The C's didn't predict it

ELTE2307

Padawan Learner
I find it kind of amazing that the C's didn't predict what happened on 9/11 or didn't comment prior to the event since they gave some predictions about other events that took place years before 9/11.
I mean, it was a huge shock for everyone of us and certainly a bigger one that an earthquake in Kobe.
Or Am I wrong ?


ELTE2307
 
It's kind of a strange subject. When you consider the Cs attitude toward prophecy - that it is almost impossible to make accurate predictions unless you are connected to the forces that intend to fulfill them - and that the future is always open, expecting that they would make such a specific prediction is not likely. Of course, our approach to the Cs experiment was as skewed as most people's approach to the "other realms" in the beginning. We had the idea that everything was fixed at some immutable level and all we had to do was access that level. The idea of many universes, infinite possibilities, and quantum wave collapses, Schroedinger's Cat and all that, didn't occur to us. We also didn't realize that there probably was a lot more information we could have obtained about things from an STO source IF we had known how to ask the precise question. But then, that would have meant that we had some idea that something was going to happen so that we COULD frame the question!

So, there we were, quite often trying to wring definite prophecies out of the Cs, and they were telling us over and over again that the future was open. Meanwhile. various individuals attending the sessions were often skewing the information with emotional beliefs and expectations.

Also there is the issue of "Frank" and his efforts to really counter the effectiveness of the information.

Then, there are the issues of larger, cosmic events vs local events such as 9-11. For example:

7 Jan 1996

{...}
Q: (P) I would like to know about the apparitions of the
Virgin Mary at Conyers, GA, as well as this book "Mary's
Message to the World" and all the other messages about the
End Times that are coming out all over?

A: The forces at work here are far too clever to be
accurately anticipated so easily. You never know what
twists and turns will follow, and they are aware of
prophetic and philosophival patternings and usually shift
course to fool and discourage those who believe in fixed
futures.

Then, there is this:

26 Nov 1994

{...}
Q: (T) One last question. How do I know you are telling me
the truth?
A: Open. For you to decide. Listen: Revelations follow.
Now would be a good "time" for you folks to begin to
reexamine some of the extremely popular "Earth Changes"
prophecies. Why, you ask. Because, remember, you are
third density beings, so real prophecies are being
presented to you in terms you will understand, I.E.
physical realm, I.E. Earth changes. This "may" be
symbolism. Would most students of the subject understand
if prophecies were told directly in fourth density terms?
Q: (L) Is this comparable to my idea about dream symbolism.
For example, the dream I had about the curling cloud which
I saw in a distance and knew it was death dealing and I
interpreted it to be a tornado, but it was, in fact, a
dream of the Challenger disaster. I understood it to be a
tornado, but in fact, what I saw was what I got, a death
dealing force in the sky, a vortex, in the distance. I
guess my dream was a fourth density representation but I
tried to interpret it in terms I was familiar with. Is
this what you mean?
A: Close. But it is easy for most to get bogged down by
interpreting prophecies in literal terms.
Q: (L) Is there more information you plan to deliver on this
subject?
A: Okay.
Q: (L) Let me ask a quick one. Did the Gulf Breeze Six, as
they are called, who were supposedly receiving information
via the Ouija board, did they receive prophetic
information of some sort?
A: Yes.
Q: And, from what source did they receive this information?
A: Mixed.
Q: (L) Was their information accurate?
A: Mixed.
Q: (L) Why were they, their board, their transcripts and so
forth confiscated?
A: Paranoia.
Q: (L) In terms of these Earth Changes, Edgar Cayce is one of
the most famous prognosticators of recent note, a large
number of the prophecies he made seemingly were erroneous
in terms of their fulfillment. For example, he prophesied
that Atlantis would rise in 1969, but it did not though
certain structures were discovered off the coast of Bimini
which are thought by many to be remnants of Atlantis.
These did, apparently, emerge from the sand at that time.
A: Example of one form of symbolism.
Q: (L) Well, in terms of this symbolism, could this be
applied to the remarks you made about the two little boys
who were missing in South Carolina.
A: Yes.
Q: (L) And the symbolism was that you were reading the event
from 3rd density into sixth density terms and then
transmitting it back into 3rd, and while the ideation was
correct, the exact specifics, in 3rd density terms, were
slightly askew. Is that what we are dealing with here?
A: 99.9 per cent would not understand that concept. Most are
always looking for literal translations of data. Analogy
is novice who attends art gallery, looks at abstract
painting and says "I don't get it."
Q: (L) Well, let's not denigrate literal translations or at
least attempts to get things into literal terms. I like
realistic art work. I am a realist in my art preferences.
I want trees to look like trees and people to have only
two arms and legs. Therefore, I also like some
literalness in my prognostications.
A: Some is okay, but, beware or else "California falls into
the ocean" will always be interpreted as California
falling into the ocean.
Q: [General uproar] (F) Wait a minute, what was the
question? (L) I just said I liked literalness in my
prophecies. (F) Oh, I know what they are saying. People
believe that California is just going to go splat and that
Phoenix is going to be on the seacoast, never mind that
it's at 1800 feet elevation, it's just going to drop down
to sea level, or the sea level is going to rise, but it's
not going to affect Virginia Beach even though that's at
sea level. I mean... somehow Phoenix is just going to
drop down and none of the buildings are going to be
damaged, even though its going to fall 1800 feet... (T)
Slowly. It's going to settle. (F) Slowly? It would have
to be so slowly it's unbelievable how slowly it would have
to be. (T) It's been settling for the last five million
years, we've got a ways to go in the next year and a half!
(F) Right! That's my point. (T) In other words, when
people like Scallion and Sun Bear and others say
California is going to fall into the ocean, they are not
saying that the whole state, right along the border is
going to fall into the ocean, they are using the term
California to indicate that the ocean ledge along the
fault line has a probability of breaking off and sinking
on the water side, because it is a major fracture. We
understand that that is not literal. Are you telling us
that there is more involved here as far as the way we are
hearing what these predictions say?
A: Yes.
Q: (T) Are we understanding what you are saying?
A: Some.
Q: (T) So, when we talk about California falling into the
ocean, we are not talking about the whole state literally
falling into the ocean?
A: In any case, even if it does, how long will it take to do
this?
Q: (LM) It could take three minutes or three hundred years.
(T) Yes. That is "open" as you would say.
A: Yes. But most of your prophets think it is not open.
Q: (J) Yeah, because they think they have the only line on
it. (T) Okay. So they are thinking in the terms that one
minute California will be there and a minute and a half
later it will be all gone. Is this what you are saying?
A: Or similar.
Q: (T) So, when we are talking: "California will fall into
the ocean, which is just the analogy we are using, we are
talking about, as far as earth changes, is the possibility
that several seismic events along the fault line, which no
one really knows the extent of...
A: Or it all may be symbolic of something else.
Q: (L) Such as? (J) All the fruitcakes in California are all
going to go off the deep end together. (L) Symbolic of
what?
A: Up to you to examine and learn.
Q: (L) Now, wait a minute here! That's like sending us out
to translate a book in Latin without even giving us a
Latin dictionary.
A: No it is not. We asked you to consider a reexamination.
Q: (L) You have told us through this source, that there is a
cluster of comets connected in some interactive way with
our solar system, and that this cluster of comets comes
into the plane of the ecliptic every 3600 years. Is this
correct?
A: Yes. But, this time it is riding realm border wave to 4th
level, where all realities are different.
Q: (L) Okay, so the cluster of comets is riding the realm
border wave. Does this mean that when it comes into the
solar system, that its effect on the solar system, or the
planets within the solar system, (Jan or us), may or may
not be mitigated by the fact of this transition? Is this
a mitigating factor?
A: Will be mitigated.
Q: (T) Is this what the Star Trek movie, "Generations" is
telling us?
A: Possible.
Q: (T) Are you or someone in the Federation influencing the
writers of that program?
A: Open.
Q: (L) Does any of this mean that the earth changes that have
been predicted, may not, in fact, occur in physical
reality as we understand it?
A: You betcha.
Q: (L) Does this mean that all of this running around and
hopping and jumping to go here and go there and do this
and do that is...
A: That is strictly 3rd level thinking.
Q: (L) Now, if that is 3rd level thinking, and if a lot of
these things are symbolic, I am assuming they are symbolic
of movement or changes in energy.
A: Yes.
Q: (L) And, if these changes in energy occur does this mean
that the population of the planet are, perhaps, in groups
or special masses of groups, are they defined as the
energies that are changing in these descriptions of events
and happenings of great cataclysm. Is it like a cataclysm
of the soul on an individual and or collective basis?
A: Close.
Q: (L) When the energy changes to 4th density, and you have
already told us that people who are moving to 4th density
when the transition occurs, that they will move into 4th
density, go through some kind of rejuvenation process,
grow new teeth, or whatever, what happens to those people
who are not moving to 4th density, and who
are totally unaware of it? Are they taken along on the
wave by, in other words, piggy-backed by the ones who are
aware and already changing in frequency, or are they going
to be somewhere else doing something else?
A: Step by step.
Q: (T) In other words, we are looking at the fact that what's
coming this time is a wave that's going to allow the human
race to move to 4th density?
A: And the planet and your entire sector of space/time.
Q: (T) Is that what this whole plan is about, then, if I may
be so bold as to include all of us here in this. We, of
the beings of light who have come here into human form, to
anchor the frequency, is this what we are anchoring it
for, for this wave, so that when it comes enough of us
will be ready, the frequency will be set, so that the
change in the planet can take place as it has been
planned?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) When this happens, will we piggy-back all those who
are still unaware?
A: Open.
Q: (T) Okay, when the people are talking about the earth
changes, when they talk in literal terms about the
survivors, and those who are not going to survive, and the
destruction and so forth and so on, in 3rd, 4th, 5th level
reality we are not talking about the destruction of the
planet on 3rd level physical terms, or the loss of 90 per
cent of the population on the 3rd level because they died,
but because they are going to move to 4th level?
A: Whoa! You are getting "warm."
Q: (T) Okay. So, we are anchoring this. So, when they talk
about 90 per cent of the population not surviving, it is
not that they are going to die, but that they are going to
transform. We are going to go up a level. This is what
the whole light thing is all about?
A: Or another possibility is that the physical cataclysms
will occur only for those "left behind" on the remaining
3rd level density earth.
Q: (T) Okay, what you are saying, then, is that we are
anchoring the frequency, so that when the wave comes, we
move to 4th level density as many people as possible, in
order to break the hold the "Dark T-shirts" have got on
this planet, those who remain behind will not have enough
energy left for the "Dark T-shirts" to bother with the
planet any longer. There will be less of them so the
planet will be able to refresh and they will be able to
move on in their lessons without interference?
A: Close.
Q: (L) At this point of dimensional transition, is what we
are doing, anchoring a frequency, are we creating a sort
of "super string" network that will literally create
another earth in 4th density, which will then exist in 4th
density, and the old 3rd density earth -- almost like the
splitting of a one celled organism, only in this splitting
one half of it moves into another dimension and is
energized and quite literally created by the anchoring
frequency, while the old one remains and experiences 3rd
density reality?
A: Step by step.
Q: (L) Are we anchoring frequency to create a split?
A: One developing conduit.
Q: (L) We are developing a conduit?
A: Yes. One.
Q: (J) How many conduits do we need?
A: Open.
Q: (T) Is this conduit going to allow those who remain behind
to be able to move to 4th density easier when they are
ready?
A: No.
Q: (T) What is the conduit for?
A: You and those who will follow you.
Q: (T) Oh, this is for those of us who will move to 4th
density. We will move through and they will follow us
through the conduit. (J) Oh, others who are ready?
A: Your group here tonight.
Q: (L) Does this mean we will have followers or just us here
now?
A: Open. Up to you.
Q: (L) This conduit. Is this a conduit through which an
entire planet will transition?
A: You are one. There are others.
Q: (L) There are other planets...
A: No. Conduit.
Q: We are one conduit and there are conduits...
A: No. Developing at this point.
Q: (J) So, at this point we are developing a conduit?
A: Yes.
Q: (T) There are other groups on this planet developing their
own conduits?
A: Yes.
Q: (T) These are conduits for us to move to 4th density in?
A: Knowledge is the key to developing a conduit.
Q: (T) I am working on the assumption that all of us here are
part of the family of light, is this true?
A: Yes.
Q: (T) And we have been drawn together in order to develop
this conduit from where we are?
A: Yes.
Q: (T) Are there others in this area?
A: Yes.
Q: (T) Are they supposed to join with us or are they working
on their own?
A: Open.
Q: (T) Okay, so it is up in the air as to whether we join
with them, they join with us, or we all work
independently.
A: It is up to how much publicity you manage to get.
Q: (T) Do we want publicity on this?
A: Open.
Q: (L) Would it help us?
A: Open.
Q: (T) We're developing a conduit to move us from 3rd density
to 4th density. Once we have moved through the conduit
does that mean we have completed what we came here to do,
and that is anchor the frequency?
A: Partly.
Q: (T) Is the conduit kind of like an escape hatch for us?
A: Close.
Q: (L) Let me get this straight. When we move through this
conduit, are the other...
A: You will be on the 4th level earth as opposed to 3rd level
earth.
Q: (L) What I am trying to get here, once again, old
practical Laura, is trying to get a handle on practical
terms here. Does this mean that a 4th density earth and a
3rd density earth will coexist side by side...
A: Not side by side, totally different realms.
Q: (L) Do these realms interpenetrate one another but in
different dimensions...
A: Close.
Q: (L) So, in other words, a being from say, 6th density,
could look at this planet we call the earth and see it
spinning through space and see several dimensions of
earth, and yet the point of space/time occupation is the
same, in other words, simultaneous. (J) They can look
down but we can't look up.
A: Yes.
Q: (L) So, in other words, while all of this cataclysmic
activity is happening on the 3rd dimensional earth, we
will be just on our 4th dimensional earth and this sort of
thing won't be there, and we won't see the 3rd dimensional
people and they won't see us because we will be in
different densities which are not "en rapport", so to
speak?
A: You understand concept, now you must decide if it is
factual.

Having said all that, my thought is that the very first prediction the Cs made probably related to 9-11 in some way:


16 July 1994


Q: [Unknown question.]
A: Go to Denver airports.
Q: (L) When is all this going to happen?
A: Scandal - Scandal - Denver Airport.
Q: (L) What about the Denver airport?
A: Scandal.
Q: I don't understand.
A: New Denver airport.
Q: I don't understand.
A: Pay attention.
Q: Okay, we are paying attention. What are you trying to tell us?
A: Denver new airport big, big, big, big scandal.
Q: (L) What kind of scandal?
A: Government.
Q: (L) Specifically what?
A: You will see. Dallas airport is secret base; Orlando too; Miami Too.
Q: (L) What about Denver airport and how does it relate to prophecies?
A: Denver reveals the government. Look for it. Pay attention.

Very next session, there was a strong "pull" among all those present to get prophecies... and so:

22 July 1994

Q: (L) Do you have information for us this evening?
A: Space invasion soon. Four to six years. Battle between forces good and evil. Wait near. Look far. Listen. Mexico fall; Ethiopia quake; September - both - New Near - January- Paris bomb - London Blizzard - 109 die - Plane down -Tahiti - Cholera - Montana - January 1995 - government US - behind California quakes - Three soon - Oklahoma political abduction -February 95 - Big news.

Now, if you look at the mishmash of words above - which I really didn't know how to separate because this was only the second appearance of the Cs and they were not yet doing their own punctuation - you see something about an "invasion" in 4 to 6 years. Well, this was 1994 and 6 years later was 2000. The only BIG thing that happened in 2000 was that George Bush and his gang stole the election which set the stage for 9-11 to happen. Well, was that a "space invasion"? Was it a battle between the forces of good and evil? Sorta seems that way in retrospect but only if you understand what they are saying as often being symbolic.

You also see the word "September" in there... and "plane down" and government. But all that is stretching. What is of greater interest is "Oklahoma political abduction -February 95 - Big news."

As it turned out, on February 25 of 1995, we were given a warning of a terrorist bomb attack within a month.

25 Feb 1995

Q: (TM) What I am trying to find out is if it is good to be
around this person.

A: Those are personal questions. There will be a terrorist
attack in the U.S. month; bomb.

Q: (T) There is going to be a terrorist attack in the United
States in a month?

A: Yes!!! [planchette flies off board]

Q: (T) In a month?

A: Yes.

Q: (T) Where in the United States?

A: Washington D.C.

Q: (T) Well, they filed bankruptcy now they are going to blow
it up and collect the insurance.

A: Trial ongoing.

Q: (BP) O.J.? (TM) Oh, that's because of the terrorist trial?
(T) Yes, the terrorist trial in New York. (TM) Yes, they
are guarding Wall Street heavily because they are
threatening to blow that up. (J) Oh, okay. (BP) Is the
CIA or the FBI involved in this terrorist bombing?

A: No.

Q: (T) Do they know about it?

A: No.

Q: (BP) Is it Moslem terrorists?

A: Yes.

Q: (BP) Are we talking about a nuclear bomb?

A: No.

Q: (T) We should be so lucky. (J) Can you pinpoint where the
bomb is going to be in Washington? (BP) Congress?

A: No.

Q: (BP) Will it be in the Capitol?

A: No.

Q: (BP) Will it be in the White House?

A: No.

Q: (BP) Will it be in a federal office building?

A: Maybe.

Q: (BP) So, it is variable as to whether it will be
successful or not as well as other aspects?

A: Yes.

Q: (T) Do the authorities have an idea that this is going to
happen yet?

A: Some.

Q: (T) Some authorities or some idea?

A: Idea.

Now, that was totally bizarre. Connecting that back to this mention of Oklahoma "political abduction," and we find a curious relationship to the bombing which occurred in a Federal building in Oklahoma, NOT in Washington DC. Those who follow the information dug up by independent investigators will note that there is a definite connection between the OK bombing and 9-11. Also, in one of the earliest reports of the capture of Timothy McVeigh, he was quoted as saying that he was under the control of an implant that was in his hip, and that he believed he had been abducted and programmed by the government. And it was, indeed, BIG news!

Also, it was a bit over a month later... but we are dealing with probabilities here.

22 April 1995
{...}
Q: (L) I want to go to
the terrorist bomb attack that just happened. Can we talk
about this?
A: You can always ask any and all questions, no need ask for
permission, if unanswerable for any reason, we will let
you know.
Q: (L) Okay. We received a prediction on this terrorist bomb
attack on February 25th, at which time you said there
would be a terrorist bomb attack in Washington D.C. within
a month or thereabouts, which was related to an ongoing
trial which was identified as the one of the Moslem
terrorists who bombed the Twin Towers.
Can you tell us if
this is the bomb that was supposed to be set off in
Washington, but was then moved to Oklahoma because of
security intensification?

A: No.

Q: (L) Well, no terrorist bomb attack took place in
Washington. Can you tell us why?

A: Yet.

Q: (L) It is yet to happen?

A: Open.

Q: (L) The bomb in Oklahoma is being connected to the Patriot
movement. Is this, in point of fact, who is behind this
attack?

A: There is no unified movement as such, in either purpose or
direction. This is extremely fragmented!

Q: (J) I read that it may be related to the Branch Davidians.
(L) Is that true?

A: No.

Q: (J) Loose cannons? (T) Are the one world government
people behind it?

A: No.

Q: (L) Were the guys who did this just loose cannons?

A: Close.

Q: (L) So this was just... (J) A couple of fruitcakes got
together and... (L) Fruited?

A: It is very easy to be manipulated, thus be confused and
see demons where there are none and the opposite.


Q: (L) Are you saying that these guys were manipulated?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) Can you identify the source of the manipulation?

A: Varied.

Q: (L) Can you give us a couple of hints, here. Name one of
the sources of the manipulation?

A: Lizard race.

Q: (T) Name another.

A: All their agents conscious and otherwise.

It's interesting that all of this ties in together and, in the above session, the Cs said the big one was yet to come. Obviously, the "open universe" system was fully functional and, even if the Cs were able to pick up on plans that were pretty strong (they must have been being discussed as early as 95), there were a lot of logistics to work out. I expect that this was when they began the systematic planning of 9-11 which required getting Bush into the White House first.

18 Nov 1995

Q: (L) Is there any relationship between all of the terrorist
bombings that have been taking place in Paris recently,
and any stepped up alien activity?

A: Open.

Q: (L) Is there anything we can obtain on that subject by
formulation of correct questions?

A: USAir-194 crash; United Air crash, Colorado Springs;
Connection? Get voice recorder tape transcripts.

Q: (L) Is this in some way related to the question about the
Paris bombing?

A: No.

So, that was an odd interjection. Maybe someone can look that up and see what the Cs were talking about. I seem to remember that it was something about a jet crashing into the side of a mountain or something.

The really strange thing is that "Frank" left the group in early November of 2000 at the time of the Bush election stealing. It was as though now Bush was "in," there would be no more sessions with "Frank" present. That is not the surface reason for that, but it was the inevitable outcome and one wonders if there is a connection there, especially considering what the Cs had to say about it afterward. It was as though there was an effort to shut down communications so that any useful information about any upcoming events would be eliminated. I worked more or less effectively, too. I ended up getting ensnared in the Vinnie Bridges trap - about which so much has been written - and we experienced our own private "9-11" at almost the same time as the WTC and Pentagon events!

So, even if there were hints and clues that the Cs knew something was coming up, there were concerted forces out there that worked very hard to prevent us accessing that information. It was a steep learning curve not only for us, but for the world.

Later we asked about the Denver Airport thing.

23 Oct 2004

Q: (J) You mentioned before about a scandal at the Denver Airport. Is this still on or have things changed?

A: Yet to come. Just keep flapping.

Q: (H) Will this have to do with 911?

A: Yes. Oh, yes!

Thing is, the Cs have quite accurately predicted all we are experiencing today which seems to be the larger plan, and thus, predictable, though exact event sequences may be variable... though you have to be really awake and aware to catch these things in the transcripts; I wasn't, in the beginning:

2 November 1994


Q: (L) Now you say there are 36 million Nephilim heading this
way, are they 4th density beings?

A: No. They live in 4 d but are 3 d. They are as physical as
you. Behave like gestapo. Gestapo was inspired by
Nephilim through Lizard beings' influence over Hitler.
It was a practice run.


4 November 1994

Q: (L) What kind of weapons do the Nephilim use to do their
"enforcing?"
A: Stun guns.
Q: (L) Do they actually use some kind of material weapon?
A: Yes.

14 July 1996

Q: (L) I am just wondering if a lot of things are going to
happen that may not be necessarily multi-density, or
'other density,' in the strictest of terms, but may in
fact be simply actions of 'human agents' of these beings
on other densities. That it will not so much be a 'space
invasion' as more like the Nazis under the control of 4th
density STS?
Hello.
A: Hello.
Q: (L) And who do we have with us this evening?
A: Derom.
Q: (L) And where do you transmit from?
A: Cassiopaea.
Q: (L) Has there been some participation in the discussion we
have been having?
A: Monitoring, not participation.
Q: (L) Would you care to comment, or shall we just ask our
questions?
A: Ask specific questions, as always.
Q: (L) Then let's start with some basic things. First of
all, I have had some contact with a physicist who is
interested in the material. And, because of this, I was
motivated to pick up a book I had read many years ago
about the German occupation of Poland, and there were some
very strange things said in this book, and some funny
synchronous numbers... It just seemed to be a prototype of
the present reality in global terms. My question is: is
there some synchronous implication between this contact,
the reading of this book when I was 11 years old, and the
material we have received through this source?
A: Open.
Q: (L) You have said that the Holocaust was basically a
'practice run' for the ultimate space invasion. Is this
invasion supposed to take place as an actual 'aliens
invading the planet' scenario, or...
A: Too many thought patterns at once. Step by step, please.
Q: (L) Let's boil it down. Was Hitler's agenda a practice
run for a future scenario?
A: Close. Was a "testing" of the will.
Q: (L) Whose will was being tested?
A: Yours.
Q: (L) Me specifically, or the planet?
A: Latter.
Q: (L) In terms of this scenario, is there some lesson that
we can learn about what may or may not occur through this
book I have mentioned?
A: Maybe, but suggest you learn to blend mosaic
consciousness.
Q: (L) What is mosaic consciousness?
A: Thinking in internally spherical terms, rather than using
linear "point blank" approach. The whole picture is seen
by seeing the whole scene.
Q: (L) Well, I guess that is why I guess I get into so many
thought patterns...
A: Picture yourself as being at the center of a mosaic.
Q: (MM) [Incomprehensible comment about mosaics being under
repair somewhere.] (L) Okay, I know what you are saying,
but I just don't think that there is any way I can DO
this!
A: Yes you can!
Q: (L) Okay. Okay. This whole situation, this Polish
connection, this German connection, the American and alien
things, the soldier/Nephilim thing, these are all
manifestations of a Realm Border Crossing, am I correct?
A: Close.
Q: (L) And some of the manifestations of a Realm Border
Crossing are that some people graduate or transition to
4th density, that their awareness changes, everything
changes, the playing field is leveled. So, what happened
in Germany was a 'practice run' but what is going to
happen is that the 'playing field' is going to be leveled,
so it will not be exactly the same scenario, is this a
correct assessment?
A: Maybe. Alright, my dear, you want the facts, so we will
give them to you, and hopefully you will comprehend. If
not now, then when necessary maybe... Fact number one:
All there is is lessons. Fact two: this is one big
school. Fact three: Timing as you perceive it, is never,
NEVER definite. Fact four: What is to happen, as you
state it, is a ways off, and will not occur until you have
reached that point on the learning cycle, and you are not
close yet. Now ponder before more facts are given!!
Q: (L) Okay, this being one infinite school, and we all seem
to be wandering around in the darkness...
A: Fact five: The learning cycle is variable, and progress
along it is determined by events and circumstances as they
unfold.
Q: (L) So, the events and circumstances of our lives,
individually and collectively, can indicate where we are
on this learning cycle? And we are asking to have things
told to us, or revealed to us about things which are, in
themselves, the necessary lessons? And it would be
virtually useless to be told about them since they must be
experienced?
A: Partly correct. If you want hints, then hints shall we
give. But, if you are looking for a "road map?,"
forgetitski!!
Q: (L) Okay, we want some hints. And Ark wants some hints,
too! He wants to know if we can invent a tool that
enhances free will?
A: No tool is needed because of facts 3, 4, and 5.
Q: (L) Ummm... So, when a person is being hypnotized and
controlled from outside, because that is the matter of
concern we were discussing earlier, they are hypnotized
and controlled until they learn to stop it?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) So, using the analogy of the pig stye, they just have
to wallow in it and suffer until they have had enough?
A: Using your analogy of the bicycle: Is there a tool which
makes it unnecessary for the child to learn how to ride
the bicycle in order to know how to ride it?!?
Q: (MM) Don't you get more free will by assimilating
knowledge?
A: Yes!! Yes!!
Q: (L) So, in other words, knowledge and awareness makes you
aware that you have free will, and also makes you aware of
what actions actually ARE acts of free will, and
therefore, when you know or suspect the difference between
the lies and deception and truth, then you are in a
position to be in control of your life?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Ark also wants to ask... well, his problem is faith,
as he said it to me.
A: Faith comes also from knowledge, and as we have stated
before... False knowledge is worse than no knowledge at
all!!!!!
Q: (L) So, it is important to take each and every thing that
is being learned or analyzed, and take it completely apart
and dig in every direction around it, and even in related
directions, to FULLY ascertain that it is true? As C.S.
Lewis said, knowledge is like a rope... as long as you are
using it to tie up a box, it doesn't matter whether it is
perfect or not, but if you have to use it to hang over a
precipice, then it behooves you to make absolutely certain
that it is strong enough to support your weight.
A: Yes.

25 July 1998
Q: (L) Well, that answered my other question about the
objective. Well, here in the book, Dr. Jacobs says that
there is ongoing abductions through particular families.
I quote: 'Beyond protecting the fetus, there are other
reasons for secrecy. If abductions are, as all the
evidence clearly indicates, an intergenerational
phenomenon in which the children of abductees are
themselves abductees, then one of the aliens' goals is the
generation of more abductees. Are all children of
abductees incorporated into the phenomenon? The evidence
suggests that the answer is yes. If an abductee has
children with a non-abductee, the chances are that all
their descendants will be abductees. This means that
through normal population increase, divorce, remarriage
and so on, the abductee population will increase quickly
throughout the generations. When those children grow and
marry and have children of their own, all of their
children, whether they marry an abductee or non-abductee,
will be abductees. To protect the intergenerational
nature of the breeding program, it must be kept secret
from the abductees so that they will continue to have
children. If the abductees KNEW that the program was
intergenerational, they might elect not to have children.
This would bring a critical part of the program to a halt,
which the aliens cannot allow. The final reason for
secrecy is to expand the breeding program, to integrate
laterally in society, the aliens must make sure that
abductees mate with non-abductees and produce abductee
children.' Now, this seems to suggest that there is a
particular bloodline that is susceptible to...
A: We have told you before: the Nazi experience was a "trial
run," and by now you see the similarities, do you not?

Q: (L) Yes, I do see...
A: Now, we have also told you that the experience of the
"Native Americans" vis a vis the Europeans may be a
precursor in microcosm. Also, what Earthian 3rd density
does to Terran 2nd density should offer "food for
thought." In other words, thou are not so special,
despiteth thoust perspective, eh? And we have also warned
that after conversion of Earth humans to 4th density, the
Orion 4th density and their allies hope to control you
"there." Now put this all together and what have you? At
least you should by now know that it is the soul that
matters, not the body. Others have genetically,
spiritually and psychically manipulated/engineered you to
be bodycentric. Interesting, as despite all efforts by
4th through 6th density STO, this "veil remains unbroken."


22 July 2000

Q: ... (L) ... But, let's change gears. I had a call from Vincent Bridges who informed me that the Wave series was really creating a stir. It seems that he has had a connection to this Dr. Hammond of the Greenbaum lecture fame, and also had a number of exchanges with Andrija Puharich, and it is Vincent's contention that the UFO phenomenon, the alien abduction phenomenon, and the many and varied other things we talk about and study and discuss, are a product of super advanced technological, human controlled mind-programming projects using the technology of Puharich and Tesla. Yes, it is supposed to be so advanced that they can not only read minds and can control minds, but that it is, in the end, merely human engineered programming. Is he, even in part, correct?

A: Well, there are elements of the phenomenon which may be connected to human, 3rd density STS engineering, but by and large, this is not the case.

Q: (L) He also said that it was his opinion, that the center of the web of all of this mind programming conspiracy, is in Tyler, Texas. Is that correct?

A: The what?!?

Q: (L) Well, what about the center of the human branch of the programming conspiracy?

A: We feel that Vincent needs to recharge his batteries a bit.

Q: (L) He also said that the area we are living is the center of a particular programming experiment, something like Nazi/Black magick cultists or something like that.

A: Better not to get too carried away. Remember, the root of all "negative" energies directed at 3rd density STS subjects, coming from 4th density, is essentially the same.

Q: (LC) Are we being currently monitored by 4th density STS?

A: You are always!

Q: (A) That's the helicopters.

A: That is more likely 3rd density. Suggest a review of the transcripts relating to the situation in Nazi Germany for better understanding here.

Q: (A) Is that why you can't leave Tyler...

A: We wish to review some things first. The concept of a "master race" put forward by the Nazis was merely a 4th density STS effort to create a physical vehicle with the correct frequency resonance vibration for 4th density STS souls to occupy in 3rd density. It was also a "trial run" for planned events in what you perceive to be your future.

Q: (L) You mean with a strong STS frequency so they can have a "vehicle" in 3rd density, so to speak?

A: Correct. Frequency resonance vibration! Very important.

Q: (L) So, that is why they are programming and experimenting? And all these folks running around who some think are "programmed," could be individuals who are raising their nastiness levels high enough to accommodate the truly negative STS 4th density - sort of like walk-ins or something, only not nice ones?

A: You do not have very many of those present yet, but that was, and still is, the plan of some of the 4th density STS types.

I know I didn't answer your question in 25 words or less, but some things aren't exactly simple.
 
Thanks for all those precious explainations, Laura.
I'm still going on rereading the transcripts but sometimes I "miss the train" :/

ELTE2307
 
Mmhh ... had a look at US Air 194 crash.

The was no crash of a US Air 194. The closest I can find is US Air 427, which crashed 1994 due to failure of a rudder on final approach into Pittsburgh with all 155 souls lost on board. A few months prior to that US Air 1016 experienced another crash, with 37 of the 51 souls on board killed.

Then there is the famous US Air 1549, which ditched into the Hudson river in 2009 withoutnany loss of life. But this was well into the future of the transmission.

No other airline with flight number 194 has had a crash in the past.

So I cannot make any sense of this at all ...
 
session November 18 said:
A: USAir-194 crash; United Air crash, Colorado Springs;
Connection? Get voice recorder tape transcripts.

Hi nickelbleu,

The way I read this snippet is, that it concerns two different crashes with probably the same cause.
You identified one of them correctly: US Air 427 which crashed in 1994 due to rudder issues.

The other one concerned the same type of aircraft (Boeing 737) on a United Airlines Flight 585 which crashed way back in 1991 while attempting to land at Colorado Springs, Colorado.
wikipedia said:
March 3 – United Airlines Flight 585, a Boeing 737, crashes while attempting to land at Colorado Springs, Colorado, killing all 25 people on board. The cause of the crash is not identified until the investigation into the crash of USAir Flight 427 in 1994; both crashes are eventually attributed to defects in a valve associated with the rudder

Sources:
_http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_accidents_and_incidents_involving_commercial_aircraft
_http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USAir_Flight_427
_http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Airlines_Flight_585
_http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_737_rudder_issues

It nevertheless seems a bit odd --as Laura already stated-- to get this answer interjected into a query about "any relationship between all of the terrorist bombings that have been taking place in Paris recently, and any stepped up alien activity" and then also the C's admitting thereafter that it was an unrelated remark.

Don't know what to make of that either. ;)
 
18 Nov 1995

Q: (L) Is there any relationship between all of the terrorist
bombings that have been taking place in Paris recently,
and any stepped up alien activity?

A: Open.

Q: (L) Is there anything we can obtain on that subject by
formulation of correct questions?

A: USAir-194 crash; United Air crash, Colorado Springs;
Connection? Get voice recorder tape transcripts.

Q: (L) Is this in some way related to the question about the
Paris bombing?

A: No.

Besides the duplicate cause of the two planes going down, there may be more connection if both planes were hypothetically brought down purposely.

Looking at the passenger manifest for USAir 427, there were 8 passengers from the Dept. of Energy, 2 from the Center for Energy and Economics, 1 Refractories engineer, 1 scientist from USX Corporation, 1 chemist, 1 from Sensus Technology, 4 from PNC Bank, 1 from Chesapeake Xray Corp, 1 from Rockwell Intl. Corp., 1 oceanographer from Scripps Institute, 1 from AKZO Nobel Chemicals Inc., 1 CEO and 1 employee from Ampco Pittsburgh Corp., 1 from Energy Concepts Inc., and various persons of unknown talents and professions.

I didn't find a manifest for UA 585 that revealed professional affiliations.

Looking at the professions and circles of influence listed above, seems possible that there might have been ulterior reasons for this crash.
 
On subject of prophecies, there was also mentioned 'an evolving prophecy'. We talk with STO beings with an STO purpose (?) on a lesson of awareness. On 21.12 it was mentioned that governmental events and an invasion thorugh people happens without remonstrance. There was mentioned that the worst things in our 100 years before history were test of a will and an alien event. I don't know what would be a mathematical formula of a growing awareness but I wouldn't be surprised if that work on channelings saved our time in experiencing such lessons as some of these 'local events'. On one channeling there was about Nephilim (?) a planet takeovered in 4 - that it would be different than at World War, because in 4. People already experienced miracles, surviving in the worst circumstances - in other words, talking with Cassiopaeans for years, living our lives consioucly, involving much energy, telling and every predicted thing just happen and kill us? All right. Being open and life is enclosed? Cool.
 
Back
Top Bottom