Author Topic: Session 27 July 1994  (Read 6223 times)

Offline Laura

  • Administrator
  • ********
  • Posts: 20,074
    • http://www.laura-knight-jadczyk.com
Session 27 July 1994
« on: January 05, 2010, 09:34:03 AM »
July 27, 1994

"Frank", "Candy", Laura

After a brief encounter with an easily identifiable "dead dude," whom we sent away, we used our Reiki symbols, asked specifically for our communicants from Cassiopaea and the following came through:

Q: We want to communicate with the Cassiopaeans.
A: I am Ra keeper of light.
Q: What are you here to tell us?
A: UFO not all bad.
Q: Why is the connection so bad tonight?
A: You see you are tired.
Q: [Unknown question.]
A: Level through 6.
Q: [Unknown question.]
A: Planet.
Q: [Unknown question.]
A: Always.  Please let me go. 

It was clear that the energy was very weak on this last contact.  It was also curious that the character "Ra" came through and identified himself as a "keeper of light."

« Last Edit: January 06, 2010, 02:18:56 AM by Approaching Infinity »
He who learns must suffer
And even in our sleep pain that cannot forget
Falls drop by drop upon the heart,
And in our own despair, against our will,
Comes wisdom to us by the awful grace of God.
Agamemnon, Aeschylus

Offline Bluestar

  • Jedi Council Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 633
Re: Session 27 July 1994
« Reply #1 on: January 06, 2010, 05:15:57 PM »
A: Always.  Please let me go. 

It was clear that the energy was very weak on this last contact.  It was also curious that the character "Ra" came through and identified himself as a "keeper of light."


This has struck a chord for me.  "Please let me go."

Does this mean that at times when the channel is weak that it may bring in someone/thing that does not actually want to be there?

Offline Laura

  • Administrator
  • ********
  • Posts: 20,074
    • http://www.laura-knight-jadczyk.com
Re: Session 27 July 1994
« Reply #2 on: January 06, 2010, 05:31:01 PM »
Either that, or it was a dissonant energy.  It was about the last of the "intruders" before the Cs became a fixture.  I just thought I'd include it since it was part of the chronological sequence and I thought it was odd that he/it/they announced as "Ra".
He who learns must suffer
And even in our sleep pain that cannot forget
Falls drop by drop upon the heart,
And in our own despair, against our will,
Comes wisdom to us by the awful grace of God.
Agamemnon, Aeschylus

Offline Bluestar

  • Jedi Council Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 633
Re: Session 27 July 1994
« Reply #3 on: January 06, 2010, 05:37:23 PM »
Either that, or it was a dissonant energy.  It was about the last of the "intruders" before the Cs became a fixture.  I just thought I'd include it since it was part of the chronological sequence and I thought it was odd that he/it/they announced as "Ra".

Thanks, yes very odd.

Offline Elizabeth

  • Jedi
  • ****
  • Posts: 196
Re: Session 27 July 1994
« Reply #4 on: January 07, 2010, 07:54:13 PM »
Even though the full set of Transmissions is available on the site, I really like having them released one-by-one on the Forum.  And I always appreciate everyone's questions and comments.

Offline C

  • Padawan Learner
  • ***
  • Posts: 53
  • Angelic Reign
    • Angelic Reign
Re: Session 27 July 1994
« Reply #5 on: June 11, 2012, 12:54:37 PM »
I'm going to go ahead and say that I think this IS Ra.
C.

Offline Richard

  • Jedi Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 341
Re: Session 27 July 1994
« Reply #6 on: June 11, 2012, 02:13:09 PM »
I'm going to go ahead and say that I think this IS Ra.

That's a pretty big leap of faith and you're entitled to it. If you read the Ra material though you'll notice every communication starts with Ra identifying itself. Not quite the same. You could be right but as nothing was said it doesn't really matter.
We don't need money - we need each other.

Offline Ana

  • A Disturbance in the Force
  • *
  • Posts: 10
Re: Session 27 July 1994
« Reply #7 on: June 11, 2012, 03:27:45 PM »
I'm going to go ahead and say that I think this IS Ra.

That's a pretty big leap of faith and you're entitled to it. If you read the Ra material though you'll notice every communication starts with Ra identifying itself. Not quite the same. You could be right but as nothing was said it doesn't really matter.

Leaving aside "faith",  I don't follow your thinking here C, the only thing that can make you think this is Ra is that he/she/it says so and that's not a big clue, is it?

Offline C

  • Padawan Learner
  • ***
  • Posts: 53
  • Angelic Reign
    • Angelic Reign
Re: Session 27 July 1994
« Reply #8 on: June 12, 2012, 07:12:58 PM »
Well. I thought more about it of course. I read all the Ra material many times over. And the communication just seemed like an extension or other facet of the C's. However I can comprehend it being a simulated 'Ra' too.

Yep, I pretty big leap o faith for sure. :)
C.

Offline C

  • Padawan Learner
  • ***
  • Posts: 53
  • Angelic Reign
    • Angelic Reign
Re: Session 27 July 1994
« Reply #9 on: June 12, 2012, 07:19:19 PM »
I will have to disagree a tad here. I think we have a built in sense that allows us to distinguish. And that is what I was going on. Not just a declaration or statement

Thanks!  Learning is fun!
C.

Offline Ana

  • A Disturbance in the Force
  • *
  • Posts: 10
Re: Session 27 July 1994
« Reply #10 on: June 12, 2012, 07:33:35 PM »
I will have to disagree a tad here. I think we have a built in sense that allows us to distinguish. And that is what I was going on. Not just a declaration or statement

Thanks!  Learning is fun!

You may want to read this thread Thinking, Fast And Slow to understand how this "built in sense" is not always right.

Offline C

  • Padawan Learner
  • ***
  • Posts: 53
  • Angelic Reign
    • Angelic Reign
Re: Session 27 July 1994
« Reply #11 on: June 13, 2012, 03:08:59 AM »
No doubt even my good guesses are wrong. But, I sense that there is something more going on with this reading. Thanks for the link!
C.

Offline Ana

  • A Disturbance in the Force
  • *
  • Posts: 10
Re: Session 27 July 1994
« Reply #12 on: June 13, 2012, 12:31:17 PM »
No doubt even my good guesses are wrong. But, I sense that there is something more going on with this reading. Thanks for the link!

Yes, in reading the thread and the book you'll have more info to understand how it all works better, you will see other members observations and experiences, and can share your own too.  :)