Article - Laura Knight-Jadczyk
|
|
Article - Laura Knight-Jadczyk
|
|
Cassiopaea relies completely on individual reader contributions. This allows us to keep our independence. Contributing
Editors Articles Something Wicked This Way Comes
|
The
Identity of the Attackers? Page 3
======== Subject: Schools to show 'cocaine and sex' film about Jesus From: "Xinoehpoel" <tesnal@psl.moc> Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 11:38:46 -0700 -------- Schools to show 'cocaine and sex' film about Jesus By Victoria Combe, Religion Correspondent (Filed: 04/09/2001)
A FILM crammed with references to sex and drugs and featuring Jesus as a 15-year-old schoolboy and Mary Magdalene as a single mother is the latest ploy to woo young people back to church. In an effort to curb the decline in young church-goers, a missionary agency has made a 30-minute film on an £8,000 budget with teenagers playing the leading parts. Called An Absence of Stones, the film will be screened in secondary schools this autumn with the aim of convincing teenagers of the relevance of the Bible to their lives. It contains references to drugs and violence with the Judas figure portrayed as a drug-taking schoolgirl who betrays Jesus for a "hit" of cocaine. At one point Jesus accompanies Mary Magdalene to an abortion clinic, although he says he "hates" what she has done. In the end she decides to keep the baby. Instead of a crucifixion scene, Jesus is murdered by a schoolfriend and is resurrected in a Leicestershire beauty spot. Nigel Roberts, scriptwriter and producer for Youth for Christ, said his aim was to defy the Church's "stuffy" image. Anthony Kilmister, spokesman for the Prayer Book Society, which has the Bishop of London as its patron, attacked the film as "a distortion" of the Bible and "harmful" to young people. http://portal.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2001/09/04/nchurc04. xml
======== Subject: Bible saves boy's life!!!! And the OT played a bigger role than the New!!!! From: "Xinoehpoel" <tesnal@psl.moc> Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 11:40:36 -0700 -------- Police: Fla. Mom Shot 6-Year-Old The Associated Press Sunday, Sept. 2, 2001; 8:29 p.m. EDT NORTH FORT MYERS, Fla. -- A mother allegedly shot dead her 6-year-old son Sunday but a shotgun blast intended for his 16-year-old brother was absorbed by the teen-ager's Bible, police said. Leslie Ann Wallace, 39, was later shot by sheriff's deputies and hospitalized in critical condition. Authorities said Wallace shot her son James Wallace at home, then drove to her family's church where she fired her shotgun at 16-year-old Kenneth Wallace as he stood outside. The blast, fired at close range, struck his Bible and the overcoat he was carrying. Kenneth Wallace's arm had minor scratches. "The Bible certainly saved his life," said Lee County Sheriff's Deputy Larry King. "Had his Bible not been in the way he would have sustained the brunt of the blast and very well could have died from that type of injury." Authorities said that from the church, Mrs. Wallace drove to a pizzeria where her 19-year-old son, Gregory Wallace, was working and she pointed her shotgun at the store's manager. Police had forewarned Gregory Wallace that his mother may be en route. Authorities said she then went to a pay phone and called 911 to report the killing of James Wallace. Police found his body at the family's home. As deputies pulled over her car, she began firing at them, authorities said. They returned fire, hitting her once. King said police found anti-depressant medication at the home but did not give a motive for the shootings. "We're still sorting through things," King said. "The rest of the circumstances aren't real clear yet." He said charges against Wallace were pending.
here is another story: http://www.news-press.com/news/today/010903churchrampage.html
======== Subject: Horrible shark attacks, gruesome story From: "Xinoehpoel" <tesnal@psl.moc> Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 11:41:34 -0700 -------- Weekend Shark Attacks Kill 2 By Estes Thompson Associated Press Writer Tuesday, Sept. 4, 2001; 10:19 a.m. EDT MANTEO, N.C. -- A man was killed by a shark as he and his girlfriend swam in shallow water along the North Carolina shore, the latest in a rising tide of East Coast shark attacks and the second deadly one of the weekend. Coast Guard aircraft patrolled the ocean Tuesday off the Cape Hatteras National Seashore with crews and a marine biologist watching for sharks, Mary Doll, a National Park Service spokeswoman, said at a morning news conference. Three types of sharks are common in the area along the Outer Banks: sand tiger, bull and scalloped hammerhead. Monday's attack, the first fatal one off North Carolina's coast in more than 40 years, came less than two days after a 10-year-old boy was killed by a shark near Virginia Beach, about 135 miles up the shore. Doll identified the victim as Sergi Zaloukaev, 28, of Arlington, Va., and his companion as Natalia Slobonskaya, 23, of Vienna, Va., both Russian nationals. Slobonskaya was alert and stable but remained in critical condition Tuesday, said Sandra Miller, spokeswoman for Sentara Norfolk General Hospital in Virginia. Residents and workers along the popular stretch of beach were stunned. "My son fishes and surfs these waters all the time," said Carlene Beckham, an employee of the Avon Fishing Pier. "But after seeing what happened today he said he's not so sure anymore." The couple from the Washington, D.C., area were swimming near a sandbar 20 to 40 feet off the beach when the shark struck. The man was alert when he reached the shore but was badly mauled, said witness Gary Harkin, 33, of Columbus, Ohio. "He was still talking when he came out of the water," Harkin told The Virginian-Pilot. Harkin said he tried to put a tourniquet on the man's leg with his long-sleeve T-shirt, while his friend, Carolyn Richards, administered CPR. "I did have a pulse on him twice, but I lost him," she said. Harkin said it appeared that the man had lost a leg and a finger. The woman lost her left foot and was bitten on her left hip and left wrist, he said. Both also had injuries in the groin area, Harkin said. The victim was already in full cardiac arrest when medics arrived, Skeeter Sawyer, head of Dare County emergency medical services, said at the news conference with Doll. The woman underwent surgery at the Sentara and was in the trauma intensive care unit Tuesday morning. "I think, barring any unforeseen complications such as infection, we'll be able to get her on the road to recovery," said Dr. Jeffrey Riblet, a trauma surgeon. The attack was believed to be the first off the North Carolina coast this year. The last reported fatal shark attack in North Carolina water came in 1957, according to the International Shark Attack File in Gainesville, Fla. In Virginia on Saturday, a shark attacked 10-year-old David Peltier of Richmond, ripping a 17-inch gash in his left leg and releasing him only after the boy's father hit the shark on the head. David died hours later after losing large amounts of blood from a severed artery. In early July, 8-year-old Jessie Arbogast's right arm was ripped off by a 6 1/2-foot-long bull shark off Florida's Gulf Coast. His arm was reattached after a daring rescue by his uncle, and he remains in a light coma.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/aponline/20010904/aponline101954_000.ht m
======== Subject: Re: Matthews Wisemen From: "Xinoehpoel" <tesnal@psl.moc> Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 12:04:52 -0700 --------
Mike Night <Don'tmail@here.com> wrote in message news:13Ck7.230263$rV6.10586626@e420r-atl2.usenetserver.com... > Sorry by changing the date of Jesus birth once again you prove that the > story is fake and can be changed at whim to cover your errors. Changing the dates doesn't prove the story (at least the original) wasn't real. I am claiming that many events (almost all) recorded in the gospels are fiction, especially the eclipse that occurred during Jesus' crucifixion, which is strangely missing from John. Events like these, that eclipse in particular, which can be dated via secular references during the 202nd Olympiad, can be dated to 32 AD, which as you can see, is the true reason 1 AD was fixed where it was. This flies in the face of the gospels however, which state that Jesus aas born before Herod died, which was 1 BC, and we know from Josephus that it had to be 2 years earlier, hence the most common 2 BC birthdate you hear about these days. This however, along with the Christian 1 AD, cannot be reconciled to the years of the census being, as they were, 19 BC and 7 BC, since they were every 12 years. This is why many more Christians accept the 7 BC birthdate. As you can see, all these conflicting traditions have completely screwed up everyone, and now everyone is wrong except me. X ........... The fact is > the story is Yeshu of 100BC fled Jannaeus towards Egypt. Since the > character is combined with Yehuda of Galilee of 6BC the new name for the > figure and new dating of this combined character (image of a man) had to > have a new birthdate and had to change the figures to coincide with the new > birthdate. Wrong. These are in fact the very same man. > Proof is in the way they mistaken the other Herod for King Herod when he was > only a Prince. > By calling this later Herod King they cover stories from both time periods, > cause remember they are trying to sell the figure as existing in the 20+ ad > era. Then there is the proof left in the widows Mite story, a Jannaeus coin > and not a Herod coin or later kings coin. So this is where the Jannaeus stuff comes from eh? What is this proof in the "widows Mite story", which maybe itself a fiction, and it seems absurd that you claim this proves anything about a Jannaeus coin. Please explain. > > > If you believe Jesus was satan explain this: Jesus was a man. Satan is not > a > > man. > > Satan is an image of a man and Jesus is a compiled image of a whitewashed > character compiled from Historical figures, biblical figures and > mythologies. > If you refer to being a fallen angel then it would help to know Hebrew > Malakh=Messenger/prophet a mere fallen prophet. > How can Jesus be an angel you might think??? > Jesus claim is as an angel: > Rev 22:16 calling himself Bright morning star. > Stars=angels > proof: > Revelation 1:20 The mystery of the seven stars that you saw in my right hand > and of the seven golden lampstands is this: The seven stars are the angels > of the seven churches, and the seven lampstands are the seven churches. > > But once again, all angel means is messenger/ prophet and any spirit > portrait is mythology with no substance to the context of the words used in > scripture in a reality sense and in it's proper use of words. > > Look, do not be confused by Revelation. You had it right that Jesus (as in the gospels) is based on a historical man, mixed with fiction, almost everything except the resurrection. Revelation is a prophecy from God, and it has been redacted by scribes who believed Jesus was GOD ALIMIGHY, and that is why it equates him to Lucifer, because this is before the Christians invented the fall of Satan. Paul also equates Jesus to "Lucifer" (which itself it a contraction made by translators) in 1Timothy 6:16. Pure and simple. Redactions of Revelation (original intention being to equate Jesus to the Creator) do not prove Jesus is Satan. But at least I understand you anti-Christian approach. ======== Subject: Re: Matthews Wisemen From: "Xinoehpoel" <tesnal@psl.moc> Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 12:31:16 -0700 --------
Mike Night <Don'tmail@here.com> wrote in message news:IzPk7.118891$54.5428750@e420r-atl1.usenetserver.com... > Misty: > Bethlehem Ephrathah= the tense in the Hebrew is MASCULINE GENDER and > birthplaces are feminine gender therefore it's not a birth place it's a > birth lineage one comes out of. > Bethlehem the son (or grandson) of Ephrathah (1 Chronicles 4:4, 2:50-51). > Micah 5:2 reads: "But as for you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, too little to be > among the clans of Judah (showing a lineage not a city) > > Micah says 'Out' of Thee so Matthew is written falaciously as Born from to > hide the true meaning of the verse being lineage as you are 'born out' of a > lineage born in a town. Interesting, never heard this before, but as I already expressed, I do not feel Jesus was born in Bethlehem, nor that there was ever a messianic prophecy which said he had to be, only conjecture. > > Dan 9 has nothing to do with Jesus and you do realize Daniel already > mentions the Redeemer in Dan 12:1-4 by name. > The verses you refer to in Daniel is talking about an anointed place and an > anointed (King) not THE ANOINTED ONE. Michael is always playing the role of the GOD behind the new religion isn't he? Only this time we have another who will fit into the picture with him, and that would be a glorified messiah/Adam figure. > > Dan 9: There is a 7-week (49-year) span between the actual destruction of > Jerusalem in 586 (beginning the exile and realizing the decree in 538bc to > rebuild), and the end of the exile brought about by the arrival of 'AN' > anointed one . Dan 9:24 says anoint the holy place not an anointed man. > Daniel 9:25 says, "from the time the decree to restore and rebuild Jerusalem > was issued, until AN annointed one, a ruler, it will be seven weeks". If the > decree is indeed sometime around the beginning of the full Exile, 586 > b.c.e., then who is the annointed one mentioned? And, GOD already has > referred to ruler Cyrus as his Annointed in > Isaiah 45:1: > 70 years after the destruction Cyrus rebuilt the Temple in other words it's > completion in 516BC Very correct, except that many scholars believe the Cyrus prophecy was added later. I am not completely against it being original, but evidence is evidence, and no evidence is no evidence. > > Daniel 9:26 > And after the sixty-two weeks, > an annointed one will be cut off, > and there will be nothing to him. > and the people of a ruler who shall come > shall destroy the city and the sanctuary, > and the end of it/him shall be with a flood,, > and, until the end of the war, desolations are decreed. > > 62 weeks (434 years) leads us to around 152 b.c.e. the time of antiochus > desolation and destruction of the temple. The anointed one was the king who > was cut off. > High Priest Onias III, who was assasinated (cut off) in 171 b.c.e. In 168 > b.c.e., the middle of the next "week" of years (171-165 b.c.e.), ruler > Antiochus IV (who had Onias killed) pillaged Jerusalem. Antiochus IV matches > the "ruler to come", > > Seder Olam doesn't agree with any of this. How sure are you about secular dating? ======== Subject: Re: 911 From: "Xinoehpoel" <tesnal@psl.moc> Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 12:33:46 -0700 -------- Wait 7 days, and then maybe I'll answer this post. You see, I am going away in seven days, and you will not hear from me again. X Thomas S. McDonald <tsmac@wwt.net> wrote in message news:Sg8l7.476$k7.7210@reggie.win.bright.net... > > "Xinoehpoel" <tesnal@psl.moc> wrote in message > news:3b950436@monitor.lanset.com... > > > > Since when do I post prophecies, other than end of the > world cataclysmic > > ones? > > > > > > Thomas S. McDonald <tsmac@wwt.net> wrote in message > > news:EoAk7.450$k7.6737@reggie.win.bright.net... > > > > > > "Xinoehpoel" <tesnal@psl.moc> wrote in message > > > news:3b923e02@monitor.lanset.com... > > > > > > > > "This is a witness against everyone on this > newsgroup." > > > > > > That's it? "This is a witness against everyone on this > > > newsgroup."? That's your big friggin' deal? You > underdid > > > yourself this time, Xin. Usually I can at least rely on > you > > > for some interesting reading. This sucks. > > > > > > Tom > > Dear Xin, > > The first post in this thread was from you, saying that > something was going to happen on August 31, and that you > would tell us what that thing was after it happened, > presumably on September 1. I was only noticing that you > hadn't followed through on what you said you'd do, and > instead had only written, "This is a witness against > everyone on this newsgroup." > > Now you write, "Since when do I post prophecies, other > than end of the world ones?" Are you now saying that you > are taking back your promise to tell us the thing that you > said was going to happen on August 31? Or are you saying > that the thing that happened August 31 was a witness against > everyone in this newsgroup, with no more specification than > that? > > Just looking for some consistency and followthrough from > you. I am interested in what happened on August 31 that > fulfilled your premonition of August 30. Or has it not > happened yet, and you are going to tell us after it does, > whatever the date? > > Peace, > Tom McDonald >
======== Subject: Re: ENNIS REALLY DID DIE IN CAr crash!!!!!!!!! From: "Xinoehpoel" <tesnal@psl.moc> Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 12:38:59 -0700 -------- What about the updates to Sollog's website? About the f-god websites, or the ebooks? Those were made after you first declared that Sollog had died. Who made those updates then? X
xganon <nobody@xganon.com> wrote in message news:43a39191ecf97185d60677af9e207b32@xganon.com... > Ennis is dead and so is his puppet lord Solog. He may still have his only fan still posting but he is just a relative or coke buddy of Ennis'. Yep Solog died when Ennis did. Good Ridence! > > > > --- > This post was anonymized at http://www.xganon.com > Come visit the newest xganon server http://www.xganon.org providing > rights and freedom related news. > --- ======== Subject: Re: Fatima 3rd secret - where? From: "Xinoehpoel" <tesnal@psl.moc> Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 22:56:20 -0700 -------- http://www.marianland.com/thirdsecret-text.html A good deal of Catholics believe it was about the third world war, you know, the one that is going to start in 2006. Don't believe everything you read about the third secret, because there is a lot of controversy surrounding it. No one knows quite for sure what it really contained, (only what Vatican has released) but I'd say nuke bomb destroys Rome. We'll see...
======== Subject: School children to create 3.0+ earthquake by jumping simultaneously From: "Xinoehpoel" <tesnal@psl.moc> Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 23:01:06 -0700 -------- Millions of pounding feet will launch Science Year Thousands of schools across Britain are being asked to let children jump together in their playgrounds to create the world's largest scientific experiment. At 1100BST on Friday, at least a million children will jump for a minute. A million children with an average weight of 7st 12 lb (50 kg) jumping 20 times would release two billion joules of energy. Scientists want to measure the impact on seismometers - machines used to monitor earthquakes - but it should not register more than three on the Richter Scale. I do not think we are going to get reactivation of the Great Glen or sightings of the Loch Ness monster Dr Ted Nield, from the Geological Society of London The event will go into the record books as the "greatest simultaneous jump in history". Dr Ted Nield, from the Geological Society of London, said: "Britain is hit by magnitude three earthquakes all the time - but you do not ever notice it. "The only danger is that somebody injures themselves jumping. "I do not think we are going to get reactivation of the Great Glen or sightings of the Loch Ness monster." The Great Glen is a huge fault line that runs straight through Loch Ness. Sightings of the monster have been blamed on tremor disturbances of the water. Speaking at the British Association science festival at Glasgow University, Dr Nield said he expected the seismic event would have a "diffuse" epicentre strongest in the most densely populated areas. The jump is being held to launch Science Year, a government-funded campaign which aims to promote science among pupils aged between 10 and 19. Record books It will be recorded by the Guinness Book of Records. The experiment - which is being billed as The Giant Jump - will be the first official event of Science Year. As well as the jump in schools, other jumps and launch events will be held at nine centres across Britain. Science Year is being run by a group called Nesta (National Endowment for Science, Technology and the Arts) which was set up by an Act of Parliament to promote innovation in science, technology and the arts. To take part, schools have to register at www.scienceyear.com.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/education/newsid_1529000/1529754.stm
======== Subject: Re: 911 From: "Xinoehpoel" <tesnal@psl.moc> Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 23:05:59 -0700 -------- What? No, I am just going away, that's all. What challenge? Ok, I'll be proud if you want me to. X Dee <.@coeeaoeeaeeco> wrote in message news:mPdl7.8693$IP6.685416@newsread2.prod.itd.earthlink.net... > > Xinoehpoel wrote in message <3b952e20@monitor.lanset.com>... > >Wait 7 days, and then maybe I'll answer this post. You see, I am going away > >in seven days, and you will not hear from me again. > > > >X > > Out on bail or what? Accept my challenge and go away with some pride in your > stupidity, fakir. > > ................. >
======== Subject: Re: 911 From: "Xinoehpoel" <tesnal@psl.moc> Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 23:09:47 -0700 -------- I said it was a witness, ie. a testimony. The testimony always comes before the prophesied judgment. For if I no testimony had been delivered, you would not be guilty of sin. If you've been tracking me at all, you know the prophesies I have made. The testimony had nothing to do with any cataclysm as you now suggest. Truly, you only see what you want to see, and for this reason, people must be destroyed, because although they can see, they are yet blind. X
Dee <.@coeeaoeeaeeco> wrote in message news:jPdl7.8692$IP6.685416@newsread2.prod.itd.earthlink.net... > > Xinoehpoel wrote in message <3b950436@monitor.lanset.com>... > > > >Since when do I post prophecies, other than end of the world cataclysmic > >ones? > > Then it didn't happen. > > .................................... >
======== Subject: Re: THE MATRIX as a prophecy concerning the fate of Christianity (Jews and Muslims read!!) From: "Xinoehpoel" <tesnal@psl.moc> Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 00:54:52 -0700 -------- So this is the challenge you were talking about. I can see you are just dying to get a hold on my interpretations, knowing they are the only true interpretations of X-72 and X-74. This is all I have to say: "What is concealed I will reveal!"
Dee <.@coeeaoeeaeeco> wrote in message news:ZGdl7.8671$IP6.684072@newsread2.prod.itd.earthlink.net... > > Xinoehpoel wrote in message <3b9503ea@monitor.lanset.com>... > >Umm, I think you misunderstood me. All I wanted from you, if you insisted > on > >calling my interpretation just another in a long list, none of which are > >more valid than any other, that you show how any other interpretation > works, > >or how mine is flawed. I could of course debunk every one else's one by > one, > >but it is much easier to watch you pathetically try to prove another, which > >I could so easily tear apart. > > Come on, stand on your own. You don't need a movie to act as your frame of > reference (unless you cut and pasted most of it). You wanna see yourself as > pathetic? Come on let's play hardball. Let's see your interpretation for > X.72, since this is a Nosty group. I'll show you how pathetic your talents > are. Is that okay with you? Go ahead and get your think tank. I might gather > my own by changing my e-mail address. You can copy off of Sollog's site if > you want. But be prepared to defend your interpretation. Then we can have > fun with the Bible, and more Nosty and more occult and physics, etc. Let's > start with a real prophecy first...one central to this newsgroup. If you > mention JFK Jr., I will laugh in your face. > > If you don't accept this challenge (5 KB of new material each posting), I > will say forget it; and you can wrap yourself with videotape of the Matrix > for all I care. I want to match my ideas with yours. Let's see whose > knowledge is pathetic in comparison to whose. You will have to do some > original work though. This won't be about the Matrix. This will be about you > implying my knowledge has decreased rather than increasing, and that I am > not a learner. Come travel with me across the realms of truth and invisible > reality. It's a perilous trip. Neither of us may like the results; but maybe > it is time. > > Will you accept my challenge by posting your interpretation of X.72? If your > interpretation of the Matrix had the real truth in it; surely in a Nosty > group, you can see the real truth in X.72 and X.74. Are you imaginative > enough to see similar truths in X.72 and X.74? If not, perhaps you should > start a alt.matrix.sollog group be cause you would apparently be unable to > see any real truth in Nosty's most important quatrains. > > Accept my challenge and prove that you are no closer to prophetic reality > than half of the people in this newsgroup. Let's up the ante. Post 10 KB of > new material whenever you like, in this branch of this thread. You insulted > me from out of the blue. You implied my knowledge is decreasing and that I > am not a learner. Let's cross swords. This time we will find out WHO SHOULD > BE THE TEACHER, of reality, between you and me (this challenge applies to no > one else, though anyone can diss me if they want, they'll probably get a two > word response like 'bless you'). If you reject my challenge, you would show > your wisdom, if you do it correctly. > > Oh and I can see obfuscations and evasions and needless expletives a mile > away. Those will be labeled and deleted. > > Do you know more prophetic reality than me so that you can imply I'm not > even a learner. I say your interpretation capabilities are meager and > biased. And I want to take you into the realms of deeper knowledge. > > So I want to take you into deeper waters, which everyone knows something > about in this newsgroup. Let's start with X.72, and work our way to the end > of the "world" which you mentioned to me. Hah. I'll prove it will be the end > of the 'age' and not necessarily the end of the world. I thought I made clear the meaning of end of the world, being the end of the the people in the world, and not the end of time itself, and therefore it could be called "end of the age" also. > > Come swim with me where sharks would dare not swim. > > Very classy thread above, predicting something will happen tomorrow and not > stating what it would be, and stating something about hate etc. Come on > fakir. Let's predict the future, you and me. Let's see what kind of original > thinker and seer you are...with original and USEFUL thoughts, that are > positive and constructive. >
======== Subject: Re: THE MATRIX as a prophecy concerning the fate of Christianity (Jews and Muslims read!!) From: "Xinoehpoel" <tesnal@psl.moc> Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 00:59:13 -0700 -------- You have not said anything for me to attack you about, Jimmy. Yea, you might be wrong, but I could hardly say you've slandered me in any way, only confused me a little more. X
Jimmy <blue0ne2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:9n6q0j$t2$1@bob.news.rcn.net... > > > > > Come swim with me where sharks would dare not swim. > > > > > > Very classy thread above, predicting something will happen tomorrow and > not > > > stating what it would be, and stating something about hate etc. Come on > > > fakir. Let's predict the future, you and me. Let's see what kind of > original > > > thinker and seer you are...with original and USEFUL thoughts, that are > > > > > > > hm, what a rant. Have to say I didn't see it coming... what is the big > deal > > with positivity and constructiveness? > > Well, I think it has to do with the fact that some people can take only so > much foundering in competitive rhetoric, before it becomes monotonous, and > the desire for fresh growth, as opposed to mental masturbation, is desired. > I thought Dee's post was well written, as it would definately appeal to X's > sense of competition, yet if he were to compete with it, it would be totally > outside of his MO, which is to find a very impassionate individual, and to > lure them into his grip with interrogative terms. X realizes that these > people are quite bent on benevolence and will bite when he poses a question > to them under the guise of friendly dialogue. Then after they have spent > themselves in an attempt to assist the questioner, the same attacks them > with brutal ferocity and insults. This is also the MO of some very highly > intelligent serial killers. Not that X is a serial killer, just that the > same instincts, and personality traits that he exhibits at a much smaller > scale are typically at play in said individuals. Its as if some are > psychological serial killers, as opposed to biological. > > Due to the fact that Dee was not appearing as "benevolent" as she has in the > past, it is outside of his MO, and if he attacks there is hardly any fun, > and his level of distinction is lost in the equanamity of her rant. As > well, if he does not post he is seen as backing down. So now he must > choose, and in doing so is on the defensive. I myself expect him to reply > to this post, and either be benevolent to me, to initiate yet another cycle, > or attack me outright. Which is futile, cause I simply ignore him anymore. > :) > > -jimmy >
======== Subject: Challenge accepted! X 72 and X 74 now REVEALED to the masses!!! From: "Xinoehpoel" <tesnal@psl.moc> Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 01:05:09 -0700 -------- This is in reply to a challenge made to me by someone named "Dee", so I therefore publish the true interpretations of X-72 and X-74, which as far as I know, no one has ever published before. Do not think, like others, that these are just my opinions or bias interpretations. No, quite to the contrary, these are the only true interpretations, and although you are free to post your opinions, and comments, please do not post negatively, because you would only be doing so in vain, since no part of these interpretations can be debunked. But you will not believe them until you see them fulfilled, starting in the in the year 2006. Learn the truth now while you are still able to!
Century X-72: L'an mil neuf cens nonante neuf sept mois, Du ciel viendra vn grand Roy d'effrayeur: Resusciter le grand Roy d'Angolmois, Auant apres Mars regner par bon-heur. The year 1999 seven month, From the sky will come a great King of terror: To bring back to life the great King of Angolmois, Before after Mars to reign by good luck
Interpretation of Leo Pheonix: After 1999 years and seven more, (typo: mais) The Great and Terrible God Mars will first be seen coming from the sky, Coming in order to 'raise from the dead' the Great God of the many white ghouls. Before and after Mars arrives, the God Satan is ruler over the earth.
Century X-74:
Au revolu du grand nombre septiesme, Apparoistra au temps ieux d' Hecatombe, Non esloigne du grand aage milliesme, Que les entrez sortiront de leur tombe. At the revolution of the great seventh number, Will appear at the time (of) Games of Hecatombe, Not very long ago from the great age of millenium, That the enterers (letters) will exit from their grave.
Interpretation of Leo Pheonix: After the completion of seven years from the commencement, Mars will arrive at the time of the Games of Olympics, Which is not long after the commencement of the Millennium. This is when the extraterrestrials will exit out of Hell.
*** Note: 'Extraterrestrials' here is does not signify a belief that such beings originate from outer space, but quite to the contrary, that they originate from 'hell'. 'Hell' here does not signify a belief that such a place is a prison to damned souls, but closer to the Jewish belief of 'Hades' or 'Sheol' that it is a literal world ruled by a God. There is also a parallel reference in the Book of Revelation to a certain ruler named 'Death' exiting out of a 'Bottomless Pit'. (see Rev 9:11) Nostradamus may have been mimicking Revelation in order to clearify its meaning. Also, there seem to be several links back to X 72, where Nostradamus mentions Mars coming in order to 'raise from the dead' the 'God of many white ghouls'. Since 'raise from the dead' could be a way of saying 'release from the pit of hell' or 'exit out of Hell' and X 74 times the arrival of Mars with the appearance of extraterrestrials, it could be logically inferred that the extraterrestrials are what Revelation calls 'the armies of Death' or 'the ones who come with the God Death from hell'.
I don't know Sollog's take on this one, but I don't need to know. I already know it will be fulfilled, as it says, in the year 2008. Personally, I don't think Nos predicted stuff like JFK Jr, TWA-800, or insignificant stuff like that, well at least not that I can see.
|