trendsetter37
The Living Force
Here is the link: _http://www.starburstfound.org/downloads/physics/cosmic-ether.pdf
Dr. Laviolette does a really good job of explaining some holes in current scientific understanding. This includes 12 verification (opposed to Einstein's Relativity theory which had 3) that have since been published by different scientist around the world. I'm currently making my way through his book and I must admit that it contains moments in every chapter. Let me know what you think.
Verifications (excerpt from the paper)
[list type=decimal]
[*]The prediction that the electric field in the core of a nucleon should be configured as a radially periodic
Turing wave pattern of progressively declining amplitude, and that a charged nucleon should have a Turing
wave pattern whose core electric potential is biased relative to the background electric potential (LaV,
1985b, 2008b).
[*]The prediction that the universe is cosmologically stationary and that photons passing through intergalactic
regions of space should progressively decrease their energy, that is, that photons should continually
undergo a tired-light redshift effect (LaV, 1985c, 1986).
[*]The prediction that photons traveling within galaxies should progressively increase their energy, that is,
blueshift their wavelengths, and consequently that the luminosity of planets and red dwarf stars should be
due to energy being spontaneously generated in their interiors (LaV, 1985c, 1992).
A: Gravity center of planet is also "window" to all other density levels and dimensional planes of existence, which is why electrically charged atoms "ground" in order to pass on to other planes through gravity binder.
A: Remember the "center of the sphere" is a window.
Q: (Ark) Center of the sphere... Now again, you mentioned long ago Mandelbrot, in fact you spelled it strange like "Mandlebrot" while normally people say "Mandel"... So I was looking for years for this Mandelbrot, and I thought it was fractals, and this was a good beginning. But I still don't know what Mandelbrot has to do with the center of the sphere because it must be somehow connected to windows, too. Hint?
A: Emergence from the center. The surface is where "things happen" and where the fractals coalesce.
(Thought) Also make me think about how neutron decay would emit electrons from the center, to which those electron form orbitals that resemble geometric patterns and/or fractals.
The prediction that the luminosity of brown dwarf stars should be due to the photon blueshifting effect
described in (3) (LaV, 1985c, 1996, 2010).
[*]The anticipation of the Pioneer effect; the prediction that a spacecraft maser signal transponded through
interplanetary space should be observed to blueshift its wavelength at a rate of about one part in 1018 per
second (LaV, 1985c, 2005).
[*]The prediction that blue supergiant stars rather than red giant stars should be the precursors of supernova
explosions (1985c, 1995).
[*]The prediction that galactic core emissions should come from uncollapsed matter-creating stellar masses
(Mother stars), rather than from matter-accreting black holes (LaV, 1985c).
[*]The prediction that stars in the vicinity of the Galactic center should be massive blue supergiant stars as
opposed to low mass red dwarf stars (LaV, 1985c).
[*]The prediction that galaxies should progressively grow in size with the passage of time proceeding from
compact types such as dwarf ellipticals and compact spirals to mature spirals and giant ellipticals (LaV,
1985c, 1994).
[*]The prediction that a monopolar electron discharge should produce a longitudinal electric potential wave
accompanied by a matter repelling gravity potential component (LaV, 1985b, 1994).
[*] The prediction that the speed of the superluminal gravity wave component of a monopolar electron
discharge should depend on the potential gradient of the discharge (LaV, 2003, 2010).
[*]The prediction that inertial mass should decrease with a rise of G potential or with an increase in negative
potential, and should increase with the reverse polarity (LaV, 1985b)
[/list]
Also linked below.
Edit: Attachment is too large :(
Super Edit: Also gave a good possible explanation on the mechanism by which quantum entanglement takes place as well as the intertwining function of electric potential and gravity.
Dr. Laviolette does a really good job of explaining some holes in current scientific understanding. This includes 12 verification (opposed to Einstein's Relativity theory which had 3) that have since been published by different scientist around the world. I'm currently making my way through his book and I must admit that it contains moments in every chapter. Let me know what you think.
Verifications (excerpt from the paper)
[list type=decimal]
[*]The prediction that the electric field in the core of a nucleon should be configured as a radially periodic
Turing wave pattern of progressively declining amplitude, and that a charged nucleon should have a Turing
wave pattern whose core electric potential is biased relative to the background electric potential (LaV,
1985b, 2008b).
[*]The prediction that the universe is cosmologically stationary and that photons passing through intergalactic
regions of space should progressively decrease their energy, that is, that photons should continually
undergo a tired-light redshift effect (LaV, 1985c, 1986).
[*]The prediction that photons traveling within galaxies should progressively increase their energy, that is,
blueshift their wavelengths, and consequently that the luminosity of planets and red dwarf stars should be
due to energy being spontaneously generated in their interiors (LaV, 1985c, 1992).
A: Gravity center of planet is also "window" to all other density levels and dimensional planes of existence, which is why electrically charged atoms "ground" in order to pass on to other planes through gravity binder.
A: Remember the "center of the sphere" is a window.
Q: (Ark) Center of the sphere... Now again, you mentioned long ago Mandelbrot, in fact you spelled it strange like "Mandlebrot" while normally people say "Mandel"... So I was looking for years for this Mandelbrot, and I thought it was fractals, and this was a good beginning. But I still don't know what Mandelbrot has to do with the center of the sphere because it must be somehow connected to windows, too. Hint?
A: Emergence from the center. The surface is where "things happen" and where the fractals coalesce.
(Thought) Also make me think about how neutron decay would emit electrons from the center, to which those electron form orbitals that resemble geometric patterns and/or fractals.
The prediction that the luminosity of brown dwarf stars should be due to the photon blueshifting effect
described in (3) (LaV, 1985c, 1996, 2010).
[*]The anticipation of the Pioneer effect; the prediction that a spacecraft maser signal transponded through
interplanetary space should be observed to blueshift its wavelength at a rate of about one part in 1018 per
second (LaV, 1985c, 2005).
[*]The prediction that blue supergiant stars rather than red giant stars should be the precursors of supernova
explosions (1985c, 1995).
[*]The prediction that galactic core emissions should come from uncollapsed matter-creating stellar masses
(Mother stars), rather than from matter-accreting black holes (LaV, 1985c).
[*]The prediction that stars in the vicinity of the Galactic center should be massive blue supergiant stars as
opposed to low mass red dwarf stars (LaV, 1985c).
[*]The prediction that galaxies should progressively grow in size with the passage of time proceeding from
compact types such as dwarf ellipticals and compact spirals to mature spirals and giant ellipticals (LaV,
1985c, 1994).
[*]The prediction that a monopolar electron discharge should produce a longitudinal electric potential wave
accompanied by a matter repelling gravity potential component (LaV, 1985b, 1994).
[*] The prediction that the speed of the superluminal gravity wave component of a monopolar electron
discharge should depend on the potential gradient of the discharge (LaV, 2003, 2010).
[*]The prediction that inertial mass should decrease with a rise of G potential or with an increase in negative
potential, and should increase with the reverse polarity (LaV, 1985b)
[/list]
Also linked below.
Edit: Attachment is too large :(
Super Edit: Also gave a good possible explanation on the mechanism by which quantum entanglement takes place as well as the intertwining function of electric potential and gravity.