SOTT > Suggest an Article for SOTT - and Discuss
Father Kills Pedophile Molesting his Daughter
Ana:
--- Quote from: forge on June 14, 2012, 04:30:50 PM ---
--- Quote from: anart on June 14, 2012, 02:59:43 PM ---
--- Quote from: forge on June 14, 2012, 11:20:03 AM ---
--- Quote from: loreta on June 12, 2012, 08:36:19 AM ---I think he did good. How can you abuse a child of 4 years? How this is possible! If a pedophile would do the same to my daughter maybe I would kill him. Because how can you abuse a child of 4 years and be free? You are a parasite if you do things like that.
--- End quote ---
If you have or somebody in the family has a young child, do not leave it in the care of a male acquaintance or kin for babysitting no matter how good you know them. Trust women only. I would be extremely wary during "guest visits" and family come together events and would not let my even child be touched by males appearing surprisingly kind, "fatherly", amiable toward the child and young or older males amazingly "good with children". These males can seemingly play well and seem very well understand children - especially if the child is 3-4 years young. I saw two teenagers 12 and 14 years of age during my career, who seemed super-good with children, turned out to be dangerous sexual-psychopaths, like the one killed in this case. They have always found the young to corrupt.
--- End quote ---
forge, that's ridiculous. Decent men do exist. Indecent women exist. How is a child supposed to learn to bond with men if he/she is shielded from interacting with any of them? The Law of Three, forge - do you remember it?
--- End quote ---
Pondering on how to resolve the consequences of abuse in the past - from the perspective of the Law of Three - I can only see one way out. There was even a podcast about it with the priest talking about transformation of torture victims. So i could figure only this:
In the torrents of fire, flood or violent earthquake mechanical humanity may have a chance to understand all Three Forces at the moment of becoming a martyr - extreme suffering - ,reaching the transformation-stage of the torture-victim. People were reported to change at that stage in the podcast. Without extreme suffering however I can see no change, no way out for this society. Remembering increasing entropy nowadays, i think this society strongly needs and attracts extreme suffering by cataclysm.
I'm only different from mechanical people of having studied the Laws of the Work to a degree and understanding some little, I am willing to follow to an extent.
Therefore:
As consequences of abuse in the past, strikingly similar to the events of the topic article without the killing - i'm willing to move toward the middle of the Pendulum by not swinging to the extreme.
Not carrying out fully what the Father did. Making our pedophile abuser*, - conceptually of course in the sphere of thought revolving about this topic -, (he being alive and well and not having been seen court yet regards his many numerous sexual abuses i know of), *so leaving him perfectly able to think (head unchanged) but rearranging his body, all tendons joints and bones to never be used again so that he lives on, and experiencing his changed physical state all the time for long long years.
I cannot accept the judges authority - Holy Reconciling Third force - yet. Where a
* plaintiff and defendant have their case resolved only through a judge.
* Flour and water become bread only when bonded by fire.
I can't make bread here yet.
Unable to reconcile, just as my signature shows.
--- End quote ---
Forge I really find it difficult to extract any substance from your post, Do you want to make an effort to read again Anart's point, think about it forgetting what the priest said, and use a direct, clear and concise communication to convey your response?
cassandra:
Forge, I think you have to be very careful who you let your kids be with, but you can't just lock them up.
You have to teach them to be assertive, if they feel any way uncomfortable about anyone, even family members, or any situation, they should feel free to come back home, even if they should seem bad-mannered in doing so. Also they should report anything untoward and be vocal.
I make it clear to others that I am very close to my kids, will always back them up if they need my help, and they can talk to me about anything.
SAO:
I agree that the law of 3 is important - it's the only way to avoid making bad decisions that do not reflect reality. I think it should be a given that we shouldn't leave our kids with anyone we don't know very well. For that reason I'd not trust baby sitters whom I don't know and are just doing it for money. But if you know someone, man or woman, who you know to be caring, loving, and genuine, then that should be the important factor, not their gender.
In the case of the article, I think killing the person is a bit overboard, but a good beating is probably warranted. And I agree, not in front of the child, although you could "start" the confrontation in front of the child - verbally, so the child sees that what this man did was not ok, that you are not ok with it, which would help them to keep that in mind if ever this situation occurs again. Then, after taking the other person away from the child, you could express your anger a bit more violently.
But then it would help to talk to your child about the experience and explain, if possible, what happened and why - catering the explanation to their level of development.
Jason (ocean59):
--- Quote from: anart on June 14, 2012, 02:59:43 PM ---
--- Quote from: forge on June 14, 2012, 11:20:03 AM ---
--- Quote from: loreta on June 12, 2012, 08:36:19 AM ---I think he did good. How can you abuse a child of 4 years? How this is possible! If a pedophile would do the same to my daughter maybe I would kill him. Because how can you abuse a child of 4 years and be free? You are a parasite if you do things like that.
--- End quote ---
If you have or somebody in the family has a young child, do not leave it in the care of a male acquaintance or kin for babysitting no matter how good you know them. Trust women only. I would be extremely wary during "guest visits" and family come together events and would not let my even child be touched by males appearing surprisingly kind, "fatherly", amiable toward the child and young or older males amazingly "good with children". These males can seemingly play well and seem very well understand children - especially if the child is 3-4 years young. I saw two teenagers 12 and 14 years of age during my career, who seemed super-good with children, turned out to be dangerous sexual-psychopaths, like the one killed in this case. They have always found the young to corrupt.
--- End quote ---
forge, that's ridiculous. Decent men do exist. Indecent women exist. How is a child supposed to learn to bond with men if he/she is shielded from interacting with any of them? The Law of Three, forge - do you remember it?
--- End quote ---
Thank you for saying this anart. People trust me with their children regularly - and as a male I take pride in honoring those commitments and responsibilities with the proper level of reverence and respect that all children deserve. It is a great responsibility, and a trust I could never even dream of betraying. Certainly I'm not the only one out there.
griffin:
Reading the news report, it seems the father struck the molester while trying to get the girl away from him. That's a different circumstance than those that have been conjectured about here. It falls under the man protecting his daughter, and no grand jury in the country will indict him for it.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version