dant
The Living Force
I would like some resolution to the mystery surrounding Bearden because I
came across a reference where Ark asked a question involving Bearden to
the C's , so perhaps this needs to be cleared up?
The following reference pertains to:
http://www.cassiopaea.org/cass/hoagland_2.htm
Session: 8.22.98
was worth looking into and Bearden's idea of 'scalar electromagnetics', might be "sound", since
the C's replied: "Close" or is it something else?
What was the result of discovery by Ark, the idea of scalar electromagnetics? Is this claim sound
or was it disinfo and perhaps Bearden is a disinfo artist? Did the C's wanted Ark to pursue this claim
as part of his learning lesson to check out the facts otherwise?
Bearden has claimed many things, a short list:
1) Over -unity devices: MEG (Big debate overhis claims, math is wrong, physical measurement methods is suspect, etc.)
2) Claims that Electrical Engineers math is faulty whereas Physicist math are not.
3) Claims that Maxwell's use of quaternions was upsurped/watered-down by Heavyside/Gibbs vector algebras.
[See forum: Outer space and "inner" space sciences: "Broken Maxwell EM?", if interested]
4) Claims to be a PhD, but he isn't qualfied as having a degree. Other say he is self-proclaimed as no degree papers are produceable.
So what can we believe at this point? Is Bearden a complete fraud/disinfo-artist and must be avoided
completely, partially, or what? Does Bearden know some truths but is using a small bits of truths to be
sandwiched between to lies in order to snare a dupe?
Here is what he says of himself:
http://www(dot)cheniere.org/books/excalibur/glossary/014edited.htm
came across a reference where Ark asked a question involving Bearden to
the C's , so perhaps this needs to be cleared up?
The following reference pertains to:
http://www.cassiopaea.org/cass/hoagland_2.htm
Session: 8.22.98
It appears that the C's were saying that: "Utilizing Scalar Electromagnetics to Tap Vacuum Energy"
was worth looking into and Bearden's idea of 'scalar electromagnetics', might be "sound", since
the C's replied: "Close" or is it something else?
What was the result of discovery by Ark, the idea of scalar electromagnetics? Is this claim sound
or was it disinfo and perhaps Bearden is a disinfo artist? Did the C's wanted Ark to pursue this claim
as part of his learning lesson to check out the facts otherwise?
Bearden has claimed many things, a short list:
1) Over -unity devices: MEG (Big debate overhis claims, math is wrong, physical measurement methods is suspect, etc.)
2) Claims that Electrical Engineers math is faulty whereas Physicist math are not.
3) Claims that Maxwell's use of quaternions was upsurped/watered-down by Heavyside/Gibbs vector algebras.
[See forum: Outer space and "inner" space sciences: "Broken Maxwell EM?", if interested]
4) Claims to be a PhD, but he isn't qualfied as having a degree. Other say he is self-proclaimed as no degree papers are produceable.
So what can we believe at this point? Is Bearden a complete fraud/disinfo-artist and must be avoided
completely, partially, or what? Does Bearden know some truths but is using a small bits of truths to be
sandwiched between to lies in order to snare a dupe?
Here is what he says of himself:
http://www(dot)cheniere.org/books/excalibur/glossary/014edited.htm
So - is it possible that Bearden is a greenbaumed person and is aligned with 4D STS due to his associations with US ARMY?Bearden said:
