Canadian Family on Trial for Death of Unvaccinated Toddler from Meningitis

Tuesday, April 19, 2016 – Former Chief Medical Examiner testifies: “Child would have survived if not for medical misadventure”

Dr. Anny Sauvageau, the former Chief Medical Examiner of Alberta, and the Chief M.E. at the time of Ezekiel Stephan’s death in March 2012, testified today of startling evidence that will likely change the official cause of Ezekiel’s brain death, and call into question Dr. Adeagbo’s, the first medical examiner, report and motives.

The parents are on trial for failing to provide the necessaries of life. The cause of death has been reported as bacterial meningitis and right pleural empyema – an infection of the lung. A jury is charged with weighing the facts, and will likely find today’s evidence significant. The entire trial over these last eight weeks has been based on what is now a highly questionable medical examiner’s report.

Dr. Sauvageau led the court through her findings, but not until the Crown Prosecutors did all they could to limit the extent of her testimony. Dr. Adeagbo’s report has been the foundation of their case. Dr. Sauvageau was questioned on bias and relevance, and to the reasons for her no longer being the Chief M.E.. The court heard of her refusal to be influenced by unethical and perhaps illegal influences. “My soul is not for sale”, she said emotionally, and is the reason why she chose to expose the corruption rather than “keep it secret”. This eventually cost her her position as Chief.

Dr. Sauvageau reviewed the history of how Ezekiel had been in and out of a suspected case of croup or respiratory infection, as well, a mild flu over a two-week period leading up to his parents, David and Collet, calling 911 when Ezekiel stopped breathing. He started breathing again, after coughing up some mucus, shortly after the first emergency call. His parents can be heard deciding to rush him to the hospital instead of waiting for an ambulance. The call also records the sound of Ezekiel’s breathing as dad put the phone near his son’s mouth to convince the operator that he was in fact breathing. Dr. Sauvageau, a leading forensic pathologist and expert in the areas of asphyxia and hypoxic and anoxic injury, listened to the breathing sounds on the recording to help her piece together the likely cause of Ezekiel’s breathing constriction.

En route to the hospital, Ezekiel stopped breathing again, and 911 was called a second time. The family met the ambulance on the highway approximately 10 minutes from the Cardston Hospital. Mom performed CPR up to the time the paramedics took over. The ambulance was not equipped to establish an airway in a child Ezekiel’s age, because the Alberta Government had recently taken over the ambulance service across the province. This equipment had been destocked against the will of the paramedics, and as a result, the child was without air for over eight minutes. This failed paramedic intervention is characterized by Dr. Sauvageau as a “medical misadventure”. It is, in her expert opinion, the cause of Ezekiel’s brain death.

The most likely infectious agent in her examination of the entire medical examiner’s file is enterovirus. This virus was found in a swab and wash of the nose, throat and bronchial, along with rhinovirus. These are the likely cause of the respiratory infection that caused Ezekiel to suddenly stop breathing. Enterovirus is also capable of an aggressive spread to the brain, and is almost always the cause of viral meningitis.

Dr. Sauvageau concludes the meningitis found at autopsy is likely viral meningitis, and supported her assertion with science. The samples taken of the infected meninges of the brain (pus) revealed an abundance of lymphocytes and other white blood cells associated with viral infections. The usual white blood cell associated with bacterial infections is neutrophils. There wasn’t an abundance of neutrophils as Dr. Adeagbo had reported. There were no bacteria identified to conclude Bacterial Meningitis.

Also, when Ezekiel was first admitted to the hospital, his condition prevented a lumbar puncture to sample the cerebral spinal fluid (CSF); this is the only way to diagnose for bacterial meningitis. Because this test wasn’t done, and because high doses of antibiotics were administered, Dr. Adeagbo employed a test reserved only for researchers to search for bacteria in the CSF. The research microbiologist cautioned Dr. Adeagbo not to rely on any findings from this test in his report, which he did. Dr. Sauvageau explained the limitations of using the microbiologist’s testing tool for 16SrRNA as too sensitive, and could amplify even one bacteria cell as a positive finding. Additionally, the test cannot identify viruses. Therefore, no scientific evidence has supported a finding of Haemophilus influenzae.

Dr. Adeagbo overlooked the failed ambulance intervention as a possible cause of brain death because of something called: Eosinophilic Neurons. When neurons are sampled and dyed with a blue or red stain, they will react according to their condition. When a neuron is starved of oxygen they will stain pink. Dr. Adeagbo reported no such pink findings. However, the asphyxia of the brain cells respond to the dye for only 6 – 24 hours after the injury. Because Ezekiel was on life support for five days after the hypoxic anoxic injury, his white blood cells would have cleaned up the damaged cells and left ghost cells in their place. The pink color would not be expected so long after injury, and hypoxic and anoxic injury could not be ruled out.

Dr. Sauvageau examined the samples of the brain and found overwhelming evidence of brain cell loss and the presence of ghost cells. As an asphyxia expert, she identified the clear evidence of hypoxic and anoxic injury in the brain. Again, the medical misadventure of over eight minutes of oxygen starvation to the brain is, in her expert opinion, the cause of the brain death.

Another posit of Dr. Adeagbo is that the brain swelling from bacterial meningitis was sufficient to cause the brain stem to be compressed, stopping Ezekiel’s heart and breathing. “Wrong”, said Dr. Sauvageau. Adeagbo’s own autopsy report shows no brain herniation. The CT Scan and its report show no tonsillar herniation compressing the brain stem. Also, Ezekiel’s anterior fontanelle is still open and any brain swelling would have created a bulging fontanelle. This was not noted in any of the medical reports before and after the autopsy. Dr. Sauvageau examined the autopsy pictures and saw no herniation.

The pleural empyema described by Dr. Adeagbo “is not”, Dr. Sauvageau says, “a cause of death”. Adeagbo’s report stated that the empyema was preventing Ezekiel from breathing sufficiently, thus contributing as a cause of death. Dr. Sauvageau explained in great detail the biology, anatomy and function of the lungs. When she reviewed the medical examiner’s tissue slides in the Calgary office, she found an x-ray that had not been disclosed to the Defense counsel. It was taken of Ezekiel’s lungs on March 13, 2012, the night he was brought by ambulance into the Cardston Hospital. It shows no pneumonia or pleural empyema.

Dr. Sauvageau questioned why it had not been disclosed or mentioned in Adeagbo’s report. Another x-ray was taken over two hours after the first, after he had been intubated. It shows early clouding of portions of his lungs consistent with aspiration pneumonia. Another x-ray was taken some time after this that revealed an even greater sign of a developing lung infection (pneumonia and empyema).

Dr. Sauvageau explained that it is quite common when emergency intubation occurs, stomach contents aspirate into the lungs, causing infection. This infection is what caused the empyema on the outside of the right lower lobe. She also viewed the slides of the tissue samples of the lungs and found giant white blood cells which had been consuming the food contents of the lungs. While the empyema did exist, it did not develop until after Ezekiel was intubated in the care of the physicians. He did not stop breathing because of empyema, as Adeagbo reported, because he had no empyema before intubation. Dr. Sauvageau testified that empyema is rarely fatal, and only after months and years of encrusted buildup.

Ezekiel’s expected outcome on the balance of probability of the respiratory infection and viral meningitis according to Dr. Sauvageau is 100%. “In the absence of the medical misadventure during the paramedic intervention, it is most likely that the child would have survived”.
 
Meechel17 said:
Tuesday, April 19, 2016 – Former Chief Medical Examiner testifies: “Child would have survived if not for medical misadventure”

Dr. Anny Sauvageau, the former Chief Medical Examiner of Alberta, and the Chief M.E. at the time of Ezekiel Stephan’s death in March 2012, testified today of startling evidence that will likely change the official cause of Ezekiel’s brain death, and call into question Dr. Adeagbo’s, the first medical examiner, report and motives.

The parents are on trial for failing to provide the necessaries of life. The cause of death has been reported as bacterial meningitis and right pleural empyema – an infection of the lung. A jury is charged with weighing the facts, and will likely find today’s evidence significant. The entire trial over these last eight weeks has been based on what is now a highly questionable medical examiner’s report.

Dr. Sauvageau led the court through her findings, but not until the Crown Prosecutors did all they could to limit the extent of her testimony. Dr. Adeagbo’s report has been the foundation of their case. Dr. Sauvageau was questioned on bias and relevance, and to the reasons for her no longer being the Chief M.E.. The court heard of her refusal to be influenced by unethical and perhaps illegal influences. “My soul is not for sale”, she said emotionally, and is the reason why she chose to expose the corruption rather than “keep it secret”. This eventually cost her position as Chief.

[...]

En route to the hospital, Ezekiel stopped breathing again, and 911 was called a second time. The family met the ambulance on the highway approximately 10 minutes from the Cardston Hospital. Mom performed CPR up to the time the paramedics took over. The ambulance was not equipped to establish an airway in a child Ezekiel’s age, because the Alberta Government had recently taken over the ambulance service across the province. This equipment had been destocked against the will of the paramedics, and as a result, the child was without air for over eight minutes. This failed paramedic intervention is characterized by Dr. Sauvageau as a “medical misadventure”. It is, in her expert opinion, the cause of Ezekiel’s brain death.

[...]

Ezekiel’s expected outcome on the balance of probability of the respiratory infection and viral meningitis according to Dr. Sauvageau is 100%. “In the absence of the medical misadventure during the paramedic intervention, it is most likely that the child would have survived”.

Very much appreciate the update, Meeche17.

Thank God for the outstanding moral support and intervention by an extraordinary gifted individual, who put her priorities and the truth at the fore front - minus the illegal influences which cost her position as Chief Medical Examiner. A very rare individual. I have to admire someone with that kind of fortitude.

A “medical misadventure” - first time I have heard that term.

From the article, it sounds like the trial is still on going? Can't imagine what the Parent's and their families are going through - emotionally? Are the Parent's locked up or out on Bail - so they can be with their other children? It must be horrible to endure this?

Thanks for Posting the update!
 
Yes, thanks for posting the update;

...she found an x-ray that had not been disclosed to the Defense counsel. It was taken of Ezekiel’s lungs on March 13, 2012, the night he was brought by ambulance into the Cardston Hospital. It shows no pneumonia or pleural empyema.

Good work Dr. Sauvageau.
 
Today's update on the Stephan family case :mad:

Health Nut News Editor comments by Erin Elizabeth Update: Collet and David Stephan were found guilty today of the death of their son Ezekial. They will not be immediately taken into custody and though the Crown wanted to take away their passports, the judge denied that (I’m assuming the judge didn’t find them a flight risk and knows they are good people) Here is their story of what really happened. The Stephan family has contacted me, and I communicated with Collet Stephan- Ezekial’s mom. They could each receive 5 years in prison which would leave their children with no parents.


https://youtu.be/R0RZskmt5OM
 
Collet and David Stephan were found guilty today of the death of their son Ezekial.

That's totally - NUT's! I don't think this trial had anything to do with that poor child's death but more to do with- beating down an alternative lifestyle of the Parent's?

How could the Court dismiss Dr. Sauvageau expert testimony? I hope the Stephan's Attorney can order a re-trial - based on evidence?

It might be, the Crown is trying to use this case as a "Landmark" to draw up additional Laws to subject Parent's and Guardians - to tow the line to mandated vaccine's and supervised childcare?

Unfortunately, all this Court business costs the Parent's additional funds, which they might not have available to them?
 
They don't have the funds available. They used crowd funding to help pay for the first trial. I'm sickened. I really thought the former CME clinched a not guilty verdict for them.
 
This absolutely awful news. The court obviously had a bigger agenda and now they've pretty much ruined the lives of the parents and their surviving children.

angelburst29 said:
It might be, the Crown is trying to use this case as a "Landmark" to draw up additional Laws to subject Parent's and Guardians - to tow the line to mandated vaccine's and supervised childcare?

I believe this is exactly the case. The author of the video above wrote about it in this article:

Now, the Canadian government is prosecuting the parents, and the outcome of the trial could set a legal precedent that would have a devastating chilling effect on parental rights. David Stephan says that his family's tragedy is being used to further an agenda that cannot be obtained by legislation under the Canadian Constitution, and the precedent could affect families all across Canada and even cross international borders.

The Public Health Agency of Canada, which is similar to the CDC in the U.S., has stated:
Unlike some countries, immunization is not mandatory in Canada; it cannot be made mandatory because of the Canadian Constitution. Only three provinces have legislation or regulations under their health-protection acts to require proof of immunization for school entrance. ... It must be emphasized that, in these three provinces, exceptions are permitted for medical or religious grounds and reasons of conscience; legislation and regulations must not be interpreted to imply compulsory immunization.
Since Canada cannot legally compel her citizens to immunize, vaccine proponents have had to seek another way to achieve their goals. It appears that they may have found a back door to mandating vaccines, by prosecuting parents who choose not to vaccinate, thereby setting a judicial precedent if they win.
 
Absolutely horrible. I hope the family can appeal, but with how the court dismissed the defense's evidence in favor of their own agenda, it's probably not going to happen. Thank you all for the updates.
 
Caught this on the maindrain-news and then thankfully on SoTT. Very disheartening - sadness abound:

Odyssey said:
This absolutely awful news. The court obviously had a bigger agenda and now they've pretty much ruined the lives of the parents and their surviving children.

Indeed. As long as people keep being influenced by trigger words in the official narratives and don't pay attention to evidence, such as what people like Dr. Sauvageau had said, this nonsense will keep festering and destroying lives. As for the evidence, it was the jury who's weight tipped the balance, and it seems obvious that their cognitive dissonance was in full gear - each in the jury needed to have no doubt in their minds and so their minds were well prepared to dismiss what was not comfortable, thus they acted in favor of the the sowed authoritative narratives that society knows so well these days.

I hope their campaign can become reignited again, cause it seems it might be open season on parents in Canada - who will be next?
 
This is heartbreaking indeed, especially in light of all the evidence of medical malpractice on the part of the ambulance service and hospital. That people as irresponsible as this get free pass in positions of power... it's horrible to think of how the courts and medical establishment can be bought and paid for so easily. Are they bribed? Or do they actually believe all the disinformation that is pumped through the mass media?
 
[quote author= whitecoast]Are they bribed? Or do they actually believe all the disinformation that is pumped through the mass media?[/quote]

Could be but maybe the jury noticed how the parents are treated by the media and with that by the general population. If the jury had chosen justice and truth they would have been treated the same. If so than they are nothing more than cowards and tyrants. Just like their psychopathic authoritarians for whom they acted for on behalf.
 
If you take into consideration, the contents of the article Meechel posted, holding the Ambulance Staff "solely responsible" seems secondary - to the fact, that when the Alberta Gov. took over the ambulance service, they destocked certain items, that prior were mandatory. A situation that the paramedics had objected to. In a real sense, this situation really doesn't surprise me. U.S hospitals have been dealing with a "shortage of IV Bags" since they instrumented ObamaCare! So why is it, that something relatively inexpensive and vital to stabilizing a patient in an emergency is compromised? Is there an agenda involved, other than cost-cutting-effects in the equation?

En route to the hospital, Ezekiel stopped breathing again, and 911 was called a second time. The family met the ambulance on the highway approximately 10 minutes from the Cardston Hospital. Mom performed CPR up to the time the paramedics took over. The
ambulance was not equipped to establish an airway in a child Ezekiel’s age because Alberta Government had recently taken over the ambulance service across the province. This equipment had been destocked against the will of the paramedics, and as a result, the child was without air for over eight minutes. This failed paramedic intervention is characterized by Dr. Sauvageau as a “medical misadventure”. It is, in her expert opinion, the cause of Ezekiel’s brain death.

Given that the sole testimony of Dr. Adeagbo, the first medical examiner, was given high priority over Dr. Anny Sauvageau, the former Chief Medical Examiner of Alberta, and the Chief M.E. at the time of Ezekiel Stephan’s death, an investigation should be conducted on his Prudential's and if he has a history of "siding with the Crown" in controversial cases before the Court?
 
I'm sadden to hear this news ... I'm still of the opinion, the Stephan Family were set up, to use their Son's death - as some type of "Land-mark Case" to penalize Parent's and Caregivers for not vaccinating their children? I don't understand, why their Attorney hasn't "set in motion" for a retrial?

If the reports are true, these circumstances led to Ezekiel's death?

En route to the hospital, Ezekiel stopped breathing again, and 911 was called a second time. The family met the ambulance on the highway approximately 10 minutes from the Cardston Hospital. Mom performed CPR up to the time the paramedics took over. The ambulance was not equipped to establish an airway in a child Ezekiel’s age, because the Alberta Government had recently taken over the ambulance service across the province. This equipment had been destocked against the will of the paramedics, and as a result, the child was without air for over eight minutes. This failed paramedic intervention is characterized by Dr. Sauvageau as a “medical misadventure”. It is, in her expert opinion, the cause of Ezekiel’s brain death.


Should the parents of a child who sought out a homeopathic treatment instead of traditional medicine for their son’s illness be punished if that treatment fails? An Alberta court says, ‘yes.’

Couple Sentenced to Prison for Seeking Natural Remedies for Son’s Illness
http://www.naturalblaze.com/2016/06/couple-sentenced-to-prison-for-seeking-natural-remedies-for-sons-illness.html

Judge Rodney Jerke sentenced David Stephan to four months in prison this week and his wife Collet Stephan to three months of house arrest. The couple was found ‘guilty’ earlier this year of failing to provide the necessaries of life to their 19-month-old son, Ezekiel, who contracted meningitis in 2012.

According to court documents, when their son became ill, the Stephans tried to treat Ezekiel with natural remedies of hot peppers, garlic, onions, and horseradish. Not until Ezekiel stopped breathing did the Stephans seek out traditional medical help by dialing 9-1-1.

The judge in the Stephans’ case called the couple “willfully blind” and blamed them for their son’s death.

“You have affected many people … your conduct has left an unerasable and chilling impact on all of us,” Jerke told the couple. “This case was about whether parents, who failed to take a sick boy to a doctor, should be held criminally responsible. The trial was not about vaccination. This is far beyond a child who simply has the sniffles.”

The judge said he acknowledged the fact that the parents loved and cared for their son, but called their alternative treatment a failure.

“Mr. Stephan’s post-conviction actions demonstrate a complete lack of remorse,” the judge said. “To this day he refuses to admit his actions had any impact.”

While many may agree with the judge’s feelings on this matter, it is important to remain objective. Did these parents willfully ignore their son’s sickness and do nothing to stop it? The truth is no; they did not.

Only because the treatment, however ill-advised, failed, did the parents receive any attention. The troublesome aspect about this ruling and subsequent sentencing is had Ezekiel died from meningitis while undergoing care from traditional medical doctors, he would have never received attention from law enforcement. Also, the couple would have been given sympathy and remorse from the community instead of hate and contempt.

However, because Ezekiel died while his parents sought out homeopathic remedies — this now becomes criminal, in spite of the fact that they never neglected him.

According to the WHO, even if the Stephans would have immediately sought out the best medical care that money could buy, Ezekiel still faced a 1 in 10 chance of death from his meningitis.

Earlier this year, scientists from Johns Hopkins finally quantified the number of deaths from medical mistakes — such as incorrect diagnoses, medication errors, botched surgeries, etc. — because those errors aren’t specifically tracked under the current system.

Analyzing medical death rates from four separate previous studies, the Johns Hopkins team found 251,454 deaths out of 35,416,020 hospitalizations stemmed from various medical errors — which they say amounts to 9.5 percent of all deaths in the U.S.

The study found that medical errors are now the third leading cause of death in the United States — only behind cancer and heart disease.

Of course, it would be irresponsible to discount the benefits of the modern medical system. Countless lives are saved every day with traditional medicine. And, Ezekiel could be alive today had the Stephans gone through this channel. However, it is not black and white as this court would have you believe.

The fact remains that people should have a choice as to how they treat their illnesses, even if that choice may be considered ill-advised by some. When caring parents are turned into criminals by the State for their choice in health care — this is the opposite of a free society.

On March 16, 2012, after being in the hospital for three days, Ezekiel Stephan died. His parents have to live with that fact the rest of their lives. Sentencing the Stephans to prison does nothing for the betterment of them or society.
 
angelburst29 said:
I'm sadden to hear this news ... I'm still of the opinion, the Stephan Family were set up, to use their Son's death - as some type of "Land-mark Case" to penalize Parent's and Caregivers for not vaccinating their children? I don't understand, why their Attorney hasn't "set in motion" for a retrial?

If the reports are true, these circumstances led to Ezekiel's death?

[..]

Couple Sentenced to Prison for Seeking Natural Remedies for Son’s Illness
http://www.naturalblaze.com/2016/06/couple-sentenced-to-prison-for-seeking-natural-remedies-for-sons-illness.html

It certainly is not black and white as the judge makes one believe. The judge said: “Mr. Stephan’s post-conviction actions demonstrate a complete lack of remorse.” and he went on to say that: “To this day he refuses to admit his actions had any impact.”

What "post-conviction actions" is he talking about, because he, the judge, did acknowledge that "they loved and cared for their son"?

What these parents went through only to be imprisoned in jail or home, also shows a judicial "lack or remorse" and is scandalous. The parents may have made some errors, I don't know, yet as the article says, medical error causing death is vastly high, and that does not count the post pharma-care where death often results down the road due to their chemical/biological toxic effects.

All so sad, and it does indeed paint a picture, a precedent, as to where this will go.

Edit=Quote
 
It's very sad indeed, and sets a precedent for anyone who seeks alternative medical care or to decline vaccinations, regardless of what the judge said about the case not being about vaccinating children. People are still blaming Ezekiel's death on not being vaccinated. The mainstream reports I've seen on the sentencing ignore that the ambulance wasn't equipped to give respiratory support to a toddler, as well as Dr. Sauvageau's testimony on how this contributed to Ezekiel's death. There was so much misinformation spread about the case.

I first learned about the sentencing from Reddit, and the comments were vicious. I'd say most people there thought the parents should be charged with homicide, characterizing the Stephans as scum who cared more about proving their opinions right than their son. Just ridiculous. If that's what the average citizen (or authoritarian follower) thinks from reading the headlines and completely ignoring the other side of the case, I think the Stephans were lucky to not have a harsher punishment. At least Collet is home with her children. Then again, if another case like theirs is publicized, how much worse will the punishments get?

For more information and documentation about the case from the family's side, those interested can see _http://www.meetthestephans.com/ . I don't know why they aren't asking for a retrial either, but it might be from a lack of funds and stress from the trial.
 
Back
Top Bottom