NATIVE AMERINDIANS
Reserved for souls most naturally attuned to Earth’s vibrational frequency;
Q: (L) What genetic type were the Atlanteans? A: They were the same as the “Native Americans.” Q: (L) Where else did the (these) Atlanteans go? A: Americas. Inca. Aztec. Maya. Hopi Tribe. Pima tribe
Only a few Jews came to the Americas from Atlantis.
(From a more recent session): Q: (L) What is the source of the Native American Indians? A: Asia. Q: (L) Across the Bering Strait? A: No. Rescued. Transferred. Q: (L) By whom? A: Grays. Q: (L) What were they rescued out of? A: Cataclysm. Q: (L) When did that cataclysm occur? A: 7200 years ago approx. Q: (L) What was the nature of that cataclysm? A: Comets.
Q: (L) Why do some Native Americans believe they come from the Pleiades? A: Where are the Pleiades? Q: (L)Well, near Orion. (RC) Oh, okay. So, they are considering the Pleiades part of Orion. What about Sirius? A: Sirius is confused as a locator because it appears in similar location in the sky in the northern hemisphere. The American Indians were confused in the translation because of similar seeming location due to vantage point.
NATIVE AMERICAN BELIEFS ON “STAR PEOPLE”
Q: Which brings up the subject of Native Americans. A big part of what is being taught by them at the present time is that the aliens, the Grays, and assorted others, are good guys - the “star people” coming here to teach us and to help us advance! They claim that it is a “good” thing to have contacts, abductions, and so on and on. A: No. Corrupted message. Some early contacts were with benevolent STO beings. Q: And now they are confused because they think that the present contacts are with the same beings of the past contacts? A: Close.
MAYANS
STO civilization, but taken by Lizards to cosmos in 4D, “Lizzieland”, ‘many possibilities of what was done to them there by the lizards, not excluding eating them; did not engage in human sacrifice at anytime (unlike the Toltecs, who did at some point); The Mayans were a transitory people who (-se remnants) still exist in the lands that you refer to as Central America. And who have certain physical features that are not consistent with the rest of human beings on 3rd density Earth environment, due to their interactions, in the past, as you measure time, with beings of other density levels, 4th density reptilian STS. Q: (L) Who was Arajuna of Tiahuanaco? A: Well, we believe that you are referring to one of approximately eight hybrids that ruled the area currently referred to as Central America. Hybrids being a 4th density to 3rd density transfer experiment from the Lizard race to the human race, which was abandoned after approximately 240 years of experimentation by the Lizard Beings, due to the lack of success for sustaining physical duplication, or reproduction of the race. It was one of several attempts by the Lizard Beings to directly transmit their souls into 3rd density environment for permanent placement there. And, of course it is no longer perceived as necessary by them because their intention is to rule 3rd density beings in 4th density when they arrive there. Tiahuanaco built by lizards in cooperation with humans, approx 8000 y ago.
SUBSAHARAN AFRICANS
For souls most naturally attuned to earth vibrational frequency (Ed: Similar to Native Americans, Africans are widely believed by most sources to be the first Terran Homo sapiens race, before NA’s);
Hybridization of Nordic genetic template mixed with Neanderthal prototype, in the case of Nubians also East Indian aborigines; Had high civilization in distant past, with assistance from Lizards;
Q: (L) Why have black people, in general, for most of recorded history, been living in such primitive conditions with such primitive mind set? A: Isolation from modern interaction. Due to karma. Punishment for past society which was cruel master hierarchical.
Q: (L) Is there something in the sub-Saharan African genes that makes one tend more toward STO? A: Not really. Q: (L) If not, why does there seem to be a continuing effort to wipe out these groups? Is this simply karma? {To TB} This was asked once before and the response was that it was partly karmic because, indeed, the Black peoples had a high civilization and were cruel masters of slaves. Same deal with the Jews. They are reincarnated Atlanteans and the holocaust was part of the expunging of their guilt for the former destruction of the global civilization.
Blacks are abducted as much as whites by the aliens, but are less aware and discuss these topics less;
NUBIANS
“Caucus”(sic) range origins; blended with East Indian aboriginals. (Ed: The Nilotic subrace of Africans?) (Shijing: “What is unclear from the above is what the other component of the genetic mixing was (presumably African of some sort“).
PEOPLES OF UNSURE ORIGINS
BASQUES
Q: (L) Where do the Basques come from? A: Atlantis. Q: (L) Is their language the Atlantean language? A: Derivative.
MINOANS
Atlantean descendants.
ETRUSCANS
Etruscan alphabet is oldest (out of Greek and Runic also), they were “Templar carriers” as well as “Pentinent Avian Lords”;
Q: Ark suggested that the Etruscans may have gotten their alphabet as a mirror image. Could it be that they lived on the ‘other side’ of the mirror? A: Latter is closer.
OLMECS
Q: Okay, what is the genetic origin of the Olmecs? A: Basically the same as yours. Q: In some of the ancient carvings of the Olmecs, they were always carved with a cleft in their foreheads. Did this represent an actual physical cleft? A: Designation in the art work is for “The Nation of the Third Eye.” Q: Is it the pineal gland? A: May be part of the picture. Q: Is the third eye something one can use to view their reality? A: Ditto. [Ed.: This may indicate that the Olmecs were originally a Caucasoid-Kantekkian race as evidenced by the references to “The Nation of The Third Eye” (See latter chapters) and “same as yours” (referring to the predominantly Caucasian group of Laura et. Al), despite the fact that the statues do exhibit both African and Native Amerindian features.]
“SEMITES” AND MEDITERRANEAN PEOPLES IN GENERAL
Partly a genetic blend of Aryan and Black African templates; Semitic genetic code structure was done approx. 130,000 y/ago -[Q: (L) Are Semites a mixture of Aryan genetics and Negro genetics as I*** and I have theorized? A: Partly. Q: (L) Once before you talked about the "mission destiny profile prior encoding" of the Semitic genetic code structure. Of course, you talked about this being done 130,000 years ago, so that's a long time. But, was that original code structure put into the genetic code of the Black peoples... A: Yes. Q: … to then be spread via their mixture with Aryans - as Semites - into other races? A: Partly. The genetic tweaking of Semites (is the other part).]
Q: What was the connection between the Hyperboreans, including the Celts of Britain, I believe, and the people of Delos? A: Northern peoples were responsible for civilizing the Mediterranean/Adriatic peoples with the encoded secrets contained within their superior extra-terrestrially based genetic arrangement. Practice of which you speak was multi-trans-generational habit.
Q: (L) If races are engineered on earth to be “best suited,” what factors are being drawn from or considered regarding the Semitic race? A: They are not engineered on earth, but in Orion lab as all others. They were “Planted” in the Middle East. Q: (L) Okay, what is it about the Semitic genes that was considered to be so undesirable in the creation of this ‘Master Race?’ A: Would blemish genetic characteristics inclined to ruthlessness and domination. Q: (L) So, you are saying that there is something, some genetic tendency or set of genes in the Semitic type that would counteract this? A: Close Q: (L) Once before you talked about the "mission destiny profile prior encoding" of the Semitic genetic code structure. Of course, you talked about this being done 130,000 years ago, so that's a long time. But, was that original code structure put into the genetic code of the Black peoples... A: Yes. Q: ... to then be spread via their mixture with Aryans - as Semites - into other races? A: Partly. Q: (L) What is the other part? A: Genetic tweaking of Semites. Q: (Galahad) Do the Arabs carry the same anti-Nephilim genes that the Cs once said was in the original Jews? A: Many, yes. Q: (Galahad) Today, do populations outside of those Jewish and Arab communities carry it as well? A: Many.
(also see ARYAN SEMITES and JEWS)
EGYPTIANS/SUMERIANS
Q: (L) Which came first, the Sumerians or Atlanteans? A: Atlanteans- set up outposts in Sumer, later to develop into a continuation culture , derivative of Atlantis. Q: (L) Which came first, the Sumerians or the Egyptians. A: Sumerians. [Note: Cassiopaeans suggest studying (hexagesimal) mathematics system for clues on the (Atlantean) origins of the Sumerians.]
Q: (L) Where did the Egyptians come from? A: Atlantis. Q: (L) Why did the Egyptians draw sideways? A: Atlantean method handed down. Simply artistic stylization. Q: (L) Then did the main Atlanteans move to Egypt when Atlantis was destroyed? A: Yes. And elsewhere. Q: What white men were seen in South America and talked to the tribes there and promised to return one day and were worshipped as Gods. A: Egyptians and Atlantean descendants.
Note: The Cretans were originally Egyptians, who migrated and set up their own version of Egyptian culture on Crete.
HEBREWS/JEWS
Do not stem from any single grouping; genetic construct of joint Atlantean, Sirian, Orion Union and Reptilian efforts (another words various STS factions within the STS chain of command);
Q: (L) Where did the Jews come from? A: Atlantis; Hebrew is an Atlantean language. Genetically engineered and planted in the Mid East 130,000 y/ago, did not maintain any “racial purity” since then;
Hebrews not a separate racial group per se, but are a joint effort genetic construct of Atlanteans and Orion STS (Lizards etc..) for the purposes of further control through the fostering of mistrust and hostility, leading to enslavement and warring. Also accomplished renewed and invigorated 3rd to 4th density “feeding.”
ON THE LEVITES
Q: All right, first question is, what is the origin of the Levites? A: Hittites Moon Worshippers. Q: Well, before the Hittites became Hittites, what were they? A: Indo-Europeans. Q: What was the source of the Indo-Europeans? A: Aryan sub-race.
ARYANS/KANTEKKIANS
“It should be noted that the terms ‘Aryans’ and ‘Celts’ are used somewhat interchangeably throughout the transcripts. ‘Aryan’ seems to be used in the older sense of ‘Indo-European’, whereas ‘Celt’ may be broadly seen as indicating western Europeans, although the term properly refers to a specific Indo-European subgroup. In general, ‘Aryan’ is used as the most inclusive label, although the two are distinguished at one point” (Shijing);
A: difference is geographic and cultural, post arrival difference development. Caucasian is subgroup of Aryan as well as being generally synonymous with ‘European’.
(Aryan prototype is) reserved for souls most aggressive; Only slightly superior to earth races at time of arrival in terms of physical durability, but lost this advantage quickly due to Terran surface environment;
Are latter day Atlanteans, but not the original Atlanteans who were/are Native Amerindians.
Remains of original prototype of “Sons of Anak” ruling over Sumerians (per Sitchin)
The C’s have also indicated that the Aryans received a partial fourth D genetic tweak to produce the Indo-Europeans.
‘NORDIC’ GENETICS
Q: (L) Can you express an opinion about Swedish genes, and any specific properties of these genes? A: Yes. They tend to produce blonds with the greatest of proficiency. Q: (L) Are there any specific properties to those genes that are of specific interest to aliens or extraterrestrials? A: Only that which we have already told you, that this was the last “race” to be seeded on earth in 3rd density.
Q: Are the Kantekkians different from the Celts? A: Only in the sense of long term racial and genetic blending. “Celts” what remains of original prototype, gravity differences accounting for height difference.
NORDIC COVENANT AND RELATED
A:..All persons of Nordic heritage hold secret power centers, can be of darkness, or of light...
NORDIC RELATIONSHIP TO MEDITERRANEAN PEOPLES
Q: What was the connection between the Hyperboreans, including the Celts of Britain, I believe, and the people of Delos? A: Northern peoples were responsible for civilizing the Mediterranean/Adriatic peoples with the encoded secrets contained within their superior extra-terrestrially based genetic arrangement. Practice of which you speak was multi-trans-generational habit.
CELTS
Post Terran arrival difference development caused the Celts to split off from the main Aryan body; “ferocious people” Identified as part of the latter-day Atlantean peoples.
Q: Well, from what you have said in prior sessions, these bloodlines can be of positive or negative orientation, a duality, and that they lead to super-secret power sources. Is that correct? A: Well, the duality is existent concomitantly through all bloodlines, but in the so-called Celts, it is more pronounced, therefore, there are more vivid power cells and centers.
SUPPLEMENT: “ORIGINS OF THE BRITISH”
Q: (Joe) In this study that was done that was investigating why a majority of English have no Celtic genes - they're all Anglo-Saxon - they had two theories. One was that...A: Not "Anglo-Saxon" proper, but Germanic certainly. Q: (Joe) The theory was that the Anglo-Saxon or Germanic peoples came over with the fall of the Romans and they came into Britain. And the ones that stayed established an apartheid society and they essentially outbred the indigenous population. A: Read Laura's book, it is closer to the facts. (L) (L) Oppenheimer’s “The Origins of the British”. He has quite a different thing to say about it.
(From
http://www.isogg.org/wiki/The_Origins_of_the_British)
>>>>The Origins of the British is a book by Stephen Oppenheimer, first published in 2006 and revised in 2007. Oppenheimer argued that neither Anglo-Saxons nor Celts had much impact on the genetics of the inhabitants of the British Isles, and that British ancestry mainly traces back to the Palaeolithic Iberian people, now represented best by the Basques, instead. He also argued that the Scandinavian input has been underestimated.
Oppenheimer uses genetic studies to give an insight into the genetic origins of people in the British Isles and speculates on how to match this evidence with documentary, linguistic and archaeological data to give insights into the origins of Britain, the Celts, the Vikings and the English. Oppenheimer uses DNA databases provided by Weale et al., Capelli et al. and Rosser et al. to provide new analyses of the haplotype distributions in both the male and female lines of the populations of Britain and Ireland (as well as Western Europe).
He breaks down the R1b haplogroup into a detailed set of "clans" that are undefined.
He makes the case that the geography and climate have had an influence on the genetics and culture of Britain, because of coastline changes. These genetic and cultural changes stem from two main zones of contact:
1. The Atlantic fringe, mainly from Spain and Portugal, to the western British Isles
2. Northern Europe, originally across Doggerland to eastern England and from Scandinavia to northern Scotland
Oppenheimer derives much archaeological information from Professor Barry Cunliffe's ideas of the trading routes using the Atlantic from Spain, and from the writings of:
* Simon James (The Atlantic Celts - Ancient People or Modern Invention?)
* Francis Pryor (Britain B.C.: life in Britain and Ireland before the Romans
* John Collis (The Celts: origins, myths & inventions )
* Colin Renfrew, (Archaeology and Language - The Puzzle of Indo-European Origins)
The work of the geneticist Peter Forster has strongly influenced Oppenheimer's linguistic theories. He uses the evidence that the Germanic genetic contribution to eastern England originated before the Anglo-Saxon conquest of much of England incursion to suggest that the possibility that some inhabitants of the isle of Britain spoke English well before the so-called "Dark Ages".
Oppenheimer's main ideas include:
1. The importance of Barry Cunliffe's Atlantic routes to the settling of Britain.
2. Since much British genetic material dates to the re-settlement of Britain following the ice ages, all subsequent invasions/migrations/immigrations occurred on a relatively small scale and did not replace Britain's population.
3. The origins of Celtic culture lie in southwestern Europe. The Central European (La Tène culture) theory for Celtic origins has no basis. Celtic culture arrived in the British Isles before the Iron Age and only involved limited movement of people, mainly into the east of England.
4. There are some differences between the male and female origins of the British population, but these are small.
5. Some genetic evidence is in support of Renfrew's theory that Indo-European origins comes with farming.
6. Genetic evidence suggests that the division between the West and the East of England does not begin with the Anglo-Saxon invasion but originates with two main routes of genetic flow — one up the Atlantic coast, the other from neighbouring areas of Continental Europe. This happened just after the Last Glacial Maximum. There is a cline between east and west, rather than a sharp division.
7. Scandinavian influences, stronger than suspected, may outweigh West Germanic influence.
8. A genetic difference exists between the Saxon areas of England and the Anglian areas. (Oppenheimer suggests that the so-called Anglo-Saxon invasion actually mostly consisted of an Anglian incursion.)
9. English being native to east Britain might explain the lack of Celtic influence on early English and the genetic split between East and West.
10. Classical sources differentiate between Gallic/Celtic and Belgae. Sources state that some of the (northern) Belgae have a German origin. Various archaeological and linguistic evidence make for a weaker case for Celtic presence in Belgium and Eastern England than in Gallic/Celtic or western Britain.
In Origins of the British (2006), Stephen Oppenheimer states (pages 375 and 378):
"By far the majority of male gene types in the British Isles derive from Iberia (Spain and Portugal), ranging from a low of 59% in Fakenham, Norfolk to highs of 96% in Llangefni, north Wales and 93% Castlerea, Ireland. On average only 30% of gene types in England derive from north-west Europe. Even without dating the earlier waves of north-west European immigration, this invalidates the Anglo-Saxon wipeout theory..."
"...75-95% of British Isles (genetic) matches derive from Iberia... Ireland, coastal Wales, and central and west-coast Scotland are almost entirely made up from Iberian founders, while the rest of the non-English parts of the British Isles have similarly high rates. England has rather lower rates of Iberian types with marked heterogeneity, but no English sample has less than 58% of Iberian samples..."
In page 367 Oppenheimer states in relation to Zoë H Rosser's pan-European genetic distance map:
"In Rosser's work, the closest population to the Basques is in Cornwall, followed closely by Wales, Ireland, Scotland, England, Spain, Belgium, Portugal and then northern France."
He reports work on linguistics by Forster and Toth which suggests that Indo-European languages began to fragment some 10,000 years ago (at the end of the Ice Age). Oppenheimer claims that Celtic languages split from Indo-European languages earlier than previously suspected, some 6000 years ago, while English split from Germanic languages before the Roman period, see Forster, Polzin and Rohl.<<<<<<<<
PICTS
White Atlanteans, also of Kantekkian derivation originally, however not “Celts”, as this is a more recent designation
DRUIDS
Early Aryan group;
SOUTH SLAVS
Of Caucasus origin (on Earth)
DANAANS/SCYTHIANS/HITTITES
The Scythians (AKA Danaans) started off from the Caucasus, migrated to China, were driven back west by the Northern Chinese, partially branching off as Hittites (A genetically altered group of Scythians (“Close”) and via Akkad (Sargon was a Scythian) ending up in Egypt eventually.
FINNS/HUNGARIANS
Originally same tribe, from the Carpathian zone originally, but with another possible experimental genetic “tweak”, now a tribal split in transit;
“The Finns and Estonians seem to be almost entirely European, genetically speaking, while the Magyars have a 12 percent Uralic genetic origin. On the other hand, while the Saami are dominantly genetically European, there is still a genetic connection between the Magyars and the Saami. Additionally, the Finnish population is subject to an unusual collection of genetic diseases that are either very rare or entirely unknown elsewhere. This suggests a bottleneck founder event. The explanation then is that a very small group entered Finland about 2,000 years ago where the Saami population already lived. The Saami retreated to the north, but there was obviously sufficient contact for the Finns to learn the Saami language, while still not intermarrying to any great degree. The reason they would have adopted the Saami language would be because, in a hostile environment, they needed to learn the local dialect of the only people who knew how to survive and get around in Finland's maze of lakes, fjords, and forests. In short, just because the Finns and Magyars speak a similar language, doesn't mean that they are genetically close.”
MALTESE
“Close enough”- that they are originally Phoenician.
GUANCHES
Q: So, I was thinking about it and wondering if they were actual Atlanteans, and that the Canary Islands were an intact part of Atlantis, and that the Guanches did not actually travel from anywhere... they were there all along. That the Canaries is an actual area of Atlantis that survived and that the Guanches survived with it. A: Close.
“ARYAN SEMITES”
Q: (L) Once before you talked about the "mission destiny profile prior encoding" of the Semitic genetic code structure. Of course, you talked about this being done 130,000 years ago, so that's a long time. But, was that original code structure put into the genetic code of the Black peoples.. A: Yes. Q: ... to then be spread via their mixture with Aryans - as Semites - into other races? A: Partly. Q: (L) What is the other part? A: Genetic tweaking of Semites. Q: (H) In reading through the transcripts in the 9/11 book, I was confused about the genetic tweak that was made 130,000 years ago. Was that a tweak that was done to all the Semites, so it wasn't only the Jews? A: Question is what is a Semite? Q: (H) You make a remark that this thing with Hitler goes off planet. So was this something that was going on Kantek before it exploded? A: Yes. Q: (H) Did the Semites have a significant role in the collapse of Atlantis? A: Indeed!
Q: (H) So, when we're looking at a replay, we're REALLY looking at a replay! A: Yup. Q: (H) So the real Semites are the Aryans? A:You got it! Q: (L) So that means that the rank and file of Jews that have carried the tradition, the Arabic types, just took on the tradition and carried it and set it back to these Aryan types. They were just intermediaries. (H) Then the genetic tweak, was it made in the Aryan Semites or was it made in the Jews that we know as Jews today? A: Aryan. Reason for destruction of Jews of the "Abrahamic" line.
OTHER INFO, RELATIVE TO ARYANS AND SEMITES
Q: The next thing is the dietary restrictions. Many cultures eat rabbits and pigs, in specific, those of Aryan extraction. The rabbit was sacred to Athena, and the Celts ate a LOT of pork. Yet, here these items are restricted from the diet of the Jews. Is there any relation between the diet as outlined here, and the Aryan genetic tendencies to conquest and domination? A: Trichinosis used to be nonexistent in Aryan types... But, mixing of genetic factors eliminated this. Q: So, the Jews were susceptible to trichonosis, and the Aryans were not? A: Originally. Q: So, it was necessary for the Jews not to eat the pork, but not for the Aryans, and the mixing caused susceptibility. In a general sense, are strong Aryan genetics indicative of the necessity for the consumption of meat? A: In a sense, but pescadorial features substitute semi-adequately. What needed to be added so that the substitution would be not just semi-adequate, but totally adequate? A: Iron/protein levels. Q: So, it is the iron that the Celts need? Well, that brings me to the next question: In all the Celtic folklore when they talk about ‘fairies,’ which are obviously other density beings very similar to our modern ‘Gray alien,’ these fairy/slash aliens insist that no iron come near them in any way. It was also said that bringing iron into contact with someone thought to be a ‘changeling’ would prove whether or not they were because if they were, they would disappear instantly. Also, the instructions for the building of the Temple of Solomon included restrictions on the use of iron in either the preparation of the materials or the putting together of the building itself, even down to the rejection of the use of iron nails in any part. What is the significance of this restriction on the use of iron by these other density beings, whoever they are? A: Bloodline trails. Q: If it was necessary for the Aryans to have iron... okay, maybe the iron is something that interacts... A: What about iron as an element? Q: Okay, let’s see: Iron - derived from early Celt ‘iserno,’ via Illyrian ‘eisarno’ from the IndoEuropean base ‘eis,’ which means to ‘move vigorously; strong, holy.’ It is a white, malleable, ductile, metallic chemical element that can be readily magnetized, rusts rapidly in moist or salty air, and is vital to plant and animal life; it is the most common and important of all metals, and its alloys, as steel, are extensively used. Symbol: Fe; atomic weight: 55.847; atomic number: 26; specific gravity: 7.86; melting point: 1535 degrees Centigrade; boiling point 3,000 degrees C. The electron shells are thus: 2,14,8,2. Iron is an element of blood, hemoglobin, and is easily magnetized... there is some new work about iron and magnetite in the brains of people who are psychic or have ‘abduction’ experiences... is it the magnetism? A: Yes.... Q: Is it something that holds one more firmly in 3rd density, and the elimination of it enables one to switch densities... or... A: Tis magnetite that acts as a conduit, and perhaps, just perhaps, allows for transference back and forth at will?!? And what about the legend about the alchemists? Is not the key term there really transformation?!? And has not the “smoke screen” really been delivered so effectively by all the concentration upon the substance?!? And does not this remind one indeed of all the misguided concentration upon substance rather than meaning that one finds so regularly on 3rd density?? Q: I get it! So, it is the magnetite in the body, that collects and holds the charge, and it has absolutely nothing to do with an external substance at all! Is that it? A: You are getting “warmer.” Q: Am I right, we need more iron for magnetite, or am I completely off base here?
A: You are right, but, do not underestimate the significance of that just delivered! What better deception than to divert the meaning of alchemy, by focusing upon substance, then addicting those souls bound to 3rd density to the substance? Q: Okay, it is the magnetite that acts as a conduit. And the concentration is upon the substance, that is, the magnetite. Let me conjecture that the thing that is believed to be distilled out of the alchemical operations is magnetite, is that correct? A: No, because no need, if not deceived by other efforts.
Q: …during the time Neanderthal man was on the Earth, did he live alongside Modern man? A: Yes. Except modern type man was different then. Q: In what ways? A: DNA and psycho/electrical frequencies. Q: Does this mean that their physical appearance was different from what we consider to be modern man? A: Radiance. Q: Oh, that's interesting. Well, there are legends that the Northern people had "light" in their veins. Very ancient belief. Is this what you are referring to? A: Maybe. Q: Was this light related to the hemoglobin level, the iron level in the blood? A: Maybe. Q: Did they have a much higher iron level in their blood? A: Possibly.... Q: One of the interesting things about this Northern civilizational factor is that one of the hallmarks of the Aryan attitude is the Male dominated religion. When did the masculine religion "take over?" Was this always the tendency or leaning of the Aryan group? A: Involves more than religion. Religion is the facilitator. Q: Facilitator of what? A: Customary psycho/social habitue. Q: Customary to whom? A: Those whom you refer to as Aryans. Q: Where did they acquire the "habit" of a masculine oriented religion? Everybody else was worshipping the goddess in one form or another. But this male dominated theology was the distinguishing characteristic of the Northern peoples. Where did they come up with this. A: Originated on home planet. Q: Kantek? A: For all intents and purposes. Q: Was it this male dominated religion that contributed to the destruction of Kantek? A: No. Q: Okay, when they were on their home planet, why did they develop a masculine religion as opposed to a feminine one, considering the fact that women are the source of life, in certain terms? A: In your density, masculinism/feminish is essentially a roll of "the dice." Remember, at higher levels gender is nonexistent. Q: The Aryans always thought they were better than everybody else... A: They were more advanced than the company they found themselves amongst. Q: But then, as far as I can tell, the Hebrew monotheism is also derived from the Aryan, monotheistic, male dominated religion. It then "fathered" Christianity, and that has been the whole patriarchal, kill-em-all and let God sort-em-out war mongering thing under which we have lived for over 2000 years. This is the Western, European mind... it came from the Aryans, from the North; it was the so-called "civilizing" influence in nearly every respect that you can track. The cohesiveness and dominance of this type of thinking was able to civilize, but then civilization involves dominance, killing, war, territory, the Hitler scene, the whole nine yards. All of this is antithetical to all that you promote as far as being desirable. Yet, you have said that you were in contact with the Northern Peoples for millennia. Yes, Cassiopeia is a Northern Constellation, and probably figured in the early myths of these peoples in ways we cannot know, but the whole thing is that they represent all that is STS. (A: But not all of them, some STS were much as Laura et al today) Q: Point taken. I am just having a hard time with this. I wish you would just tell me! Who interacted with these Aryans to give them this male-dominated, monotheistic idea that they then sought to impose on every other human being on the planet - and are STILL trying! A: Interactions were transdensity.
ORIENTALS/ EAST ASIANS/ SE ASIANS/ POLYNESIANS
Reserved for souls most advanced; previous hybridization from 7 genetic code structures of Orion Union, designed to best fit the earth climate and cosmic ray environment then existent on earth; Originally from Lemuria (Pacific off S. America), Language phylum corresponding most directly - Austric;
TIBETANS
Origin is Asia;
AUSTRALOIDS/ MIXED DESCENDANTS OF PARANTHAS
“Australoid is a broad cover term for people in the southwestern Pacific area who have dark skin, frizzy hair, broad noses, and other features. They include native Australians, natives of Papua New Guinea, Melanesians, and the Negritos of places like the Philippines, Andaman islands, and southern India (where they were probably more numerous in prehistory). The two language phyla which correspond to this group are Indo-Pacific and Australian.” (Shijing); Paranthas were antecedents of today’s Australian aborigines as well as New Guinea and the Dravidic components of India, Pakistan and Sri Lanka, but with genetic mixing and dilution over time.
INDIAN SUBCONTINENT
Blue skinned people in Vedas were white Aryans, but perceived as “blue” relative to and by local brown population; Aryans invaded India 8243 y/ago, where Asian tribes and Neanderthal prototypes were already present.
GYPSIES
Gene spliced of an alien race, humanoid and Atlantean drone workers(were a slave race controlled by crystal); slaves of dark forces (human-reptilian brotherhood); gypsy cohesiveness is due to genetic based programming and mind control;
SUPPLEMENT: EDGAR CAYCE ON “ROOT RACES”
(From:
http://www.kheper.net/topics/Theosophy/root_races.html)
(CASSIOPAEANS ON EC’S TEACHINGS ON THE ROOT RACES BEING BASICALLY CORRECT: “CLOSE”- ) (Ed. note: It is not clear whether these root races refer to the various ancestors of today’s terran races, or if these are the actual alien races which contributed to the various mixtures you find on earth today)
The Theosophical Root Races
In the fractal divisions of Theosophy each stage and cycle and plane is divided into seven subdivisions of the same. This goes for the evolutionary cycles of man as much for everything else. If then we take the Earth globe (era) of the present evolutionary or cosmic Round, this is made up of seven great Racio-Spiritual divisions, called "Root Races", which represent the recapitulation of the Rounds as a whole. These are as follows
1) Polarians, 2) Hyperboreans, 3) Lemurians, 4) Atlanteans, 5) Aryans, 6) 6th Root Race, 7) 7th Root Race
The first root race was primarily spiritual (Astral/Etheric), and did not leave physical remains. The second (tee Hyperborean) were also non-physical (etheric).
The Lemurians were the first with physical bodies. They were described as a race of three eyed giants and inhabited a "lost continent" of Lemuria which is where the Indian and Pacific oceans now are. Modern theosophists identify Lemuria with the actual ancient supercontinent of Palaeos comGondwana.The Atlanteans are generally considered to have had great occult and/or technological powers, and inhabited the lost continent of Atlantis, which was destroyed due to their abuse of psychic powers or whatever (the versions of this late 19th/early 20th century myth of hubris and the arrogant Atlanteans, given by Blavatsky, Leadbeater, Steiner, A. Bailey, Edgar Cayce, and others all differ in detail). The survivors became the present fifth or Aryan race.
The Atlantean Root Race consisted of the following sub-races
1) Rohmahls, 2) Tlavatlis, 3) Toltecs, 4) First Turanians, 5) Original Semites, 6) Akkadians, 7) Mongolians
It was from the 5th sub-race of Atlanteans, known today as the Semites, that the first Aryans emerged (not the rigid symbolism, the 5th subrace becomes the 5th race), migrating to India and producing what was known in those distant times as the Rama Empire. According to one interpretation they were rivals to the Atlanteans in the leadership of the ante-dilluvian World and it led to a war between the two empires, including ancient nuclear warfare.
The Fifth Root Race - the Aryan
According to Theosophical doctrine we are presently at the fifth stage, referred to as the Aryans. A few words about this term. Ethnologically, the Ayrans (the word means "noble" in Sanskrit) were the original Indo-European nomadic tribesmen, a war-like race of horsemen that moved east to India and West into the near East and Europe. Feminist historians argue that when they got to Europe they destroyed the peace-loving earth-wisdom pagan matriarchal societies and replaced them with war-like sky-god worshipping patriarchal societies such as we still have today.
The constituent "sub-races" of the Aryan (5th or present) race are as follows
1) Hindus, 2) Sumerians, 3) Egyptians, 4) Hellenes, 5) Europeans, 6) Nova men, 7) ?
These exact same stages were used by Rudolph Steiner as the seven culture periods of the Post-Atlantic (current) era. The 6th race constitute a new coming racial expression, which will demonstrate a group consciousness and telepathic rapport, high intelligence and intuitive skills, combined with numerous other qualities. This formulation, very innovative and forward looking when it first appeared, now seems very dated, as the future of nanotech, cyborgs, genetic engineering, transhumanism and the Singularity seems like drastically overtaking any theosophical version of a coming race.
_________________________________________________
____________________________________
TERRAN LINGUSITICS SINCE THE ARRIVAL OF KANTEKKIANS:
“A: The roots of all languages are identical... Q: What do you mean? A: Your origin. Q: You mean Orion? A: Interesting the word root similarity, yes? A: The architects of your languages left clues aplenty. And, you have the rare opportunity to learn far more of this by being taught to speak and understand other languages. WE suggest you work to penetrate the STS implanted resistance in this area. Q…For example: the first letter of the Greek alphabet is alpha, which has the ‘a’ sound, and the first letter of the Elder Futhark is a rune with an ‘f’ sound. However, they both claim to represent ‘cattle,’ or ‘movable’ goods...”
*Many thanks to Cassiopaea Forum moderator ‘Shijing’ for doing the footwork and putting this section together for us, the current editor just reworded and reorganized what Shijing took the time to put together.
For more information please go to:
http://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php?topic=13982.0*. All quotations in this section are directly from Shijing.
Map 1: Language phyla of the world (Greenberg) (
http://starling.rinet.ru/maps/maps20.php?lan=en)
AFRICANS
“The African group, which is located in sub-Saharan Africa, is represented primarily by Nilo-Saharan and Niger-Kordofanian. The third and southernmost group, Khoisan, is notable for their small stature and click languages.”
NATIVE AMERINDIANS
Language Phyla most closely corresponding: Amerind and Dene-Caucasian :
“It can be seen comparing the maps above that Dene-Caucasian was likely spoken more extensively to the north, but it was overrun by Eurasiatic (a Nostratic subgroup), possibly as a result of the speakers of the latter being in a position to take advantage of the land freed up by retreating glaciers after the last ice age.
Based on recent work by Vitalij Shevoroshkin, it is starting to look like Amerind and Dene-Caucasian may have a closer relationship with each other than was previously realized, but it is still too early to say for sure. “
ARYANS/KANTEKKIANS
(Eurasiatic branch of Nostratic)
“The Kantekkians have been associated with Nostratic, which includes Dravidian (Ed.: ???), Kartvelian, and Eurasiatic (which itself includes Indo-European, Uralic, Altaic, and the Paleosiberian languages Gilyak (Nivkh), Ainu, Chukchi-Kamchatkan, Eskimo-Aleut)” Q: (L) If Nostratic is a valid linguistic unit, does it essentially represent the original language of the Kantekkians? A: Yes Q: (L) Okay, does it essentially represent the original language of the Kantekkians? A: Half, the other half belongs to earth. There was blending at a very early stage. “So the C’s basically say that Kantekkians spoke pre-Nostratic, and that what can be reconstructed as Nostratic using data from the languages of Earth is essentially a heavily creolized form of the language that includes a significant component from the languages being spoken on Earth (probably in Atlantis) at the time. A tentative hypothesis would be that the language phylum Nostratic was most-heavily influenced by was Dene-Caucasian, which includes languages spoken primarily by people with a north Asian phenotype (but also Caucasian in Europe and Amerind in North America).”
Q: (L) Okay. So the next question is: The putative Nostratic speakers in East Asia include the Asians that I think were the original shamans which I've discussed in Secret History and elsewhere, Altaic speakers in particular. So if this is the case, and if Nostratic as a linguistic group can be correlated with an original population from Kantek, does that mean that both the early shamans of East Asia and the circle-people of Europe (with the pyramid people further south) have their origins on Kantek? A: Yes. Q: (L) And does the difference in phenotype between the two groups indicate admixture of the East Asian Kantekkians with a more native group that was already on Earth? A: Yes. And notice the ongoing dispute over the "out of Africa" versus the "out of Asia" groups. It is an improper assumption. Out of Kantek vs. out of Earth is a better formulation. “So it looks like what happened is this: The Kantekkians were transferred to the area in and around the Caucasus when first brought to Earth, and it is still in that area that you find the greatest concentration of their original phenotype (light-haired, light-skinned, blue-eyed). They proceeded to conquer all of what we know today as Europe, and at the same time spread eastward. They entered what is now Asia and intermixed with the ethnic group that was already there (speakers of Dene-Caucasian, and probably related to the group known today as the Native Americans); they also entered India, intermixing with an Australoid group related to the earlier Paranthas.”
NOTE: When the philologists track the language roots, they arrive at the Kurgan region, north and west of the Caucasus. Where Celts/Aryans/Kantekkians went after Atlantis was destroyed.
INDO-EUROPEAN
“When Indo-European (Aryan) languages are asked about, Germanic is given as the most conservative subgroup“: Q: (L) Is there any language in existence today that is descended from the Aryan language? Or, that has remained more similar in development from Indo-European? A: Yes. All Germanic. Q: (L) Is Celtic considered to be one of these? A: Yes. (“Celtic is normally considered a separate Indo-European subgroup from Germanic, so if the above is not in error, one possible interpretation is that the conservative group being indicated is the one which includes both of these groups as well as Italic “)
Sanskrit has Atlantean roots and is the oldest surviving (spoken with an unbroken tradition) language on Earth today.
AFROASIATIC LANGUAGES (SEMITIC AND HAMITIC)
“Afroasiatic (which includes Semitic) is considered to be a sister of Nostratic”:
“So if the Semites are considered ‘Aryan’, (see ARYAN SEMITES) it implies that they are originally Kantekkian, meaning that the connection of Afroasiatic to Nostratic (mentioned above) is valid. It is also quite interesting that the Semites played ‘a significant role in the collapse of Atlantis’ and that ‘they were the reason for the destruction of the Jews of the “Abrahamic” line’. Aramaic, a Semitic language, is also asked about, confirming an Aryan connection”: Q: (L) Who were the original inhabitants of the city of Jericho? A: Aramaic. Q: What bloodline are we talking about here? A: Aramaic/Aryan. Q: Are you saying that the Jews are Aramaic/Aryan? A: No. Jews are not bloodline categorizable, per se Q: (RC) Okay. If Aramaic was ancient Hebrew, was it the language spoken in Atlantis? A: No.
MISC.
Q: I am tracking the clues through the various languages and alphabets. I would like to know which of these alphabets, Runic, Greek, or Etruscan, preceded the others, and from which the others are derived? A: Etruscan. Q: Well, who were the Etruscans? A: Templar carriers.
Q: The other thing I noticed about the word ‘Isis’ is that it can be slightly altered to make ‘I Zeus.’ And, Perseus can be ‘per Zeus’ and Persia can be made to say ‘per ziu.’ One of the oldest etymological roots for the word ‘God’ is ‘ziu’ from which we get ‘deu.’ These all represent the English traslation of ‘for God,’ with Perceval being ‘per ziu val’ or ‘strong for God.’ Could you comment on these relationships? A: Interconnected by trilingual learning curve.
Q: (L) I want you to translate for me this phrase: Enuma elish lanabu shamamu. A: All are seen together. Q: (L) Translate: Apsu. A: Life. Q: (L) Nudimmud. A: World. Q: (L) Marduk A: Mars. Q: (L) Kingu A: Light. Q: (L) Duggae A: Ground. Q: (L) What is the Enuma elish really about? A: Ascent. Q: (L) Ascent of what? A: Gods. (Lizards) Q: (L) How many planets did the Sumerians know about? A: They thought 12. Q: (L) What is a “tablet of destinies”? A: Map. Q: (L) What did it mean when it said “putting Tiamat’s head into position?” A: Mars conjunct Moon. Q: (L) How did Tiamat’s head form the “hammered bracelet”? A: Comet trail.
_________________________________________________
____________________________________
“ORGANIC PORTALS” AND PSYCHOPATHY
GENERAL
Q: ..Is trying to analyze the speech pattern of psychopaths vs. non-psychopaths something that would prove fruitful? A: It can be done. But there are easier ways. A: Observation coupled with instinct.
The new plan in order to create a breeding ground for the reintroduction of the Nephilim, since the 3rd Reich failed, is to introduce psychopaths and “cull” non-psychopaths;
STATISTICS ON PERCENTAGE OF PSYCHOPATHS TO TOTAL POPULATION BY COUNTRY
6.5% of the entire world’s population are clinical psychopaths; Of this, 1.7% (within the 6.5) are female, which are actually more dangerous than the male variety;
23% USA
14% United kingdom
42% Israel (The highest percentage of any contemporary country- In the 18th century it was the Low Countries at 9%- most of these (genetic lines) emigrated to the US and South Africa)
13% Netherlands/ Low Countries (contemporary)
10% France
17% Russia
3% Ethiopia
2.6% Spain
0.9% China
0.6% Samoa (the lowest percentage of any country, relative to the total population)
THE SPECIFICS…
Q: We have recently been working with some material from Boris Mouravieff. We can see many relationships between that work and so many of the clues and hints scattered throughout the C's transmissions. What seems to be important is his information about the Centers - three lower and three higher that are not "seated" in the body. Then, he talks about the difference between "A" influences and "B" influences, and the necessity for assimilation of "B" influences in order to fuse the "magnetic center" which then enables the soul - or higher centers - to "seat" in the body. Is the information from Mouravieff about these matters fairly accurate? A: Not just fairly. It has been preserved from the time of the "Fall." Q: Mouravieff says that there are two kinds of humans - he calls the "pre-Adamic" and "Adamic," (discussed in book III). The idea is that pre-Adamic human types basically have no "soul" nor any possibility of growing one. This is a pretty shocking idea, but there have been recent scholarly discussions of this matter based on what seems to be clinical evidence that, indeed, there are human beings who are just "mechanical" and have no "inner" or "higher self" at all. [See: "Division of Consciousness"] Gurdjieff talked about this and so did Castaneda. Are these ideas Mouravieff presents about the two basic TYPES of humans, as far as they go, accurate? A: Indeed, though again, there is a "Biblical Gloss." Q: Mouravieff says that the "pre-Adamic" humans do not have the higher centers, nor the possibility of developing them in this cycle - which we assume to be the Grand Cycle you have previously described, the length of which is around 300,000 years. Is this an accurate representation of "pre-Adamic" beings? A: Yes, they are "organic" portals between levels of density. Q: Based on what Mouravieff has said, it seems to be so that any efforts to try to raise the consciousness of such individuals is doomed to fail. A: Pretty much. Most of them are very efficient machines. The ones that you have identified as psychopaths are "failures." The best ones cannot be discerned except by long and careful observation. Q: (V) Have I, or anyone in this room, ever encountered any, and if so, can you give us an example for reference? A: If you consider that the population is equally distributed, then you will understand that in an ordinary "souled" person's life, that person will encounter half as many organic portals as souled individuals. BUT, when someone is in the process of "growing" and strengthening the soul, the Control System will seek to insert even more "units" into that person's life. Now, think of all the people you have ever met and particularly those with whom you have been, or are, intimate. Which half of this number would YOU designate as being organic portals? Hard to tell, eh? Q: (BT) Is this the original meaning of the "pollution of the bloodline" that the Bible talks about? A: Yes.
(On accusing people of being OP’s without careful consideration) A: Now, do not start labeling without due consideration. Remember that very often the individual who displays contradictory behavior may be a souled being in struggle. Q: (L) I would say that the chief thing they are saying is that the really good ones - you could never tell except by long observation. The one key we discovered from studying psychopaths was that their actions do not match their words. But what if that is a symptom of just being weak and having no will? (A) How can I know if I have a soul? A: Do you ever hurt for another? Q: (V) I think they are talking about empathy. These soulless humans simply don't care what happens to another person. If another person is in pain or misery, they don't know how to care. A: The only pain they experience is "withdrawal" of "food" or comfort, or what they want. They are also masters of twisting perception of others so as to seem to be empathetic. But, in general, such actions are simply to retain control. Q: (A) What does having a soul or not having a soul have to do with bloodline? A: Genetics marry with soul if present.
Q: Do "organic portals" go to fifth density when they die? A: Only temporarily until the "second death."
{This refers to an esoteric tradition teaching that some consciousness units dissipate over a period of 40 days after death unless the individual has crystallized an individuated soul.} Q: (V) What is the "origin" of these organic portal human types? In the scheme of creation, where did they come from? A: They were originally part of the bridge between 2nd density and 3rd density. Review transcripts on the subject of short wave cycles and long wave cycles.
Q: (L) ….the life force energy that is embodied in Organic Portals is something like the soul pool that is theorized to exist for flora and fauna. This would, of course, explain the striking and inexplicable similarity of psychopaths, that is so well defined that they only differ from one another in the way that different species of trees are different in the overall class of Tree-ness. So, if they don't have souls, where does the energy come from that recharges Organic Portals? A: The pool you have described.
Q: Does the recharging of the souled being come from a similar pool, only maybe the "human" pool?
A: No - it recharges from the so-called sexual center which is a higher center of creative energy. During sleep, the emotional center, not being blocked by the lower intellectual center and the moving center, transduces the energy from the sexual center. It is also the time during which the higher emotional and intellectual centers can rest from the "drain" of the lower centers' interaction with those pesky organic portals so much loved by the lower centers. This respite alone is sufficient to make a difference. But, more than that, the energy of the sexual center is also more available to the other higher centers.
Q: (L) Well, the next logical question was: where does the so-called "sexual center" get ITS energy?
A: The sexual center is in direct contact with 7th density in its "feminine" creative thought of "Thou, I Love." The "outbreath" of "God" in the relief of constriction. Pulsation. Unstable Gravity Waves. Q: Do the "centers" as described by Mouravieff relate at all to the idea of "chakras?" A: Quite closely. In an individual of the organic variety, the so-called higher chakras are "produced in effect" by stealing that energy from souled beings. This is what gives them the ability to emulate souled beings. The souled being is, in effect, perceiving a mirror of their own soul when they ascribe "soul qualities" to such beings.
A: No. The "sexual center" corresponds to the solar plexus. Lower moving center - basal chakra; Lower emotional - sexual chakra; Lower intellectual - throat chakra; Higher emotional - heart chakra; Higher intellectual - crown chakra; Q: (L) What about the so-called seventh, or "third eye" chakra? A: Seer. The union of the heart and intellectual higher centers. {Laura's note: This would "close the circuit" in the "shepherd's crook" configuration.}
Q: (L) So work on the self in different incarnations - assuming one is not an organic portal - can be cumulative? You can pick up where you left off if you screw up? A: Yes. To some extent
Q: (L) Okay, now we have a couple of questions we want to get to here. You said before that OP's were originally intended as a bridge between second and third densities and that they were used. Is Mouravieff right about the potential for OP's to advance being dependent upon souled beings advancement to STO at the end of this cycle? A: Not exactly. A soul imprint can grow independent of the cycle. However, it is more likely for a soul to "grow" when interacting with 4th Density STO. STS tends to drain energy for its own use.
A: It means that "souls" run in families for the most part. Thus a souled, and we mean "potentially fully souled, individual is likely to encounter and interact more with other souled humans. However, when awakening, they may encounter even more OP's. Q: (L) So they tend to run in families so they can have aberrations. Or a family that's mostly OP's could have an occasional souled human, which they don't know what to do with. And, in the same way, a family of mostly souled people could have an occasional OP, or a line of them that pops up in the family every now and then. But for the most part, people with souls marry people with souls unless there is some danger of them awakening in which case there's special situation where they insert OP's into their lives. But I would say that in a general sense what they're saying, and y'all can correct me if I'm wrong here, is that, what, water seeks its own level, so to speak. Q: (L) So in other words, the people who noticed that remark were right, and the way I took it was wrong. Okay, another question, are there other types of soulless beings more than those reanimated or remolecularized dead dudes and OP's? Is there such things as holographic projection beings running around on the planet at this point and time? A: In a sense, you are all "holographic" projections. But to answer the question, it is rare.
Q: (L) So what makes any one us susceptible to that kind of resonance so that chemistry can completely overwhelm or trigger emotions that have no matching response? How can we protect ourselves against that? A: It is indeed difficult because such creatures are amazing mimics, yes? Q: (L) How many people are born without emotional centers? Are they born that way? A: Yes Q: (L) How many people like that are on the planet? A: Many. Quite often authoritarian types. Q: (Ark) What is the advantage for someone having no emotions, some not evident advantage? A: Easily become tools of intrigue. (Perceval) Is not having an emotional center the same as being a psychopath? A: Not exactly, but close. Q: (Andromeda) Does he feel any emotions? A: Not what you call true emotions. But you haven't experienced the full range either. Most of what you experience is chemical, though there is a true emotional component. You are still the "princess in the tower" kept captive by the dragons set to keep you captive. Q: (L) What are the dragons? A: Fear and distortions of your emotional center programmed into you in childhood. You bit the apple and fell into a trance. Q: (Andromeda) Not permanently though, right? A: True love conquers all. But chemicals usually only feed the dragon; at least as long as the dragon is master. Q: (Ark) This lack of emotional center, is this to some extent genetic? A: Yes. Q: (Ark) How it comes to... like every second generation, or father to son, or what? A: Mother to son. If father is "the son" and marries one like himself, it can also manifest in a daughter. Q: (Perceval) Is that similar to psychopathy? (L) Pretty close, yeah. Can you grow an emotional center if you don't have one? A: No. Q: (G) Is it like a malignant narcissist? A: Close. Do not underestimate the ability to mimic and to also generate bodily resonance. A creature without an emotional center is quite a "thing", eh? Q: (Mr. Scott) They keep saying "creature". That's really freaky. (Perceval) Is someone without an emotional center very susceptible to being possessed or "walked into"? A: No. What self-respecting "spook" would want to eat at a restaurant that serves food made of air? Like stone soup before the neighbors came. Q: (L) In other words, possession is a quality [process] of eating emotions. There have to be emotions. (Andromeda) What drives them, then? A: Pure "nature". That's why there is so strong a bodily resonance. In a strange way they are more closely connected to the "divine stuff" of creation than you are. The sex center is directly connected with that heavy sleeping matter that just "loves to be loved" and creative. Q: (Andromeda) What exactly is bodily resonance? (L) Is it something like limbic resonance? A: Close but not exactly. It is similar to a forced vibration. When a creature with those properties is in proximity to wounded or weakened prey they can force the weakened body to their own frequency. Imagine a violin that has no music emanating. Then imagine some primitive string stretched taut. When it is plucked strongly, it doesn't matter how the violin is tuned. It will respond, and produce distortions of its true sound. Call it a "crime of opportunity" with other forces plucking his string. A one note samba, no doubt.
Organic portals more susceptible to Multiple Personality Disorder; Q: (L) Okay, can multiple personality disorder or dissociative identity disorder be induced in a souled individual or one who is potentially souled? A: Yes, but it is extremely difficult. Q: (S) Does that mean that all these programmed assassins are all OPs or something? A: Most likely. Q: (DD) You hear stories about children of military families that are inducted into this and taken at a very early age... A: What kind of genetics do you think you are dealing with in "military families?" Q: (L) That leads me to my next question. You've said that psychopaths are defective OPs? A: Yes Q: (L) Well, how do they get to be defective? I'm trying to figure out how to ask this... Are they defective because they're born that way? A: Yes Q: (L) Are they defective because of something that happened in their childhood? A: Sometimes... Q: (A***) Were they engineered that way somewhere along the line? A: Some are engineered especially lately. But in general it is genetics due to mutation. Q: (L) Okay, so if it's due to a mutation, when did the original mutation occur? A: More than one occasion, but first time was fifty thousand years ago. Q: (L) Is it true that psychopaths... well, we know they appear in the population at a certain percentage. Do they increase at various times in history so that they grow more numerous and kind of take over the planet and create a lot of destruction, and in creating this destruction, do they destroy themselves or reduce their own numbers significantly, kind of like populations of rabbits and foxes or something like that? A: Very similar, yes. Q: (L) Is there anything to my idea that the present strain of psychopathy comes from a crossing between Neanderthal and Aryan types in Europe or in Asia somewhere? A: One strain, yes. But not all psychopaths. Q: (L) What particular strain would come from the crossing of the Neanderthal and the Aryan cross? A: The kind with the drive to destroy. [(from C Forum) “I think that the Cs meant that all earth races were created combining Neanderthal, Nordic (in general, not necessarily Kantekkians) and other different types from Orion, to create the different earth phenotypes. Which is different than the direct mixing of Aryans with Neanderthals that produced one strain of psychopaths which had the drive to destroy. “] Q: (L) Could some cases of multiple personalities be where more than one spirit essence resides in the same body? A: Can be. Q: (L) So if it's a case of possession acting as MPD, then it would be with a souled person, is that correct? A: Yes (CASES BY EXTREME TRAUMA ARE VERY
