How is it possible not to send any distress signals when crashing a large airplane from high altitude? I wonder if something instakilled the electronics perhaps.
Khalsa said:
This media cover-up of the increase in cometary activity by conflating it with military missiles lends an almost prophetic tone to the following text written in 1996:
Victor Clube said:
The problem is that, unlike conventional missiles, cometary bodies, because of their electric activity, have a strong electromagnetic signature that can trigger lightning bolts between incoming asteroids and the Earth’s surface that can fry electrical devices over a wide area. One naturally wonders if this is related to the media frequently reporting, since around 2008 , on the development of electromagnetic pulse (EMP) weapons by the USA , Israel , China , South Korea and the usual suspect, Iran. The source mentioning the development of Iranian EMP weapons specifically states the following:
Shamah said:
Because of the protection provided by our atmosphere, an overhead cometary explosion is a far more probable event than a direct impact and could easily be mistaken for an “above-atmosphere detonation”. And the EMP generated by such an explosion could, of course, be blamed on the ‘Iranian EMP missiles’. In addition to ‘disguising celestial intentions’, a cover story about Iranian EMP weapons would provide a casus belli for the US and Israel to attack Iran.
Theoretical peak electric field induced by a high-altitude electromagnetic pulse. Burst height is 75 km. (© Metatech corp.)
The recent series of ‘disclosures’ about new EMP weapons is all the more suspicious because the prime generators of electromagnetic pulses are nuclear weapons. This effect was already suspected by the time the Manhattan Project’s Trinity Test in the desert of New Mexico on July 16th, 1945 detonated the first atomic bomb. Their electronic equipment had been shielded because project scientist Enrico Fermi had predicted that an EMP would accompany the explosion. By the 1960s, the EMPs generated by nuclear explosions and their disruptive effects on electronic and electric equipment was being extensively measured and documented. Put simply, nuclear weapons are EMP weapons, an established fact for over half a century. Why then does the media depict EMP bombs as a ‘newly discovered’ weapon? Why all this fuss about half a dozen countries suddenly developing EMP bombs around the same time?
Another phenomenon is an apparent spike in unexplained surface-level explosions, one sub-set of which is explosions or fires at industrial plants. There were nearly 40 such hazardous incidents, including five at fertilizer plants, just between April and August 2013.
Before investigations are even begun, official explanations invoke similar causes each time: chemical reactions, accidents, defective equipment, human error, etc. However, one might wonder if cometary discharge or impact may be the cause for at least some of these explosions and fires. The illustration below shows how an industrial plume can act as an attractor for cometary discharge:
Electric interactions between a meteor and a plant. (© Sott.net)
A (left illustration): A meteorite enters the atmosphere. Its (relative) positive charge pulls negative charges (free electrons) up from the plant and the metallic chimney. Those electrons are captured by the low-mobility smoke particles of the plume, making even more negative the charge of fumes that are already loaded with negative ions. A positive meteor and a negative plume would attract each other.
B (center illustration): When the electric charge difference is high enough and/or the distance small enough, a massive discharge would occur. An ascending lightning bolt (upwards electron transfer) might directly connect the chimney and its plume to the meteor.
C (right illustration): The lightning bolt leaves an ionized and negatively charged atmospheric trail that attracts what remains of the meteor towards the vicinity of the plant. Note that the meteor may have fragmented before reaching the ground.
Astronomers expected the encounter to be a trivial event. “You won’t see anything. The comet crash will probably amount to nothing more than a bunch of pebbles falling into an ocean 500 million miles from Earth.” Then came the encounter and an about face. As reported by Sky & Telescope, “When Fragment ‘A’ hit the giant planet, it threw up a fireball so unexpectedly bright that it seemed to knock the world’s astronomical community off its feet…”
The Hubble Space Telescope (HST) detected a flare-up of fragment ‘G’ of Shoemaker-Levy long before impact at a distance of 2.3 million miles from Jupiter. For the electrical theorists this flash would occur as the fragment crossed Jupiter’s plasma sheath, or magnetosphere boundary.
‘Impact’ of fragment ‘G’ of comet Shoemaker-Levy on Jupiter. (© Siding Spring telescope)
