Cassiopaea Sessions? it stopped?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bo
  • Start date Start date

Bo

The Living Force
FOTCM Member
Can anyone tell me why the sessions which Laura had was stopped at September 28, 2002

as you can see this is the final session I came across http://perceval.netfirms.com/sessions/020928.html and I tried to find more sessions about that matter, but i could not find any.

Can anyone please tell me if there are more sessions or not?



P.S I'm also really interested in what is going to happen in 2012, I hope I can share my ideas with you in the upcoming 5 years.


-Adam-
 
No new transcript.

I know that Laura and Co. are not "obligated" to provide new transcripts on any formal schedule, but the trend lately has been rather consistent, one session per month, towards the end of the month. I also know that in previous sessions, there have been certain sensitivities, some related to personal issues, some related to information that was deemed to be "risky" in its disclosure. I don't fully understand all of the risks associated with disclosure, but I don't let that lack of understanding color my judgement (or so I'd like to think...). Certainly I cannot imagine how much more "risky" the information could be when compared to what was in the most recent HPH update, many things of which are seeming to be right on the money so to speak.

This is all the more why I find it curious that the "normal" end-of-month schedule for May was not followed. I'm curious, can the rather glaring omission be explained - even if only a little? I am not "demanding" an explanation, but I am trying to see how the schedule difference fits into the rest of the information. "Knowledge protects".
 
Re: No new transcript.

rs said:
I know that Laura and Co. are not "obligated" to provide new transcripts on any formal schedule, but the trend lately has been rather consistent, one session per month, towards the end of the month. I also know that in previous sessions, there have been certain sensitivities, some related to personal issues, some related to information that was deemed to be "risky" in its disclosure. I don't fully understand all of the risks associated with disclosure, but I don't let that lack of understanding color my judgement (or so I'd like to think...). Certainly I cannot imagine how much more "risky" the information could be when compared to what was in the most recent HPH update, many things of which are seeming to be right on the money so to speak.

This is all the more why I find it curious that the "normal" end-of-month schedule for May was not followed. I'm curious, can the rather glaring omission be explained - even if only a little? I am not "demanding" an explanation, but I am trying to see how the schedule difference fits into the rest of the information. "Knowledge protects".

Laura and her family suffered a great personal loss :cry:

http://www.cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php?topic=17909.0
 
Re: No new transcript.

Guardian said:
rs said:
This is all the more why I find it curious that the "normal" end-of-month schedule for May was not followed. I'm curious, can the rather glaring omission be explained - even if only a little? I am not "demanding" an explanation, but I am trying to see how the schedule difference fits into the rest of the information. "Knowledge protects".

Laura and her family suffered a great personal loss :cry:

http://www.cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php?topic=17909.0


Which is why its externally considerate to give her, the family, and the chateau plenty of time to rest. And a better question would be: "What can we do to help in the meantime?" :flowers:
 
Re: No new transcript.

rs said:
This is all the more why I find it curious that the "normal" end-of-month schedule for May was not followed. I'm curious, can the rather glaring omission be explained - even if only a little? I am not "demanding" an explanation, but I am trying to see how the schedule difference fits into the rest of the information. "Knowledge protects".

Maybe instead of seeing the sessions as something normal that Laura has to do each month, you could see them as a gift from Laura to all of us.

By the way, if you have read all of them, you might have noticed that it takes a lot of energy to do a session and if you have been following this forum over the past weeks, you might have noticed too that Laura and her family suffered a great personal loss.

Are-you really sure that you are not demanding an explanation, since you have just started that thread ?
 
Re: No new transcript.

Quote from: rs on Yesterday at This is all the more why I find it curious that the "normal" end-of-month schedule for May was not followed. I'm curious, can the rather glaring omission be explained - even if only a little? I am not "demanding" an explanation, but I am trying to see how the schedule difference fits into the rest of the information. "Knowledge protects".


Perhaps rs ask yourself this! What have i given lately as to understand what it is to receiving?

The great art of giving consists in this: the gift should cost very little and yet be greatly coveted, so that it may be the more highly appreciated.
Baltasar Gracian

Get not your friends by bare compliments, but by giving them sensible tokens of your love.
Socrates (469 BC - 399 BC)

Generosity is giving more than you can, and pride is taking less than you need.
Kahlil Gibran (1883 - 1931)
 
Re: No new transcript.

Gandalf said:
rs said:
This is all the more why I find it curious that the "normal" end-of-month schedule for May was not followed. I'm curious, can the rather glaring omission be explained - even if only a little? I am not "demanding" an explanation, but I am trying to see how the schedule difference fits into the rest of the information. "Knowledge protects".

Maybe instead of seeing the sessions as something normal that Laura has to do each month, you could see them as a gift from Laura to all of us.

By the way, if you have read all of them, you might have noticed that it takes a lot of energy to do a session and if you have been following this forum over the past weeks, you might have noticed too that Laura and her family suffered a great personal loss.

Are-you really sure that you are not demanding an explanation, since you have just started that thread ?
I do see them as a gift, and I understand the energy it takes. Somehow I completely missed the thread mentioned regarding Laura's loss. I'm terribly sorry and had I "had a clue" would never have even thought to post this, but now, unfortunately, the damage is done.

My most sincere condolences to Laura and her family.

Edit:

Actually, I would ask if one of the moderators could simply delete this whole thread. Again, had I known I would have never posted it to begin with and now it just seems so rude and embarrassing.
 
Re: No new transcript.

rs, I understand that you are getting a bit impatient. So are we all, including me. I just haven't had what it takes to even be in the frame of mind to sit down and do it lately. Soon, though. And if you don't mind, let's leave the thread so others might learn something? Like I'm human and DO have a life with unexpected (or not so unexpected) things that happen and take the stuffing out of me.

Thanks.
 
Re: No new transcript.

rs said:
This is all the more why I find it curious that the "normal" end-of-month schedule for May was not followed. I'm curious, can the rather glaring omission be explained - even if only a little? I am not "demanding" an explanation, but I am trying to see how the schedule difference fits into the rest of the information. "Knowledge protects".

I was wondering if it would be possible to make the "Condolences" Thread sticky...at least for a time?

I know many folks who don't get on their computers and check their groups more than once a week or so....and we know how quickly threads can drop.
 
Re: No new transcript.

Laura said:
rs, I understand that you are getting a bit impatient. So are we all, including me. I just haven't had what it takes to even be in the frame of mind to sit down and do it lately. Soon, though. And if you don't mind, let's leave the thread so others might learn something? Like I'm human and DO have a life with unexpected (or not so unexpected) things that happen and take the stuffing out of me.

Thanks.

I have been thinking about your loss lately Laura, and I truly hope you are ok, or as ok as one can be under the circumstances. Some part of me tells me that you are, you have such a strong group of people surrounding you at the chateau, that I imagine you have been given wonderful support.

You've been keeping track with the forum without rest ever since, which is admirable. Please, take care of yourself!
 
Re: No new transcript.

rs said:
I do see them as a gift, and I understand the energy it takes. Somehow I completely missed the thread mentioned regarding Laura's loss. I'm terribly sorry and had I "had a clue" would never have even thought to post this, but now, unfortunately, the damage is done.

My most sincere condolences to Laura and her family.

Edit:

Actually, I would ask if one of the moderators could simply delete this whole thread. Again, had I known I would have never posted it to begin with and now it just seems so rude and embarrassing.

Hi rs,
All that is, is lessons.

While I don't think that any real damage has been done, I do think that's a perfect moment when you can give something. Instead of focusing on feeling embarrassed, you can offer this thread as a gift which can help others to see Laura as a human being who has her private problems from time to time, and that with all she's been Giving for most of her life she really deserves some trust on this matter.

I'm just pretty sure you were not the only one who "couldn't wait" and was becoming a bit impatient. And there will be next ones for sure. In this case, 'your message' can serve as a reminder for all of them. That can also balance the energies a little bit, as it takes a small (but conscious) sacrifice on your part. :)

osit.
 
Re: No new transcript.

Guardian said:
I was wondering if it would be possible to make the "Condolences" Thread sticky...at least for a time?

I now many folks who don't get on their computers and check their groups more than once a week or so....and we know how quickly threads can drop.

Good idea and thank you for mentionnig it.

Done.
 
Re: No new transcript.

rs -- I asked this question too so don't feel too bad about it. I just didn't start my own thread to do so in. like Possibility of Being said above, there is probably at least a few others who are impatient like you and me.
 
Back
Top Bottom