Esoterica > The Cassiopaean Experiment

A comparison of channeled sources

(1/2) > >>

abeofarrell:
Recently I have been reading the Ra material and also the Law of One material.  Although there are many similarities in content with the C readings, I felt there is a big difference in the communication style.

The Ra material almost feels as though it is coming from a robot, or an alien for that matter (which it is, right?).  The communication is very rigid and feels almost translated.  Kind of reminds me of how the Men in Black (not the movie) were supposedly talking.

The Bringers of the Dawn book is certainly encouraging, but at the same time I feel like the style of communication the source uses is too much like a modern American (too casual maybe?).  Does this mean that too much of the channel is coming through in the communications?  I guess that is unavoidable as she channeled the source alone, right?  I find it hard to accept some of the content too, such as motherships beaming love from around the Earth, etc.

The Cassiopea source however uses very natural communication but at the same time it is formal, even intellectual. It is very believable to me that they are indeed "Us in the Future" as they say as they talk like advanced humans. They are very direct when they need to be and also do not waste time when it is better for the team to research it themselves.  The C readings are very readable and contain a good balance of science and esoterica so I always feel that they have served me both mentally and also spiritually.

I am sure this has been discussed countless times, but I just wanted to express my appreciation for the Cassiopea Experiment, both to the Cs themselves and also to the team.  Thank you again.

Akar:
I read an article from Michael Topper (If i remember correctly, in one of the Thunderbird publications) analyzing the strange way that Ra communicated via Carla. It was argued that it was not so the source that was having "problems" with our language (after all, Ra is also a 6D complex memory entity, same as the Cs, and the last ones do not have any problem in using everyday plain English language) but in fact the limitations within Carla, her mental structures or the way she had for working with the kind of concepts Ra was transmitting.


Laura has had some contacts with Carla, so she may know much better why that difference between a seemingly same level of entities transmitting via two human channels. Think also that while Laura and team use a board, Carla was departing her body, in trance, and Ra was channeling directly through her, maybe this accounts for some of the complexity and differences as well.


I have read the Law of One twice in the last years, the first time was very hard, the second time I understood many concepts (I just met the Cs recently so Ra was my primer source for quite a long time), and the third time, which I have just started again with book 1, many concepts seem terribly logical and easy (but after having read Laura's book and countless others recommendations). 


I have the feeling you need to take it easy with Ra if it is the first time you read the books, same with Michael Topper, they are no light weights in the metaphysical literature!

Akar:
and btw! now that I am rereading the first book of the Law of One, in the intro they quote several transmissions of an entity names Hatonn. This forum showed several results implying that it is more non-sense and another new-age-asthar-command figure, however, the couple of transmissions quoted in the book intro appear to have a good level of information explaining pretty much the same that Ra explains later about the harvest, jump to 4D, cosmic changes, etc.


Wonder if that entity did a few "good" channelings and then was corrupted or it just happen that the book quotes only the few excerpts that pretty much make sense?




pd I was trying to quote the text, but I do not know how to copy-paste it from kindle!

Palinurus:
Hi to both of you,

Just in case you wouldn't be aware of it, the following topic gives an overview of evaluations of channeled sources:

http://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php?topic=14234.0

As to the Ra material specifically, the following numbers from that list are important:

#13 part 1:  http://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php?topic=3886.0
#13 part 2:  http://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php?topic=3977.0
#20:  http://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php/topic,7490.0.html

Other materials here:

http://www.cassiopaea.org/cass/cassiopaeans_ra_wanderers.htm
http://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php/topic,6873.0.html

Hope this helps a bit.

Psalehesost:

--- Quote from: Akar on August 02, 2012, 02:20:43 PM ---I read an article from Michael Topper (If i remember correctly, in one of the Thunderbird publications) analyzing the strange way that Ra communicated via Carla. It was argued that it was not so the source that was having "problems" with our language (after all, Ra is also a 6D complex memory entity, same as the Cs, and the last ones do not have any problem in using everyday plain English language) but in fact the limitations within Carla, her mental structures or the way she had for working with the kind of concepts Ra was transmitting.

--- End quote ---

This part of The Wave addresses the question in the same way: http://cassiopaea.org/2010/05/12/the-wave-chapter-10-the-truth-is-out-there-but-trust-no-one/


--- Quote from: Akar on August 02, 2012, 02:26:24 PM ---and btw! now that I am rereading the first book of the Law of One, in the intro they quote several transmissions of an entity names Hatonn. [...] Wonder if that entity did a few "good" channelings and then was corrupted or it just happen that the book quotes only the few excerpts that pretty much make sense?

--- End quote ---

Another possibility, because the name does not equal the entity: Any entity (of a kind below 6D) can jump into a modern-day uncritical channeler and claim to be anyone or anything, including any other channeled entity.

Regarding early Hatonn (and other entities communicated with by them at that time) sessions: I read through some of the pre-Ra sessions (as available here: _http://www.llresearch.org/transcripts/transcripts_toc_year.aspx ) before, and the quality is very variable, much of the content being on the fluffy side. If you filter out the fluff, you can find some good bits and pieces in there - at the cost of wading through a lot of text of little use.

In short, on the whole it's "mostly harmless". However, the very first session (which happens to be one with Hatonn - as in Hatonn the original from the 70s) is pretty good and, I think, at least read-worthy. It concerns the lack of maturity of humanity, and the true meaning of maturity. It was channeled through Don.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page