Cassiopaean Sandbox > Music

432 Hz vs 440Hz

<< < (3/26) > >>

dant:
I listened to:
432 vs 440 tone comparison:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZLhegBf_TkI

432 sounds lower and more sinsoidal dominant whist 440 seems
higher and not quite sinsodial and a bit more "whinny".  By "sinsodial",
I mean it seems more resonant, ie a pure standing wave...

While the above example was completed, another list of 432 showed
up, and the following supposedly based on 432Hz?  I cannot hear well, but
what does this one sound like?

[Tool - Schism (432 hz)]
_http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=19aoCWnn4RM&NR=1


However, I also listened to this Classical Prelude @432Hz:
(and it sounds to me, more pleasant!)
_http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xeVGOs8bUMU&NR=1

Interesting indeed!

P.S: Since Pythagorean was brought up, I found this:
http://www.absoluteastronomy.com/topics/Pythagorean_tuning

Dingo:
Pink Floyd - The great gig in the sky 432Hz
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLw2NK1AZ1Y&feature=related

SAO:

--- Quote from: Dingo on March 25, 2010, 01:43:42 AM ---Pink Floyd - The great gig in the sky 432Hz
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLw2NK1AZ1Y&feature=related

--- End quote ---
And here it is in 440 Hz
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZAydj4OJnwQ

abstract:
You know, i just compared the two and I find that I did in fact enjoy the 432hz more. :)

Rhys:
I'm also enjoying 432Hz more than the "standard" 440Hz, it certainly feels more natural to me, imho. I've never heard of this Stradivari/Verdi Tuning, I'll definitely be "converting" my instruments when I get home!  :D

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page