Cassiopaean Sandbox > Tickle Me
Men are just happier
Palinurus:
--- Quote from: Approaching Infinity ---It seems to me that G is saying a true human has both the qualities of "man" and "woman", which he listed above. So perhaps in a "true human", the male aspect is the one who writes books, aspires, paints, DOES. It's the active principle, in a male OR a female. The female aspect is the part that already knows everything, the soul essence, the infinite potential, the ground in which aspiration takes root.
--- End quote ---
Couldn't agree more and I take it this must be the ground for a remark of the C's somewhere that gender as such doesn't exist in higher densities, or words to that effect.
Ana:
--- Quote from: Palinurus on March 25, 2012, 09:22:29 PM ---
--- Quote from: Approaching Infinity ---It seems to me that G is saying a true human has both the qualities of "man" and "woman", which he listed above. So perhaps in a "true human", the male aspect is the one who writes books, aspires, paints, DOES. It's the active principle, in a male OR a female. The female aspect is the part that already knows everything, the soul essence, the infinite potential, the ground in which aspiration takes root.
--- End quote ---
Couldn't agree more and I take it this must be the ground for a remark of the C's somewhere that gender as such doesn't exist in higher densities, or words to that effect.
--- End quote ---
I think this is more clearly explained by Laura here, in talking about how the different hemispheres operate and more...
The Wave Chapter 23: Lucifer and the Pot of Gold or The Quest for the Holy Grail of No Anticipation
Palinurus:
Thank you for that link, Ana.
I just refreshed my memory while reading it again and it perfectly fits in here. Thanks again for this reminder, much appreciated.
Nienna:
--- Quote from: truth seeker on March 25, 2012, 08:38:25 PM ---
--- Quote from: daco on March 25, 2012, 02:46:49 PM ---I dont want to support mine own thoughts-reasons, I dont even feel or think that women is inferior it is just when I read some authors I want to understand why someone think in that way. And then I got confused. Then it comes instinctivly feel that some views can be true, but I not accepted it I dont believe in it, that views just stuck somehow in me, it is hard to explain. Without accepting it some of them are in me.
I want to clear one think, for me women is not inferior and it is capable of doing the work. It is just when it comes to philosophers and other authors I just dont understand why they share similiar views and in that sense ponerization is one simple answer to all of that which is not sufficiant because it is too simple. There must be more to it.
--- End quote ---
It's one answer, but it's not "simple". I really think that when you get the opportunity, you should read Political Ponerology. It explains the complexities involved which may help you understand more fully.
Also, we are all ponerized to one extent or another - it's not just you. Understand?
--- End quote ---
Daco, reading the suggested materials in this thread would really help to answer your questions.
Programming is not only done in our dna, it is programming of the mind and emotions from infancy onwards. Reading Caricature of Love will show you how men - and woman - have been programmed by psychopaths to, well basically, hate women. It has been passed down from generation to generation by our parents, friends, relatives and books we read.
Also reading Laura's article on SOTT Witches, Comets and Planetary Cataclysms will really help to show you how women, especially strong women, have been feared and loathed by men and so hunted and gotten rid of.
If you really want to know about these things, then reading the material suggested in this thread is very important. It's up to you to put in the effort to learn.
Laura:
--- Quote from: tom32071 on March 25, 2012, 07:14:12 PM ---The original post in this thread was made as an attempt at humor. I found it humorous and don't see the big deal here. Are the comparisons all true? Not necessarily. Some are, but not all. It is a concept generally held, that's all. Like saying that all blonde women are stupid. It isn't true, but it's a perception that is held by a lot of people.
Like saying that all blue eyed people are smarter than people with eyes of different colors.
Humor can be found in almost anything, but just because something is funny doesn't necessarily make it true and also it doesn't necessarily mean that you actually believe it. :huh:
--- End quote ---
Yes, true enough in the world we have grown up in. Unfortunately, like Bible myths, just having these ideas around means that a whole lot of people will buy into them. MOST people do not have any discernment. We like humor around here, but there are some kinds of humor that just aren't funny to everybody. In this case, fully half the human population on this planet have been subjected to these stereotypes for millennia and frankly, I had enough years ago. I suspect that most of the women on this forum agree with me and the men should be sensitive to that.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version