Antibacterial products fuel resistant bacteria in streams and rivers

H-KQGE

Dagobah Resident
I remember a thread (probably in the diet & health section) that spoke about certain chemicals found in soaps & detergents etc. It's hardly surprising to hear that they're creating problems in rivers & streams.

http://www.caryinstitute.org/newsroom/antibacterial-products-fuel-resistant-bacteria-streams-and-rivers

Studies in Chicago metro-area unveil concerning trends, urban sites most impacted

(Millbrook, N.Y.) Triclosan – a synthetic antibacterial widely used in personal care products – is fueling the development of resistant bacteria in streams and rivers. So reports a new paper in the journal Environmental Science and Technology, which is the first to document triclosan resistance in a natural environment.

Invented for surgeons in the 1960s, triclosan slows or stops the growth of bacteria, fungi, and mildew. Currently, around half of liquid soaps contain the chemical, as well as toothpastes, deodorants, cosmetics, liquid cleansers, and detergents.Triclosan enters streams and rivers through domestic wastewater, leaky sewer infrastructure, and sewer overflows, with residues now common throughout the United States.

Emma Rosi-Marshall, one of the paper's authors and an aquatic ecologist at the Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies in Millbrook, New York explains: "The bacterial resistance caused by triclosan has real environmental consequences. Not only does it disrupt aquatic life by changing native bacterial communities, but it's linked to the rise of resistant bacteria that could diminish the usefulness of important antibiotics."

With colleagues from Loyola University and the Illinois Sustainable Technology Center, Rosi-Marshall explored how bacteria living in stream and river sediments responded to triclosan in both natural and controlled settings. Field studies were conducted at three sites in the Chicago metropolitan region: urban North Shore Channel, suburban West Branch Dupage River, and rural Nippersink Creek.


A combined sewer overflow on Chicago's North Shore Channel. Photo: John Kelly.

Urbanization was correlated with a rise in both triclosan concentrations in sediments and the proportion of bottom-dwelling bacteria resistant to triclosan. A woodland creek had the lowest levels of triclosan-resistant bacteria, while a site on the North Shore Channel downstream of 25 combined sewer overflows had the highest levels.

Combined sewers deliver domestic sewage, industrial wastewater, and storm water to a regional treatment plant using a single pipe. Overflows occur when a pipe's capacity is exceeded, typically due to excessive runoff from high rainfall or snowmelt events. The result: untreated sewage flows directly into rivers and streams.

The research team found that combined sewer overflows that release untreated sewage are a major source of triclosan pollution in Chicago's North Shore Channel. In addition, their findings support past work that indicates sewage treatment plants can effectively remove triclosan from wastewater.

John Kelly of Loyola University Chicago, the paper's senior author, comments, "We detected much lower levels of triclosan at a site downstream of a sewage treatment facility as compared to a site downstream of combined sewer overflows. And we demonstrated a strong link between the presence of triclosan in the environment and the development of triclosan resistant bacteria."

Nearly 800 cities in the United States rely on combined sewer overflows, with the Environmental Protection Agency citing them as a major water pollution concern.

Artificial stream experiments, conducted at Loyola University, confirmed field findings that triclosan exposure triggers an increase in triclosan-resistant bacteria. In addition to the creation of these resistant bacteria, researchers also found a decrease in the diversity of benthic bacteria and a shift in the composition of bacterial communities. Most notable were a 6-fold increase in cyanobacteria and a dramatic die-off of algae.

Rosi-Marshall explains how these shifts could affect aquatic life, "Cyanobacteria are less nutritious than algae and can produce toxins. In triclosan-polluted streams and rivers, changes in microbial communities could negatively affect ecological function and animal communities."

The study is the latest in an ongoing effort to better understand the environmental and human health consequences of synthetic antimicrobials. Funding was provided by a grant from the Illinois Sustainable Technology Center.

Triclosan Exposure Increases Triclosan Resistance and Influences Taxonomic Composition of Benthic Bacterial Communities, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2013, 47 (15), pp 8923–8930



Authors:

Bradley Drury, Loyola University Chicago
John Scott, Illinois Sustainable Technology Center
Emma Rosi-Marshall, Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies
John J. Kelly, Loyola University Chicago


The Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies is a private, not-for-profit environmental research and education organization in Millbrook, N.Y. For thirty years, Cary Institute scientists have been investigating the complex interactions that govern the natural world. Their objective findings lead to more effective policy decisions and increased environmental literacy. Focal areas include air and water pollution, climate change, invasive species, and the ecological dimensions of infectious disease.

So, you get the point, it's bad stuff. Then there's this from almost a year ago: http://www.ufz.de/index.php?en=30926

Press release, 26 October 2012
Triclosan needs to be monitored

Leipzig. Researchers from Germany and Slovakia have pointed out that the chemical triclosan is one of those particularly harmful substances for the ecological status of rivers that are still not sufficiently monitored. With extensive monitoring conducted in the Elbe river basin that was more comprehensive than standard monitoring procedures, concentrations of the chemical at numerous test sites exceeded the predicted no-effect concentration (PNEC) for algal communities up to a factor of twelve. From the 500 river basin-specific pollutants investigated, triclosan (normally used as an anti-bacterial agent) ranked sixth as one of the most particularly harmful substances in Europe. It is therefore imperative to include this substance in routine monitoring programmes at the European scale, according to what researchers from the Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ) and the Environmental Institute in Slovakia have written in the journal „Environmental Science Pollution Research“.
[…]

This chemical has been on the market since 1972 and it was not until 1998 that the first serious effects were discovered. Until now triclosan has been used as an antibacterial and antifungal agent in personal care products (e.g. toothpaste) and sportswear. Scientists were also very concerned about the fact that nowadays triclosan cannot only be detected in organisms living in wastewater but also in human plasma and in breast milk. Therefore, harmful effects extending beyond water organisms cannot be excluded.
Approximately 350 tons of triclosan were used in the European Union in 2005. However, it is still not monitored in many parts of Europe. " Substances that are not on the list of priority substances do not have to be monitored and substances that are not monitored are usually not included on the list, because too little is known about their environmental relevance", Dr. Peter von der Ohe from the UFZ portrays this dilemma. Within the EU-research project MODELKEY scientists have therefore been closely examining several hundred pollutants in different European river catchment areas and have come up with suggestions on how the monitoring of rivers for chemicals could be improved.

Tilo Arnhold

As always there's more info dotted around & in this case, it seems as though every year going back a fair bit from today, has been some other discoveries of a similar sort.
 
You'd have thought we'd have learned our lesson after putting antibiotics in animal feed. The practice created super-bacteria in our food supply. When they started putting antibacterial agents in hand soaps, the problem was obvious to most experts, but the bottom-line was that billions could be made playing on the fears of consumers.

"Damn the future, and public health, we need to see big profits this quarter..."
 
Everyday I think that I can't see more madness in the world than what I've already seen. More fool me.

https://asunews.asu.edu/20140401-antimicrobial-product-regulation

Research shows need to regulate antimicrobial products
Posted: April 01, 2014


Does the widespread and still proliferating use of antimicrobial household products cause more harm than good to consumers and the environment? Evidence compiled in a new feature article published in the journal Environmental Science & Technology by Arizona State University professor Rolf Halden shows that decades of widespread use of antimicrobials has left consumers with no measurable benefits.

Worse yet, lax regulation has caused widespread contamination of the environment, wildlife and human populations with compounds that appear more toxic than safe, according to recent scientific research.

After 40 years of unfinished business, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has revisited the issue regarding the safety of some of the most common antibacterial additives of household products, chemicals called triclocarban (TCC) and triclosan (TCS), used in soaps and toothpaste.

"It's a big deal that the FDA is taking this on," said Rolf Halden, who has been tracking the issue for years. Halden is the director of the Center for Environmental Security, a joint research hub created with support from Arizona State University's Biodesign Institute, Fulton Schools of Engineering and the Security and Defense Systems Initiative.

The FDA has given soap manufacturers one year to demonstrate that the substances are safe or to take them out of the products altogether. The FDA rule is open for public comment until June.

"The FDA's move is a prudent and important step toward preserving the efficacy of clinically important antibiotics, preventing unnecessary exposure of the general population to endocrine disrupting and potentially harmful chemicals, and throttling back the increasing release and accumulation of antimicrobials in the environment," said Halden.

TCC and TCS were first introduced into the market in 1957 and 1964, respectively.

"This multi-billion dollar market has saturated supermarkets worldwide and vastly accelerated the consumption of antimicrobial products," wrote Halden in the ES&Tpaper. "Today, TCC and more so TCS can be found in soaps, detergents, clothing, carpets, paints, plastics, toys, school supplies, and even in pacifiers, with over 2,000 antimicrobial products available."

Antimicrobial soaps are very effective if used properly in health care settings. However, in households they don't work because hardly anyone uses them as originally intended. To be effective, public health officials recommend scrubbing your hands with the soap to a verse of "Row, row, row your boat" for about 20-30 seconds.

In reality, Halden says, consumers use antimicrobials in hand soap for far too short a period of time, 6 seconds on average. This pattern of use voids any potential health benefits but allow TCC and TCS to contaminate the environment and expose wildlife for a lifetime and multiple generations.

Using modern research technology and more sophisticated detection methods pioneered by his lab team, Halden has examined both the human health and environmental consequences of the widespread use of antimicrobials. His research has added to the growing worldwide scientific evidence of TCC and TCS collateral damage, including:

• TCC and TCS are the most abundant drugs in wastewater treatment plant sludge (60 percent of the mass of all drugs detectable in sewage sludge).

• TCC and TCS do not degrade easily and have persisted for more than 50 years in U.S. sediments.

• TCC and TCS contaminate lakes and rivers, exerting lifetime exposure to aquatic organisms, with endocrine disruptive and immunotoxic effects.

• Approximately 310,000 lbs/yr of TCC and 125,000 lbs/yr of TCS are applied inadvertently on U.S. agricultural land as a result of sewage sludge disposal, presenting a pathway for contamination of food with antimicrobials and drug resistant microbes

• Traces of toxic dioxin are present in commercial grade TCS and additional dioxins are known to form upon disposal down the drain and during sludge incineration.

And that's just the environmental and wildlife consequences. Among the human health risks are promoting the development of drug-resistant infections and altering hormone levels in developing children, possibly leading to the early onset of puberty.

The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) has found the chemicals in the urine of three-quarters of Americans, and an industry-funded study detected TCS in the breast milk of 97 percent of U.S. women tested.

In the U.S., regulating TCS and TCC has been challenging. In 1974, a single umbrella guidance document, called the topical antimicrobial drug products Over-the-Counter (OTC) Drug Monograph of the FDA, attempted to regulate all uses and best practices.

And yet, 2014 marks the 40th anniversary of the OTC FDA issuance, with this piece of federal legislation still not being finalized to protect consumers from ill effects of TCC and TCS.


Halden points out that ultimately, innovation holds the key toward solving the current worldwide antimicrobial issues. He envisions a more sustainable future with "green" next-generation antimicrobials on the horizon that offer broad-spectrum effectiveness against pathogens but possess low toxicity and potential for fostering antimicrobial drug resistance; they also will degrade rapidly in wastewater treatment plants, thus limiting unwanted exposure and contamination of the environment following use.

With a multi-billion dollar market potential, next-generation compounds should be a highly competitive industry and the source of new jobs to fuel the "green economy."

"Sustainability considerations already are informing the design of green pharmaceuticals and adopting this approach for antimicrobials promises to yield important benefits to people and the planet," he concludes in the ES&T paper.

In the interim, Halden will be off to Washington, D.C. to exchange information with scientists and lawmakers at the FDA and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

Citizens also have a chance to make their voice count in the responsible management of microbial risks in households and healthcare settings. The FDA welcomes public comments until June 16
 
More on the effects of triclosan, this time it's in the nose...

http://www.asm.org/index.php/journal-press-releases/92909-antimicrobial-from-soaps-promotes-bacteria-buildup-in-human-noses

WASHINGTON, DC – April 8, 2014 – An antimicrobial agent found in common household soaps, shampoos and toothpastes may be finding its way inside human noses where it promotes the colonization of Staphylococcus aureus bacteria and could predispose some people to infection. Researchers at the University of Michigan report their findings this week in a study published in mBio®, the online open-access journal of the American Society for Microbiology.



Triclosan, a man-made compound used in a range of antibacterial personal care products such as soaps, toothpastes, kitchen surfaces, clothes and medical equipment, was found in nasal passages of 41% of adults sampled. A higher proportion of subjects with triclosan also had S. aureus colonization. S. aureus could promote infection in some populations such as people undergoing surgery.



Triclosan has been around for the past 40 years, says senior study author Blaise Boles, PhD, an assistant professor of molecular, cellular and developmental biology at the university, and has been incorporated into many antibacterial household products within the past decade. Other studies have found traces of triclosan in human fluids including serum, urine and milk, and studies in mammals have found that high concentrations of triclosan can disrupt the endocrine system and decrease heart and skeletal muscle function.



“It’s really common in hand soaps, toothpastes and mouthwashes but there’s no evidence it does a better job than regular soap,” Boles says. “This agent may have unintended consequences in our bodies. It could promote S. aureus nasal colonization, putting some people at increased risk for infection.”



Additional experiments found that S. aureus grown in the presence of triclosan was better able to attach to human proteins, and that rats exposed to triclosan were more susceptible to S. aureus nasal colonization.



“In light of the significant use of triclosan in consumer products and its widespread environmental contamination, our data combined with previous studies showing impacts of triclosan on the endocrine system and muscle function suggest that a reevaluation of triclosan in consumer products is urgently needed,” the authors wrote.

Boles says he would like to conduct a more broad survey to determine if triclosan is influencing microbial colonization at additional human body sites.
 
Triclosan can form pretty nasty side-products in water such as chloroform, chlorophenols and ultimately dioxins. That's just bad in many ways as stated in the previous posts.

Apparently, activated charcoal can remove it from the water (such as many other organic compounds) but I don't know to what degree.
 

The Dirt on Antibacterial Soap and Hand Sanitizers​

Story at a glance:
  • Routinely disinfecting your body and surroundings may actually cause more harm than good in the long run. Not only do they promote the development of drug-resistant bacteria, antibacterial compounds such as triclosan and quaternary ammonium compounds (QACs or “quats”) have also been linked to a number of harmful health effects
  • Research has shown triclosan is a potent endocrine disruptor that interferes with thyroid function. Endocrine-disrupting chemicals can promote a variety of health problems, including obesity, breast, ovarian, prostate and testicular cancer, preterm and low birth weight babies, precocious puberty in girls and undescended testicles in boys
  • The U.S. Food and Drug Administration banned triclosan from soap products in 2016 due to suspected health risks, but it’s still found in many toothpastes, mouthwashes and hand sanitizers. Triclosan also makes its way into our food supply; it’s routinely found in lakes, rivers, streams, wastewater, irrigation water and biosolids applied to fields as fertilizer
  • QACs are found in cleaning products, hand sanitizers, personal care products, many kinds of wipes (surface, baby, hand and disinfecting wipes) and certain pesticides
  • Adverse health effects of QACs include allergic contact dermatitis, asthma and COPD, suppressed immune function, reduced fertility, impaired embryo development and developmental disorder, mitochondrial dysfunction and an increased risk of antimicrobial resistant infections
 

Attachments

  • triclosan-qac-antibacterial-soap-hand-sanitizers-pdf.pdf
    203.9 KB · Views: 0
Back
Top Bottom