Supression of information...

fluxed

The Force is Strong With This One
The suppressed history of planet earth

Is the true history of planet earth being suppressed?

There are many archaeological finds which don't get recognised because
they don't fit into the official establishment record of how life on earth evolved.
Why is this? What are they trying to keep hidden?

It can only be presumed that there is some history that they don't want
people to know about. In other words, we are being lied to about the
real history of planet earth.

Like the burning of the library at Alexandria, keeping the public in the dark
has come to be a feature of our current world rulers. It could almost be
presumed that there is information that would cause a loss of control
and power to manipulate reality outcomes if known.

_http://members.iimetro.com.au/~hubbca/archaeology.htm



Egypt is the key to our history.
 
Just curious. Have you read any of Laura Knight-Jadczyk's works?
 
Nienna said:
Just curious. Have you read any of Laura Knight-Jadczyk's works?

Just had a quick look and she seems to be going down the occult road
and is relying on pagan methods, to enter into communication with these E.T's.

Lots of masonic themes if you ask me and connections to the genepool
of royalty.
 
I think i know why our history has been supressed; truth = royal SHAME.

The royal ancestors were pagan and each family branch sponsored state paganism.

Paganism rendered royalty as divine and superior.
It rendered us as inferior and superstitious, causing the brain to experience
mild schizophrenia.

Pagan royalty wanted us proto-schizophrenic, to aid
them in warfare and empire expansion.[invasion]

How did we fall for this proto-schizophrenia?

It was royalty told us they were related to gods
and we should talk to the gods.
Royalty told us what to do, say, sacrifice.
The famous prophet exposed royal paganism
so they were forced to act - christianity.
Paganism was then outlawed.
Today, schizophrenia is a remnant of evil royal
intentions, along with the confusion of why its
happening in the first place.
When we were all proto-schizophrenic[pagans], there
was no confusion because we were all in the same
boat.
Its all about intensity of symptoms today, which may suggest
ancestors of modern schizophrenics were very involved in
witchcraft or the priesthood [negative/violent acts ]
All of us exhibit some symptoms such as superstition
, religion, patriotism, naivity and im sure there are more.
 
Fluxed, I think there's a good chance you walked into the wrong forum, which is based on the work of Laura Knight-Jadzyck and the research of surrounding team. You seem to have a fixed narrative thing going on with royalties and 'paganism', which Laura has written about and has been discussed extensively over the years, so unless you have reasonable data to qualify your beliefs then you are only adding noise.
 
fluxed said:
I think i know why our history has been supressed; truth = royal SHAME.

The royal ancestors were pagan and each family branch sponsored state paganism.

Paganism rendered royalty as divine and superior.
It rendered us as inferior and superstitious, causing the brain to experience
mild schizophrenia.

Pagan royalty wanted us proto-schizophrenic, to aid
them in warfare and empire expansion.[invasion]

How did we fall for this proto-schizophrenia?

I am not sure what your point is Fluxed, but I would venture to say that what you are describing here is the process of ponerization, and it doesn't come down to the citizens from royalty, but from psychopaths who hold positions of power in a community/state.

Have you read the book, Political Ponerology: A Science on the Nature of Evil Adjusted for Political Purposes? It will help you understand the process. It will also help you to learn about these things in their proper terms, and provide you references too.
 
Fluxed,

One of the things that is important on this forum is the concept of External Consideration which has to do with taking others into account when acting (you can read more about it here: http://glossary.cassiopaea.com/glossary.php?id=40&lsel=E).

In this thread other forum members have taken the time to reply to your thread and given comments that they believe are important to be aware of if you want to be a contributing part of this forum.

It would be externally considerate to reply to their comments. Alternatively, demonstrating that you have read and understood the comments would also be fine. It would seem to me that you have both ignored replying to the comments of Parallel and Alana and continued posting subjective beliefs in other threads which is counter to the goal of this forum.

Many people come to this Forum and discover that it's different from what they'd expected. Some find that it's not to their liking and leave and others value the mirroring and feedback given from other forum members and use this forum as part of their path to personal development. Whether you chose one or the other is entirely up to you but as Parallel said, at the moment you're just adding noise.

I am not saying this to insult or upset you but rather to make the distinction clear.

I hope you'll benefit from all the Work being done on this forum and contribute to it in the best way possible.
 
fluxed said:
Nienna said:
Just curious. Have you read any of Laura Knight-Jadczyk's works?

Just had a quick look and she seems to be going down the occult road
and is relying on pagan methods, to enter into communication with these E.T's.

Lots of masonic themes if you ask me and connections to the genepool
of royalty.

So you have not really read any of her material. If you had, you would find that none of what you wrote above is true. Just for your information, she is not "going down the occult road", nor is she "relying on pagan methods", nor is she "into communication with these E.T.s".

She happens to be the owner of this forum. Her channeling of the Cs has always been, in her words, 10% inspiration and 90% perspiration, which means that everything is researched that can be researched. The rest is just theory. Nothing is taken as fact until it can be collaborated with research.

As mentioned above, you may have walked into the wrong bar. You seem to be here to pass on your opinions of what you believe rather than reading what is here already on this forum. Maybe it would better suit you to start your own blog and write down your beliefs and if anyone follows along the same lines of thinking as you, they can then read your blog?

As Alana has said, psychopaths are who are, and has been, causing the problems we are, and have been, dealing with. There is a lot here on this forum about psychopaths, also, the book that Alana suggested you read quite clearly describes a lot about psychopaths and what we are dealing with today.
 
Parallel said:
Fluxed, I think there's a good chance you walked into the wrong forum, which is based on the work of Laura Knight-Jadzyck and the research of surrounding team. You seem to have a fixed narrative thing going on with royalties and 'paganism', which Laura has written about and has been discussed extensively over the years, so unless you have reasonable data to qualify your beliefs then you are only adding noise.

Both myself and Laura ask the same questions.

Taken from her website...

'For millennia the knowledge of the true nature of reality has been denied
to humanity. Religion has offered false hopes and beliefs about the plight
of humanity and science has divorced itself from what it means to
be truly human. In a world where science and spirituality have ceased
to complement each other in the search for meaning, we are still left
pondering the questions: What is it to be truly human? Why is the
world in the state it is? Why is there evil? Is our way of life the best
one possible? What is the reality of higher worlds? And most importantly,
what can be done to better ourselves and humanity?'

http://cassiopaea.org/

I have researched the above questions and have ample evidence to show
the source of pagan religion and the development of it.
Paganism was the cause of degradation of mankind and supression
of information and drive behind the class system, leading to the above
questions.

I have studied Northern mythology which mirrors the African, only
adapted to the northern geography / climate.

I simply state here that royalty worshipped the pagan gods first,
then the people.

Could you please direct me to Laura's research of the pagan religion?
 
Alana said:
I am not sure what your point is Fluxed, but I would venture to say that what you are describing here is the process of ponerization...

Thanks Alana, your associating my research with ponerization
is apt, but long words turn people off

Telling people the truth in laymans terms is the better option.

Alana said:
.....and it doesn't come down to the citizens from royalty, but from psychopaths who hold positions of power in a community/state.

Alana, have you researched kingship ? If not, the above is premature.

Why also, would you disconnect royalty from the psychopathic mind above?

Do i need to post examples of the royal psychological profile - i think we all
know they are psychopaths, beyond any who live in society.

Seems strange why you should protect royalty from this mindset????
 
From what you quoted, fluxed, the religions Laura was talking about is Christianity, Judasim and Islam.

If you want to know what this forum is about, a good place to start is with the Wave series that can be read for free here. Also, a lot of what is also on that site would give you a good understanding of what this forum is about.

From what research is showing, Jesus Christ is a myth built on Julius Caesar and his life.

It seems to me that you read things and then turn them around until they fit your narrative of what you believe. If you can't get them to fit, you discard them.

So far, the fact that you keep posting the same things over and over in different threads are bordering on spam. If you are not inclined to understand what this forum is about, you may want to go to some other forum where your ideas will be more accepted.
 
Alana said:
I am not sure what your point is Fluxed, but I would venture to say that what you are describing here is the process of ponerization...

Thanks Alana, your associating my research with ponerization
is apt, but long words turn people off

Telling people the truth in laymans terms is the better option.


Alana said:
.....and it doesn't come down to the citizens from royalty, but from psychopaths who hold positions of power in a community/state.

Alana, have you researched kingship ? If not, the above is premature.

Why also, would you disconnect royalty from the psychopathic mind above?

Do i need to post examples of the royal psychological profile - i think we all
know they are psychopaths, beyond any who live in society.

Seems strange why you should protect royalty from this mindset????


PONEROGENIC ASSOCIATIONS

"In any society in this world, psychopathic individuals and some of the other
deviant types create a ponerogenically active network of common collusions,
partially estranged from the community of normal people... Their sense of
honor bids them to cheat and revile that ‘other’ human world and its values
at every opportunity." (Lobaczewski, 138)

“We could list various names ascribed to such organizations… gangs,
criminal mobs, mafias… which cunningly avoid collision with the law while
seeking to gain their own advantage. Such unions frequently aspire to
political power in order to impose their expedient legislation upon societies
in the name of a suitably prepared ideology, deriving advantages in the
form of disproportionate prosperity and the satisfaction for their craving of power.” (Lobaczewski, 158, emphasis added)

"Gangs have always provided great opportunities for young psychopaths.
Their impulsive, selfish, callous, egocentric, and aggressive tendencies easily
blend in with - and may even se the tone for - many of the gang's activities.
Indeed, there cannot be many other activities that produce so many
rewards for violent psychopaths, with such impunity." (Hare, 176)


http://ponerology.com/evil_2b.html


The above clearly points out GANGS - the first of which was pharaohs gang.

All later sociological problems arised from this first gang mentality.

Royalty is the ultimate gang with the ultimate oath.
 
Nienna said:
From what you quoted, fluxed, the religions Laura was talking about is Christianity, Judasim and Islam.

Has she posted any research concerning paganism?

My research suggest all above religions appeared in the same geographical
and cultural context.
This creation of Islam and Christ religions, owes much to the jews
who owe their culture and genes to Pharaoh and his culture.

Pharaoh worshipped a god called Amen - 'the god of the lifted hand'.
Moses lived alongside pharaoh, so must have known about Amen.
Then the jewish nation formed. Then the above two religions.

All three religions honour Amen, for ever and ever. Say no more.


Nienna said:
From what research is showing, Jesus Christ is a myth built on Julius Caesar and his life.

Egypt is the root, the Roman empire a later shoot and Scandanavia a leaf.
From Scandanavia came the Normans[German, Viking, French etc..]

Horus existed long before Christ or Caesar, please check the
connections showing Horus and Ptah are the original christ models.

'The Jesus-legend Traced In Egypt For Ten Thousand Years..'
http://www.wisdomlib.org/egypt/book/ancient-egypt-the-light-of-the-world/d/doc6949.html

Nienna said:
It seems to me that you read things and then turn them around until they fit your narrative of what you believe. If you can't get them to fit, you discard them.

I see the opposite happening, to be honest.
I come here only to post my findings and much of what i see
from Laura such as the new world order and the beast, correlates
with my less symbolic findings.

Nienna said:
So far, the fact that you keep posting the same things over and over in different threads are bordering on spam. If you are not inclined to understand what this forum is about, you may want to go to some other forum where your ideas will be more accepted.

Laura repeats 'the lizzies' - should we discard it, if it is repeated?

I personally think all this lizard stuff is global spam, distracting people
from the human alien and earth royalty collaboration.
 
Nienna said:
So you have not really read any of her material. If you had, you would find that none of what you wrote above is true. Just for your information, she is not "going down the occult road", nor is she "relying on pagan methods", nor is she "into communication with these E.T.s".

Was i wrong in reading that she uses the Ouija board to contact the Cs?

Nienna said:
She happens to be the owner of this forum. Her channeling of the Cs has always been, in her words, 10% inspiration and 90% perspiration, which means that everything is researched that can be researched. The rest is just theory. Nothing is taken as fact until it can be collaborated with research.

Non of what i relay concerning kingship is theory because royalty
always prides itself in recording family history.
Where i reference Egypt; the Egyptian culture remains preserved
thus factual conclusions ,afforded.

I rely not on others[Cs] to direct me. I direct myself.
And i source factual records for substance.

Yet people are quick to undermine my position here.


Nienna said:
As mentioned above, you may have walked into the wrong bar. You seem to be here to pass on your opinions of what you believe rather than reading what is here already on this forum. Maybe it would better suit you to start your own blog and write down your beliefs and if anyone follows along the same lines of thinking as you, they can then read your blog?

As Alana has said, psychopaths are who are, and has been, causing the problems we are, and have been, dealing with. There is a lot here on this forum about psychopaths, also, the book that Alana suggested you read quite clearly describes a lot about psychopaths and what we are dealing with today.

About Blogs, my music helps me spread the word and online forums
open to the research of humanity. I may write a blog in the future.

As i pointed out, Alana disconnected royalty from the psychopath, which
is contradictory.

Royalty is the ultimate criminal machine, as evidenced.
 
fluxed said:
Nienna said:
So you have not really read any of her material. If you had, you would find that none of what you wrote above is true. Just for your information, she is not "going down the occult road", nor is she "relying on pagan methods", nor is she "into communication with these E.T.s".

Was i wrong in reading that she uses the Ouija board to contact the Cs?

Close. A 'spirit board' is a kind of variation on a Ouija board (or the other way round). Please define 'pagan'. If a pagan is "a person holding religious beliefs other than those of the main world religions", then I think we're all pagans here! :halo:

I rely not on others[Cs] to direct me. I direct myself.
And i source factual records for substance.

Yet people are quick to undermine my position here.

There's a difference between "factual records" and the interpretation of those factual records. So far I haven't seen much from your posts here to give me much reason to trust in your interpretation of facts.

As i pointed out, Alana disconnected royalty from the psychopath, which
is contradictory.

Royalty is the ultimate criminal machine, as evidenced.

Alana said no such thing. Are you setting up a straw man? Or did you just not understand Alana's point? I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and go with the latter, in which case it would probably do you a world of good to actually get the book ponerology and read it. Sure kings can be psychopaths, but not all of them are or were. And 'royalty' certainly isn't the root of all evil, which seems to be what you are suggesting.
 
Back
Top Bottom