9/11 > WTC Attack
Charlie Sheen and 9/11
dhess31:
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/march2006/200306charliesheen.htm
Don
Puck:
Took about 3-4 years for JFK to get some attention, bout time 9-11 is too. Noticing the same trend among my friends - they're starting to wake up.
Renaissance:
My initial reaction prior to reading the article was, "what if he's coming in the movement as a distraction." After reading the article and doing a little research I don't think that is the case. He supports the solid pieces (i.e. the big holes in the official version - i.e. the little hole at the Pentagon) and it seems like he is facing some tough times as a result of his support. The first 'Charlie Sheen forum' I came across, one guy posted how he was an idiot drug addict, while all the others posted in support of the 911 truth movement. I found all that support rather interesting.
The next forum showed how his wife had filed for divorce just a couple of weeks ago:
--- Quote ---Denise Richards Files for Divorce from Charlie Sheen
Actress Denise Richards has filed for divorce from actor Charlie Sheen,
citing irreconcilable differences. Married since June 2002, the couple
have a one-year-old daughter and are expecting their second child in
three months. Richards is seeking spousal support and full legal and
physical custody of the children; she has asked Sheen be granted
visitation rights. Richards has retained powerhouse attorney Laura
Wasser, known for representing Hollywood's most powerful men.
--- End quote ---
One has to wonder if these 'irreconcilable differences' deal with his decision to publicly support the 911 Truth Movement. Certainly for a wife to leave while she is pregnent means some pretty big 'differences' must be there.
He'll be facing a custody trial for his children while standing up for the truth about September 11th. That can't be easy.
Heimdallr:
See, some people will focus on what he is saying. And others will focus on his past. A few people who I've shown the prison planet article to have scoffed at the notion that Sheen represents a credible source. His associations with cocaine and prostitues is undeniable, but still what he says is very true. Leave it to prison planet to paint Sheen as a "highly credible public figure" and a "prominent, credible whistleblower". Maybe the implication is that he is an actor and thus more weight is added to his words. But he isn't blowing any whistles.
Then again, his credibility should be defined in a fluid way. If he continues to support the truth, then, for me, he will be a worthwhile spokesperson. But it's hard to define what motives famous people have in taking on political issues. That is to be determined as well.
So, I'm unsure if Sheen is meant to be a distraction or not. His father does have a history of speaking up. But from my experience the involvement of famous persons in the truth movement is few and far between. And it's typically for their benefit, not for all. so it seems to me
dhess31:
One of the reasons I posted this article in particular is because of who he is. Although his dad was known as somewhat of an activist, Charlie doesn't usually get involved in this kind of stuff to me knowledge.
In general he doesn't get "associated with the left". so maybe, MAYBE, people who are on the fence might listen to what he has to say since he isn't known as a whack-job.
Although I'm sure he will get labeled like that NOW.
Don
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
Go to full version