Portals - The "Other" Race. Part II
An Organic Portal Views the Organic World
because the OP can be intelligent, observant, and analytical, and because
they appear to include some of our most famous scientists, they are
able to describe for us how they see the world and their interior "life"
very accurately and in great detail.
the bottom of this is perhaps the answer as to the source of one of
the most enduring debates of human history i.e. good versus evil.
is it that there is so much strife in the world, why are so many divided
over the promotion of war or peace, respect or disrespect, environmental
protection or destruction, in short, a purely material self serving
outlook or a spiritual serving of others outlook?
we are getting close to the answer, for the truth would seem to be that
there is not and never has been a homogenous "we" (the human race)
on the planet, "we" are not all alike, "we" do not see the world in
the same way, "we" are not just a divided race, we are two different
becomes clearer then why most "top scientists", in their theories, do
not consider the spiritual dimension, or quickly write off any "unconventional"
theories. The OP scientist (and just how many OP scientists there are
is discussed further below) has no notion whatsoever of "spirit" or
of the existence of higher centres. They are incapable of experiencing
these higher centres, and therefore their descriptions of the world
are lacking them. And because they cannot experience them, they deny
their existence for everyone, including for those who are capable of
"seeing" what the OP is incapable of seeing. In a materialistic world,
where Organic Portals are in their Natural Element, and Souled Beings
are NOT, with Organic Portal science drawing the boundary between what
is true and what is false, there is no place for the Higher realms.
It is "false" compared with the self-evident "truth" of materialism
as experienced at all levels by the OP.
Organic Portal in his role of scientists is bound to come to a materialistic
explanation for the workings of the universe because that is all they
know and are able to see.
is very clear when we look at the question of consciousness itself.
The answers are very revealing.
apparent ability of humans to be "self-aware" and the question of consciousness
is one that has troubled the minds of philosophers, psychologists, scientists
and the odd layperson, too, since time immemorial. Today more than ever
consciousness is one of the most perplexing problems outstanding in
science, and one that reflects on our very nature and relation to reality.
culture has seen various theories put forward as to the nature of human
consciousness. Most of these can be included in one of two main schools
of thought, i.e. the materialistic, Darwinist, evolutionary/"survival
of the fittest" approach which proposes that mind/consciousness is an
epiphenomenon which arises on top of material existence. From this scientific
viewpoint the brain is a computer, with neurons and synapses acting
as basic switches and "bits", and consciousness is thought
to "emerge" as a novel property of complex computation.
the other hand, we have the more "spiritually" inclined school of thought,
which holds the above to be wholly inadequate in explaining the phenomenon
(undoubtedly fuelled by various religious teachings and creeds), and
which holds to the concept of an ethereal spirit inhabiting the body/mind
and expressing itself in the form of consciousness and that this is
the fundamental aspect of life. Other schools mixing and matching from
the two also exist.
this point, it is interesting to look at just who are the various exponents
on opposing sides of the argument. In one camp we have the many scientists
and MDs of various disciplines such as the "neural Darwinism" of Edelman
and the "memes" of Dennet and Dawkins. In the other camp we find "new
age" gurus and authors and the odd respectable scientist such as David
Chalmers, as well, of course, as the Church and the many twisted turns
there that many OP concepts have been utilized to coopt spiritual truth.
We find many OPs, imitating souled beings in their "spiritual searching,"
promoting ideas and theories that are fundamentally flawed because they
are "imitations" of the real thing which the OP can never,
by his very nature, perceive accurately.
figures recently released show that 50% of all medical and scientific
papers are published by the same small group of academics, who account
for just 6% of the total number. If we take it as real that our reality
is manipulated to a large extent, then the logical step to keeping the
scientific world under control would be to ensure that it is populated
with people that will reflect the views and opinions that suit a specific
is true for the spiritual and esoteric world. 4th Density STS makes
sure that the religions, spiritual concepts, and nearly the entire metaphysical
"world" is dominated by OPs to keep the "cattle in the
a perfect strategy might be to ensure that top posts are held by organic
portals allowing the controllers to rest safely in the knowledge that
all mainstream theories and research will have a definite materialistic
and non-spiritual slant, thus perpetuating the Darwinist evolved "monkey
clinging to a godless lump of rock spinning in space" shtick and keeping
those pesky souled beings under their spell.
"top man" with a relatively new axe to grind is Richard Dawkins.
Dawkins, while developing the singular theory that humans were the method
developed by genes to perpetuate themselves, coined the term "meme" in
1976 as a way to describe and validate the idea outlined above, i.e. that
consciousness is merely a function of groups of ideas or concepts in our
minds. What differs, however, in his interpretation is that it is not
the "machine" that collects and organises data and then takes some predetermined
action based on it, rather these "memes" take on a more hostile attitude
and in a "virus"-like way, they invade the human mind (individual and
mass) and compete with each other for dominance and, therefore, survival
in the fertile ground that is the human neurological network.
the words of Dr
Susan Blakmore (another chief "meme head")
are ideas, skills, habits, stories or inventions, that are passed from
person to person by imitation. Like genes they compete to get copied,
but unlike genes their competition is for space in our memories, and
for the chance to get into books, magazines and television programmes.
The survivors in this game are the ones we see all around us. Just as
genes have created our bodies, so memes have created our minds and our
explains, so the theory goes, our incurably religious nature, our unusual
forms of cooperation and altruism, our use of language, and our ability
to defy our genes with birth control and genetic engineering. We humans,
alone on this planet, are meme machines. The term 'meme' (to rhyme with
cream or dream) was coined in 1976 by Richard Dawkins, in The Selfish
Gene. The purpose of his book was to explain the power and generality
of Darwin's great insight. What Darwin had realised was that a simple
mindless process can account for evolution --- without a designer. If
you have creatures that vary, and if only some of them can survive, and
if the survivors pass on to their offspring whatever it was that helped
them survive, then the next generation must be better adapted than the
first---and so the process goes on. In more modern terms, if you have
variation, heredity and selection, then you must get, as philosopher Dan
Dennett puts it "Design out of Chaos without the aid of Mind".
And this inevitable process works on anything that is copied---not just
Dennett had this to say about memes and viruses:
points out that we can think of cultural items, memes, as parasites,
too. Actually, they are more like a simple virus than a worm. Memes
are supposed to be analogous to genes, the replicating entities of the
cultural media, but they also have vehicles, or phenotypes; they are
like not-so-naked genes. They are like viruses (Dawkins, 1993). As with
viruses, there is a phenotype/genotype distinction, but just barely.
Basically, a virus is just a string of DNA (or RNA) with attitude. And
similarly, a meme is an information-packet (the information, not the
vehicle) with attitude--with some phenotypic clothing that has differential
effects in the world that thereby influence its chances of getting replicated.
Dennett is one of the most ardent defenders of the theory "mind as program",
although in Dennett's theory, the mind is not one program, it is a collection
of very simple programs which each do one thing very well. This is detailed
in his book Consciousness Explained.
proposes that this collection of programs gives the impression of a unity
that is the "self," but that this self as unity does not exist. Dennett
is giving a very accurate description of the way the mind works in an
Organic Portal. It is also the way of the mind for an External Man,
that is, the "souled" man who has not yet begun the work of building his
magnetic centre which will permit the balancing and fusion of his three
lower centres and the establishment of a permanent link with the higher
we ask someone who lives under this constant pressure of contemporary
life to turn his mental vision towards himself, he generally answers
that he has not enough time left to undertake such practices. ... If
he acquiesces, he will in most cases say that he sees nothing: Fog;
Obscurity. In less common cases, the observer reports that he perceives
something which he cannot define because it changes all the time.
This last observation
is correct. Everything is in fact continually changing within us. A
minor external shock, agreeable or disagreeable, happy or unhappy, is
sufficient to give our inner content a quite different appearance.
If we follow up
this interior observation, this introspection, without prejudice, we
will soon note that our "I" of which we are so consistently
proud, is not always the same self: the "I" changes.
As this impression
becomes more defined we begin to become more aware that it is not a
single being who lives within us but several, each having his own tastes,
his own aspirations, and each trying to attain his own ends.
If we proceed with
this experience, we will soon be able to distinguish three currents
with that perpetually moving life: that of the vegetative life of the
instincts, so to speak; that of the animal life of the feelings; and
lastly that of human life in the proper sense of the term, characterized
by thought and speech.
It is as though
there were three beings within us, all entangled together in an extraordinary
So we come to appreciate
the value of introspection as a method of practical work which permits
us to know ourselves and enter into ourselves.
The inner content
of man is analogous to a vase full of iron filings in a state of mixture
as a result of mechanical action. Every shock received by the vase causes
displacement of the particles of iron filings. Thus real life remains
hidden from the human being due to the constant changes occurring in
his inner life.
Even so, as we
shall see later, this senseless and dangerous situation can be modified
in a beneficial way. But this requires work; conscientious and sustained
effort. Introspection carried out relentlessly results in enhanced internal
sensibility. This improved sensibility in its turn intensifies the amplitude
and frequency of movement whenever the iron filings are disturbed. As
a result, shocks that previously were not noticed will now provoke vivid
reactions. These movements, because of their continuous amplification,
can create friction between particles of iron so intense that we may
one day feel the interior fire igniting within us.
The fire must not
remain a harmless flare-up. Nor is it enough that the fire smolders
dormant under the ashes. A live and ardent fire once lit must be carefully
kept alight by the will to refine and cultivate sensitiveness. If it
continues in this way, our state can change: the heat of the flame will
start a process of fusion within us.
From this point
on the inner content will no longer behave like a heap of iron filings:
it will form a block. Then further shocks will no longer provoke interior
change in man as they did previously. Having reached this point he will
have acquired a firmness; he will remain himself in the midst of the
tempests to which life may expose him.
Thus we see that
the idea that there is no unitary self is correct from the esoteric point-of-view.
Only, we go further than Dennett. We hold that the possibility to create
this "self" exists and that approximately 50% of the population of the
earth at this time actually possess the latent resources with which to
do this. This work involves being aware of our actions and responses and
bringing our "programs" to light so that we can reach what lies behind,
what is obscurred by the many little "I"s, the real, unified "I".
To further demonstrate
the working of the organic portal scientific mind, we have the following
Heylighen, a research professor at Free University of Brussels and
editor of the Principia
Cybernetica Project, "an international organization for the collaborative
development of an evolutionary-systemic philosophy". In attempting to
convince us of the mind as machine theory, he defines this very
situation and gives us an insight into and description of the mind and
nature of an organic portal.
there a Hard Problem of Consciousness" he writes:
person experiences or qualia are the essentially subjective, personal
feelings or experiences that each of us have (e.g. the feeling of "redness"
or "cold"), and that cannot be described by words, formulas, programs
or any other objective representation. According to some consciousness
theorists, such as David Chalmers, an agent without such qualia would
merely be a "zombie", a creature that may behave, sense and communicate
just like a human being, but that would lack the most crucial aspect
of consciousness. The "hard problem" of consciousness research then
consists in elucidating the nature of first-person experiences.
believe that this approach is essentially misguided. If the hypothetical
zombie behaves in all respects indistinguishably from a person with
consciousness, then the principle of the identity of the indistinguishable
would force us to conclude that the "zombie" has consciousness. How
else would we know that the people around us aren't zombies? We assume
they have conscious experience similar to ourselves because they behave
in all other respects similar to us. But if you would take this reasoning
seriously, then you might start to get nightmarish fantasies in which
you are the only real, conscious person in the world, and all the others
are merely sophisticated automatons that pretend to be like you.
you ever had this "nightmarish fantasy" that the world is populated by
zombies ? Well, guess what, it isn't a fantasy. Half the people out there
are exactly that: "sophisticated automatons that pretend to be like you".
is entirely fitting that he uses the term "agent" (the Matrix movie anyone?)
for the type of programmed being, "be they made from flesh and blood or
goes on to say:
do not sense the world as if they were impersonal, objective bystanders,
that try to internally represent the world as it is, independently of
themselves. For an agent a sensation is meaningful only to the degree
that it relates to the agent's goals, which, in practice, means that
it is relevant to the agent's individual survival.
is describing the predator's mind. This is startlingly close to the actual
real life scenarios of psychopath's behavior and thinking that are presented
in Cleckely's book "The Mask of
author concludes :
is not some mysterious substance, fluid, or property of matter, but
a level of organization emerging from abstract processes and relations.
People who search for consciousness in elementary particles (a form
of panpsychism that has been suggested as a way to tackle the "hard
problem"), because they cannot otherwise explain where the consciousness
in our brain comes from, are misguided. Their intuition may be correct
insofar that particles, just like any other system, should be seen as
relations rather than just as clumps of matter. But to attribute consciousness
to these extremely simple types of relations is merely a way to evade
the really hard, but solvable, problem of reconstructing the complex
cybernetic organization of the human mind in all its details and subtleties.
we have seen the Organic Portal view of themselves. Whether or not the
individuals named are Organic Portals is not the issue. They may be souled
individuals who have not yet been able to see behind the lie of the Personality.
As long as that has not happened, souled individuals will function and
see the world and themselves as if they were Organic Portals. But it is
clear that this manner of "explaining" consciousness is limited, explaining
only that particular form of consciousness manifested by the Personality
- the exterior man. It can describe the functioning of the OP or the exterior
man; it can not do justice to the consciousness of the Seeker engaged
in the work of fusion to seat the soul.
next look at the question of creativity.
have seen that the OP learns through imitation. Meme theory posits that
memes spread through imitation. And works of art, books, music, scientific
ideas, all of these forms of "creation", are merely the spreading of memes.
A "creator" is someone who takes memes and finds new ways of putting them
together, of arranging and rearranging. But nothing is ever really "created."
is because the moving centre of the Organic Portal, unable to draw energy
from the higher emotional and intellectual centres which do not exist
for him. His creativity in the form of "love" is limited in
its functioning to carnal love. Mouravieff writes:
is important to remember that - except of course for adamic man - every
creature taking part in organic Life on Earth, whether it has one centre
to its psyche, two, or three as in the man of the VIth day [the organic
portal], has only one higher centre. Indeed, on the hylic plane, the
sexual centre is analogous to the higher emotional and higher intellectual
centres, since it is by nature and structure whole, that is,
when its energy is usurped by the three centres of the Personality,
the sexual centre in its direct function, which is carnal love, has
a goal that is well defined by the words: Be fruitful, and multiply.
In other words, in a healthy organism, this centre, like the higher
emotional and intellectual centres, knows neither doubt, nor hesitation,
nor sadness, which is quite the opposite with what is too often the
case with the three lower centres.. (Gnosis, Book III, p. 143.)
special function of the sexual centre in souled beings is explained further
by the C's:
Does the recharging of the souled being come from a similar pool, only
maybe the "human" pool?
A: No - it recharges from the so-called sexual center which is a
higher center of creative energy. During sleep, the emotional center,
not being blocked by the lower intellectual center and the moving center,
transduces the energy from the sexual center. It is also the time during
which the higher emotional and intellectual centers can rest from the
"drain" of the lower centers' interaction with those pesky
organic portals so much loved by the lower centers. This respite alone
is sufficient to make a difference. But, more than that, the energy
of the sexual center is also more available to the other higher centers.
Q: From where does the so-called "sexual center" get ITS energy?
A: The sexual center is in direct contact with 7th density in its
"feminine" creative thought of "Thou, I Love." The
"outbreath" of "God" in the relief of constriction.
Pulsation. Unstable Gravity Waves.
creativity comes from this connection with "7th density in its 'feminine'
creative thought of 'Thou, I Love'" in its conjugation with the higher
emotional and intellectual centers. Thus the souled individual is able
to "create" in the sense of manifesting something new through his or her
thought and the connection to 7th Density. This is a profound
process for it ties us directly to the "Creator", to the One.
organic portal, when seeking to define this genuine creative impulse,
is obliged to fall back upon the idea of the meme, of imitation. Look
at Dennett describe the creative act:
is a new way of thinking about ideas. It is also, I hope to show, a
good way, but at the outset the perspective it provides is distinctly
unsettling, even appalling. We can sum it up with a slogan:
scholar is just a library's way of making another library.
don't know about you, but I am not initially attracted by the idea of
my brain as a sort of dungheap in which the larvae of other people's ideas
renew themselves, before sending out copies of themselves in an informational
Diaspora. It does seem to rob my mind of its importance as both author
and critic. Who is in charge, according to this vision--we or our memes?
is, of course, no simple answer. We would like to think of ourselves as
godlike creators of ideas, manipulating and controlling them as our whim
dictates, and judging them from an independent, Olympian standpoint. But
even if this is our ideal, we know that it is seldom if ever the reality,
even with the most masterful and creative minds. As Mozart famously observed
of his own brainchildren:
I feel well and in a good humor, or when I am taking a drive or walking
after a good meal, or in the night when I cannot sleep, thoughts crowd
into my mind as easily as you would wish. Whence and how do they come?
I do not know and I have nothing to do with it. Those which please
me I keep in my head and hum them; at least others have told me that
I do so." [emphasis added]
is in good company. Rare is the novelist who doesn't claim
characters who "take on a life of their own"; artists are rather
fond of confessing that their paintings take over and paint themselves,
and poets humbly submit that they are the servants or even slaves to the
ideas that teem in their heads, not the bosses. And we all can cite cases
of memes that persist unbidden and unappreciated in our own minds.
us look at this notion of "where do creative ideas come from?" In the
External Man, that is, the souled individual who has yet to begin the
work of forming the magnetic centre, there is a connection, albeit veiled,
with the higher centres. Because it is veiled, "ideas" which are able
to pierce the veil will have the appearance of "appearing from nowhere."
They may well be genuinely creative acts, however, the Personality is
unaware of this.
arrival of a meme in the mind of the organic portal will also have the
appearance of "appearing from nowhere", but in this case, there is no
veil that has been pierced, no higher centre from which it has received
nourishment. Because the OP and the souled individual who has yet to begin
esoteric work are describing the same surface features of an event - the
"creative" act -- they may well confound the genuine creative act with
the mere propagation of the meme.
"creation", our connection with "7th density in its 'feminine' creative
thought of 'Thou, I Love'", is reduced to mere imitation and emptied
of its expression of Love. If every creative act is an expression of Love,
and every act of imitation is not, we can see clearly that we live in
a world without Love.
come to the realization that there are 3 billion Organic Portals in the
world, discussion at the Quantum
Future School turned to "How do we identify them?" This is not easy,
as their primary talent is that of imitation, of mimicry. As we saw in
the section on where they fit in the Organic world, it is through imitation
that they are able to begin the process of developing their own souls.
This ability to mimic must therefore be an integral part of their character.
To progress, they must be good at it.
implies that the "best" OPs will be the best mimics, the ones best able
to mimic being "souled."
the internal structure of the OP is missing the higher centres, having
only the three lower centres which form the Personality, the "I" of the
small "I"s, and the "I" of the body, and a sexual centre cut off from
the other higher centres. A study of the following passage by Mouravieff
gives indications on how a careful study of the inner dynamic of people
can separate the "good seed" from the "tares".
adamic man who has even a vague consciousness of his real 'I' finds
that this is a source of internal conflict that he cannot solve on a
purely human plane. This conflict becomes more acute from the moment
he actively enters esoteric work. It is then that he becomes weak and
falls a prey to uncertainty, doubt, and mistrust towards himself, for
the road that leads to Truth always passes through doubts. Throughout
this work, we have seen several times the considerable sum of efforts
and superefforts that are demanded of the adamic man, who, after having
recognized his position in life, resolutely crosses the First Threshold
and climbs the staircase to attain and pass the Second Threshold with
its promised Redemption. (Gnosis, Bool III, pp. 131-132)
the first indication of an Organic Portal is a lack of "internal conflict
and resulting doubt." There are people who never doubt their thoughts
or what they are told or what they have chosen to believe. No matter the
circumstances, the failures or set-backs, these people are unassailed
by self-questioning or questioning of the system. How many of you reading
this site were prompted to do so because of a feeling of conflict or doubt
about what was "out there" and what some intuition or inner knowing was
suggesting? The character Morpheus sums it up pretty well in The Matrix:
"You are here because you know something.."
OP does not have this inner conflict, they do not react to evidence of
"more to life" than material existence. But even if the OP is not beset
with this type of doubt, they can and do have a form of "inner conflict"
that is Personality based.
are not subject to these fits of anguish and these permanent inner conflicts;
not that they live in perfect peace, or are never troubled by conflicts
- far from it - but in most cases their conflicts take place in the
interior of the Personality, between different groups of the little
'I's which produce these conflicts. As a result, the character of the
conflicts is purely psychic, and they are generally resolved by some
kind of compromise.
more acute conflicts that take place in pre-adamic man occur between
the 'I' of the Personality and the 'I' of the body. We have dwelt at
length on this subject in volume II of Gnosis, emphasizing the
fact that the 'I' of the body usually wins over the weak, changing Personality,
which capitulates without much of a struggle whenever it is a question
of satisfying the stomach or the sexual appetites.
Justification is then sought in slogans such as those which allow us
to think that it is normal to 'act like everyone else,' or in a maze
of paradoxical reasons that are simply lies to oneself. (Gnosis,
Book III, p. 132)
inner conflicts of the Organic Portal are not about his relationship
to the world in the sense of his fundamental "Being" in this world.
He cannot become preoccupied by such questions, because they arise from
the influence of the real 'I'. There can be no contradiction between
the Organic Portal and his Being in this world because he is fully OF
this world, he is the expression of it as a material realm.
souled individual, however, is different, having "fallen" into this
world, retaining a memory of the higher worlds which come to him through
the real "I". The tension between this "re-mind-er" of his true
nature from the real "I" and the fallen nature of his Personality is
what creates the potential for esoteric work, is what creates the grounds
for the heating of the crucible as the two enter into conflict. [The
conflict described in alchemical texts, the tests of the Knight on the
Quest for the Grail.]
the inner conflicts of adamic man, who often enters esoteric work because
he has reached the last extremity of moral bankruptcy, cannot be resolved
by compromise, as there is no place for this kind of solution in the
consciousness of the real 'I' from which he receives his calls. In him,
it is the ensemble formed by the entire Personality, with the 'I' of
the body, an ensemble which, directly or indirectly, is often made to
act by the sexual centre, which flees from the voice of conscience,
i.e. of the real 'I'. He then has a choice, either to obey his real
'I' and triumph over himself, or to flee from this invisible Combat
into self-calming and powerful illusions offered by a life of lying
every case, if he triumphs over himself, which is what will enable the
adamic man to resolve the inner conflict of the moment, this will inevitably
involve a modification of his attitude towards outer life. Generally,
the result will be conflict with those closest to him, unless the latter
follow him step by step in his esoteric evolution, which is rare.
does not mean that those who are near and dear to him wish him any ill;
on the contrary, it is nearly always his good that they have in view:
the conflict arises simply from their different conceptions of what
is real. If those who surround the individual in question are pre-adamic,
they could never agree with him, being incapable of understanding the
reasons for his change of attitude and unable to grasp the nature of
the end he pursues. They will automatically become the instruments of
the General Law, which makes sure that those who step out of line are
brought back into the fold. This is how 'a man's foes shall be of
his household.' (Ibid.)
describes the situation for the Seeker, but only hints at the activity
of the Control System when he mentions the "General Law" or "A" influences.
The C's have said, in the session quoted above, "the Control System
will seek to insert even more 'units' into that person's life." We
have also seen how the Organic Portal's natural role has been coopted
by 4D STS. This would imply that the problems arising from different conceptions
of what is real will be used, magnified, and stoked to the wildest proportions
imaginable by the conscious activities of the Controllers as they seek
to feed themselves and prevent the Seeker from walking the Way.
man cannot be subject to inner or domestic conflicts of this kind. He
rarely receives 'B' influences. If he vaguely senses their existence,
they only appear as a curiosity to his eyes and do not have the power
to trouble him right down to the depths of his psyche. In him, the sexual
centre reigns supreme, whether by its direct action that takes the form
of carnal love, or by an indirect, 'psychological', action of the psyche
to which his Personality submits. Like adamic man's, his Personality
contains three lower centres, but that is all. Equally underdeveloped
and unbalanced, but sheltered from the troubles provoked by the 'B'
influences, this Personality lives and acts obedient to the commands
of the sexual centre. Nothing within him withstands the latter, which
is known in contemporary language as temperament.
the arena of the 'exterior' life of human society, dominated by the
'A' influences, the adamic man who has crossed the First Threshold proves
to be weaker than his pre-adamic counterpart.; and the greater the strength
he acquires during his progress on the Staircase, the greater is his
weakness when faced with life. (Gnosis, Book III pp. 132-133)
last comment gives another clue. The pre-adamic being is IN his or her
environment in a way that an adamic being is not. The world with its "A"
influences holds great attraction. The activity of the sexual center seeks
gratification in a world more and more sexually charged through media
and open displays of sexual imagery. The "I" of the body can exist happily
on the level of a basic animal existence governed by the lower centers,
but the developing real "I" in the process of activating the higher centers
cannot. And throughout it all, the soulless being doesn't feel uncomfortable,
unless they have been caught up in the brainwashing of Church, etc., intended
to control the souled. We see also that the organic portal will not react
to "B influences" (which are evidence of a greater or spiritual reality)
when they intrude upon his daily life but will rather quickly seek to
question of identifying OPs also led to further exchanges among members
of the Quantum Future School.
J: Ok, but surely there would be much more evidence of this in
our interactions with people, I mean there are 3 billion of them!
L: There is a lot of evidence. But we are programmed by
the system, through the OPs, to either misperceive, misinterpret, or
simply refuse to believe the objective evidence.
As to the larger picture, there is also evidence that, in our interactions
with them, they are prevailing. Just look at the state of the
world right now. They are running the show.
And because they have acted as the "portals" of the 4 D STS
manipulations (ya really gotta read this "operators and things"
to see how it all works!) - what we see in our world is exactly what
the 4 D STS wants.
But again, remember what C's said: the really good ones are SO good
that it is almost impossible to identify them. And that is exactly
what we are trying to formulate here: how to identify???? How
to keep from "dancing" with them so as to conserve enough
energy to grow our awareness so that we can SEE the unseen better, so
that we can be colinear with others who see... so that our frequencies
will mutually and reciprocally commutate... so that there will be sufficient
"leaven" to leaven the whole loaf at the point of "splitting
of universes" which will guide our trajectory to the 4 D STO reality.
Or so it seems.
H: We have learned that the "best" OPs are really,
really hard to identify, even after a long period of study. Factor in
that in the social circles within which most if not all of us move,
there might be a preponderance of the better ones. I would guess that
the people on this list are fairly well educated, they have internet
access, they read regularly (right there, that sets us apart from most
people these days), and we read things which have more meat on them
than a Danielle Steele novel. We most likely do not spend much time
with people who live in front of the TV. And if the people around us
do this, then we will think they are "like us."
But consider that people like Dawkins and Sagan are/were very possibly
OPs. What in their day-to-day lives would tell you they were OPs? They
married, had families, live lives which are the "model" for
our society. And therein may very well be a clue. Our models of "life"
are probably based upon the "perfect" OP life. So when we
go to make the comparison, we may be comparing OPs to OP models. Of
course it is hard to see! We have ingrained the OPs, souless existence
as the "norm."
Maybe it is the "souled" individuals who will be easier to
see, they will stick out like sore thumbs because they are hurting like
L: Oh, excellent point! And just as you were writing it,
I was reading in Cleckley some ideas that make it really understandable
why he could not quite get to the problem... he was using models of
psychiatry to try to formulate what is "wrong" with the psychopath...
and those models are essentially flawed - they are created by OPs!
No wonder the poor guy was driving himself nuts trying to figure this
one out. All the psychiatric models say that the psychopath is
the sanest of individuals. They say that people who are "paranoid"
- even if everything else about their lives is successful - MUST be
deeply psychotic - even IF those things that they are "paranoid"
about are possible, not absurd, and even explainable in logical terms.
See how cleverly the system is set up?
It is set up to establish as an incontrovertible FACT, that anybody
who suggests a "deeper" reality is crazy - or being taken
in by a cult - or is delusional - or psychotic - etc.
But OPs - those who aren't defective so that their machines don't act
up like the psychopath does - in their firm committment to what you
can weigh and measure as the only REAL reality, are the arbiters of
What did the C's say? STS worships the physical universe.
For that orientation, that is all that really matters - matter.
And, of course, their pin-pointed devotion to it ensures that what they
worship is what they will become... primal matter.
So the idea is that the 3 billion OPs are fundamentally the same as
the psychopath subjects that cleckly details, from the POV of not having
a real feeling, intuiting, "reading between the lines", soul
aspect to their being, but they are simply too good at mimicing actually
having these qualities for us to be able to discern the difference and
they simply dont have the flaws that the psychopaths have?
L: That seems to be the point.
And we started out studying them in the really "flawed" aspects
where the "mask of sanity" was not too securely tied on.
Our interactions written about in the Adventures
Series and others, woke us up in a startling way. After a certain
period of time, we realized that there was something much deeper than
just simply bald-faced lying, theft and general spiritual corruption
going on out there in New Age land.
we have a couple of clinical psychologists in the school, there was
quite a bit of off-list discussion about the possible dynamics, and
that led to the idea of psychopathy.
Of course, the most available work on this has to do with Hare's work
with psychopath's in prison. That did not quite "fit the
bill." Yes, the casual lying for which none of them seemed to feel
any shame even when exposed with evidence was there. Yes, the complete
"fabrication" of their version of reality was there. Yes,
it was evident that there was absolutely no real empathy there - they
spout grand words about their interests in helping children, their "philanthropic
activities," and charities etc, and then turn around and wilfully
conspire to expose our children to danger by stealing and publishing
very personal information, as well as writing about them in a libelous
and defamatory way in public.
thing for them to be hostile toward us, our work, our group, and the
fact that they were mad because we refused to allow them to use us to
either destroy our work or use it for their own financial gain. It was
something else altogether to put our children in harm's way deliberately
and with vicious intent to hurt us through such maneuvers.
even more interesting was the completely irrational nature of the attacks.
On the one hand, they would accuse us of being a cult and making tons
of money off the readers of our site, never mind that we barely scrape
by. At the same time, they would write lies about how we lived in squalor
and how much our children were suffering from filth, vermin, and God
knows what else. The one thing that was clear about these attacks -
based on our personal interactions with Mr.
Most - was that the main reason they were angry was because we had
been their object of prey - they had seen us as a quick ticket to big
bux selling their seminars and books to our readership, all the while
making sure that our own work was buried. And when we saw through them,
and refused to be prey - it was like the fury of a predator whose dinner
there we were, observing them while they wrote noble sounding essays
in public exuding sympathy and the milk of human kindness - all the
while they were libeling us, defaming us, and - behind the scenes -
trying to destroy our work and our family. And when we published the
FACTS - with witnesses and evidence - they simply brushed it off and
claimed that WE were lying. It was astonishing to me to see such behavior.
I simply could NOT conceive of human beings with literally no empathy,
no shame, and utterly no ethics whatsoever. Especially when they were
so capable of giving the impression that they had them and further,
were able to convince others who simply believed every word they said,
and never did their own checking or asking questions. I'm sure they
relied on the laziness of their readers.
So, it was this astonishment, this puzzlement, at their behavior that
actually drove us to investigate. Had they behaved as "normal human
beings" - as we expect normal, ethical, human beings to act - most
especially those who claim to be knowledgable seekers of higher knowledge
- we would never have followed the threads that led to the revelations
we have presented on the site. And, as the puzzlement grew, as we dug
deeper, we began to see that there was a whole lot more to this puzzle
than met the eye. We realized at some point that the characteristics
of the psychopath were like caricatures - writ large and in flashing
neon. Yes, we certainly saw them in the actions of these people,
but the niggling idea that these are things we experienced with other
more "normal" people who never did any of the horrible things
that say, Ira Einhorn or O.J. Simpson, or even Maynerd Most would
do, just wouldn't go away.
So, we moved to another area of study: Cleckley. And he does,
indeed, talk about some psychopaths who have never gone "over the
line" in social terms. They are successful doctors, lawyers,
What we now suspect is that there is an even more covert "layer
of the onion" on this subject: the effective and efficient Organic
Portal. The PERFECT Mask of Sanity. But more than that:
the perfect Mask of Consciousness.
we accept, as Mouravieff describes, that the Organic Portal has the possibility
of moving forward in his own evolution during the next cycle, moving
from pre-adamic to adamic, and if we also admit that the current cycle
is approaching its end, there is the following possibility. We are living
in the period when a certain number of OPs have achieved an imitation
of the souled being which is so realistic, so developed, that they can
only come back as adamic beings. They can not evolve any further within
forces the Seeker to develop his or her discernment, to refine it continually
in order to "see" finer and finer degrees of manipulation happening around
and to us. It will heat the crucible to higher and higher temperatures,
creating in turn the conditions of liberation.
pull together the various threads and weave a tapestry which illustrates
our current situation.
"going for the gold," that is, desiring to experiment with physicality,
our consciousness unit fell from its state of "grace," that is, a 3D STO
existence in a "semi/sort of" 4D state aligned with 4D STO into a 3D STS
world already populated with an anthropoid race who served as organic
portals, the bridge linking 2nd Density to 3rd Density.
Having fallen, and thereby losing awareness of its connection to the higher
centers, the souled race was in no way different from the anthropoid race
when seen from the exterior. He differed only in having the potential
to reconnect with the higher centers by developing the magnetic center.
The DNA which seated these higher centers was burned away - disconnected
and dispersed in the cell structure. However, the ability to get it back
3rd Density STS world in which Adamic man "awoke" was not his
natural habitat. It is the world of the anthropoids, the meat puppets,
the dead who think they are living, the world of the organic portal,
a world of matter and material explanations of existence. It is a farm
run and controlled by 4D STS to provide their nourishment. It is the world
of the three lower centers and a sexual center limited to a role of procreation
through carnal love. It is a world organized on the basis of hunger, sex,
souled race came into this world and became part of it, interbreeding
with the native race until the genetic pool became thoroughly mixed. Now,
the two races are so mixed that they can both be found within the same
than that, the models we are taught and forced to internalize are based
upon the "natural" inhabitant of this realm, the Organic Portal. Thus,
material explanations are the norm. The inner life of the Organic Portal,
cut off from the higher centres, is the "norm." Should we then be surprised
that we live in a world which is more and more "mechanical," which treats
individuals as "units," where "creativity" is the replication of existing
ideas as in a production line, where "franchising" and "branding" are
so important in the economic world, where democracy is a multiple choice
test every few years rather than the creative input of individuals into
the organization of their lives, where people who "see" other beings,
other worlds, are shipped off into prison camps for the "mentally disturbed",
where culture consists of endless copies of the same product with slight
modifications to fool the consumer that it is something "new" and "revolutionary".
And on and on it goes.
it is all organized to prevent YOU from advancing, to distract YOU, to
keep YOU concerned with a husband, wife, mother, father, daughter or son
who is beyond your ability to "save" because he or she cannot be "saved"
-- they are fundamentally different from you, they do not have the DNA
which would allow a soul to "seat" so as to enable an understanding of
the possibility of a higher life. Worse, they are draining you of vital
energy and thus denying you any chance of developing your magnetic centre,
with the final destination of this energy being 4D STS. It feeds and maintains
the Matrix. In these interactions, you are nothing but a battery and the
organic portals in your life are the "feeding tubes."
need that energy to advance. It is yours, and it is your right to claim
and retain it. But to do so, you must stop this "dance of death" with
the Organic Portals in your life.
addressed the importance of this in a message to members of the Quantum
Q: So, based on what you said, right now I am thinking that
seeking a "definitive difference" between OPs and souled individuals
might be practically accomplished more easily by learning to "see"
souled individuals, as you say. Of course > this is further complicated
by the fact that souled STS 4 D candidates ALSO exist and STS actions
by STO candidates are also tossed in the mix.
Yes. And we might think that souled individuals are those who are "suffering"
in some way. And some of them that suffer the most, might actually
"act out," and they might be classified as "crazy"
or whatever because they simply can't adjust to the emptiness of the
3D STS life.
of course, because they also have a strong create/expand-survive impulse,
they may learn to knuckle under, to "play the game," to "do
the right thing." In these cases, they live lives of quiet
they can be programmed so early on that the power of their soul is channelized
into the "belief systems," so that, as has been pointed out,
their soul energy is what is feeding and sustaining the Matrix. In
fact, I think that this is the usual thing, and even the purpose of
the whole thing.
Hmmm...why do we need to specifically identify OPs at all?
Ultimately because "dancing" with them - or being intimately
involved, or unaware of the true nature of the interaction with them
- is what keeps us drained and unable to achieve sufficient graduation
frequency. IF - and that's a big "if" - we can really and
truly interact with them without them draining our energy - all fine
the likelihood is that we can't do that until we can truly SEE - and
we can never SEE until we have sufficient energy to do so... and we
can't have the energy to do so as long as we are "dancing"
with the OPs in our lives. So it's like a catch 22.
can't see them until you stop interacting. And you can't stop interacting
until you can see them.
you have to discover the clues to the program - and to "experiment"
and watch for "reactions" in the Matrix - and base some choices
on the most ambiguous evidence.
your decision is correct, it will result in saving enough energy to
be able to see that your decision was correct!
Maybe for our purposes it is better
right now to focus on the "A" influences and the "B"
In a very real and important sense, determining the nature of our relationships
IS the very process of discerning "A" influence and "B"
influences. It is the most important work we can do. We can accomplish
NOTHING else without doing this first. You cannot be "unequally
yoked." You cannot serve two masters.
Instead of labeling definitively the more subtle cases of OPs, maybe
it is better to focus on identifying within ourselves how much energy
is being drained in any interaction. This can be done I think. And
this is the crucial distinction that needs to be made, imo. I think
this is essentially how we are doing it already...
Indeed. And when we discern that our energy is being drained in an
interaction... we are then faced with a very difficult situation especially
if the OP in our lives is of the type that is not overtly "defective,"
so to say. It may be a "doggie" type that is very nice to
have around most of the time, though demanding and draining.
example: if we are in a relationship where we feel we "need to
get away now and then to recharge" or something, but in most other
respects, the relations are satisfactory, we may be involved with an
OP that is very subtle and good in terms of draining our energy off.
may take years to realize that we are really getting nowhere in terms
of spiritual growth, even if we do sort of manage to "hold
the line" with our regular "getaways" or other coping mechanisms
we develop in our relations.
are very happy to be working to leave the 3rd Density STS Planet
Earth to its original inhabitants. It must be as difficult for them as
it is for us to continue to cohabit the same world with such diametrically
opposed points of view on how the universe works and in which direction
we should be working.
wish them well in the next Cycle.