9/11 > The Pentagon Strike

The Pentagon Flyover: How They Pulled It Off

(1/4) > >>

Craig Ranke CIT:
Hi SOTT.

Sorry I haven't been around lately but I have been rather busy.

Get ready for a new full feature presentation further exposing the Pentagon deception.

We have new smoking gun interviews and have compiled a ton of data proving the NTSB and 84 RADES data fraudulent.

In addition to proving that the plane was on the north side of the former citgo gas station we can now also prove that it came from east of the Potomac River and actually flew over DC skies!

This is absolutely fatal to the official flight path that never has the plane over DC skies at all.

We will demonstrate how the C-130 and the white "mystery plane" or E4B were used as cover for the decoy jet that flew away from the Pentagon timed perfectly with the explosion.

Check out the trailer:

High quality divx version (looks great on full screen mode!)


Low quality youtube version

I'll be back in a few days with the full version.

Peace!

Craig

Nathan:
Hi Craig,

The trailer looks great!

Also, since you haven't released/uploaded it just yet, it might be worth mentioning there were a couple of typos.

"Proving 9/11 an inside job" -- missing "was".
"Proving the black box and radar data fraudulent" -- missing "was".

The up-beat music seemed to not quite match the content, but that's just my personal opinion! The footage itself was engaging. There are plenty of 9/11 videos/presentations out there that rely mostly on pictures, so it's good to have engaging cut-aways. If you want some smooth pans with the camera, you might want to consider a fluid-head tripod. Unfortunately, they are not as cheap as photography tripods but they don't jerk or drag the camera when you pan.

Another thing for future interviews, try not to give the interviewees too much head room. If there's too much space above their heads it looks like they're drowning in the shot. Go by the thirds rule (dividing the frame up into horizontal thirds), always keep one third of "head space" above the person's head. And there's also looking room too: if a person is not sitting front on (as is usually the case), you should have them on the opposite side to where they are looking, so two-thirds of the screen become the person's "looking room". But from what I can see on the trailer, you already know about looking room :)

I look forward to seeing the presentation in its entirety.

Approaching Infinity:
Nathan, it's common to leave out those verbs in headlines/ads. So it's not a really big deal.

Craig Ranke CIT:

--- Quote from: Nathan ---Another thing for future interviews, try not to give the interviewees too much head room. If there's too much space above their heads it looks like they're drowning in the shot. Go by the thirds rule (dividing the frame up into horizontal thirds), always keep one third of "head space" above the person's head. And there's also looking room too: if a person is not sitting front on (as is usually the case), you should have them on the opposite side to where they are looking, so two-thirds of the screen become the person's "looking room". But from what I can see on the trailer, you already know about looking room :)

I look forward to seeing the presentation in its entirety.
--- End quote ---
Thanks a lot for the advice Nathan.

I never had aspirations to be a filmmaker (and still don't) but our investigation has turned up so much important footage that it has simply led to that.

I am learning a lot as I go and have been teaching myself video editing.

That trailer was pretty much my first effort editing on my own other than this piece I did for practice:
http://www.thepentacon.com/Ingersoll-Collection.htm

But the new full length presentation has turned out a lot better than I thought it would!

As soon as I can figure out how to get a decent compressed version rendered it will be uploaded.

This has turned out to not be an easy task for some reason.

Craig Ranke CIT:

--- Quote from: hkoehli ---Nathan, it's common to leave out those verbs in headlines/ads. So it's not a really big deal.
--- End quote ---
Exactly.

Those weren't typos.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page