9/11 > WTC Attack
Charlie Sheen and 9/11
Mr. Premise:
I think you are right about this. He is more well-known for not being political, so he is harder to write off.
As for his reputation as a hedonistic airhead, someone put it this way to me today: "If even Charlie Sheen can figure it out, no one has any excuses not to see the official story is full of holes!"
--- Quote from: dhess31 ---One of the reasons I posted this article in particular is because of who he is. Although his dad was known as somewhat of an activist, Charlie doesn't usually get involved in this kind of stuff to me knowledge.
In general he doesn't get "associated with the left". so maybe, MAYBE, people who are on the fence might listen to what he has to say since he isn't known as a whack-job.
Although I'm sure he will get labeled like that NOW.
Don
--- End quote ---
Mr. Premise:
As of now, 77% of respondents say they agree with Charlie Sheen on the CNN website. Vote here: http://www.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/showbiz.tonight/
Approaching Infinity:
--- Quote from: DonaldJHunt ---As of now, 77% of respondents say they agree with Charlie Sheen on the CNN website. Vote here: http://www.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/showbiz.tonight/
--- End quote ---
79% now. :)
Ruth:
I particularly like this effort at damage control by the Boston Herald. Talk about blatant.
http://thetrack.bostonherald.com/moreTrack/view.bg?articleid=131750
--- Quote ---Charlie Sheen doesn’t buy 9/11 spin
By Inside Track
Thursday, March 23, 2006
Charlie Sheen, following in the footsteps of his politically outspoken father, Martin Sheen, has joined the chorus of conspiracy theorists who don’t believe the official version of events surrounding 9/11.
The estranged husband of Denise Richards, who is better known for his affinity for prostitutes and gambling than his Homeland Security credentials, told the GCN Radio Network he doesn’t buy the government’s explanation that “19 amateurs with box cutters (took) over four commercial airliners and (hit) 75 percent of their targets.”
The “Two and a Half Men” star, who was shooting his former sitcom “Spin City” the morning the World Trade Center towers fell, said he was immediately suspicious about the official reason given for the buildings’ collapse. After watching in horror as the South Tower was hit, he said to his brother, “call me insane, but did it sorta look like those buildings came down in a controlled demolition?”
Sheen pointed out that eyewitnesses recounted hearing what sounded like bombs and explosions coming from the basement levels of the buildings and discounted the theory that the damage to the towers’ lobbies was the result of fireballs traveling 110 feet down elevator shafts.
The father of two also questioned whether a plane actually hit the Pentagon and how President George Bush was able to see the first plane hit the north tower, when no live footage of that incident was carried.
“I guess one of the perks of being president is that you get access to TV channels that don’t exist in the known universe,” the actor-turned-pseudo-intellect quipped.
“It is up to us to reveal the truth,” Sheen asserted. “We owe it to everybody’s life who was drastically altered, horrifically that day and forever. We owe it to them to uncover what happened.”
Excuse us if we don’t exactly feel that Charlie’s the man for that job!
--- End quote ---
Mr. Premise:
Yes, it's blatant. That's because the Herald is a cheesy tabloid. The classier paper in Boston, the Globe (owned by the New York Times, didn't run the story at all! At least I didn't see it there. Didn't go through every page, though.
--- Quote from: Ruth ---I particularly like this effort at damage control by the Boston Herald. Talk about blatant.
http://thetrack.bostonherald.com/moreTrack/view.bg?articleid=131750
--- End quote ---
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version