9/11 > WTC Attack

WTC Collapse

(1/2) > >>

Ruth:
Here are some things I posted on the Pentagon Strike Forum before it was amalgamated.  I would like to re-post here, if I may.

Here is something written by Steve E Jones from the Dept of Physics and Astronomy, Brigham Young University.  It questions what could have caused the WTC to collapse.  Quite a good piece imo, I don't see any evidence of COINTELPRO here, does anyone else?
http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html

This one questions the WTC financial viability as it needed HUGE subsidies to keep running and would have been very expensive to pull down (due to aspestos).  It tends to give the picture of being a 'white elephant'.
http://www.notbored.org/wtc.html

This one is about 'Lucky Larry'.
http://globalfire.tv/nj/03en/jews/wtc-silverstein.htm

In the course of my surfing I came across an something that 'alluded' to Mr Silvestein being involved in trafficing of amphetamines.  I can't find anything more on this and it may well be COINTELPRO.  Mr Silverstein is a property developer and may never have been involved drug trafficing.  Although that doesn't preclude a person from having other interests.

Oh and here's something else as well
http://www.ditrianum.org/Artikelen/artikel33en.htm

monkee:
747 hits a flat building in Amsterdam. It didn't collapse completely.

Ruth:
Here's another story from the website Propaganda Matrix that comments on building collapses.  I wonder how the PTB are going to react to this increasing scruitiny by the public into building demolition.  Mind you, the official story has so many holes in it it may as well be a sieve.

http://propagandamatrix.com/articles/march2006/200306landmarkimplosion.htm


--- Quote ---Landmark Implosion Looks Like WTC Collapse
Classic crimp and leaning mirrors Building 7, South Tower

Paul Joseph Watson/Prison Planet.com | March 20 2006

The controlled demolition of a North Texas building Saturday provided a stark reminder that WTC Building 7 and the twin towers could not have been brought down by any other means than planned implosion.

Watch the video of the Landmark Tower implosion in downtown Fort Worth and compare it to the South Tower of the WTC.

We see the classic crimp and leaning effects of controlled demolition in both cases.

The foundation of the building is blown first to weaken the structure and the building's 30 floors are then quickly popped out one by one to ensure the building falls rapidly in its own footprint.


WTC workers who were inside the building before its collapse state that they were eyewitnesses to underground explosions that were totally separate from the plane impacts.

The building falls faster than the speed of gravity as was the case with the twin towers.

Reminiscent of 9/11, dust then quickly engulfs surrounding city blocks.

Adjacent buildings receive minor damage such as broken windows and yet we are to believe that falling debris caused WTC 7, a 600 foot building that occupied an entire city block, to collapse in the late afternoon of September 11.

The twin towers and Building 7 were the first and only steel buildings to collapse from supposed fire damage in history.

Firefighter dispatch tapes prove that there were no raging infernos inside the towers and the fires were nearly extinguished. Photos before the collapse show a few minor fires in Building 7.

The Windsor Building in Madrid burned for nearly 24 hours as raging fires enveloped almost all of its 32 floors. The steel framed building did not collapse. The South and North towers collapsed within 56 and 103 minutes of being hit by planes respectively.

What is wrong with this picture?
--- End quote ---

monkee:
A better picture of the Bijlmer Disaster:

http://www.corrosion-doctors.org/Aircraft/el-al.htm

Ruth:

--- Quote ---Thousands In NY Dying
Of '911 Disease' - Uranium Probable
9/11 Cough - More Than Just "Asthma" Indeed
--- End quote ---
http://www.rense.com/general72/911dis.htm

Last I heard, aspestosis was quite a significant problem to those who inhaled it.
http://www.healthline.com/galecontent/asbestosis

I wonder why Ms Garger is trying to 'promote' the idea of fearing poisonous radiation.

Aspestos also the reason why the NJ and NY Port Authority could not demolish the building by implosion when they owned it, but instead, sold is beloved 'white elephant' to Silvestein.  All he had to do was wait for a fake 'terrorist' attack, watch whilst the two towers 'magically' imploded (plus a third building that wasn't needed) and collect double his insurance money!  Poor man!  What are the odds of that happening?  Pretty long, I'd say.  As will be his punishment if he was in any way involved.  If not in this life, then maybe the next.

I can definately 'see', with very little use of my imagination, any individual involved in this crime being 'reborn' as a cockroach.  It would certainly be a fitting punishment for any person with an interest in realestate who turns to crime and murder for gain.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

Go to full version