1963 Pole shift book declassified in 2016

JGeropoulas

The Living Force
FOTCM Member
I watched this video on pole shifts and crustal displacement which was very interesting--most particularly because the book featured was classified shortly after it was published in 1963.
Here's some highlights from the video summarizing the book: Chan Thomas wrote a book in 1963, which was then classified by the CIA in 1965. In 1993, Thomas published a modified version of his book which was 52 pages shorter than the original. Due to a FOIA request, 57 pages (of 284) were declassified in 2013, then released to the public in 2016 with each page stamped "Sanitized Copy".

But why was Thomas' book classified when others in a similar vein were not? For example, "The Path of the Pole" by Charles Hapgood, with an introduction written by Albert Einstein: "In a polar region there is a continual deposition of ice, which is not symmetrically distributed about the pole. The earth's rotation acts on these asymmetrically deposited masses [of ice], and produces centrifugal momentum that is transmitted to the rigid crust of the earth. The constantly increasing centrifugal momentum produced in this way will, when it has reached a certain point, produce a movement of the earth's crust over the rest of the earth's body, and this will displace the polar regions toward the equator."

Thomas differed from Hapgood in that he proposed the magnetic reversal occurs every 6,500 years, but usually reverses back within 60 days, leaving no geological evidence, as exists for those occurences when it did NOT reverse back (e.g. 11,500 BC, 5,000 BC)

Much of what's written parallels what the C's have said about the sinking of Atlantis and Mu, and subsequent dispersion of those people and explaining shared DNA, language between such distant locations as Australia and South America. Other evidences are mentioned e.g. fossilized whale bones found at the top of the Andes and Himalayan mountains 22,000 feet above sea level.

The basic theory seems to be that the nearing of our sun's twin star-->periodic sun fluctuations -->geomagnetic changes in earth's core-->climate change-->crustal shifts (electromagnetic changes make the core lose it's binding grip on the crust)-->less shield from/more attraction of comets-->cataclysm. He cites various recent evidences: mysterious seismic wave that circled the earth at 9,000 mph (November 11, 2018), ocean currents have slowed to lowest in 1,600 years (2018), 8.5 Fukashima earthquake (2011) moved Japan 8 feet, changed the earth's tilt by 6.5" and increased the earth's rotation by a millisecond. Another earthquake moved New Zealand's islands 15 meters closer together, and the earth's magnetic pole has migrated 600 miles since 1990.

Thomas' time table parallels the research of Clube, Napier, Firestone and West regarding the Younger Dryas cometary bombardments. Both seem very convincing based on the convergence of research from varying fields of study, so perhaps both occurred, which would create a cataclysm even more devastating than their descriptions.

I encourage everyone to read the declassified material themselves to see the quality of thought behind it (it includes some odd pages from a TIME magazine strangely included at the beginning, and some kind of inventory list at the end). Here's the link to the declassified pages: https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP79B00752A000300070001-8.pdf

Who was Chan Thomas? The only information available is what he included in his book. His credentials and accomplishments are impressive (e.g. correctly predicting several major earthquakes). Though educated in electrical engineering at Dartmouth, he delved into a broad range of sciences along the way to formulate his theory. For more details, see page 55 of the document linked above.

Related material can be found in these sessions:

Related thread, "Inuit Elders: Earth has shifted"
 
Last edited:

JGeropoulas

The Living Force
FOTCM Member
This video supplies additional information on Chan Thomas' book. It begins with a reading of Thomas' gripping description of the onset of his theorized cataclysm. At 55:50 it discusses how Hapgood's theory was flawed and easily debunked so as to redirect the scientific community away from further explorations in that direction.
 

Skyfarmr

Jedi Master
FOTCM Member
This video supplies additional information on Chan Thomas' book. It begins with a reading of Thomas' gripping description of the onset of his theorized cataclysm. At 55:50 it discusses how Hapgood's theory was flawed and easily debunked so as to redirect the scientific community away from further explorations in that direction.

I finally got around to watching this lengthy video and it is packed with details and information, some familiar and some unknown.
Davidson brings information together from many experts known for challenging the mainstream scientist.

There is also a short section at the end of film (1:15:20) presented by Davidson's long time friend who got a hold of a complete copy of the unredacted (un-sanitized) version of "The Adam and Eve Story" by Chan Thomas. They are offering it in a Downloadable format (.pdf)for free on suspectsky.com It has 43 pages, I've downloaded it, but haven't read it yet. Will be back with review as soon as I do.

This video, in my opinion, is very complimentary to information we can find on this site. This could have easily been a 6 hour presentation, but he compacts years of research in a fraction of that time.
Pop some popcorn, sit back and hang on to your seat.
 
This article caught my attention worth read... Link New Studies Warn of Cataclysmic Solar Superstorms
and Error - Cookies Turned Off

A powerful disaster-inducing geomagnetic storm is an inevitability in the near future, likely causing blackouts, satellite failures, and more. From a report: Unlike other threats to our planet, such as supervolcanoes or asteroids, the time frame for a cataclysmic geomagnetic storm -- caused by eruptions from our sun playing havoc with Earth's magnetic field -- is comparatively short. It could happen in the next decade -- or in the next century. All we know is, based on previous events, our planet will almost definitely be hit relatively soon, probably within 100 years. Geomagnetic storms are caused by sunspots, solar flares and coronal mass ejections, resulting in calamities to which our modern technological society is becoming ever more susceptible.

Most experts regard the Carrington Event, a so-called superstorm that occurred in September 1859, as the most powerful geomagnetic storm on record. But new data suggest that a later storm in May 1921 may have equaled or even eclipsed the Carrington Event in intensity, causing at least three major fires in the U.S., Canada and Sweden -- and highlighting the damaging effects these storms can have on Earth today. In a paper published in the journal Space Weather, Jeffrey Love of the U.S. Geological Survey and his colleagues reexamined the intensity of the 1921 event, known as the New York Railroad Storm, in greater detail than ever before.

Although different measures of intensity exist, geomagnetic storms are often rated on an index called disturbance storm time (Dst) -- a way of gauging global magnetic activity by averaging out values for the strength of Earth's magnetic field measured at multiple locations. Our planet's baseline Dst level is about -20 nanoteslas (nT), with a "superstorm" condition defined as occurring when levels fall below -250 nT. Studies of the very limited magnetic data from the Carrington Event peg its intensity at anywhere from -850 to -1,050 nT. According to Love's study, the 1921 storm, however, came in at about -907 nT. "The 1921 storm could have been more intense than the 1859 storm," Love says. "Prior to our paper, [the 1921 storm] was understood to be intense, but how intense wasn't really clear."
 

Pashalis

Ambassador
Ambassador
FOTCM Member
But why was Thomas' book classified when others in a similar vein were not? For example, "The Path of the Pole" by Charles Hapgood, with an introduction written by Albert Einstein: "In a polar region there is a continual deposition of ice, which is not symmetrically distributed about the pole.
Who was Chan Thomas? The only information available is what he included in his book.

According to Joe, Chan Thomas and Charles Hapgood are the same person, with the former being a Pseudonym of the latter:

Speaking of Prof. Charles Hapgood, (he used Chan Thomas as a pseudonym), he promoted the earth crust displacement theory in 1958, and previously worked for the CIA. A document he wrote called 'The Adam and Eve story' was declassified in June 2013, and the classified version was apparently used in the storyline of the movie 'The day after tomorrow'.


Here's the first part of the declassified document:
 

Zzartemis

Jedi Master
Diehold Foundation video series. I did a search for these and did not find here. First up starts with how the CIA hid this from the public. Full playlist of videos next...been awhile since I watched these but remember them as very good.


COMPLETE PLAYLIST
Causes of the Ice Ages and Polar Reversals and Mass Extinctions
Diehold Foundation
 

Persej

The Living Force
FOTCM Member
Diehold Foundation video series. I did a search for these and did not find here. First up starts with how the CIA hid this from the public. Full playlist of videos next...been awhile since I watched these but remember them as very good.

His presentations do sound interesting, but I would need somebody more knowledgeable about this matter to tell me how much of his theory makes sense. He might be wrong about some things and right about other. On first glance, it seems that he is missing several factors that we talked about on this forum, including twin sun and comets.
 

goyacobol

The Living Force
FOTCM Member
Diehold Foundation video series. I did a search for these and did not find here. First up starts with how the CIA hid this from the public. Full playlist of videos next...been awhile since I watched these but remember them as very good.

@Zzartemis,

That was a very interesting video. I think the guy is smarter than the average bear (he made me feel stupid anyway but that's not so difficult I suppose :-/).

The part about the center of the earth stood out to me. He seems to have this concept of information being an ingredient of the creation of matter and that is intriguing for a scientist to say. His description of a pulsar seems to be different from the mainstream scientific opinion too.

Anyway, I thought of something the Cs said about the center of the earth (ammonia core) that I have been pondering. It seems to be a requirement for planets that have "life". I was not going to include the "pole shift" but for those more scientifically inclined this session is jam-packed with "knowledge" that may be useful.

Session 31 October 2001 (only about 19 years ago):
Q: (L) Now according to these guys who are writing this web page about pole shift, they say it can be predicted where the poles will shift to. Is this in fact the case?
A: No.

Q: (L) Why can't pole shifts be predicted? Can't we know where the new pole will end up?
A: Chaotic function here
Q: (L) Okay, in a pole shift does the lithosphere of the planet slide on the core? (A) No. We have to be very precise. There are three possible things that would come under the name pole shift. Only one of them may come, or two, or three, okay? And these are the following -1) the axis of rotation with respect to stars is changing, straightening out for instance; this is one thing; while all the rest goes with the axis, the lithosphere and the magnetic field. 2) Second, the axis stays where it is, maybe it shifts a little bit; the lithosphere stays where it is - maybe it wobbles - but the magnetic field changes: for instance reverses. 3) Third, axis stays, magnetic field stays, but the lithosphere is moving. So that's three ways a pole shift can happen. And of course there are things that come together. The most dramatic one which is seen from outside is when the axis of rotation changes. The next dramatic one is probably when the lithosphere changes. And the third of unknown consequences is when the magnetic pole changes, okay? So, we want to have an understanding what will be the main change. (L) Well I guess we ought to ask an even more basic question: are we looking at a pole shift happening? That's starting at the beginning. (A) Alright. (L) In the next ten years. Is a pole shift possible in the next ten years?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Is a pole shift of the axis...(A) Honey, you ask if the pole shift is possible, of course it's possible. But suppose it's almost zero probability? 'Is it possible' is not the right question. 'Is it going to happen?' That's a question. (L) Okay you ask, carry on. (A) Are we looking at a pole shift during the next ten or so years with a high degree of probability?
A: Yes.
Q: (A) In this concept of pole shift, what would be the main feature of this pole shift, of all those which we were discussing?
A: New axial orientation, and magnetic reversal.
Q: (L) That's fairly dramatic. (A) Alright, now, change of axis or orientation of axis of rotation: can we say we would straighten up, getting almost perpendicular to the ecliptic? Or the other possibility is that it will fall down being almost parallel to the ecliptic. The third is that we'll flip completely by 180 degrees. We know it's highly unpredictable, but can we have a clue from which one is, so to say, dominate?
A: Perpendicularity will be restored.

Q: (A) We know the axis will change dramatically and magnetic reversal will happen. You didn't mention a change or shift of the lithosphere alone. Can we...
A: Lithospheric shift will feature to some extent.
Q: (A) But, that means eventually that the equator will almost not change because...
A: Correct.

Q: (A) So it will just shift a little bit, but its not going to go to Hawaii? (L) Oh rats! That was my theory! Well, it was a good idea. (A) What about changes in the lithosphere: can we predict a little bit of change in geography, coming from motions in lithosphere and changes in water level?
A: Chaotic features predominate but in general it will be safer inland and in mountainous areas since less folding occurs in such locations.
Q: (A) Now, the major, the change of the orientation of the axis, what would be the main trigger, force, or activity, or what kind of event will trigger this change of the axis?
A: Cometary bodies.

Q: (L) Are the planets of the solar system going to kind of shift out of their orbits and run amok? Is that a possibility?
A: Yes.
Q: (A) Due to cometary orbits alone?
A: Yes. Twin sun also.

Q: (A) When we speak about these cometary bodies, are we speaking about impacts?
A: Some will hit.
Q: (A) What would be - if any - the role played by electric phenomena?
A: Twin sun grounds current flow through entire system setting the "motor" running.

Q: (L) Does this mean that all of the different bodies of the solar system are like parts of some kind of giant machine, and once this electric current flows through them, depending on their positions relative to one another at the time this current flows, that it has some influence on the way the machine runs?
A: Yes, more or less.

Q: (A) I want to ask about this magnetic pole reversal. It's the current theory or understanding of magnetic field of planets in terms of dynamo mechanism, where there is a liquid metal - iron - which is hot - there are convective currents, and there is self-excitation through magnetic field. That's the present model. They were able to model this magnetic pole reversal using this kind of magneto-hydro-dynamics. Is this model essentially correct?
A: Only partly.
Q: (A) What is the main thing that is important, and that is lacking from this model?
A: Crystalline ammonia core.
Q: (A) Everybody thinks that the core is a crystal iron; that's the present thinking. Say it's an ammonia core: is an ammonia core in all planets with magnetic fields? Is this so?
A: From this perspective, no but from the perspective of organic life, yes.

Q: (A) When we speak about crystalline ammonia, do you mean a new kind of crystalline ammonia that is not yet known on Earth to our scientists?
A: More or less.

Q: (L) I think we need to find out something about this crystalline ammonia. (A) What would make it go into the very core? (L) I don't know. We don't know enough about it to even know how to frame a question. I know we thought it was crazy when they were talking about Jupiter and the ammonia, and then of course all this ammonia shows up on Jupiter. And I remember them saying something about this at the time, but I don't think we ever followed up on it because I thought it was even to crazy to think about. Maybe we need to find out something about ammonia, crystalline ammonia. (A) Is there a mini black hole in the center of the Earth?
A: No.

Q: (L) I remember when I was a kid - this is a funny thing - we got this kind of chemistry experiment. You put these chemicals together and it grew crystals. I think ammonia was part of it. I think you had to use ammonia to grow crystals. (A) Okay, now this crystalline ammonia core inside the Earth, can we have idea how big it is, what radius?
A: 300 km.
Q: (L) What is surrounding it, what is the next layer? (A) Normally people would say it's an iron crystal. What is the next layer?
A: Correct.
Q: (A) There is this ammonia - crystalline... (L) Surrounded by iron crystal. Is it crystal iron? (A) Probably at this pressure that is here, it may very well be crystal. (L) Okay, is the iron surrounding the ammonia, is it crystalline?
A: Yes.

Q: (L) What's the next layer?
A: Molten iron.
Q: (A) Okay, now we know that some planets have this crystalline ammonia, and some do not. When we consider planets that have this crystal ammonia inside, how did it get there? Was it a kernel first around which the planet was formed, or first the planet was formed and then during some processes the ammonia sank and crystallized inside? I would like to know how it got there?
A: It is the natural formation process for ammonia to accrete iron from supernovae.
Q: (L) I read somewhere - about supernovae - that the only reason we have iron is because it's produced in supernovas. That would mean that our solar system is formed from a supernova, right? In which case what blew up and when? (A) I understand that this crystalline ammonia core - 300 km radius - must have certain magnetic properties which are important. Because it was mentioned that it was lacking in dynamo theory or certain very important properties concerning heat convection. So there are these two main things in dynamo theory - conductivity and electric properties - on the other hand heat convection properties. Why is this ammonia important for the magnetic field because of what properties?
A: Super conducting.

Q: (A) According to what we know it's very hot inside the earth because of the pressure. Now, is this ammonia also hot, as much as iron?
A: Grows alternately cold and hot.
Q: (A) Is it super conducting even if when it is very hot?
A: No.
Q: (A) When it gets cold, how cold does it get?
A: 55 degrees below absolute zero.

Q: (L) What is absolute zero? (A) That is something you can't get below. That's why it's called absolute zero. It's a new thermo-dynamics. (L) How often does it alternate?
A: Close to hour long periods.

Q: (L) So when it gets so cold and becomes super conducting, the act of super-conducting is what heats it up? Is that it?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Well once it heats up, how does it then get cold again?
A: It stops conducting.
Q: (L) What is it conducting? When something is super conducting what does it conduct?
A: Electrons.

Q: (A) The point is, you see, that when something is super conducting it offers no resistance. Which means that the current it flows through it, is not heating it. Well we learned that it gets hot because it's super conductive, right? Which is somewhat contradictory because when it is super-conducting there's no reason for it to be hot except it can become hot because there is the hot external shell of iron. So that is very likely why it would become hot. Because by the very definition of super conductivity you don't become hot when you conduct, see? Well, if there are big, very big currents, then okay, they can stop super conductivity, then it gets warm.
A: Currents of this nature set the surrounding iron to vibrating which produces heat, not heat produced by the current.
Q: (A) Now, I want to go back to this 55 degree below absolute zero. And here I would like to have a confirmation of this 55 degree below zero. Because. according to the current knowledge of physics, the absolute zero was set by definition, as the temperature on the scale, according to the science of thermo-dynamics, which is - so to say - nothing moves so you cannot go below this temperature. If you say 55 degrees below zero it means we have to redo physics and redo thermo-dynamics.
A: You have entered a different realm.

Q: (A) What?
A: Lack of movement as measured by physics is based upon 3rd density conventions.
Q: (A) What causes this appearance of new physics in the center of the planet? We do not see this need for new physics around us. But somehow there are specific conditions, apparently, in the center of the planet that cause necessity of entering this new physics.
A: Windows.

Q: (L) Let me ask this, if it was possible to measure a temperature of something that was being subjected to a very intense electro-magnetic field what would it show? (A) Well the question is different, you see, because we asked first about why there is this ammonia crystal inside, okay? The answer was it was a natural process. But now we see there is this window inside. What is the reason that there is this window inside? Now you suggest, honey, that the widow inside is because there are - or because who knows what causes what - but there are very strong electro-magnetic fields. Is the window inside related to the fact that we have to go beyond standard physics? Is it related to the fact that there are very strong electro-magnetic field inside?
A: Reciprocal function.
Q: (L) What is ammonia composed of? (A) Ammonia? NH3, one nitrogen and three hydrogen atoms, and it kind of rotates, and that's ammonia. (A) What is nitrogen number? Six? Or seven? Seven is phosphorus, yeah? (L) I don't know, I don't remember, I'm too tired to remember. (A) You're too tired.
Q: (L) We haven't received any offers, you said we'd get an offer and we should do something.
A: Soon, have faith.

So, for now, I hope this was a "Reciprocal function" of networking. :-/
 

MikaelYosef

Jedi Master
I encourage everyone to read the declassified material themselves to see the quality of thought behind it (it includes some odd pages from a TIME magazine strangely included at the beginning, and some kind of inventory list at the end). Here's the link to the declassified pages: https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP79B00752A000300070001-8.pdf

I'm only half-way through the book (and thanks again to @scout for the referral to this thread that I missed). My 2 main observations so far and before I forget them:

1. The book feels like reading one of Laura's works. It takes obscure and seemingly unrelated information, pieces it together, and explains it logically in plain English. Separately - I also imagine a visual 'duh' expression by the author's in response to people who read what they wrote and who have their own 'wow' reaction moment.
2. Considering the above and the times in which it was written, I can imagine many reasons why it was classified.

To be continued.....
 

rrraven

Dagobah Resident
FOTCM Member
A: Crystalline ammonia core. I found this on this subject
Highly compressed ammonia forms an ionic crystal

I was wondering about the window thing too
now a window is different to say a door or portal that it lets in light not objects or people
so the crystalline window at the center of the planet lets in solar and cosmic radiation aka ''light'' and this is somehow important for organic life
 
Top Bottom