State of the Union Address 2010

[Shijing]

I thought this excerpt below from Democracy Now! was interesting -- its a brief interview with Noam Chomsky and Naomi Klein about the SotU address, followed by a pertinent clip from Howard Zinn's final DN! interview:

http://www.democracynow.org/2010/1/28/noam_chomsky_and_naomi_klein_respond

January 28, 2010

AMY GOODMAN: We’re broadcasting from Park City, Utah, from the headquarters of the Sundance Film Festival, the largest festival of independent cinema in the country.

In his State of the Union address, President Obama renewed his criticism of the Supreme Court ruling, saying he hopes Congress passes legislation, quote, “that helps to right this wrong."

President Obama delivered his first State of the Union address Wednesday night. The President did not lay out any far-reaching new policies, but instead used the occasion to call on Congress to move forward on issues already on the agenda, including economic recovery, healthcare reform and education.

A full two-thirds of the President’s seventy-minute address was devoted to the economy, the central theme of which was job creation. Obama talked through a series of steps his administration hopes to take to aid middle-class families and spur job growth. As expected, Obama proposed a three-year freeze on discretionary government spending, threatening to use his veto to achieve it.

      PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA: Starting in 2011, we are prepared to freeze government spending for three years. Spending related to our national security, Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security will not be affected. But all other discretionary government programs will. Like any cash-strapped family, we will work within a budget to invest in what we need and sacrifice what we don’t. And if I have to enforce this discipline by veto, I will.

      I know that some in my own party will argue that we can’t address the deficit or freeze government spending when so many are still hurting. And I agree, which is why this freeze won’t take effect until next year, when the economy is stronger. That’s how budgeting works. But understand—understand, if we don’t take meaningful steps to rein in our debt, it could damage our markets, increase the cost of borrowing, and jeopardize our recovery, all of which would have an even worse effect on our job growth and family incomes.


AMY GOODMAN: Obama went on to urge action on energy legislation, linking success to the creation of new jobs. He called for construction of new nuclear power plants, new offshore oil drilling, and passage of climate change legislation. Obama also challenged Congress to supersede the Supreme Court’s ruling last week that allows corporations to spend unlimited amounts of money to elect and defeat candidates. The President also vowed to end the military’s “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy and urged Congress to pass legislation opening the military fully to gay men and lesbians.

For a response to President Obama’s first State of the Union address, we’re joined by two guests. Noam Chomsky joins us on the telephone from his home in Massachusetts. Chomsky is Institute Professor Emeritus of Linguistics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, where he taught for over half a century. He’s the author of dozens of books; his most recent is Failed States: The Abuse of Power and the Assault on Democracy. And joining us here in Park City, Utah is Naomi Klein, journalist and author. Her latest book is The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism.

We welcome you both to Democracy Now! Noam Chomsky, let’s begin with you in Massachusetts. Your response to President Obama’s State of the Union address?

NOAM CHOMSKY: Well, one doesn’t expect to get much content from a State of the Union address, and there wasn’t very much. But that’s normal.

There were some proposals that made some sense. They weren’t very definite, but, yes, it’s a good idea to put Americans to work building the infrastructure of tomorrow, railroads, but not the interstate highway system. He said that. I don’t think that’s a good idea. It’s a good idea to take $30 billion of the money Wall Street banks have repaid and use it to help community banks to give credit to small businesses and so on. It’s true that we should export more of our goods, but he didn’t mention the way that has to be done to do that, namely, lowering the inflated dollar, which the financial industries aren’t going to like, so I don’t think it’ll happen.

On freezing government spending, it’s not—it’s certainly not—it’s partially, but not totally, in accord with the public will. So, in fact, the recent, most recent poll I’ve seen by Pew on people’s priorities, the highest for increase in spending, by far the highest, over two-thirds was for education. Well, that’s being frozen. The next was veterans’ benefits; that’s frozen. Next is healthcare, which is partially frozen. Environmental protection, not there. Energy, not there. When you get down to about, I think it’s eleventh or so, you get the military defense, which is increasing—call it “defense.” Antiterrorism defense is thirteenth; that’s increasing. So, by and large, the priorities are, I wouldn’t say the opposite of, but not consistent with the spending block.

It’s a good idea to revitalize community colleges, to cut back, to modify the student loan program so it doesn’t go through banks. The childcare tax credit makes some sense. These are all—it’s also good to reverse the Supreme Court ruling, but he didn’t say—which was a horrible ruling, but he didn’t indicate how we should go ahead with that. And most of it is the kind of rhetoric you expect in a State of the Union address. There were a few scattered things like the [inaudible] be sensible if there’s—if there’s some way to carry them out.

AMY GOODMAN: Naomi Klein, right now—well, you just flew into Park City, Utah just before President Obama’s State of the Union address. Your reaction to it?

NAOMI KLEIN: Well, I mean, we knew the spending freeze was going to come, but to me, it’s really striking. I think what this moment represents is the decision, which we all feared would come, to pass the bill on from saving Wall Street, from saving the elites of this country from their own mess, a bill worth trillions of dollars, to regular people in need in this country. I mean, that’s what a spending freeze really means.

And we have to look at it in the context of the debt crisis that is occurring at the state level. There’s deficit—huge deficits being run up. California is the most dramatic example, but you’re already seeing how students are facing things like 30 percent tuition increases. Women’s shelters are being closed. So, you know, when the President says freeze spending, that’s saying to the states, “We’re not going to help you. We’re not going to bail you out.”

So this is really—this, to me, all comes back to the top-down bailout that should never have taken place in the first place, the decision that was made to throw the taxpayer dollars at the banks, at the elites, no strings attached, not to help the people losing their jobs, losing their homes. And now the bill is being passed on, because the debt crisis, the private-sector debt crisis, which started this, the banks racking up these huge debts, was never solved. It was just moved. It was just moved to the public coffers.

And now Obama is—this is a Hoover move. This is a Herbert Hoover move. And I think we have to say very clearly, he is not FDR. And, you know, in the spirit of Howard Zinn, who passed yesterday, I keep thinking, you know, what would he say about the State of the Union? And I think he would tell us to refuse to pay this bill, that we need a debtors’ revolt.

AMY GOODMAN: Well, as you said, Naomi, hours before President Obama delivered his State of the Union, we learned the sad news that the pioneering historian and professor Howard Zinn had died. He died at the age of eighty-seven of a heart attack.

Howard Zinn was a frequent guest on Democracy Now! He last joined us at our old firehouse studio in May. At that time, I asked him for his assessment of President Obama.

      HOWARD ZINN: I wish President Obama would listen carefully to Martin Luther King. I’m sure he pays verbal homage, as everyone does, to Martin Luther King, but he ought to think before he sends missiles over Pakistan, before he agrees to this bloated military budget, before he sends troops to Afghanistan, before he opposes the single-payer system, which you talked about earlier in your program. He ought to ask, “What would Martin Luther King do? And what would Martin Luther King say?” And if he only listened to King, he would be a very different president than he’s turning out to be so far. I think we ought to hold Obama to his promise to be different and bold and to make change. So far, he hasn’t come through on that promise.

     AMY GOODMAN: When Barack Obama was running for president, asked in the debates who would MLK endorse, who would Dr. King endorse, he said, “None of us.”

      HOWARD ZINN: Yeah, that’s true, because King believed—and this actually is one of the themes of our people’s history, is that you cannot depend on presidents, and you cannot depend on elections and voting to solve your problems. People themselves, organizing, demonstrating, clamoring, they are the only ones who can push the President and push Congress into change. And that’s what we have to do now with Obama. We have to point to what Obama said in the course of the campaign, when he said we not only have to get out of Iraq, we have to get out of the mindset that brought us into Iraq. Obama, himself, has not gotten out of that mindset yet. And I think we, the people, have to speak to him about that.

      AMY GOODMAN: How?

      HOWARD ZINN: Well, these people that I saw on your program earlier who were demonstrating for the single-payer health system, which Obama is very, very reluctant to endorse, they were doing what needs to be done. They were committing acts of civil disobedience. They were going into offices where they were told to leave, and they wouldn’t leave. They were doing what we were doing during the movement against the war in Vietnam. They were doing what the black movement was doing in the South. And this is what we will need. We will need demonstrative acts which dramatize the fact that our government is not responding to what the people need and what the people want.

When I listened to this, I was thinking 'just think what they would be able to come up with if they had a really good handle on psychopathy and political ponerization'.  That really seems to be the missing link with people like those above (who otherwise do generally good work at their level of understanding IMO) -- there is always this tendency to assume that at the end of the day, everyone is the same as you when it's just not true (reference what Zinn says above about changing Obama's mindset).  So there's this blank spot that they have to feel their way around, and the purposeful behind-the-scenes orchestration fails to be observed.  The one thing I do find encouraging, though, is that voices in the progressive movement like these aren't just stepping in behind Obama because he's Obama, which is something that I've observed with disappointing regularity in people that I know personally.

[Ana]

The message is only what one perceives it to be.  What matters to the individual is what matters most. 

But, to wich individual?

I realize that my response may seem empty but it isn't up to me to answer those questions for you. 

Ok, don’t worry.

[Pob]

Great analysis Anart! - As a side note, this video was taken a day after the SOU speech:

A gutsy college student asks Obama a question. The president states, "The Middle East is obviously an issue that has plagued the region for centuries.

" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=npjKObsTAng

It shows Obama stuttering without a teleprompter and him making jokes when posed a challenging question about what he didn't say in his speech about US support for Israeli human rights violations against Palestinians.

[Jerry]

The message is only what one perceives it to be.

The way I see it, perception must be tested for truth.  A person can use words of truth to produce lies, and it takes a good speech to do so.

Let's keep in mind that from the beginning of Obama's presidency, the US has been murdering women and children and has been caught in various lies.

[Kniall]

Great analysis Anart! - As a side note, this video was taken a day after the SOU speech:

A gutsy college student asks Obama a question. The president states, "The Middle East is obviously an issue that has plagued the region for centuries.

" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=npjKObsTAng

It shows Obama stuttering without a teleprompter and him making jokes when posed a challenging question about what he didn't say in his speech about US support for Israeli human rights violations against Palestinians.

"The Middle East is obviously an issue that has plagued the region for centuries."

What?!?! The Middle East is the region. The plague is Israel. And it has been infecting the region since 1948. (Well, prior to its creation also)

Amazing how one little question can incapacitate him like that!

[Heimdallr]

What?!?! The Middle East is the region. The plague is Israel. And it has been infecting the region since 1948. (Well, prior to its creation also)

Amazing how one little question can incapacitate him like that!

Yeah, I noticed that little nugget of a non sequitur myself as well.  I think what he really meant was "The Arabs are obviously an issue that has plagued the region for centuries."  Just a little insider's phrasing for those who know what he really means.

[Elizabeth]

Thanks, Anart.  I really enjoyed your running commentary on the State of the Union address. 

[Lauranimal]

"...        "it lives IN you"  ( get it out!! ) -  ..."

 

[JEEP]

It shows Obama stuttering without a teleprompter and him making jokes when posed a challenging question about what he didn't say in his speech about US support for Israeli human rights violations against Palestinians.

Yes, and notice how he totally did not answer the question! Just more obscurantism in both meanings of the word!

From my Webster's New World Dictionary:

Obscurantism: 1) opposition to human progress; 2) being deliberately obscure or vague.

I still read the emails from MoveOn.org and they're still eliciting money from their members nonstop:

"Yesterday, MoveOn members blew away our goal and have already donated more than $200,000 to help launch a huge new campaign to end corporate domination in Washington, DC. That's awesome—thank you! Now we're aiming to raise $350,000 together."

Yes, just bleed those suckers dry! You'd think by now they'd figure it out that no amount of donations is going to change a thing! And why haven't their MoveOn.org leadership done anything to hold the Democrats and Obama accountable for their total lack of accomplishing anything relating to the hope and change promises/mandate of the successful Presidential campaign? Ponerology in action or Oh, you Spellbinder you!

[Herakles]

Great analysis Anart! - As a side note, this video was taken a day after the SOU speech:

A gutsy college student asks Obama a question. The president states, "The Middle East is obviously an issue that has plagued the region for centuries.

" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=npjKObsTAng

It shows Obama stuttering without a teleprompter and him making jokes when posed a challenging question about what he didn't say in his speech about US support for Israeli human rights violations against Palestinians.

thanks for this link, very interesting to observe.  Notice how the crowd started to boo before the girl could even get her question out?  The immediate judgment and reaction without even listening to what is being said, namely, a result of mind-programming.

Clearly Obama stumbled in trying to come up with something 'satisfactory' to be sold to the public just then, taken by surprise by the question perhaps and in my mind the way he danced around giving any real answer is indicative of him knowing the facts but choosing to consciously lie about the reality of the situation.  He stumbled in providing any decent or real answer because he had to think something up on the spot that he knows is not true. 

That or he himself has been entirely brainwashed into believing Israeli propaganda, either way it is not good.  As an American it makes me MADDER THAN HELL to hear him say 'Israel is one of our greatest allies' and that funding/relationship will continue, which he did say by default in terms of not answering her question/issue about why billions are appropriated to Israel annually.

Most interesting to note Biden in the background as Obama was making it up and stumbling as he went along.  At one point Biden breaks his posture and his body movements indicated to me he was displeased, or at least irritated, with the way Obama was handling the question.  Sort of like "Come on, Barry, we've been over this before and you should know how to convincingly lie on this issue by now!'

That could be just my subjective view and not true entirely yet it sure was interesting to watch him squirm.  Well, to watch both of em squirm actually.

[bngenoh]

Know see Mr. O bummer propose a "legal" framework to indefinitely detente his hoping for change subjects. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8mPZlysCAm0

p.s. good to see that not all reporters have tapiocafied brains (yay, invented a new word) at least in this instance.