« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Session 10 March 1996  (Read 2722 times)

Offline Laura

  • Administrator
  • ********
  • Posts: 20,069
    • http://www.laura-knight-jadczyk.com
Session 10 March 1996
« on: December 06, 2011, 01:57:58 PM »
March 10, 1996

Frank, Laura

Q: I have a number of questions that I want to get into tonight. Frank and I have been discussing the nature of attack. The first thing I would like to ask is: I did a hypnosis session with MM and utilized some of the Greenbaum techniques. She responded in the affirmative. I was told that she had several alter personalities: "masterprogrammer, gatekeeper, Alpha, Beta, Theta and Delta, zero," and that there were over 3,000 installed programs. Were these responses valid?

A: Validity is subjective.

Q: Does MM have over 3,000 of these "programs?"

A: Be careful of data which originates from sources which mislead.

Q: Which is the misleading source?

A: May mislead.

Q: Which is misleading: MM or the Greenbaum text?

A: No its the center of origin.

Q: That which I perceive as a negative attachment?

A: This "subject" appears to be fragmented.

Q: So, MM is suffering from MPD?

A: Not that simple.

Q: Are her fragments caused by abductions?

A: She has had abductions and the like, but not the issue here. She is "searching," and when one is searching...

Session interrupted by long distance phone call and never resumed. 


Logged
He who learns must suffer
And even in our sleep pain that cannot forget
Falls drop by drop upon the heart,
And in our own despair, against our will,
Comes wisdom to us by the awful grace of God.
Agamemnon, Aeschylus

Offline MethodOfMadn ess

  • The Force is Strong With This One
  • **
  • Posts: 35
Re: Session 10 March 1996
« Reply #1 on: February 27, 2012, 01:05:08 AM »
Do you choose not to verify who you communicate with? Or is this just another oversight?

I've seen this happen many times and in those instances you have almost always gotten mixed/corrupted influences (assuming all this is real of course)!!!

I just want to clarify because maybe you've verified but not included it in the transcript.
Logged

Offline venusian

  • SuperModerator
  • ********
  • Posts: 940
Re: Session 10 March 1996
« Reply #2 on: February 27, 2012, 01:43:21 AM »
Hello Hashhashin,

Welcome to our forum.  :)

We recommend all new members to post an introduction in the Newbies section telling us a bit about themselves, how they found the cass material, and how much of the work here they have read.

You can have a look through that board to see how others have done it.
Logged
"The individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists."

Offline Ronan

  • A Disturbance in the Force
  • *
  • Posts: 18
Re: Session 10 March 1996
« Reply #3 on: February 27, 2012, 01:45:10 AM »
Quote from: Hashhashin on February 27, 2012, 01:05:08 AM
Do you choose not to verify who you communicate with? Or is this just another oversight?

I've seen this happen many times and in those instances you have almost always gotten mixed/corrupted influences (assuming all this is real of course)!!!

I just want to clarify because maybe you've verified but not included it in the transcript.

From having read the Wave, Adeventure and the old session transcripts I would say Laura is normaly very thorough. Have you read these? For me I found they give you an extremely good view of the dificulties Laura endured then and SOTT must be facing now.
   I have found it is easy to question/critise anothers efforts especially when one just reads them. It's different when you contribute. I am not a great contributer to this forum but I do input where I think I have a valid observation. Also a fiancial contibution helps in the give/take or exchange factor.
Logged
Ideas are simple, once you've thought of them.

Offline Laura

  • Administrator
  • ********
  • Posts: 20,069
    • http://www.laura-knight-jadczyk.com
Re: Session 10 March 1996
« Reply #4 on: February 27, 2012, 10:12:48 AM »
Quote from: Hashhashin on February 27, 2012, 01:05:08 AM
Do you choose not to verify who you communicate with? Or is this just another oversight?

I've seen this happen many times and in those instances you have almost always gotten mixed/corrupted influences (assuming all this is real of course)!!!

I just want to clarify because maybe you've verified but not included it in the transcript.

No, you are making assumptions here.  Some session notes don't include every detail, especially if no one else was present to take notes and I was the only one handling the tape recorder. 
Logged
He who learns must suffer
And even in our sleep pain that cannot forget
Falls drop by drop upon the heart,
And in our own despair, against our will,
Comes wisdom to us by the awful grace of God.
Agamemnon, Aeschylus

Offline Gaolea

  • The Force is Strong With This One
  • **
  • Posts: 32
Re: Session 10 March 1996
« Reply #5 on: February 28, 2012, 07:17:02 AM »
Wow! U expect a longer session like ever and...

aw! is a joke :D

 i love all the session like ever and i love u very much master laura ^^

all the sessions has very important information, no matter the quantity but the quality :)
Logged

Offline MethodOfMadn ess

  • The Force is Strong With This One
  • **
  • Posts: 35
Re: Session 10 March 1996
« Reply #6 on: March 07, 2012, 06:34:53 AM »
Quote from: Ronan on February 27, 2012, 01:45:10 AM
From having read the Wave, Adeventure and the old session transcripts I would say Laura is normaly very thorough. Have you read these? For me I found they give you an extremely good view of the dificulties Laura endured then and SOTT must be facing now.
   I have found it is easy to question/critise anothers efforts especially when one just reads them. It's different when you contribute. I am not a great contributer to this forum but I do input where I think I have a valid observation. Also a fiancial contibution helps in the give/take or exchange factor.

Hi, not criticising, just an observation and something I have noted.

Quote from: Laura on February 27, 2012, 10:12:48 AM
No, you are making assumptions here.  Some session notes don't include every detail, especially if no one else was present to take notes and I was the only one handling the tape recorder.

Thankyou Laura, it is a pleasure to have you answer me directly. Apologies for the forthrightness of my comments, I was not assuming, I just wanted to clarify this. Now that you have, I will keep this is mind if I see a future transcript where the verification was not necessarily noted down.

And thankyou for all the hard work, many many many many hours that you have dedicated of your life to this. Once again, I didn't mean to offend if that is what I have done, and I do admit my comment was a bit abrupt.

How often are you channelling the C's nowadays?
Logged

Offline scottiet

  • The Force is Strong With This One
  • **
  • Posts: 34
Re: Session 10 March 1996
« Reply #7 on: June 03, 2012, 12:11:47 PM »
This transcript looked like it was going to release some valuable information, what a shame!
Logged
Trust your instincts, Always!
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »