Session 27 February 2016
- Thread starter Laura
- Start date
Thanks again for another fascinating session.
What an ordeal that must have been for those poor souls.
The plantiferous aliens reminded me of the the movie the "The Thing from Another World". It too was a plant based alien.
Like C's said "a carrot with brain".
Crew Chief: Pretty spry for a guy with twelve dogs on him.
Lt. Dykes: ...and losing an arm.
What an ordeal that must have been for those poor souls.
The plantiferous aliens reminded me of the the movie the "The Thing from Another World". It too was a plant based alien.
Like C's said "a carrot with brain".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Thing_from_Another_World
Crew Chief: Pretty spry for a guy with twelve dogs on him.
Lt. Dykes: ...and losing an arm.
That reminds me of this post-apocalyptic novel The Day of the Triffids by John Wyndham:
The story seems to be allegoric in some ways.
The story seems to be allegoric in some ways.
Sentenza
Jedi
Laura said:
Just wondering... Two persons, appointed Sand and jenael, argue that the gray aliens are future humans who were in their past vegetarians (so now) and they evolved that way because they refused their human condition, their predatory side. They blinded themselves and have become degenerate humans, and from eating plants have developed certain characteristics of plants.
Could this plants basiferous aliens being Grays aliens, and by extensions degenerated vegetarians humans in their past ? (our present)
Sentenza said:
We can imagine many things but I don't think that it's serious to say that humans will turn into plant-based beings partly because they eat only vegetables...
Actually, many have been already written on greys, about their research on humans to cure their degeneration, their quest to understand soul but here is an old information from a transcript dated from the 24th september 1995 :
and
You never know and it's also true that we use to say that the 1rst transcript were sometimes corrupted by the presence of Franck. Nevertheless, other sources seem to confirm that story about grays so this story about vegetarian humanity's degeneration looks like a non-sense.
Anyway, I took a look at their website and I did what I always do with such a place. I read some texts, I do a general tour and I observe the way I feel about the datas I read.
Besides, the more you learn, the more you make your knowledge grow and the more you can separate the truth from the lie or at least you can feel when it's not good sometimes.
Honestly, I don't feel good on their website. The given informations seem to be a mix between their own thoughts and various work as Laura, Anton Park, and others datas picked up on books and websites. Whey not and maybe, they' are really kind and they absolutely want to do the right thing but for now I don't think we should give them too much credits.
Of course, I can be wrong, programmed to think that way but for now I follow my instinct and my analysis.
Sentenza
Jedi
Yes, I understand. On their website, Sand and Jenael specifies that only some greys are degenerated humans in the future. They also said that they are like that not only because they used to eat only vegetables, but also because when the wave had come, they don't follow their heart but their technology, hide into nuclear shelter... they lost contact with the Source... And now, they return into their past (our present) to change their present (our future). And, according to Sand and Jenael, that's why governments can't speak about that... It involve too much things...
Personnaly... Dunno... It doesn't speak wrong to myself... I let it open...
Well, generally I agreed with their work. It's sometimes a little cold, but.... This gives lot to think about.
You are right ! I do the same ! And currently this forum is the one I trust in priority ;)
Divide by Zero
The Living Force
Elohir said:
Interesting idea. From what we know about the paleo diet helping our brains and health, I would think that eating purely vegetarian may overall stunt the higher emotional centers. If the brain is not working correctly, how could one be in touch with objective reality?
After having seen Vaxxed and how other things are allowed under the story of everything runs on money, I would think it goes deeper than that. But, if we think of time - the greys being some future possibility coming here to manipulate, it could very well be a self-fulfilling time loop. They create the conditions that create them!
Just some thinking out loud on an interesting possible connection!
Divide By Zero said:
I do like this kind of issue :D
We can see that in some books or movies as Terminator. Kyle Reese sent back in the past by his own son
and his son knows the whole story ! This a well known temporal paradox and it's very interesting because it breaks the common view of a linear time. It makes us think about the origin of each event.As the master of Poo tells him in Kung Fu Panda (Yeah I know... :P) : "You often find your fate on the path you take to avoid it" (sorry for my translation from french).
So, in some cases, it's useless to try to stop your future to happen, in fact you could simply make it happened in doing what you do to prevent it.
C's often seem to inform us about that and they perfectly know that everyone has his own purpose in the big picture.
As they use to say "Wait and see"....
Yuriy
Padawan Learner
Hello!
On the occasion of the "Pass of Djatlova ", in the Russian-speaking segment of Yutubе, there appeared quite a lot of sessions of various channeling, through regressive hypnosis and similar practices. So, many of these sources say that the group of Djatlova was killed by Soviet servicemen because there were tested some kind of rockets and the place was classified.
Can our friends comment on this?
On the occasion of the "Pass of Djatlova ", in the Russian-speaking segment of Yutubе, there appeared quite a lot of sessions of various channeling, through regressive hypnosis and similar practices. So, many of these sources say that the group of Djatlova was killed by Soviet servicemen because there were tested some kind of rockets and the place was classified.
Yuriy
Padawan Learner
Last edited:
Another possibly strange connection was a session where the Cs talked about the Sayan mountains:
Session 15 April 2000:
Just an odd connection I thought.
Plant based humanoids is mentioned in the 1938 movie "Who Goes There" (by John W. Campbell) .
Non-human characters
And the alien rendition from the Howard Hawks movie (1951) "The Thing from Another World"
And the rendition from John Carpenter version.
And on the Dyatlov Pass incident, (DPI).
Run time / 1:45:35 DPI starts at 9:31
PS: Thank you, one and all.
Non-human characters
- "The Thing": the antagonist – a malevolent shapeshifting alien creature. It appears in all the adaptions. In the 1951 adaption it is depicted as a monstrous alien made up of vegetable matter, and is unable to shapeshift.
- In the 1982 and 2011 adaptions, the Thing retains the ability to shapeshift, although it loses the telepathy.
And the alien rendition from the Howard Hawks movie (1951) "The Thing from Another World"
And the rendition from John Carpenter version.
And on the Dyatlov Pass incident, (DPI).
PS: Thank you, one and all.
Last edited:
Bastian
The Living Force
Hello.
I have a few remarks / questions about these extracts :
We can infer, from latin planta (plant, in the old meaning of vegetable), and latin fero (bearing), that it would mean "bearing plants" ?
(For instance, "platiniferous" means platinum-bearing.)
Could anyone (native speakers, preferably) explain it better, if possible ?
2/ The Cs first mention "other dimensional plant based amateurs."
Laura (US American), Joe (Irish) & the team (among who there are native speakers) understood this expression like "vegetable-based" beings.
The next Cs' answers seems to validate this meaning.
But plant has different meanings in English, beyond the botanical one, particularly it may describes (according to the Wiktionary) "A factory or other industrial or institutional building or facility".
So it might means rather : amateurs based in a plant ("industrial" site) on some other dimension ?
(Then all the following Cs answers would be wrong due to this initial misinterpretation.)
3/ But then there is Joe's question about these beings' look, and the Cs' answer : "Similar to some so-called gray aliens.".
Does it mean that among the "gray alien" category, there are different varieties, including some "vegetable" ones, and "animal" ones ?
4/ Let's say that these "amateur" beings are really some evolved (sentient) kind of "plants" of other dimension.
In our density / dimension, plants generally feed on minerals from the air and soil (through bacteria around their roots) in addition to sunlight.
(Some of them are even able to dissolve pure rock with their roots and allied bacteria !)
A few of them (carnivorous plants)feed on animals in addition to mineral.
So it seems logical that these evolved "plants" would scout / mine minerals in mineral-rich moutains.
5/ We (as humans) tend to consider ourselves as the most evolved species on this planet (probably because we were able, or obliged, to "conqueer" the whole planet, and destroy it !), but it depends on which criteria you choose. Some plant species, including trees, or plants "collection" such as forests, are able to do incredible things, that we are not yet able to do (or, sometimes, even understand), like creating soils / air, regulate the microclimate, manipulate animals (through flowers/fruits in particular), etc. So according to these criteria, they're a lot more "evolved" (and cooperating) than we are...
6/ But there is a giant gap between our known Earth reality and imagining such "evolved plant" using technology. Well, anything may exists in the multiverse...
I have a few remarks / questions about these extracts :
1/ @Laura used the word "plantiferous", which is a rare word (geology/stratigraphy jargon, apparently) : I checked this word on all the (20+) dictionaries proposed by Lexilogos for both English and American, none of them lists such a word.
We can infer, from latin planta (plant, in the old meaning of vegetable), and latin fero (bearing), that it would mean "bearing plants" ?
(For instance, "platiniferous" means platinum-bearing.)
Could anyone (native speakers, preferably) explain it better, if possible ?
2/ The Cs first mention "other dimensional plant based amateurs."
Laura (US American), Joe (Irish) & the team (among who there are native speakers) understood this expression like "vegetable-based" beings.
The next Cs' answers seems to validate this meaning.
But plant has different meanings in English, beyond the botanical one, particularly it may describes (according to the Wiktionary) "A factory or other industrial or institutional building or facility".
So it might means rather : amateurs based in a plant ("industrial" site) on some other dimension ?
(Then all the following Cs answers would be wrong due to this initial misinterpretation.)
3/ But then there is Joe's question about these beings' look, and the Cs' answer : "Similar to some so-called gray aliens.".
Does it mean that among the "gray alien" category, there are different varieties, including some "vegetable" ones, and "animal" ones ?
4/ Let's say that these "amateur" beings are really some evolved (sentient) kind of "plants" of other dimension.
In our density / dimension, plants generally feed on minerals from the air and soil (through bacteria around their roots) in addition to sunlight.
(Some of them are even able to dissolve pure rock with their roots and allied bacteria !)
A few of them (carnivorous plants)feed on animals in addition to mineral.
So it seems logical that these evolved "plants" would scout / mine minerals in mineral-rich moutains.
5/ We (as humans) tend to consider ourselves as the most evolved species on this planet (probably because we were able, or obliged, to "conqueer" the whole planet, and destroy it !), but it depends on which criteria you choose. Some plant species, including trees, or plants "collection" such as forests, are able to do incredible things, that we are not yet able to do (or, sometimes, even understand), like creating soils / air, regulate the microclimate, manipulate animals (through flowers/fruits in particular), etc. So according to these criteria, they're a lot more "evolved" (and cooperating) than we are...
6/ But there is a giant gap between our known Earth reality and imagining such "evolved plant" using technology. Well, anything may exists in the multiverse...
