Applied Kinesiology (Health Kinesiology ... as requested by Deckard ;)

Following a thread I answered on What's on your mind about personality and molds, and answering Deckard's request, here is a brief post about Applied Kinesiology.

As some of you know, I'm a Health Kinesiology practitioner. Health Kinesiology is directly derived from Applied Kinesiology but is a little different. The system remains the same, however: you address the body directly to check its level of health and more importantly, to see what can be done to remedy any problem. So the explanations I'm gonna give are for HK.

The best definition for me is taken from the founder of Health Kinesiology, Jimmy Scott: http://www.subtlenergy.com/about_hk/what_is_hk.htm

The method involves muscle testing, which is the tool by which the communication is operated. After making sure that the client's energy system (i.e. system of meridians) is balanced, the practitioner selects a muscle (very often the brachio-radialis, on the forearm), check that it is functioning properly and take this muscle as representative of the whole system. It is called the indicator muscle. This muscle tests strong when you simply apply pressure on it. It is like locked in position. When this muscle is stressed (or when your system/body is stressed) for example by being pinched, it unlocks and when you apply pressure on it, it tests weak. The person will have to make a tremendous effort to keep it into position to resist a simple pressure. So, the practitioner asks the person to put their hand on their navel (because the meridians used in kinesiology (we use 14 of them) all go through that part of the body, and so you can test the whole system by putting your hand there) and tests the whole system. There are also points around the navel that acts as reflex points which either test strong or weak, and that way you can know what meridian needs balance. Once you know that, there are reflex points on the torso which tell you what kind of points you should be holding (neurovascular, neurolymphatic, end points, sedation or activation points).

Then, and that's the big difference i would say with Applied Kinesiology, a HK practitioner can actually talk to the body. It is to my knowledge, the only kinesiology which actually asks oral questioning and not a system of papers put on the body, nor by simply touching a part of the body to check its energy. So, the practitioner asks a question like "Is the diet Mr. X is following the best diet for him?". Should it be the case (the diet is the best), the energy/body of the person will be in accordance with what you say and will have no stress linked to that question. The indicator muscle will then test strong. Should it not be the case (Mr. X is eating something that's not right for him, or, from my experience, almost nothing that is good for him ;), the body will be intensely stressed by this question and the stress involved with this issue plus the pressure put on the indicator muscle will be too much to bear and the test will test weak.

But what is answering? Is it the client? Is it the brain? How can a body know something what we don't? Here is a link to a partial answer: http://www.subtlenergy.com/articles/articles/clinical_abstracts.htm
Some (like Jane Thurnell-Read in her great book about Health Kinesiology called 'Health Kinesiology - The muscle testing system that talks to the body') say that part of the answer lies in the homeostatic mechanism of the body (the mechanism which monitors body processes, adjust hormone levels, etc. in an attempt to maintain an optimum environment). I agree, but I think that when we ask questions in HK, we tap into something bigger than the physical body, because, I have more than once had answers which at first baffled me and my client, but once I did some research on the subject, understood why the body answered that way. For example, one of my clients had to eat apples, a lot of them, for a while. She did not particularly like them. At first, I thought that maybe she simply needed the pectine for some reason. And later on, i stumbled upon an article about how apples help your body to get rid of lead. When I asked that person several sessions later, surely enough, she had been diagonosed as having a high level of lead in her body. I did not know that nor did she when I tested. But her body told us.

From this conversation (which is, it's true, limited, because, all you can get is a yes or no answer but still), you can determine the best choices for your body, and when necessary, the best HK procedures. Everything is made to measure, so to speak.

The muscle testing has undergone a lot of double blind test with success (Laura talks about it in one of her posts). I conducted a lot of these experiments. It has convinced me that a lot of what is said to be good (or bad for that matter) for you might not be. So, to me the SOTT forum is invaluable because, everything that is said about health issues, I test. I tested that pure nicotine was indeed good for some people, that most of the diet I was personally recommanding to clients was in fact the Blood Type Diet (about which I had heard but never read before coming here), etc.

Hope this has provided Deckard with some answers, and maybe interested others to check this great method.

I read this book awhile ago, it was called Power vs Force by David Hawkins, and he discusses kinesiology as a means to ask general questions. For example, he claimed that the body could answer yes/no questions based in the external world. One of the examples he gave was that if you have the person watching a politician speak they always test weak. I read it a long time ago, but some of the other examples i recall are testing weak due to being exposed to lieing, certain types of angry rock music, violent images etc. They'd test strong if they were told a 'true' statement, exposed to classical music, etc.

So his whole shtick was using it as a means of determining 'true' from 'false', he also cited a lot of research that showed the true/false aspect held when different subjects were used, thou i never sought the studies myself. Anyway i was just wondering if you had any experience using kinesiology in this manner or if (in your experience) it's strictly applied to health issues.

I've had quite a few treatments with my kinesiologist and they've been very beneficial and really quite eye-opening. I had quite a difficult childhood emotionally, dealing with anger (a lot of it - poor old liver) and depression (which may be a manifestation of anger turned inwards).

The body seems to be the faithful servant of the mind (worst luck) and 'memories' of emotional events in the past are 'stored' and manifest as energy imbalances and often disease - eventually 'seating' in a physically weak part of the body.

I still have a lot of 'work' to do though. Living with possibly lifetimes of supressed rage at situations of disempowerment isn't the easiest thing to do. Its kind of sad that we don't come into the world with a "clean slate" or even the chance to be 'treated fairly' in the one we are in now. It can be a bit of a double-whamy.

Its funny that my kinesiologist doesn't seem to want to go much back into past lives, but wants to deal with the one I have now - probably because there's so much there... Not too keen on aliens either when I queried. Apparently we attract what we put our minds on (create our own reality... sigh), but that includes the things we fear. I'm not sure if all kinesiologist are alike in that respect, because I've only gone to one. She's my 'real doctor' now.

Hello Mrs. Tigersoap!

When I had my amalgam fillings removed, my mother brought me to a kinesiologist, for which I am extremely grateful today. She, the Kinesiology practitioner, applies a system called Psycho-Kinesology (PK) taught by Dr. Dietrich Klinghardt, a German doctor who now lives and works in Seattle. To my knowledge, he also started from basics like Touch For Health (Dr. John F. Thie) and developed this basics into the area of family systems, detoxification, trauma release, etc. He officially doesn't touch past life issues, but I think each past life issue can be reflected in events of the history of a family.

Mrs. Tigersoap said:

It is to my knowledge, the only kinesiology which actually asks oral questioning...

Click to expand...

In this PK work, the body is also talked to. We often asked questions, e.g. at which age something happened, or which dynamic was involved (hate, fear, etc.). So, I don't know what was "first", HK or PK, but the two systems seem to be very similar.

Mrs. Tigersoap said:

But what is answering? Is it the client? Is it the brain? How can a body know something what we don't?

Click to expand...

I also aked this question myself. It is definitely more than a mere physical action. I theorize that it is an intimate work with and the communication of energy (or information) "fields" of the patient AND the therapist. I suspected once that it is a kind of yes/no channeling of the body's information. Which brings up the question about correct information / corruption caused by e.g. strong emotional beliefs.

My PK theapist explained once, that she only could test Hg in others if she had LESS Hg in her body than the patient. It sounds reasonable to me that a therapist (or teacher) should be more "purified" or more "advanced" along a way in which he/she helps or teaches. I think this holds true in many aspects of life. She told me that issues in patients can also touch issues in herself, and that in a therapeutical session both, therapist and patient, can heal each other.

So, for me Kinesiology was and is a great help to be informed about things that are ready to be released, be it physical or psychological issues.

Cyre2067 said:

So his whole shtick was using it as a means of determining 'true' from 'false', he also cited a lot of research that showed the true/false aspect held when different subjects were used, thou i never sought the studies myself. Anyway i was just wondering if you had any experience using kinesiology in this manner or if (in your experience) it's strictly applied to health issues.

Click to expand...

Hi Cyre,
Yes, i've had many similar experiences. You test weak to just about everything that provokes a strong emotion (i've seen people testing weak about the name of their beloved children for example). So that's why I think that using this to determine true or false is misleading: you can have a strong emotion to someone telling the truth (because you are touched, because it relates to a problem you have, etc.). There is always a context and for example, most people would test weak for angry rock music but i don't because i happen to love it!

I think that practitioners using the muscle test have to be aware of that, otherwise you could easily develop a god complex.
When people see how muscle testing works, their mind goes into overdrive about all questions they could now ask about their body, life, childhood, etc. And I have pretty bizarre requests, which I sometimes refuse (somebody wanted to know if her husband cheated on her, for example). I've tested where my car keys are, or where I had parked the car when I had forgotten, i sometimes test about the geobiology of the place they live in, sometimes about past lives (I'm not a fan of testing things I know little about). I tested weak looking at some gifts I receive from friends with bad taste (LOL).

You can test anything but you have to obey three rules: being energy balanced (meridian wise), knowing how to ask the questions (the phrasing of the question can lead to really open answers, which can be misleading), and keep an open mind about the answer (it can be totally against your beliefs). The fourth rule would be to get feedback whenever you can (for the keys or the lost car, it's easy, you just find them back, for the geobiology, a specialist came to that person's house and with his equipment tested exactly the same as I did, etc.)

Data said:

I suspected once that it is a kind of yes/no channeling of the body's information. Which brings up the question about correct information / corruption caused by e.g. strong emotional beliefs.

Click to expand...

Hi Data,

One of the first thing we learn is that in order to muscle test properly, you must first have your energy system (meridians) balanced, then master oral questioning properly (when you ask questions and only get yes/no answers, it's easy to get carried away in one direction and completely dismiss another, just as valid, option, etc.) and third, be open and unexpecting of the answer. Of course, if you're not careful, you could be influencing the test (if only because of the ligands for example). So the whole skill is to actually learn to see the world AS IT IS. That's why I'm on this forum!!! But it's true that you have to work on yourself a lot before being able to take on some cases, as your test could be influenced because of your belief system. I guess that's the difference between a good practitioner and an OK (or mediocre) one: trying to expand your views, getting feedback from other sources, constantly learning from trustworthy sources.

Ruth said:

Not too keen on aliens either when I queried

Click to expand...

Hi Ruth,

I understand. Most practitioners won't test what they don't feel comfortable with. That's why we should always learn, learn, learn. Knowledge protects!

My experience with kinesiology is that it worked when nothing else did. I went to a clinical kinesiologist. I'm not sure how that differs from HK or PK. It seemed to be all inclusive. Therapies ranged from exposure to certain sound frequencies, colored lights, supplements, gem, herb, flower, and homeopathic tinctures, diet, work, spirit detachment, emotional memory work, etc. I actually ended up moving to Hawaii after following my clinical kinesiologist there.

I didn't think I'd ever get strong enough to face the 'real world', but things changed once my doctor advised me to spend more time playing the guitar. That had the most impact on my health by far. Looking back it seems so obvious, but at the time I never would have guessed that playing it was so essential to my healing process.

Hello Mrs. Tigersoap :) ,

thanks very much for opening this thread it is great to be able to learn form your experiences.

In the past I was looking into Body Talk applied for animals so I can use it in my practice but it turned out the method is too complicated.
I didn't know then that this method stemmed from applied kinesiology.
And then few days ago my chiropractor did some tests (she felt comfortable as she knows I am very much into the "weird" stuff) mostly on my cranial bones in relation to TMJ. I was amazed.
Even with the test question YES and NO.

Actually this method seems just like the thing I was looking for. Unlike Body talk protocol applied kinesiology is short and sweet, perfect to quickly diagnose problem or to check if I am giving the right remedy.
Now the problem is that I need to use it on animals and I was wondering what is your experience, is it as effective when you use surrogate?!
that is if you ever used this method on babies using mother as a surrogate.

Also I tested this method (using brachio-radialis) on few of my friends, it was spot on in 3 out of 4 cases. One case was totally confusing.
Can it be that the method is not working in the persons which are energetically imbalanced (funny thing is this person is totally healthy, yoga teacher, strict vegetarian and on the whole seems to be pretty much in balance).
I remember when my chiropractor first demonstrated the method, when she would put magnet on my groin that seemed to render the method dysfunctional due to interference of the magnet.


I totally agree with you that this method shouldn't be used for silly questions such as - is my husband cheating- I would consider that as abuse.
I think as long as you focus on health issues and things related to the body emotional interference will be kept at minimum.

Once again thanks for your willingness to share your expertise. I am looking forward to further discussions.
At the moment I am in the learning and testing stage and trying to gain as much experience as possible before I can find a proper way how to incorporate it into the practice without raising to many eyebrows as some of my clients are totally ignorant about these things and consider them as some sort of witchcraft.

Best regrds

Also can you really test yourself on your own or you need someone to help you.

If you can, how is it exactly done.

Miss Isness said:

My experience with kinesiology is that it worked when nothing else did. I went to a clinical kinesiologist. I'm not sure how that differs from HK or PK. It seemed to be all inclusive. Therapies ranged from exposure to certain sound frequencies, colored lights, supplements, gem, herb, flower, and homeopathic tinctures, diet, work, spirit detachment, emotional memory work, etc. I actually ended up moving to Hawaii after following my clinical kinesiologist there.

I didn't think I'd ever get strong enough to face the 'real world', but things changed once my doctor advised me to spend more time playing the guitar. That had the most impact on my health by far. Looking back it seems so obvious, but at the time I never would have guessed that playing it was so essential to my healing process.

Click to expand...

Your experience is similar to mine: I was referred to Health Kinesiology when nothing else was working for my insomnia. I had been an insomniac since childhood and it had become a huge problem when I had to stop working because I hadn't slept for several days. And in just 2 sessions, HK cured the problem. I was so amazed. I kept on working on other stuff and finally after a year or so, started taking classes and then established myself as a practitioner. It's amazing how something so simple can make such a huge difference.

Deckard said:

Now the problem is that I need to use it on animals and I was wondering what is your experience, is it as effective when you use surrogate?!
that is if you ever used this method on babies using mother as a surrogate.

Click to expand...

Yes, it is just as effective. I've worked on animals many times. On dogs and cats, mostly, but one of my colleagues is a horse fanatic and she has great results with them. I have many babies and toddlers in my practice and they are very receptive to the work,too. They usually sit on their mother's lap (or on the floor) and play while the mother and I do all the work!
You can work on animals for their behavioural problems, for optimum nutrition, for allergies/intolerances, etc. The more you know about them, the easier the work become. One of my clients, who is a veterinarian, was coming to work on herself and when she saw what muscle testing could do, she decided to take classes to incorporate it in her work. She said she knew a ostheopath for horses who worked with that and had great results and now she understood why.

About self-test: yes, you can test on yourself. The way we do it in HK is that you choose a muscle you're comfortable testing: it can be brachio-radialis if you are sitting at a table (or couch) and can rest your elbow on it. You then apply pressure with your other hand. In HK, at first we do the self-test on our own quadriceps but we are generally encouraged to later use one of the muscles of the finger. I personally always test on my little finger. My colleague likes to test on the fourth finger. At first, the quadriceps is the most reliable because it is usually so strong. But once you are used to it, you can start double check with your fingers what you tested on the quadri and then only use the finger to test. I'm not sure it makes much sense without showing you, though.

Deckard said:

Can it be that the method is not working in the persons which are energetically imbalanced (funny thing is this person is totally healthy, yoga teacher, strict vegetarian and on the whole seems to be pretty much in balance).

Click to expand...

Exactly. In order for the method to be reliable, the tester has to be energetically balanced and so should be the person tested. Without this balance, the test is not as reliable and could lead you to make mistakes. Sometimes, when I test, I get bizarre answers and go nowhere and surely enough when I test the balance, I'm out of balance or the person is. To achieve this balance, there are points on the body to hold or tap. Of course, the best is take at least one class to learn to properly test and learn the 'art' of questioning. Jane Thurnell-Read also wrote a book about Verbal Questioning Skills in Health Kinesiology, as it is crucial to know how to ask to have the most reliable answers.

Deckard said:

I remember when my chiropractor first demonstrated the method, when she would put magnet on my groin that seemed to render the method dysfunctional due to interference of the magnet.

Click to expand...

Yes, it's true. The same goes with cellphones. If a person tests strong, and you bring a cellphone (even if it is shut down) within a metre, they test weak. It is important to do that test with the hand of the person on the navel so that you test their whole system and not just the brachio-radialis, which would mean that you only test the Stomach meridian.

Deckard said:

At the moment I am in the learning and testing stage and trying to gain as much experience as possible before I can find a proper way how to incorporate it into the practice without raising to many eyebrows as some of my clients are totally ignorant about these things and consider them as some sort of witchcraft.

Click to expand...

:) People can indeed sometimes consider it like witchcraft. Some people ask me if i'm a psychic, as I sometimes tell them things that I'm not supposed to know, but I explain them how it works, generally putting the emphasis on the meridians so that they can relate to something they usuallly know (acupuncture).

Hope this helps you see how you could use it for your practice. ;)

Hello Mrs.Tigersoap

I'm happy to see an other HK practitionner here. I'm one too, but I don't practice professionally for the moment. I just work on me and time to time, on my relations.

I must say that the best results (or rather the more visible) I've had is with the allergy correction. Very efficient in the most of case.
But sometimes I'm not very satisfied and I wonder if there is something wrong with my practice.
One thing very bizarre is since I'm more involved in the work here, I got very strange "demands" from my body :
for example : the most of the corrections are to "build" - I don't have to use the "menu", but however, the test is not the same as for the point/operation matrix . The points are not the same too (before it was classically the end points or those of others groups), and often I must use the "batteries".
I must wait for a long time between two sessions.
I don't really know what to think about that. I 'm waiting and observe. As you seem to have a good experience in this stuff, perhaps do you got some ideas on what is happening?

Hi Stardust,

Yeah, my husband had told me about another HK practitioner on the forum! Great to be able to share ideas!
I only see two possibilities for your situation:

1. Maybe your body is not confident enough with the procedures (or points) from the menu. That could be if you're not practicing enough with them OR if your energy is for the moment in disarray because you are learning so much new stuff (as I'm sure you're doing on this forum). Never underestimate the work that is done on you just by reading. Being confronted to all this new knowledge is probably 'messing around' a bit with all that you've learn in HK, and it needs some time to settle/integrate . That might also explain why you cannot work that much on yourself: because you are working so much already! Don't forget that all the concepts, all the work which is put forward here probably work on your ligands, helping old beliefs to be discarded. And that's exactly what the procedure MC (mécanismes de contrôle) do! So, in many ways, you're doing MC's all the time by coming here. And when you see how tiring and powerful that procedure is, you get an idea of what is going on..

If your body/energy is not comfortable enough for lack of practice (but somehow, I don't think that's the problem here), just take some time to re-read the material given by your teacher, and re-practice all the procedures that you know as much as possible.

2. Maybe you (your energy) are at a stage where you need to experiment with HK. It used to happen to me a lot at the beginning, and now it pops up from time to time. It's actually a good thing. It allows you to keep an open mind about what you do, being open to new techniques. Your body may just be teaching you 'There is more to this than you think'. That's what it's telling me all the time! Now, if you tell me that you NEVER use the procedures nor the NV/NL/EP/SED/ACT, then maybe your energy is just discarding the whole thing (il jette le bébé avec l'eau du bain, if you know what I mean), and that's a shame, because there IS some pretty amazing stuff in the menu. It all depends on the results you get with your 'free' technique.

But don't forget that Jimmy is the first to say that HK is open-ended and that new material is being added all the time. I sometimes incorporated new corrections that I had to do for a specific reason and now they are an integral part of my menu. HK was made to experiment.

Anyway, this is my two cents ;)
Hope it gives you a little bit of answer?

Mrs.Tigersoap said:

1. Maybe your body is not confident enough with the procedures (or points) from the menu.

Click to expand...

During my formation I have working with all of them and my teacher (it was M. Fontaine) was uncompromising with the "homework".
There's few procedures with I feel uncomfortable, and for a long time, I use the menu as it is build, and except some of them, it was OK.

The fact is that I have more results with the others than with me (and you can't imagine the hours I spent testing and correcting myself) or the results on myself don't continue in the time.
As Martine said, there's 2 things which could make cancel the corrections : a big emotional trauma or a big electro-magnetic stress ( and perhaps others thing we don't know)

Remembering that yesterday after posting my last message, I have had a little "dialogue" with my body, and it seems that the second option is the problem, and, for what I have tested, I have to work with the LT "protection against EM" each month to cancel the EM effect and the consequences.
The bad new is that all what I have done before is like I have done nothing :(

So I will try with the LT, and see if I feel a difference. For the origin of the EM, I don't want to talk about too soon , I 'd like to obtain confirmation with other tests and persons.

Don't forget that all the concepts, all the work which is put forward here probably work on your ligands, helping old beliefs to be discarded. And that's exactly what the procedure MC (mécanismes de contrôle) do! So, in many ways, you're doing MC's all the time by coming here. And when you see how tiring and powerful that procedure is, you get an idea of what is going on..

Click to expand...

Indeed, I have made a link with this kind of procedures( and not only the MC, but a lot of psy factors) and that is the only thing which stay effective : when I have understand something here, I don't have to come back on it! :) only to go more profundly.
What's amazing is that some things which have litterally disappeared (obsessions for example) and my mind processes are not exactly the same than before I work on all this stuff here. Oh, I have always a lot of "little I" who seed riot and I'm not free from all the" programms, buffers, and predator's mind" but it's rather encouraging.

So, "l'aventure continue" !

Just other thing, I don't know if you have read " Meeting with remarkable men" of Gurdjieff, but in the chapter where he talked about Ekim Bey, it seems, at a moment, that he spoke in fact of the muscular test (when he said that he could guess the name or the age of everybody just by feeling the muscular reaction of people when their hands were above an alphabet ). I found it funny...

I knew that your teacher was M.! She used to be my teacher too!

It's true for the EMF, that they can cancel stuff. Now, as you tested it was the case, you can see if it comes from your place, your workplace, etc. and not only protect yourself with the EMF LT but maybe also with geobiology corrections.

If you haven't followed the geobiology seminar yet, don't worry: read about it (on the net, in Jane's book, etc.) and simply test where there is something to do (room by room, etc.), then test what to do (whether it is a drawing, a battery, a crystal, etc.) and apply what the test tells you to do. I haven't followed the geobiology seminar yet and still make useful corrections that way. As a matter of fact, my apartment is located near a huge antenna and had to test carefully all the procedures to correct that problem before I could actually work on anybody. And I have been wearing a gizmo for YEARS to reinforce that.

I haven't read Meeting With Remarkable Men yet, but it sure sounds like muscle testing! That's funny :)

Can the 'Field' book have anything to do with kynesiology?

http://www.cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php?topic=7462

Cyre2067 said:

One of the examples he gave was that if you have the person watching a politician speak they always test weak.

Click to expand...

Try testing after you've made the sign of the cross, as it is done in church. It will test weak. That's because the "flow of energy" in the front main meridian is upward, and yet the movement of the hand is downward. Then the hand's movement from left to right can be seen a sealing of this downward, weakening movement.

dantem said:

Can the 'Field' book have anything to do with kynesiology?

Click to expand...

Of course! See below a quote from www klinghardt org/faqs.asp. Note that 'signal enhancers' are normal polished plexiglass quaders, often combined with polarization filters from photography! See also the excerpt of Klinghardt's book in my post in the 'Field' thread.

Q: What is the Autonomic Nervous System?
A: The Autonomic Nervous System (ANS) is the part of the nervous system that controls functions such as blood flow, heart rate, organ function, digestion, the immune system and healing, etc.

Q: What is ART?
A: Autonomic Response Testing (ART) is a system of evaluation and treatment developed by Dietrich Klinghardt, MD, Ph.D, and Lousia Williams, DC, ND. ART uses muscle testing through biofeedback of the Autonomic Nervous System (ANS) to determine disturbances and potential remedies. ART is a Functional Assessment used by the Holistic/ Integrative Doctor, to determine bodily function (or dysfunction), not specific diseases. Dr. Klinghardt blended the muscle testing of American Applied Kinesiology with the understanding of the anatomy and physiology of German Neural Therapy to develop ART. The result is a highly structured and sophisticated muscle testing biofeedback system designed to give reliable and reproducible results. A medical assessment tool (like ART) that records generalized and localized ANS disturbance can be helpful in determining the root causes of health disturbances. Autonomic Response Testing (ART) grew out of the importance of detecting and correcting problems of the autonomic nervous system. ART allows the doctor to correct the problems of the ANS and to help restore the self regulating mechanism of the body allowing the patient to return to a state of health.

Q: How is ART different from other types of muscle testing?
A: ART is different from other forms of muscle testing in that is uses the latest findings of quantum and biophotonic physics to aid in the assessment of the body. This allows for a much deeper level of testing not available before to traditional kinesiologists. Tools such as a polarization filter and signal enhancers are used to get stronger, clearer feedback from the body. ART often finds things that are missed with traditional kinesiology. ART pracitioners, in general, also have the ability to test for a wider variety of root causes of illness, including specific infections, toxins, and emotional disturbances.

Q: Can ART diagnose diseases?
A: ART is used along with traditional tests, to determine the root causes of illness. It is not used to diagnose diseases.

Q: How accurate is ART testing?
A: ART has been shown to be the most accurate of all kinesiology techniques, with the best reproducability and inter-examiner reliability.

Click to expand...