Hope it's OK to post this here but someone's just found hard evidence that totally stacks up to prove that one of Jimmy Comet's Followers on Instagram is sharing hardcore pornography (some referencing snuff) on his website:
The dates of the uploads strongly suggest that Pizzagate is not a psyop.
mod: deactivated link
"Miguel Flores-Vianna is one of Jimmy Comet's Followers on Instagram so he is intrinsically connected to Pizzagate"
A=b=c doesn't make a=c (a being Miguel, b being alefantis's instagram acont, and c being pizzagate).
It's a pretty big claim to state that because someone is following someone on instagram, they are intrinsically linked to whoever they are following. The evidence here just seems beside the fact, sure there may potential other person involved (unlikely imo), but that's just another connection that ultimately doesn't prove anything.
There was a 30 minute youtuve video, where it showed the instagram account post a picture of an adult in his underwear wearing bondage ropes around his chest (the youtuber claimed this was "not explainable", but bondage is a huge sexual fetish that's hardly taboo insofar that most people are aware of it nowadays).
Rather than speculating who else is involved VIA Instagram comments, we really need to use what proof we do have to try to gaze deeper into this. I understand that pedophiles use coded language, but it would be ridiculous to think everyone who follows alefantis is involved. Especially when the only proof is that Miguel commented "I'm voting for pizza!". Yes i've seen what pizza means to pedophiles, but we have to remember that alefantis owns a pizza restaurant that does in fact serve pizza. So pizza is definitely going to show up all over the place. We can't just jump at buzzwords like this.
Even if Miguel were proven to be a part of it, it wouldn't crack this open
I have been thinking about the whole topic of Pizzagate and pedophilia and the strategy/strategies we should maybe consider. It is disturbing but worthy of trying to pay attention but how much attention and for what end purpose? I think this one video I just watched makes some sense. I am wondering if censorship on all alternative media is not on the way. This may be one of the best topics to use for shutting down all alternative media. I think this guy has some valid thoughts:
I think the deeper thing is that this pizzagate focus is a red herring. The pictures and tweets are so obviously sick, why make it public? Meanwhile behind the scenes there is the real pedophile/sacrifices by the psychopaths.
It's just too dramatic and obvious, I don't think the deeper levels of PTB are this stupid to be this obvious.
I disagree with this, i think it's something huge that's being deflected into a red herring. I saw how and where this investigation started. The investigation was done by 4chan and reddit originally. IIRC's and discord servers were used to compile all of the pertinent information. THEN it blew up and everyone wanted to start writing articles about it. That's when the disinformation started to happen. So from my perspective, it seems like we stumbled onto something and the PTB had to squabble real quick to try to make it seem ridiculous. What's a red herring imo is running around saying the clintons (specifically, not saying they couldn't, but using them as scapegoats when in reality the operation is way larger than 2 politicians.) are behind all of this (which is what the news projected MOST researchers on this topic to say, which is not true).
The investigation started because of a user finding 30 ssid networks that change their name constantly (this screams child porn ring). This led him to investigate his bosses ebay account who oddly sold "broken hard drives" for very strange prices (hmmm... needing that many networks that change their name every 4 minutes for security and selling hard drives? Sounds like a child porn ring). A hacked email account later and we discovered that this guys boss was related to this pizza place for some reason. This led to the investigation of Comet Ping Pong. Not dramatic at all in my opinion.
The evidence itself certainly wasn't "obvious". What's dramatic and obvious is right winged conspiracy nuts using this story to get clicks for their website and mainstream media using those as examples for what the "evidence" is. Textbook deflection method right there if you as me.. If the evidence wasn't substantial it would have been addressed, rather than just using ad hominids on easy targets like alex jones etc (pfft he's a joke, but i digress). Those "journalists" and youtubers weren't the investigators, those were the journalist who were poorly reporting on this.
It took hacking an email, finding out pseudonyms for multiple people, completely ripping through the clinton emails, checking domain registry on all sites related to Alefantis, and figuring out all of the business he owns. Not very obvious stuff in my opinion.. The investigation of this went on for a good 2-3 weeks, heck almost a month before there was a word about this on any media publication.