I agree with Laura, that it doesn't really matter in a total pathocracy like the US, who gets elected, since the real PTB will direct them anyway.
The best case scenario would be, that Sanders is something like our current pope:
Session 13 June 2015 said:
So is the pope doing all those things because he has a conscience or is there something else behind it, like some kind of plan to appease the people in the world, who more or less wake up and see the propaganda for what it is, in order to bring the Catholic church back "into play" now, or in the near future?
(L) That's a good question.
A: It is a little of both.
Q: (L) So, the guy has a conscience...
(Chu) But he also wants to appease the people...
(Joe) Well, there's also a power behind the pope. There are a bunch of cardinals who see the problem of everybody leaving and the money flying out of the coffers. They probably picked Francy because he's a nice guy and he wants to do good. Then people will come back to the Catholic Church, and they'll get their money back, and so on.
(L) So, it's basically like psychopaths that come to an understanding that they've gotta put somebody more human out there on the front so that they can survive because their sources are drying up. Is that fairly accurate?
A: More or less. Francis really wants to do good but he also understands the forces in play.
But even if that should be the case, the only way such a person could change anything in such a deeply ingrained pathocracy as the US, is to be a very experienced and strategic person
in different key sections of the state like intelligence, military and law.
You would need a whole other caliber of person to change anything there. A person like Putin that knows the system from inside, because he worked in it for a long time and
experienced its different facets thoroughly and closely and thus knows how to approach a given situation. And on top of that
such a person needs to have an almost god like will, a lot of hero qualities and a very strategic way of handling things and a masterful colinear team behind him.
If that is not the case, such a person can not change much in the long run. There are a lot of examples in history of good willed people that got president, but who essentially lacked those key experiences a guy like Putin has, and a good team, that enables him to carefully maneuver the dangerous waters without getting shot down quickly.
I think JFK, Chaves and Gaddafi were such people (and we know what happened to them), with a good will to change something, but who lacked those key experiences, a good team and that very important strategic disclosure that results out of it, in order to change things for the better in the long run.
A person like Putin, that would fit that bill, is very, very, very rare... And it is also questionable if even a person like Putin could change anything at this stage in the US and the rest of the world, that is aligned with it.
The pathocracy in the US is so big and has penetrated every facet of life there, that it seems that the only thing that could really change things there, is a total reset through cataclysms, in one way or the other.