Among the most difficult concepts the C's have presented to us over the years is that of Organic Portals. We've received tons of hate mail about this from fundie types - both mainstream religion and New Age - protesting the very idea of human type beings that may not have the potential of an "immortal soul." Then, of course, we get even MORE letters from people who nearly shout in relief at finally having something of an explanation for things they have observed all their lives. The question that exercises many people is: are psychopaths a type of Organic Portal or are psychopaths something else altogether?
The way this idea works is to think about all humanity as represented by a bell curve. At one end is a small percentage, maybe 6 % that not only are potentially souled, but also have the conditions to develop in the direction of creative potential in the fullest sense. At the other end are psychopaths, or those that are not potentially souled, but who do have a capacity to develop strongly in the direction of entropy. In the middle is a larger grouping divided more or less equally between potentially souled and Organic Portals.
I'm not sure that this is an accurate representation. My thought is that there needs to be two separate Bell Curve graphs, one for Potentially Souled beings and another for Organic Portals with Creation and Entropy being at either end. I don't think you can even put them on the same graph because the fundamental criteria are so different.
Yes, you could probably make a bell curve of souled vs non souled, but only for that single criterion.
So where do psychopaths belong? Do they belong on the graph of potentially souled, but having "sold their souls to the devil" (figuratively speaking), or do they belong on the graph of Organic Portals?
It's a tough question and one that deserves some thought and analysis.
If you consider a bell curve graph of non souled vs souled, you would notice that a lot of people fall into the bulge of the bell curve. This group would include those who are potentially souled, but might as well be soulless for all the good it does them. But an equally large number would be definitely not souled, but so similar to the potentially souled as making it impossible to tell the difference. At the negative end of the bell curve would be those OPs that are fairly easily found out, and at the positive end would be those individuals with soul potential that are actually in the process of developing and manifesting it.
Not too much else can be derived from this representation.
When you turn to the bell curve graph of Organic Portals, with creativity at the positive end and entropy at the negative end, you can notice that fully half of the OPs are on the "creative" side, though most of them bunch together (as bell curves do) as more or less "tending toward creativity" and a few being highly creative.
But what will we be looking at when we consider the negative half of this bell curve? What, exactly, is at the far end??? Is that where we find psychopaths?
I'm not sure. Here's a snip from a C's session that brings up this question:
Does that mean that Organic Portals at the extreme of the bell curve on the negative side are NOT psychopaths? Or is the bi-density being, the "souped up" OP, just the most extreme form of psychopathy?
Here's another clue:
Does that mean that we have to put the bi-density types, whether positive or negative, at the positive end of the Organic Portal graph, meaning the ultimate development of the Organic Portal, and the Psychopaths at the far, negative end, the "failures"?
I'm not sure about that. Any ideas anyone?
The way this idea works is to think about all humanity as represented by a bell curve. At one end is a small percentage, maybe 6 % that not only are potentially souled, but also have the conditions to develop in the direction of creative potential in the fullest sense. At the other end are psychopaths, or those that are not potentially souled, but who do have a capacity to develop strongly in the direction of entropy. In the middle is a larger grouping divided more or less equally between potentially souled and Organic Portals.
I'm not sure that this is an accurate representation. My thought is that there needs to be two separate Bell Curve graphs, one for Potentially Souled beings and another for Organic Portals with Creation and Entropy being at either end. I don't think you can even put them on the same graph because the fundamental criteria are so different.
Yes, you could probably make a bell curve of souled vs non souled, but only for that single criterion.
So where do psychopaths belong? Do they belong on the graph of potentially souled, but having "sold their souls to the devil" (figuratively speaking), or do they belong on the graph of Organic Portals?
It's a tough question and one that deserves some thought and analysis.
If you consider a bell curve graph of non souled vs souled, you would notice that a lot of people fall into the bulge of the bell curve. This group would include those who are potentially souled, but might as well be soulless for all the good it does them. But an equally large number would be definitely not souled, but so similar to the potentially souled as making it impossible to tell the difference. At the negative end of the bell curve would be those OPs that are fairly easily found out, and at the positive end would be those individuals with soul potential that are actually in the process of developing and manifesting it.
Not too much else can be derived from this representation.
When you turn to the bell curve graph of Organic Portals, with creativity at the positive end and entropy at the negative end, you can notice that fully half of the OPs are on the "creative" side, though most of them bunch together (as bell curves do) as more or less "tending toward creativity" and a few being highly creative.
But what will we be looking at when we consider the negative half of this bell curve? What, exactly, is at the far end??? Is that where we find psychopaths?
I'm not sure. Here's a snip from a C's session that brings up this question:
That last part really caught me: Bi-density beings can be Organic Portals with "souped up engines."14 Sept 2002
Q: (L) ... You said before that OP's were originally intended as a bridge between second and third densities and that they were used [by 4D STS]. Is Mouravieff right about the potential for OP's to advance being dependent upon souled beings advancement to STO at the end of this cycle?
A: Not exactly. A soul imprint can grow independent of the cycle. However, it is more likely for a soul to "grow" when interacting with 4th Density STO. STS tends to drain energy for its own use.
Q: (L) The question came up about the remark as to the numbers of OPs and you said something about encountering half as many OP's as souled humans. It was pointed out that, in mathematical terms, that would work out to encountering or interacting with more souled humans than OPs. So, you said the population was evenly distributed, when you say the population was evenly distributed does that mean that there are half organic portals and half souled humans, more or less?
A: Yes
Q: (L) So when you say encountering 'half as many,' what does that mean?
A: It means that "souls" run in families for the most part. Thus a souled, and we mean "potentially fully souled, individual is likely to encounter and interact more with other souled humans. However, when awakening, they may encounter even more OP's.
Q: (L) So they tend to run in families but families can have aberrations. That is, a family that's mostly OP's could have an occasional souled human, which they don't know what to do with. And, in the same way, a family of mostly souled people could have an occasional OP, or a line of them that pops up in the family every now and then. But for the most part, people with souls marry people with souls unless there is some danger of them awakening in which case there's special situation where [4D STS] insert OP's into their lives. But I would say that in a general sense what they're saying, and y'all can correct me if I'm wrong here, is that, water seeks its own level, so to speak.
A: More or less.
Q: (L) So in other words, the people who noticed that remark were right, and the way I took it was wrong. Okay, another question, are there other types of soulless beings more than those reanimated or remolecularized dead dudes and OP's? Is there such things as holographic projection beings running around on the planet at this point and time?
A: In a sense, you are all "holographic" projections. But to answer the question, it is rare.
Q: (L) So, there are holographic projection type beings or there can be, but there's not too many of them. Alright, on to the next question. Are there any particular clues that we could have about identifying OP's?
A: Is it necessary to have more clues? Remember some things are to be learned.
Q: (C) I think they're saying to start paying attention, making mental notes and figuring it out for yourself. (J) Didn't they say that generally OP's don't get abducted? ... (C) I think it's probably better, from what they're saying, if we just all figure it out from experience. You learn more by just watching than if they handed it to you. (L) Another question we had was, in areas where 3rd and 4th density are merged or merging, is it easier for Men in Black to project themselves into such a reality.
A: Of course.
Q: (J) They once said something about bi-density beings. They were like hybrids between 4th density beings and a 3rd density being. Or could such an individual be a genetically enhanced human?
A: Humans were once "bi-density." And some may be again in the natural way. Those of 4D STS "manufacture" are similar. Just think of them as a type of OP with souped up engines.
Does that mean that Organic Portals at the extreme of the bell curve on the negative side are NOT psychopaths? Or is the bi-density being, the "souped up" OP, just the most extreme form of psychopathy?
Here's another clue:
What does it mean that psychopaths are "failed Organic Portals"?13 July 2002
Q: Mouravieff says that the "pre-Adamic" humans do not have the higher centers, nor the possibility of developing them in this cycle - which we assume to be the Grand Cycle you have previously described, the length of which is around 300,000 years. Is this an accurate representation of "pre-Adamic" beings?
A: Yes, they are "organic" portals between levels of density.
Q: Based on what Mouravieff has said, it seems to be so that any efforts to try to raise the consciousness of such individuals is doomed to fail.
A: Pretty much. Most of them are very efficient machines. The ones that you have identified as psychopaths are "failures." The best ones cannot be discerned except by long and careful observation.
Does that mean that we have to put the bi-density types, whether positive or negative, at the positive end of the Organic Portal graph, meaning the ultimate development of the Organic Portal, and the Psychopaths at the far, negative end, the "failures"?
I'm not sure about that. Any ideas anyone?
Last edited: