Perceval said:
You're joking, right? You actually think that the gang behind 9/11 is going to suddenly admit it just because someone proves that 'directed energy weaponry' was used on 9/11? Or maybe you think that this evidence is somehow going to awaken the masses and ignite the touch-fire of revolution? Or maybe it will convince some scientists or some academics or some politicians and THEY will do something about it? Or all of the above? Or maybe you think that all of the existing and IN YOUR FACE evidence that 9/11 was an 'inside job' was somehow not enough? That Judy Wood's information is the missing ingredient?
Hmmm…First I get a summary dismissal and wholly inadequate response from Laura, which actually goes toward making my point concerning SOTT’s promotion of 9/11 fraudsters and its snubbing of Dr. Judy Wood’s evidence demonstrating the use of free energy technologies at the WTC on 9/11.
Now I get this childish outburst addressing the outing of the 9/11 perps and the public’s cognitive dissonance concerning the 9/11 events—topics which I did not discuss or even mention!
I will say, in regard to the public’s cognitive dissonance, that my 82-year-old mother, who accesses only conventional media and taught 2nd grade for 28 years, asked to borrow my loaner copy of
Where Did the Towers Go? and kept it for weeks while she read it. She was able to follow Dr. Wood's exposition of the evidence quite well and found it convincing as well as shocking and, although I can’t say exactly how it has changed her view of the world, she no longer listens to Rush Limbaugh (previously a favorite) and has given money to and supports Ron Paul for President! :)
Perceval said:
Look, let's face it, you're really naive about this whole situation, and are missing the big picture (although you don't seem to be able to recognise that yourself). The big picture that you are missing is that there is more than enough public evidence available, for those who are willing and able to See it, that 9/11 a self-inflicted wound to usher in an overt global police state. On the other hand, no amount of proof of this will ever suffice to convince those who are unwilling and unable to See it..
I don’t believe I mentioned trying to “prove” anything to the general public. My questions were raised with respect to the SOTT readership, which, I daresay, is barely a tiny fraction of the public at large.
Why do the questions I raised lead you to assume that I’m missing your supposed “big picture” concerning the public’s beliefs about 9/11? I was active in the so-called 9/11 “truth” movement for several years, and I can assure you I’m quite aware of the brainwashed American public’s infantile obeisance to the government’s suicidal Muslim fantasy.
What I questioned is SOTT’s failure to recognize the foremost scientific body of evidence as to what actually happened during the most significant event of this century. That failure has resulted in SOTT’s promotion of the Jones/Gage thermite distraction and other fraudsters as well as its ignorant dismissal and lack of coverage of new energy technologies.
Far from being a “tar baby and a red herring,” those technologies are proven by the evidence assembled by Dr. Wood to have been deployed on 9/11 at the WTC and, probably, at the Pentagon and Oklahoma City and other places as well.
THAT is the “big picture” that SOTT seems to be missing, which IMHO evinces a critical lack of discernment and regard for a subject with vast implications for the “brighter” future for humanity which SOTT claims as its primary goal.
Those who have educated themselves in these matters (without SOTT’s help) are aware that there is a long history of such technologies going back to the work of Tesla and even further, to that of Michael Farraday in the 19th century. A good review of the history of these suppressed energy discoveries may be viewed here: _http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=314&Itemid=55
BTW this video has been banned from YouTube. It’s about 2 hours long, and I do have it on DVD; if anyone would like a copy, simply PM me with a mailing address, and I will send it gratis.
Here are some of the more comprehensive websites with info on new energy technologies:
_http://panacea-bocaf.org/summaryofcommercialdevices.htm
_http://peswiki.com/index.php/Main_Page
_http://www.free-energy-info.co.uk/
_http://jnaudin.free.fr/
_http://www.infinite-energy.com/ (site founded by the late Eugene Mallove, who exposed Steve Jones’ sabotage of the original cold fusion announcement by Fleischman and Pons)
Besides “Rossi” I searched SOTT for terms like “cold fusion,” zero point,” “Tesla,” “Townsend Brown,” “de Palma” and “John Hutchison,” whose work is prominently cited by Judy Wood, and found virtually nothing on SOTT. Furthermore, I have been a subscriber to the SOTT newsletter for over 14 months now, and I see very, very few articles even cited, much less explored, that deal with advanced energy technologies.
So I ask again, where is all this “extensive research” on free energy?
Mod: links disativated
