Session 23 January 2016
(L) Other questions?
(Joe) There's an alignment of five planets starting more or less now...
(L) It's not an alignment. Let's call it a display... a visual display.
(Joe) Okay. Of Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn for the next month. The last time this happened was December 2004, which also lasted for one month. About ten days into that event, there was the Indian Ocean earthquake and tsunami that killed 300,000 people.
(L) When was the last time it happened before that? Has anybody looked into that?
(Data) It's hard to calculate it.
(Joe) Well, it would be in the news, no? But maybe the first question is: Did the last alignment have anything to do with that earthquake?
A: Yes partly.
Q: (Pierre) The reason why this alignment was a cause or partial cause of the earthquake is related to this discharge model we developed in the Earth Changes book?
A: Yes but not all such configurations are necessarily connected to such events. In the present period, there are other important energies afoot in the cosmos.
Q: (Pierre) In 1997, you mentioned that the energetic source of El Niño was some kind of energetic connection with the cosmos around 18 degrees latitude.
A: Yes
Q: (Pierre) Now, you also mentioned in 1997 that Laura should look for a
spike in the graph. Here in my hand, in front of my eyes I have an ocean index graph showing that there is a spike. Right now we're experiencing the strongest El Niño since 1950. So, first: Is this spike the spike you were hinting about 19 years ago?
A: Indeed. And it is not yet over.
Q: (Pierre) We have reached a level that is higher than ever, and it's STILL climbing up. You mentioned this spike in conjunction with a 10.4 earthquake near the West coast of the USA in the Pacific.
A: Indeed.
Q: (Pierre) So, does this spike in El Niño activity indicate a 10.4 earthquake coming in the Pacific?
A: Could very well be. Notice the Hawaii aviation crash and then relate to the items we listed as being associated.
Q: (L) Well, now wait a minute. In that particular list of items... Admittedly, that also includes something about, "Ukraine explosion". Well, what we have in Ukraine is not even an explosion, it's like a human explosion there. There are lots of associated bombs exploding and military type activity. But a singular Ukraine explosion, chemical or nuclear, did not occur.
A: Notice also in that possible timeline that Princess Diana was mentioned?
Q: (L) Yes, Princess Diana was mentioned as some kind of suicide attempt. But Princess Diana is dead, so what are you saying? Are we on a different timeline than the one that was involved in that collection of predictions?
A: Somewhat. Notice that what has happened in Ukraine is worse than a single explosion.
Q: (L) So Princess Diana died in 1997, before we talked about that spike. The predictions about Ukraine and all those other things came, what? In 1994? Several years earlier, I think. And you're saying that what was predicted in that string of predictions about Ukraine specifically was not as bad as what is actually happening now. And obviously, Princess Diana dying in that terrible car crash as she did then was a lot worse than her living on and maybe having a suicide attempt but getting counseling and living her life, her children not being left alone, and all that sort of thing. So, what appears to me to be what's going on is that we actually switched to a worse timeline because of something somebody did in 1996 or 1997?
(Pierre) Between the predictions and now.
(L) And are the predictions still similar?
A: Yes
Q: (L) I mean, we've still got Ukraine having explosions, just different. We still had this Hawaii aviation crash, which was on the list. But there were several other things. So, some things could be worse and some things could be not so worse? Is that what we're getting at?
A: Yes
Q: (L) What about the 10.4 earthquake? That was talked about after Diana’s death... I had the feeling that Diana's death was an evil thing. Like if somebody did that, they changed the whole future in a negative way. What was the date of that session?
(Andromeda) It was an evil marker.
(Chu) What else was in those predictions?
(L) California, Lassen, gas explosion in the Northeast... We've been having gas explosions like CRAZY, but everywhere.
(Data) What about the supernova?
(L) The supernova was included. We just got that report about the most bodacious supernova ever seen.
{December 13th, 2015: 'Intense Alaska storm ties strongest on record'
Quote
A potent storm approaching western Alaska this weekend has tied the strongest recorded storm to impact the region. This storm comes a little over a year after ex-Super Typhoon Nuri became the most powerful system on record to cross Dutch Harbor, Alaska, which is located in the Aleutian Islands, with a central low pressure of 924 millibars (27.29 inches of Hg).
Wiki entry on the November 2014 'Bering Bomb':
Quote
Due to an unusually powerful North Pacific jet stream, the extratropical cyclone underwent extremely explosive cyclogenesis on November 7, owing to the energy from differences in air masses. The system split into two centers early on the same day, but the former center on the southwest was absorbed into the new center on the northeast, within half of a day. After attaining typhoon-force winds at 70 knots (130 km/h; 80 mph), the new storm’s central pressure decreased to 924 mbar (hPa; 27.29 inHg) [NOAA's figure] early on November 8, becoming the most intense extratropical cyclone of the North Pacific Ocean since reliable records began. The system's intensity shifted the jet stream far to the north of Alaska, resulting in a large mass of Arctic air invading the United States along and east of the Rocky Mountains, which caused the worst cold wave the United States had experienced since the 2013–14 North American cold wave.}
(L) So, yeah... There is obviously some kind of energetic sink there. It's sucking energy.
(Data) Did the supernova that happened in January (this month) have any effects on humanity?
A: It didn't happen in January.
Q: (L) When did it happen?
(Data) The news article is from January.
(Andromeda) I think they discovered it in June of last year – June 2015. That's when it was first detected.
{Lee Billings of Scientific American reports:
Quote
Discovered in June 2015 by ASAS-SN’s twin 14-centimeter telescopes operating in Cerro Tololo, Chile, the supernova just appeared as a transient dot of light in an image, and wasn’t immediately recognized as particularly special. Only after several other telescopes piled on to provide additional observations of the outburst’s fading afterglow did it become clear to Dong and his collaborators that they had seen something record-breaking. The first hint came from a spectrum of the supernova delivered by the 2.5-meter du Pont Telescope in Chile seven days after the initial discovery. “When we saw the spectrum, we were baffled,” Dong recalls. “It didn’t look like any supernova we had seen.
The explosion’s magnitude is so large that it challenges the current theories about these cosmological phenomena. Allison Eck of PBS explains:
If ASASSN-15lh’s parent star shed its out layers of gas and then collapsed its inner core to form what’s called a magnetar—a dense, rapidly rotating magnetized core—then magnetized wind emanating from that collapse could have shocked the outwardly flying matter enough produce a massive explosion. The catch is that the magnetar would have to have been spinning at a rate of one revolution per millisecond—that’s 60,000 rpm—which pushes the boundaries of what scientists think is physically conceivable. The magnetar idea may not be correct, but it’s at least plausible. Meanwhile, experts are on the lookout for other explanations.}
(Data) What were the effects from the supernova?
A: Compare news to event!
Q: (L) Are you saying that it can have an effect on humanity, or it did?
A: Yes
Q: (L) But it's up to us to figure it out?
A: Yes
(Dark Star+ Comet Cluster + The Wave ?)
