Esoterica > The Cassiopaean Experiment

Entry and exit point for alternatives realities

<< < (3/7) > >>

Akar:

--- Quote from: NewOrleans on April 08, 2012, 05:22:35 PM ---Frank Tipler was/is an amazing thinker.


Here's a disabled link to get to an article he'd written on parallel universes:

_ http://edge.org/response-detail/2873/what-is-your-favorite-deep-elegant-or-beautiful-explanation


Happy Easter to ya'll.

--- End quote ---

Read the article, very interesting indeed. Started thinking about this and a sentence came to mind, it could be that it is not a spliting of the soul into different parts which take different paths, but more like a cloning process, so a whole "self" replicates itself and then starts a new path.

That reminded me of something that Seth (Jane Roberts, Seth Speaks) mentioned on the books. "He" said he was originally a part of the same entity that Jane Robert was,  then, Seth took on a different path and evolved into the entity that later, started the channeling.
I read the books some time ago, and can't remember the details, but now that situation seems vaguely similar to what we are discussing here.

bngenoh:

--- Quote from: Laura on April 08, 2012, 11:14:32 AM ---
--- Quote from: David Topi on April 08, 2012, 10:14:26 AM ---However, that dream (being significant or not) raised the question, could it be that the exit point is different for each alternated self?
I mean, that someone who died few years ago has not "died" in an alternate reality and keeps going (like the dream I had)?

--- End quote ---

I think so.  If there are alternate selves, they might "check out" at different points on their timelines from yours.  There is actually a very interesting physics paper about this that I read back in 2003 and when I am home and have access to my own computer, I'll look it up and you can read it.  It even talks a bit about how the different "yous" in the different timelines/realities, could possibly influence one another at different significant nodes.  Very interesting stuff.

--- End quote ---
Colinearity is indeed awesome,

When meditating by a creek yesterday, and in the zone of relaxed attention. "I" started thinking about conscience, and how it is like the observer, and how my actions were different whenever a situation triggered conscience. Then the thought came, what if conscience and the observer are the same thing? And what if the observer, when certain conditions are met, can cross over into other realities, and operate there? ie acting as the conscience of that you in that reality. The evidence for this line of thought is that whenever i have found myself in certain kinds of situations, a portal seems to open up inside my mind, and it is a "me" looking at this reality. Since coming in contact with "The Work" though, this state has been consciously cultivated, the effects, especially when a group such as ours are doing this at the same juncture, are interesting to contemplate, osit.

As to this David:

--- Quote from: David Topi on April 08, 2012, 05:13:01 PM ---And so it could mean that there may be no point where all different "fragments" of the soul are reunited ever, each of them keeping ongoing on a different path, so they move and evolve at different rate. A part of me can jump in 4D within a few years (maybe not the one writing this) and another part of me can remain in 3D if that alternated self decided not to do any work on itself.
--- End quote ---
My understanding is that there is a point where one is unified, it is merely a result of working on oneself up to the point where one's awareness is spread out, permeating those different realities with the conscious awareness of you in this one, therefore resulting, for all intents and purposes, in a unification of self.

As to this Solaris:

--- Quote from: Solaris on April 08, 2012, 05:28:53 PM ---Wouldn't your 'point zero' actually just be a smaller subset of all the possible circumstances which result in your birth? What i mean to say is that you are a result of choices made by others, if you assume that your entry point is fixed doesn't that also suggest that their actions were fixed?

--- End quote ---
You are right, the circumstances in those other realities may have us being born at different times & locations, not born at all, etc. So it is not fixed, therefore the possibilities & their dynamics, are quite rich.

mssotelo:
As far as I know, the easier an idea is, the more powerful and elegant it is.

C's said that Time is only a 3D experience but it is unreal at higher levels. So, why is so importante when we were born or in which timeline?

Solaris:
You can know without understanding, but you can't understand without knowing. I think time is as important to us as it is fabricated.

SeekinTruth:
Just a note: the C's tell us that there's no such thing as LINEAR time as we experience it. There is time that we don't fully understand and it is cyclic -- the oldest human conception of time, by the way. In this objective time all instants/moments happen simultaneously -- so, again, no linearity, time is NOT an arrow.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page