Hi henry,
Any particular reason why you put my name in quotes?
Yes, it was simply to maintain clarity in the event others entered the exchange.
The emphasis if You like is simply indicative of the fact that I am replying to
Your response on behalf of SOTT as an Administrator. I am certain, though
that you respond with SOTT's blessing, so no need really if You prefer.
There is no mission statement per se
No problem as You have already satisfied my original queery in this regard. I am
content with the simple statement:-'The War against Subjectivity' & the open-ended
approach is great as well as necessary in my view.
But that still leaves us with a single point of view. The network is needed to help us see our own blindspots, but also because our individual points of view when combined give us a more objective look at things than any of us as individuals.
Yes, I understand & a Catch22 is inevitable as each single viewpoint needs to move
rapidly towards objectivity to maintain harmony in order that the Unified Field
Network may hold its righful place, in what has elsewhere in this forum been
referred to as a, colinear alignment.
To clarify:-Whilst I understand & accept that SOTT no doubt has its own 'Higher
Influence', the objective unity aimed at appears to be focused upon the
subjective, as it relates to the dissemination of information in 3D. Correct me if
I am wrong but this intimates to me a 'doing' in the 'Exoteric sense. Whilst I
personally feel that this is both necessary & right, my own research has led me
to understand that colinearity needs to be present at the outset & that in order
for the 'Work' to be complete this colinearity should not only be present
exoterically, but across the board. Now unless I am sorely mistaken & I am open
to correction, there is from my perspective a 'mesoteric component' missing.
The primacy of the Spiritual as 'Esoteric Presence' will reveal its agreement with the colinearity at the appropriate time) & assistance from this influence would come forth in a natural harmonic. One could say, the 'signs shall follow, they shall not proceed as it were.
Thus it becomes pertinent that the esoteric network will arise simultaneously as
the exoteric becomes apparent in 3D. What is essential is that the 'mesoteric
arising' must give regonition to the primacy of the spiritual.
Short answer: Over the cliff with everyone else.
Thats ok - there is always the potential You will fly as Casteneda apparently did.
I am not certain what you mean.
Well, hopefully what I have stated herein clarifies.
What if it should be "I am thought, therefore I am"?
Upon analysis I see no edges - same thing
What level of reality are we discussing?
From an ontological perspective there can only be one level. It must therefore be
omni-dimensional.
Maybe there is some wise man somewhere with it all, but we haven't had the pleasure of meeting him yet.
I think there are many - and I speak in terms (refer previous statements herein)
of Gurdjieffs 200, but now wish to emphasise that if I remember correctly he
refers directly to supermen(i.e.-man #7)
Also, Gurdjieff died. Fulcanelli didn't. The second had knowledge that the first did not. Maybe that means that Gurdjieff himself didn't have all the pieces.
Not sure why You mention this. Ontologically, there is no death. Perhaps Gurdjieffs
reference to 'writing a cheque with 7 figures' was not a reference to the fact that
he was a man #7. I do remember it being written that he stated immortality within
our Cosmos was possible for a man#6 & in any Cosmos for a man#7.
Am I correct in thinking your statement appears to intimate a 'physical immortality'
for Fulcanelli? Either way would make no difference for from an ontological point of
view neither died.
Do you have experience with any of the Gurdjieff schools?
Experience - indirectly. Yes, I am aware of genuine Schools in the tradition
of the 4th Way who utilise 'a modern application' of the Tradition.
There is definitely an information war
I do not disagree, on the contrary. I simply understand it as a symptom of the
Real War, which is a War of the Mind...and the other side 'does not' have the
Tradition.
Thanx again for a detailed reply