Snow, also reported having seen a plane, "circling over the Capitol Building," at around the same time.



The "white jet," was in fact an E-4B National Airborne Operations Center (NAOC) plane, a highly modified Boeing 747, that acts as flying military command post, it was mission control for the attack on America!!
--- End quote ---
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cUmr9dFbf2c

911 Commission member says missile strike, then quickly corrects himself!!

                   

Above, a computer animation of the flyover compiled from the testimony of numerous eye witnesses!!

Kesdjan:
Hi Martin,

First, welcome to the forum.

The "missle theory" has been discredited by a number of facts (some of which you seem to be aware of ). E.g.:

1) The plane was witnessed on a trajectory inconsistent with the damage path in the building (it banked right to the north of the Citgo station in front of the Pentagon).

2) Some of the collumns appear to be blown outward.

Also, the flyover plane was neither the E4B, nor the "cruiser" you mention. It is very clearly described as a white "commercial jet" with two engines (not 4 as the E4B has). There is no evidence of the E4B even being in the area until after the attack.

See:

There was No Missle at the Pentagon- But the Plane did not Hit
The Pentagon Flyover: How They Pulled it Off

Also, check out the forum:

CIT forum

RedFox:
You may also want to see Evidence That a Frozen Fish Didn't Impact the Pentagon on 9/11 and Neither Did a Boeing 757

Nomad:

--- Quote from: Kesdjan on June 10, 2009, 02:52:52 PM ---The "missle theory" has been discredited by a number of facts (some of which you seem to be aware of ). E.g.:

--- End quote ---

To clarify, are you suggesting that it was not a cruise missile that hit the Pentagon? OR that there may have been a missile but you don't think it was launched from the Boeing?
My current understanding is that some kind of missile is the most likely candidate for the hole in the pentagon wall.

Kesdjan:

--- Quote from: Nomad ---To clarify, are you suggesting that it was not a cruise missile that hit the Pentagon?
--- End quote ---

Yes, the flight path rules out a missile fired from the plane because it doesn't line up with the damage path.

There is no evidence of a missile being used in addition to the decoy jet, and the many reports of secondary explosions seems to render a missile redundant

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page