Recently there was this Sott.net article:
Funny how mainstream science sees Supernovae as a destructive cataclysms. If in this case they got it backwards too (as with almost everything else, e.g. diet), then Supernovae may be rather the opposite, an intense form of Creation. In any event, the new star was confirmed to be indeed a Supernova:
So, it seems we had 3 Supernova discoveries in just a month, whereas the first article says that there are usually only 10 per year (I couldn't find confirmation of this given freuqency). This reminded me of a C's exchange:
Maybe "Energy is pouring into your universe from higher densities" is an explanation for increased Supernova observations?
Also, the remark about the explosion being nearer than given is interesting in relation to the Electric Universe theory, which includes the idea that the redshift (which is used to calculate distance) is a function not (only) of an expanding universe, but of electrically charged space and/or interstellar plasma ("tired light"). If the latter holds true, then redshifted objects may indeed be closer than they appear.
http://www.sott.net/article/276623-Possible-Nova-pops-in-Cygnus said:Possible Nova pops in Cygnus
To see a nova is to witness a cataclysm. Astronomers - mostly amateurs - discover about 10 a year in our Milky Way galaxy.
...
Nishiyama and Kabashima [note: those are Japanese observatories] are on something of a hot streak. If confirmed, this would be their third nova discovery in a month! On March 8, they discovered Nova Cephei 2014 at magnitude 11.7 (it's currently around 12th magnitude) and 10th magnitude Nova Scorpii 2014 (now at around 12.5) on March 26. Impressive.
Funny how mainstream science sees Supernovae as a destructive cataclysms. If in this case they got it backwards too (as with almost everything else, e.g. diet), then Supernovae may be rather the opposite, an intense form of Creation. In any event, the new star was confirmed to be indeed a Supernova:
_http://www.astronomy.com/news/sky-events/2014/04/a-new-nova-shines-in-cygnus said:On March 31 at approximately 19h UT, two Japanese astronomers, Koichi Nishiyama, of Kurume and Fujio Kabashima of Miyaki, reported the discovery of a possible nova. The pair had seen the magnitude 10.9 object on two 40-second unfiltered exposures they captured with a CCD camera attached to a 105mm f/4 camera lens.
Approximately seven hours later, at 2h40m UT April 1, astronomers Gianluca Masi, Francesca Nocentini, and Patrick Schmeer at the Virtual Telescope Project imaged the region with a pair of remotely controlled telescopes. They provided optical and spectroscopic evidence that the new object was, indeed, a nova.
So, it seems we had 3 Supernova discoveries in just a month, whereas the first article says that there are usually only 10 per year (I couldn't find confirmation of this given freuqency). This reminded me of a C's exchange:
Laura said:A: What do you think about the ”new” explosion 3 to 4 billion light years away? They think, that is.
{Here it seems the Cs are referring to recent news of an explosion that is going on in the center of a small galaxy said to be 3.8 billion light-years away. See:
http://www.tgdaily.com/space-features/55258-bizarre-cosmic-explosion-observed
http://www.technewsworld.com/story/Cosmic-Fireworks-Erupt-When-Black-Hole-in-Dragons-Belly-Swallows-Star-72239.html
“Astronomers say they have never seen anything this bright, long-lasting and variable before. Usually gamma-ray bursts mark the end of a massive star and emission from these events never lasts more than a few hours. But radiation from the blast continues to brighten and fade from the location a week after the explosion.”
And: “Rather than the short-lived gamma-ray bursts typically associated with the death of a massive star -- most last no more than a few hours -- this explosion continues more than a week later to emanate pulses of high-energy cosmic radiation for an effect that's brighter, longer lasting, and more variable than scientists have ever seen.”}
Q: (L) Are you saying that it’s not as far away as they’re saying it is?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) What is it representing? What is it doing?
A: The wave has begun in earnest!
Q: (L) What do you mean?
A: Energy is pouring into your universe from higher densities.
Maybe "Energy is pouring into your universe from higher densities" is an explanation for increased Supernova observations?
Also, the remark about the explosion being nearer than given is interesting in relation to the Electric Universe theory, which includes the idea that the redshift (which is used to calculate distance) is a function not (only) of an expanding universe, but of electrically charged space and/or interstellar plasma ("tired light"). If the latter holds true, then redshifted objects may indeed be closer than they appear.