Dragon Snacks
Padawan Learner
I know they appear to not be able to (or won't) predict the future. But is there any knowledge to which they don't have access?
rymw said:Put it this way, you're a 3 year old and they are 60. What kinda question would you be able to formulate that a normal 60 year old can't answer? And that is only within the common realm of knowledge in this density. I can't remember the exact session during which the C's said that 4th density technology alone is 30 or 40000 years ahead of ours (anyone please correct me here on the exact figure)...so, you go figure ;)
Session 980718 said:Q: (A) Can we have a UFT which unifies
EM and gravity and does not include the
concept of other densities. In other words,
can we put in a textbook all about the gravity
and electromagnetics, and a student could
learn all of this and still know nothing about
other densities?
A: No. Other densities become apparent
when...
Q: (A) So, it means that Einstein and Von
Neumann knew about these other densities?
A: Yes, oh yes!!!
Q: (T) Just a thought: having UFT and being
able to manipulate different fields within it,
creates different effects. So, as we
understand it in the apparent present state of
science, we have to spin something in space
in order to create gravity. But, with the UFT,
one small offshoot is that one could create
real gravity without spinning anything. So,
the problem of weightlessness is really
already solved...
A: Elementary my dear TR, elementary.
Q: (T) So, this whole thing with the space
station and all the trouble they are having
readapting to gravity when they come back,
is all a game...
A: When you "let the cat out of the bag," you
create an entire feline "nation."
Q: (T) So, we are capable of "Star Trek"
right now?
A: In a sense, but there is so much more than
that.
Q: (T) Of course. Most people would say
that 'cutting edge' science is 25 years ahead
of what we see, and I say it is more like a
hundred years, and I am even off? Cutting
edge science on this planet is more like 3 or
4 hundred years ahead?
A: More like 30 to 40,000 years "ahead!"
Q: (L) Is that because of 4th density influence
and information?
A: Yes.
Q: (T) 30 to 40 thousand years? Let me get
that number right...
A: Yes, at least.
TOL.celestialvisionz said:I wonder what the Cassiopaeans would do if they were in human form. What would be their ultimate goal for
living a life like we.
I would really love to read those sessions if you are able to find them?ankhepiphan said:There was a question about 7th D a few years back, to which they mentioned they weren't sure, and another question to exactly how many 'realities' (dimensions) existed, to which thay weren't exactly sure either (or so I remember)
With regards to the second point I believe ankhepiphan may have been referring to this session:davey72 said:I would really love to read those sessions if you are able to find them?ankhepiphan said:There was a question about 7th D a few years back, to which they mentioned they weren't sure, and another question to exactly how many 'realities' (dimensions) existed, to which thay weren't exactly sure either (or so I remember)
The only times i remember them being unsure is when they were asked about someone that the asker did not know or have any kind of link with.
Q: (L) Well, that is certainly true, considering the stuff that is coming back to me about the "Wave." But, all my internet postings are dated, so it would be fairly easy to track. We have some questions here: Physicists talk about multi-dimensional universes. The idea is that our 3 dimensional space and 1 dimensional time is an illusion of plane beings, while the true universe has more dimensions perpendicular to the above ones. Physicists have different guesses here: 5, 6, 7, 11, 256. How many dimensions does the true universe have?
A: Not correct concept. Should be: How many universes does the "true" dimension have?
Q: (L) Alright, then. I think that from a previous session we were told that the number of universes was not countable. Is that correct?
A: Infinite, maybe, but more to the point: variable and selective.
Q: (L) Is it that there can be more at one time and less at another?
A: No.
Q: (L) Does this mean that any potential universe can be selected at any time to be the ONE that is cued? (T) No, the "jukebox" idea relates to time. Explain variable and selective, please?
A: For those who know how, universes can be created at will in order to transmodify reality merge.