March 6, 2004: Having been immersed in research for the second volume
of the The Secret
History of The World series, I have been rather quiet on the website
lately. Nevertheless, some of this research took an interesting turn recently,
and I was so fascinated by the connections that I really wanted to share
it with our readers right away, independently of other projects. This
was, however, a bit of a sticky wicket.
the past few days I have been wondering exactly how to go about putting
these items together without getting myself into hot water again, and
I couldn't quite see a clear path for this material. However, today the
Signs team pulled up a couple of most interesting articles that just happen
to provide the perfect platform for my subject. The first is a brief discussion
of Ethnic Specific Weapons entitled The
Mark of Doom, and the second is Did
a Comet Trigger The Great Chicago Fire? Let
me deal with the second article first. It tells us:
lends credence to an alternative explanation [for the Great Chicago
Fire of 1871]: The fire, along with less-publicized and even more deadly
blazes the same night in upstate Wisconsin and Michigan, was the result
of a comet fragment crashing into Earth's atmosphere. The comet theory
has been around - and most often discarded - since at least 1883,
but Robert Wood, a retired McDonnell Douglas physicist, said never before
has the orbital parameters of the rogue comet been taken into consideration.
suspect, in Wood's eyes, is a fragment from Biela's Comet, which had
been circling the sun every six years and nine months before a close
encounter with Jupiter caused it to break into two large fragments in
1845. During its next passage, astronomers noted a 1.5-million mile,
15-day gap between the two pieces. Wood said his analysis of the fragments'
positions during subsequent orbits shows that Jupiter's gravity again
affected their speed and trajectory, sending the smaller fragment on
a path toward Earth that ended in October 1871. He presented his findings
at a conference last week titled "Planetary Defense: Protecting Earth
from Asteroids," held in Garden Grove, Calif.
eyewitness reports of spontaneous ignitions, lack of smoke and "fire
balloons" falling from the sky to bolster his theory. If the fire had
been caused by comet debris, which is believed to have consisted of
small pieces of frozen methane, acetylene or other highly combustible
chemicals, it also would explain the cause of the fires blazing north
of Chicago, which wiped out 2,000 people and burned 4 million acres
of farm and prairie lands.
included many who showed no signs of being burned, Wood said. "This
would be consistent with either the absence of oxygen or the presence
of carbon monoxide or carbon dioxide above lethal levels," - a rare
- but not unprecedented - situation in large forest fires. In all, over
a 24-hour period, an area of land the size of Connecticut was burned.
the main body of the comet crashed into Lake Michigan, with peripheral
fragments causing the fires in Chicago, Wisconsin and Michigan. [...]
important about these findings," Wood said, "is that they show you people
can actually get killed from something from out of space."
Did you catch
the two most important comments? 1) "The comet theory has been around
- and most often discarded" and 2) "What's important
about these findings is that they show you people can actually get killed
from something from out of space."
above article reminded me of a few comments made by Morris Jessup in his
book The Case For the UFO, as follows:
of the great comets and the red spot on Jupiter in the late 1870's
was coincident with the mysterious appearance of a new crater on the
to be something of periodicity in events of celestial and spatial origin.
This has been called to our attention by John Philip Bessor in the Saturday
Evening Post as early as May, 1949; but no one has thus far been
able to catalogue and classify enough of this data to determine for
certain whether such cycles exist, much less their time period or
It is not
particularly astonishing that these phenomena should be cyclic, for
practically everything astronomical is periodic. If periodicity could
be firmly established for these phenomena, that fact alone would be
proof of their reality and integration with the organic world about
rush of oddities and unusual events in the decade 1877 to 1887 is very
much in evidence. Perhaps it does seem to be drawing the long bow
a bit if one tries to make out that the presence of the great comets,
or the activity of the Red Spot on Jupiter, were influential in causing
such events, but that all of these were concomitant is undeniable.
something more of astonishment, however, in finding that the astronomical
observations include two distinct and divergent types of bodies: the
solid, geometrically shaped structures, and the ill-defined nebulous
been recorded by impeccable witnesses. Both have been shown to exhibit
evidences of intelligent direction or control. Both have their parallel
instances among the current observations of UFO's seen by the man in
the street, since 1947, and by our forebears as shown in historical
enough, however, the cloudy types have been seen really far out in space,
and rather probably associated with such large comets as that of 1882.
But whether seen two-thirds of an astronomical unit away or hovering
over New York Harbor, they have had peculiar characteristics.
those seen by Schmidt in the neighborhood of the great comet in 1882
were moving both with the comet and at right angles to it, and there
were undoubtedly objects moving about within the head of the comet.
observations are so definite that we must leave them largely to speak
for themselves, other than to point out again their concentration
in certain years. It may be that further investigation will disclose
other years of concentration, but the task is an enormous one. It is
possible to say, however, that the search has been fairly exhaustive
for the years 1877-86. There is reason to think that the next intensive
investigation might bear fruit if concentrated around the prior years
1845-1860. [Click HERE
to download the Varo edition of Morris K. Jessup's classic, The
Case For the UFO]
this time, I don't want to comment on Jessup's remarks about strange objects
in the sky that seem to accompany cyclic cometary events. We are here
interested in a different issue. First of all, let us ask: What "Great
Comets" is Jessup talking about? There were quite a few during that
period: 1807, 1811, 1819, 1823, 1830, 1831, 1843, (Great March comet),
1844, 1845, (Great June comet), 1854, 1860, 1861, 1865 (Great southern
comet), 1880 (Great southern comet), 1881, 1882 (Great September comet),
1887 (Great southern comet).
comets are called "Great," and those that are, are generally
visually quite impressive due to a combination of factors. Far from the
sun, comets are inactive and are not large enough to be seen with the
naked eye. However, when they approach the sun, the icy cometary surfaces
begin to vaporize and throw off gas and dust, forming the enormous atmosphere
and tails that make comets "Hairy Stars."
this activity by itself does not mean that a comet is a "great comet."
A comet can only become great by making a particularly close approach
to the sun so that it produces enormous quantities of gas and dust,
or by making a close approach to the Earth so that it dominates the night
we consider the fact that there were only two Great Comets seen in the
20th century, and both of them seemed to be tag alongs to the comets of
the 19th century, we see that the above list of Great Comets - only a
partial list from that century - is quite extraordinary.
thing I would like to draw the reader's attention to is Jessup's reference
to Jupiter. As it happens, I'm rather fond of Jupiter for a number of
reasons. Those readers who have read the story of the Cassiopaean Experiment
are aware that the breakthrough in the experiment that resulted in the
superluminal communication from "Us in the Future" came at the
exact moment the fragments of Comet Shoemaker-Levy began to impact the
surface of Jupiter. What is even more striking about this (no pun intended)
is the fact that some of the most important information received from
in the Future has been concerned with cyclic cometary bombardment
of the Earth and it's possible cause: a Companion Star - a Brown Dwarf.
When we launched
the official Cassiopaea website in 1998 (though we had shared some of
the information and research on earlier, primitive, free sites), among
our main pages were Cometary
Showers, Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse? and Does
Our Sun Have a Dark Companion?
the above quoted article says "The comet theory has been around -
and most often discarded," we have certainly been publishing
research on the subject since 1998, after having begun to work on the
comet problem in 1985. Based on this research, we definitely think that
things coming from out of space can hurt you...
to Jupiter: We note that Jessup connected something unusual about the
appearance of the Great Red Spot on Jupiter to the influx of Great
Comets. Let me repeat his comment because it is important: "Perhaps
it does seem to be drawing the long bow a bit if one tries to make out
that the presence of the great comets, or the activity of the Red Spot
on Jupiter, were influential in causing such events, but that all
of these were concomitant is undeniable."
Jupiter had an encounter with the fragments of Shoemaker-Levy (clearly
NOT a Great Comet) in 1994, and we also have read many reports of the
increasing "count" of satellites around the Giant Planet of
the solar system which we speculate could be newly captured cometary bodies
rather than "old ones" that have been there a long time but
nobody managed to see them before this. We certainly know about Comet
Hale-Bopp (another NOT Great Comet) and that there is an extraordinary
number of "fireballs" and "mystery booms" on the planet
at present. The reader might want to take a look at our collection of
these events in the Signs
another item to mull over at the present moment in time:
Blue Band Around Jupiter!
Disturbance In Jupiter's Clouds..... It is a very elongated, bluish
streak that runs along the interface of the dark South Equatorial
hint that that something unusual was taking place in the cloudy Jovian
atmosphere came from Spanish amateur when he reported that a small,
bicolored feature was forming in the Southern Hemisphere a little over
2 weeks ago. NOW, this disturbance has stretched, what looks like, right
around the planet!
moment it's too early to be sure of the nature of this disturbance or
its potential evolution. The wide band shown on the photograph could,
quite easily measure, 3-4 times the diameter of the Earth!
Jupiter has, in the past, produced some unusual upper cloud features,
nothing like this has ever been seen before!
An Amazing Disturbance in Jupiter's clouds the likes of which has NEVER
been seen before. I don't think it is stretching it too much to suggest
that this wide, blue band is as interesting as the Great Red Spot.
Great Red Spot seems to be a giant hurricane-like storm system rotating
with the Jovian clouds. Observed in 1655 by Italian-French astronomer
Jean-Dominique Cassini, over 300 years later it is still going strong.
Systematic observations of the Great Red Spot began to be made in 1821.
(For a general discussion of the weather on Jupiter see: Jovian
Activity & Nomenclature)
eh? Let's poke this tar baby and see what sticks.
else happened around the time of the appearance of the Great Red Spot?
As it happens, the Maunder Minimum - a sort of mini-ice age - a period
of virtual absence of sunspot activity prevailed between 1645 and 1715.
(The reader might wish to revisit my discussion of the Maunder Minimum
included in the article entitled: Independence
Day.) At the present time, there is some considerable discussion
of an impending descent into a new Ice Age and we wonder if there is any
relationship between the sudden appearance of this atmospheric disturbance
on Jupiter and said Ice Age. We are, of course, repeatedly told that Global
Warming is the cause of the coming Global Climate Flip-Flop. If that is
the case, then it seems highly unlikely that disturbances on Jupiter would
have anything to do with our weather at all.
what if that is not the case? What if "Global Warming" is driven
by an entirely different engine? In this respect, let us consider the
so-called Sun Spot cycle. It was noted that there was almost total suppression
of Sun spots during the period of the Maunder Minimum, the same period
during which the Great Red Spot on Jupiter made its debut. Does that suggest
a connection between atmospheric disturbances on Jupiter and the activity
of our Sun?
The Moon and The Planets, A Catalog of Astronomical Anomalies,
a review of professional scientific papers compiled by William Corliss,
we find a chapter entitled Jovian Atmospheric Phenomena, which
outlines the subject of the progress of Jovian observation. The excerpts
I have selected represent the abstracts of a series of papers, presented
chronologically, so as to show the development of the various ideas:
features of Jupiter - the cloud patterns, ephemeral spots, changing
colors - confirm for us watching from the earth that Jupiter has a form
of "weather," alien weather perhaps, but gross atmospheric
changes analogous to the earth's. [...]
Jovian magnetic field may play an important role, as might also bizarre
chemical reactions. From all the telescopic and spacecraft observations
of the restless atmosphere of Jupiter, only one class of data seem worth
focusing on at the present time: the apparent cyclic behavior of
the planet's surface features, particularly the size, color,
and motion of the Great Red Spot.
suggested that solar activity modulates Jovian weather. [...]
there is an unrecognized force that affects both Jupiter and the sun
and forces them to dance to the same tune. [...]
recent study of Jupiter's color variations: When the short-period variations
were compared with sunspot activity, it was found that when sunspots
were numerous, the belts were generally a dark brown; when they were
not numerous, the belts had a tendency to be orange. Because of
the similarities of sunspot activity to the short-period color fluctuations,
it is suspected that the color changes may be influenced by solar
corpuscular emissions [...]
between solar activity and the rotational periods of surface features
on Jupiter were investigated over the period 1880-1968, [showing] that
the mean rotational periods of the features display a double-maximum
relationship in the course of the 11-year solar cycle. [...]
of the sun spot cycle and the relative brightness of the Jovian red
spot reveals ... a correlation. [...]
variation of the visibility of Jupiter's red spot does have a component
dependent on solar activity. [...]
It is interesting,
however, that subsequent values exhibit a completely different correspondence
which does not fit into the previous period... Nevertheless, considering
the behavior of the red spot from 1894 to 1945, as revealed by the present
analysis, it is difficult to conclude that there is no correlation between
Jovian and solar activities.
Red Spot begins to show a clear inconsistency around 1947. It is
interesting to note in this connexion that this is also the time when
the Sun showed an unexpected large enhancement in sunspot numbers. [...]
to 1947 a clear correlation was present. A dearth of sightings in the
seventeenth century, along with the Maunder Minimum, further supports
the relation. An anti-correction, however, from 1948 to 1967 removed
support for such an effect.
reaction of Phosphine gas to triclinic red phosphorus crystals is a
reaction dependent upon solar UV radiation. It may explain the striking
appearance of the Great Red Spot... The Maunder Minimum was a period
when few if any sun spots were apparent.
relative brightness variations of Jupiter may possibly be directly related
to variations in the sun's ultraviolet energy output...
brightness variations cannot be accounted for by variations in the total
energy output of the sun since variations of Jupiter's distance from
the sun appear to have little effect on the relative brightness of Jupiter.
Some sort of triggering effect of solar radiation is suggested.
long and short term fluctuations in longitude of the Red Spot are indeed
the actual phenomena, as well as the fluctuations of the B-term and
of cometary discoveries. We show relationships: (a) The quasi-simultaneity
of rises and falls of long term fluctuations of the Red Spot, of terrestrial
rotation and of cometary discoveries with periods approaching
that of the period of great aurorae. (b) The coincidence of the period
and the phase of the three monthly oscillations of the Red Spot with
inferior conjunctions of Mercury and the indirect relationship of their
amplitude with the degree of the alignment of Mercury on the Sun-Jupiter
axis. All of these multiple coincidences may be purely fortuitous
even if the probability of that is very small.
As we see,
relating the appearance of the Great Red Spot on Jupiter strictly to solar
activity doesn't seem to hold up very well, though it seems evident that
there is SOME sort of relationship. Then, the material diverts off to
discuss a relationship between the Red Spot fluctuations, terrestrial
rotation, and cometary periods that is maddeningly vague. What is clear,
however, is that this subject has been an item of research for some time
and certainly, somebody has some ideas that changes on Jupiter are indicative
of changes on Earth.
When we consider
a possible relationship between Jupiter and cometary cycles and solar
cycles, the comment at the beginning of the chapter seems prescient:
there is an unrecognized force that affects both Jupiter and the sun
and forces them to dance to the same tune.
the Earth is caught up in this dance as well.
As I speculated
Day, the Maunder Minimum just may have been the "calling
card" of our Sun's companion, a Brown Dwarf. If that turns out to
be the case, it may then be significant that this was when Cassini first
noted the Great Red Spot on Jupiter. Another Sign?
us to now consider just what might be causing the enormous blue band?
I would like to draw the reader's attention to an excerpt from my article
and Prince on the Cassiopaeans that may provide some necessary
clues to answer this question:
and Prince: The [Cassiopaeans state that the] dominant gas in the
atmospheres of Jupiter and Saturn is ammonia: Both are 99 per cent hydrogen
and helium. Jupiter has a tiny amount (a fraction of one per cent) of
& P confidently state that the composition of both Saturn and Jupiter
are "99 per cent hydrogen and helium."
all, when astronomers speak about the composition of the entire planet,
they say "It is believed that ....", and then, sometimes they
give the reasons why they believe so, and sometimes not. Second, composition
of the entire planet is different from composition of the atmosphere.
Third, composition of the upper regions of the atmosphere can be completely
different than composition of the lower regions. Fourth, concerning "expert
opinions" on the composition of planets, here is a selection; spin
the bottle and pick one:
Opinion 1 Jupiter, on the other
hand, may well be fluid throughout, although it could have a small
solid core (say up to 15 times the mass of Earth!) of heavier elements
such as iron and silicon extending out to perhaps 15% of its radius.
Opinion 2 4%
of the planet's mass is in a rocky inner core.
3. The core of a planet is its central, spherical portion. It can
be divided in two regions: the inner region is made of a mixture of nickel,
iron, and sulphur, while the external portion is made of silicates.
The composition of Jupiter's core resembles the composition of Earth as
4: Jupiter has rapid rotation and a large metallic hydrogen core
Opinion 5: At
the center of the planet may be a core of rocky material massing
around 10 to 15 times that of Earth.
It is believed that Jupiter has a small rocky core but is mostly
a giant ball of liquid hydrogen and gases.
According to a theory formulated in 1958, the interior of Jupiter includes
a large core of metallic hydrogen.
8: A strong concentration of mass is located in the center, or core;
it is thought to be made up of rock and ice contain compounds of
metals, oxygen, silicon, and heavy volatile elements.
you have made a selection, you can write a book and declaim your "expert
opinion" to be the only correct one as Picknett and Prince have done.
to the issue of the atmosphere of Jupiter, the temporary "facts,"
as they are presently understood, are:(emphases, ours)
"Galileo Probe Suggests Planetary Science Reappraisal"
analysis of early data returned by NASA's historic Galileo probe mission
into Jupiter's atmosphere has provided a series of startling discoveries
for project scientists. (...)
of helium measured was about one-half of what was expected.(...)
of Jupiter's atmosphere offered some surprises, according to project
scientists. It contains significantly lower-than-expected levels
of helium, neon, and certain heavy elements, such as carbon, oxygen
the probe's high-speed, atmospheric-entry phase, deceleration measurements
high in the atmosphere showed atmospheric density to be much greater
than expected. (...)
of a high-level ammonia ice cloud was detected by the net flux
radiometer. Evidence for a thin cloud which might be the postulated
ammonium hydrosulfide cloud was provided by the nephelometer
The light blue region to the upper left of the Great Red Spot is the first
ammonia ice cloud positively identified on Jupiter.
This unusual cloud is produced by powerful updrafts of ammonia-laden
air from deep within Jupiter's atmosphere.
Press Release October 24, 2000
SEES AMMONIA ICE CLOUD ON JUPITER
pure cloud of young, fresh ammonia ice has been found on Jupiter by
NASA's Galileo spacecraft, the first discrete cloud of ammonia ice
ever seen, though the planet is known to contain ammonia gas.
first discovered during Galileo's first orbit of Jupiter, may be in the
cross-current of opposing paths of uncommonly strong wind, which pulls
up ammonia gas from below, forming a large cloud of ammonia ice. Scientists
have named the spot the Turbulent Wake Anomaly because it lies
downstream from Jupiter's Great Red Spot, a 300-year old storm two times
as large as Earth. (...)
scientists have known that Jupiter contains lots of ammonia gas,
because the gas absorbs certain wavelengths of light. Scientists would
then expect that the low temperatures in Jupiter's outer atmosphere would
cause the ammonia gas to condense into ice. Until now, localized ammonia
ice clouds have never been seen, despite the cold temperatures and
the abundance of ammonia.
Closer examinations by Galileo's spectrometer instrument in May 1999 and
May 2000 revealed that the spot was a heavy concentration of ammonia
The cloud, which may be as much as 15 kilometers (over
9 miles) thick, is the first concentrated cloud of ammonia ice seen
on Jupiter. Baines said that the ammonia cloud is located in an especially
turbulent area, in the northwest corner of the Great Red Spot. A current
flows around the Great Red Spot from east to west. Behind it, the current
eddies and whirls, just as a rock in a stream creates whirlpools and whitewater
behind it. Another powerful current moving in the opposite direction of
the Great Red Spot's current may intensify the Turbulent Wake Anomaly.
This constant tumultuous motion pulls up ammonia from below the cloud
level, creating fresh, dense clouds of ammonia ice. (...) There is
a whole host of materials seen in the upper atmosphere that cannot be
In other words: scientists are finding new surprising data that are not
in agreement with their expectations based on standard mass spectrometer
estimates. One of the recent surprises, as we could see above, consisted
of discovery of a 15 kilometers thick cloud of ammonia ice. The
future can easily bring more surprises in this respect.
mention of the importance of ammonia on Jupiter was made on December 9,
1995 from Us
in the Future, well in advance of the scientific discoveries listed
above. This was, of course, only one of the many scientific clues obtained
by our "unorthodox" method of inspiration for research - superluminal
communication with ourselves in the future. But as we repeatedly stress
in our work, "inspired material" is only ten percent of the
equation: hard work and research is the other ninety percent. Without
the scientific facts to back it up, the Cassiopaean comments about ammonia
on Jupiter would mean nothing - they would stay in the realm of "unproved
returning to the nice blue cloud of Ammonia ice, we notice that it was
apparently caused by
extremely stormy conditions even by Jovian standards. We also notice that
these observations of the ammonia ice cloud were made in 1999 and 2000.
our clue from the color, let us theorize that the enormous blue band on
Jupiter is evidence of some great turbulence that is churning up ammonia
ice in monstrous quantities. One then might wish to ask just what could
cause such monumental storminess?
the dots, we come back to the great Chicago fire that may have been started
by an exploding comet during a period of time when a lot of Great Comets
were being observed, as well as changes in the weather on Jupiter.
At the present period, we notice another MOST significant weather phenomenon
on Jupiter, more comets reported to be on the way, a lot of fireballs
in our own skies, as well as a few actual asteroid hits on the planet,
and nobody is sitting up and taking notice?
turn in a slightly different direction now.
I read a transcribed lecture by Daniel Quinn, author of the phenomenally
successful little book, Ishmael.
The title of the lecture was The Great Forgetting. In this talk,
Quinn poses a certain problem:
if you've ever considered how strange it is that the educational and
character-shaping structures of our culture expose us but a single time
in our lives to the ideas of Socrates, Plato, Euclid, Aristotle, Herodotus,
Augustine, Machiavelli, Shakespeare, Descartes, Rousseau, Newton, Racine,
Darwin, Kant, Kierkegaard, Tolstoy, Schopenhauer, Goethe, Freud, Marx,
Einstein, and dozens of others of the same rank, but expose us annually,
monthly, weekly, and even daily to the ideas of persons like Jesus,
Moses, Muhammad, and Buddha.
it, do you think, that we need quarterly lectures on charity, while
a single lecture on the laws of thermodynamics is presumed to last us
the meaning of Christmas judged to be so difficult of comprehension
that we must hear a dozen explications of it, not once in a lifetime,
but every single year, year after year after year? Perhaps even more
to the point, why do the pious (who already know every word of whatever
text they find holy) need to have it repeated to them week after week
after week, and even day after day after day? [...]
ever wondered why it is the duty of the clergy of so many sects to read
the Divine Office - daily? Why the same affirmations of faith are repeated
word for word in so many religious communities around the world - daily?
so difficult to remember that Allah is One or that Christ died for our
sins that it must be reiterated at least once every day throughout life?
in the world, East or West, you can walk up to a stranger and say, "Let
me show you how to be saved," and you'll be understood. You may not
be believed or welcomed when you speak these words, but you will surely
that you'll be understood should astonish you, but it doesn't, because
you've been prepared from childhood by a hundred thousand voices - a
million voices - to understand these words yourself.
instantly what it means to be "saved," and it doesn't matter in the
least whether you believe in the salvation referred to.
in addition, as a completely distinct matter, that being saved involves
some method or other. The method might be a ritual-baptism, extreme
unction, the sacrament of penance, the performance of ceremonial works,
or anything at all.
on the other hand, be an inner action of repentance, love, faith, or
addition, and again as a completely distinct matter, you know that the
method of salvation being proposed is universal: It can be used by everyone
and works for everyone.
You know that the method has not been discovered, developed, or tested
in any scientific laboratory; either God has revealed it to someone
or someone has discovered it in a supranormal state of consciousness.
Although initially received by divine means, the method is nonetheless
transmittable by normal means, which explains why it's possible for
a perfectly ordinary individual to be offering the method to others.
this barely scratches the surface of what is meant when someone says,
"Let me show you how to be saved."
and profound worldview is implicit in such a statement.
to this worldview, the human condition is such that everyone is born
in an unsaved state and remains unsaved until the requisite ritual or
inner action is performed, and all who die in this state either lose
their chance for eternal happiness with God or fail to escape the weary
cycle of death and rebirth.
we've been schooled from birth to understand all this, we're not at
all puzzled to hear someone say, "Let me show you how to be saved."
Salvation is as plain and ordinary to us as sunrise or rainfall.
try to imagine how these words would be received in a culture that had
no notion that people were born in an unsaved state, that had no notion
that people need to be saved. A statement like this, which seems plain
and ordinary to us, would be completely meaningless and incomprehensible
to them, in part and in whole. Not a word of it would make sense to
all the work you'd have to do to prepare the people of this culture
for your statement. You'd have to persuade them that they (and indeed
all humans) are born in a state in which they require salvation. You'd
have to explain to them what being unsaved means - and what being saved
means. You'd have to persuade them that achieving salvation is vitally
important - indeed the most important thing in the world. You'd have
to convince them that you have a method that assures success. You'd
have to explain where the method came from and why it works. You'd have
to assure them that they can master this method, and that it will work
as well for them as it does for you. [...]
At this point,
Quinn's ideas diverge significantly from those based on our own Quantum
Future research but that is not so important at this point. What is important
is the manner in which he has outlined the method of CULT-ivation of humanity.
the Signs Team wrote yesterday:
of Le Nouvel Observateur
no. 2051, week of 26 February - 3 March, 2004.
that there are extremely dangerous cults in the world who focus on death.
They not only focus on prophetic claims of the end of the world, but
they are in a position to bring about the death and destruction of millions,
if not billions, of people. The French newsmagazine, Le
Nouvel Observateur, ran this cover on last week's edition. The
title says: Evangelicals: The Cult that wants to conquer the world.
head of this cult stands George W. Bush. Bush has said that he gets
advice from God, friendly and helpful advice such as orders to invade
Afghanistan and Iraq. We wonder whether Bush's God has an office next
to Rumsfeld's at the Pentagon.
a cult that believes their savior is going to return very soon, that
they, themselves, will be saved, whisked off to safety before the bombs
start to fall, and those left behind will face the Tribulations. They
believe that by aiding in creating the conditions for their savior's
return, that is, by bringing on Armageddon, the "End Times,"
they are doing "the Lord's work."
Yet a man
who fervently believes these fairy tales is at the head of the most
powerful country in the world, a country that spends more on arms than
the next twelve combined!
Lord works in mysterious ways.
what is happening on our planet, we need to understand the hyperdimensional
character of our reality. It is science that can help us understand
this reality, science married with work on the self, a joint raising
of one's knowledge and one's being so that one has the understanding
necessary to put into practice one's knowledge.
that such scientific work deliver, such as the possibility that there
are many different realities coexistent with our own, and many different
dimensions, both above and below our own, may appear completely crazy,
especially when slander campaigns and disinformation attempt to reduce
this scientific understanding to the level of a tabloid by associating
it with vulgar stories of "space brothers." When these slander
campaigns are orchestrated by the same powers that buy into the Christian
"End Times" scenario, one is forced to admit that things
are completely upside down, reason has been thrown out, and we are facing
a horrible mass hallucination that has taken in most of the people on
the planet and threatens to destroy the world as we know it.
it that scientific work attempting to explain the truth of our multidimensional
universe is debunked and ridiculed while the entire monotheistic worldview
is accepted by billions without question?
monotheism comes complete with miracles, prophecies, God parting the
waters to set his people free, covenants thousands of years old used
to justify genocide today, teachings that being a martyr for one's religion
will bring you to the side of God, which depends upon BELIEF, and no
means to verify any of it! It may have to do with the educational system,
the media, consumerism, and our economic structures, but, hush, don't
talk about it, because you can be accused of being a "terrorist."
As I wrote
the World Coming to an End?
where we come to a special problem. It is very difficult for me to say:
"yes, the observable records of our planet suggest that catastrophe
comes, and regularly," because that is automatically branded as
a "cult" declaration and nonsense. It is certainly by means
of "end of the world" claims that the monotheistic cults keep
everyone in line. It is also the means by which the New Age offshoots
of monotheism attract their followers. And it is also apparent that
the many claims of the impending end of the world that did NOT transpire
may have been generated just for the purpose of creating an "automatic
knee jerk response" to any mention of the subject, no matter how
much evidence there is to back it up.
we have to ask is: could it be that there is a reason that a REALISTIC
assessment of probabilities based on evidence must be demonized
by the Powers That Be?
It is certainly
interesting that George Bush and his cronies can believe in the End
of the World and act in ways designed to hasten it, and the Pentagon
can predict another kind of "End of the World" that seems
custom made to "scientifically support" the Bush Reich agenda,
and the New Age crowd can endlessly promote "mass landings"
and "photon belts" and "Planet X" scenarios, but
absolutely no one can ever breathe a word of possible cataclysm based
on scientific assessment or real research into the history of this
planet in a reasonable way without being branded a "cult."
knee-jerk reaction and certainly, there will be those reading these
words who will say "Oh, well, Laura and the C's are a cult because
she is suggesting that there is a cyclical cometary bombardment that
may kill a lot of people... just like the other cults that have said
the world is gonna end... " blah, blah. And then, they will go
back to sleep just as they have been programmed to do by the cult "sensitization"
official culture party line.
mind, folks, that this material is painstakingly pieced together from
many hours - even years - of dedicated research, and we are only estimating
probabilities. It is clear that we cannot attach a date to any of it
for a lot of reasons that we have covered elsewhere on the site. But
what IS important is the fact that the SIGNS are all right in front
of us that something is definitely amiss on the Big Blue Marble. It's
what's REAL! It's HAPPENING right now! And, at the same time, there
are horrible plans being implemented in the Secret enclaves of the Powers
That Be, behind the scenes - soon to play at a city near you, with the
masses of humanity in the starring roles!
I have bored all the agents and those who really don't want to know anything
or who want to get it from me without at least taking the time to read
through the process of discovery, let me get to the next item on my list
of odd connections: Mongols.
you may ask, "do Mongols have to do with anything?" Well, just
bear with me here and you will soon see.
You are visitor number .