Fellowship of the Cosmic Mind > Fellowship of the Cosmic Mind (Public)
my ignorance
AaronAgassi:
I could swear I came upon "science of channeling" or something of the sort, on the front page to this very forum wherein, indeed, science is bandied about. After all, experiment that is by definition the exercise of science with appropriate controls, is explicitly claimed. Indeed, whatever clues ought to give rise conjecture, competing viable hypotheses subject to rigor within constraints of time. And thanks, I asked no questions about how it came about. First things first: I enquired merely as to whatever experimental protocols of refutable hypothesis and controls.
Megan:
--- Quote from: AaronAgassi on November 03, 2011, 06:51:59 PM ---I could swear I came upon "science of channeling" or something of the sort, on the front page to this very forum wherein, indeed, science is bandied about. After all, experiment that is by definition the exercise of science with appropriate controls, is explicitly claimed. Indeed, whatever clues ought to give rise conjecture, competing viable hypotheses subject to rigor within constraints of time. And thanks, I asked no questions about how it came about. First things first: I enquired merely as to whatever experimental protocols of refutable hypothesis and controls.
--- End quote ---
Possibly this material?
--- Quote ---The issue of "channeling" as a scientific experiment - utilizing information obtained by such a method - is problematical, to say the least...
--- End quote ---
Mr.Anderson:
Welcome to the forum, AaronAgassi. Lots to read, glad you're here.
AaronAgassi:
Aside vaguely the notion of anything salvageable from channeling, I still can glean no hypothesis, much less conditions of refutation, not even, for that matter, a clear question calling for explanation in answer. What is the question, then? Apparently something to do with accounting for all manner of occult reference with which the reader is simply assumed to be familiar with, particularly the existence of channels. And this despite all preliminary avowal of scientific skepticism and parsimony of explanation, generally. Why? Ouija boards to tune into the divine Gnosis past satellite interference? PKD, anyone?
anart:
--- Quote from: AaronAgassi on November 04, 2011, 03:01:12 PM ---Aside vaguely the notion of anything salvageable from channeling, I still can glean no hypothesis, much less conditions of refutation, not even, for that matter, a clear question calling for explanation in answer. What is the question, then? Apparently something to do with accounting for all manner of occult reference with which the reader is simply assumed to be familiar with, particularly the existence of channels. And this despite all preliminary avowal of scientific skepticism and parsimony of explanation, generally. Why? Ouija boards to tune into the divine Gnosis past satellite interference? PKD, anyone?
--- End quote ---
Hi Aaron, I think the problem here is that you are asking a very vague question. Could you please phrase your question clearly and concisely so that it can be answered in the same manner?
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version