A Visual Study of Gurdjieff's Enneagram of Foods

JonnyRadar

The Living Force
SymbolStudy.jpg



Click here to view a full-res PDF that you can zoom in on


A study of the structure of the seven-tone musical scale gives a very good foundation for understanding the cosmic law of octaves.

~ Gurdjieff, In Search of the Miraculous, p.125

For a few years now, I’ve been fascinated with the work of Reginald Brooks (_http://www.brooksdesign-ps.net/). During that time, and while revisiting Gurdjeff’s Enneagram as explained in ISOTM, I began to see similarities in the structure of the enneagram to Brooks’ music/color wheel.

This is a visual study of those relationships - an attempt to bring together what I’ve been learning into one coherent piece. I have a number of hand-drawn versions I had been working on and picking up now and again, and eventually decided to do it on the computer (in Adobe Illustrator) so I could examine the exact proportions. At first, it was just an effort to help myself understand the material, but I just recently came to a certain point with it and wanted to share this version here and (hopefully) receive some feedback on possible errors and faulty thinking.

As a precursor, some of the things Gurdjieff said specifically about symbols and the enneagram that piqued my curiosity to look further into it…

“A symbol, by expressing the knowledge of the laws of unity, has at the same time expressed the path to it.”

“The number connects up with the geometrical form of the symbol; the number in the symbol pours out into the form.

“Word, number, and form, when combined, give a still more perfected symbol. […] As I pointed out, it is necessary to experience them, discover them, and by delving deep down into yourself to make them your own property.

“But a symbol that expresses an all comprehensive law, is ipso facto itself all comprehensive and for that reason it cannot be interpreted in a way that is not exhaustive; it can only be lived through.

~ The Enneagram Lecture (an excerpt of ISOTM chapter 14) _http://www.endlesssearch.co.uk/philo_enneagramtalk.htm

That last quote is very important, IMO - to not consider the symbol as something that will automatically or magically impart knowledge. In order to really grok it, the student must delve into it.

So, I’d like to explain some of the connections I saw in an effort to clarify the illustration.

The music/color wheel is based on 16 equal sections of a circle, and the enneagram on 9 equal parts. The first common multiple of 16 and 9 is 144, so the circle is split into 144 sections, each comprising 2.5 degrees of rotation, to allow a visual examination of the relationships between the different sections. The music/color wheel’s 16 sections each comprise 22.5 degrees, and the enneagram’s 9 sections comprise 40 degrees.

The Enneagram

I am still working on my understanding of G’s Enneagram of Foods, but to my current understanding, one proceeds from the first do-re-mi on the “food” octave through the octave back to do, at which point that do becomes the second do of the triangle (at 120 degrees), the air octave (breathing). Then the re-mi-fa-sol etc. shifts according to the new position of do. The same shift of do is repeated for the third octave, impressions, when the do begins at 240 degrees.

Along the process of the enneagram, there are shocks. These manifest in life or the universe as external shocks that come from an outside force. One, between mi and fa, and one between sol and la, which “should be” between si and do. This took a while for me to wrap my head around, and at present I think Gurdjieff placed the shock in the “wrong place” as a sort of alchemical diversion for those who would not delve into the symbol itself. I.e., without doing the work to study the symbol, one would not know why the shock is apparently in the “wrong place.”

When the notes of the c-scale are plotted on the wheel, the half-steps of the scale (E-F, B-C) begin at 120 and 315 degrees. The first mi-fa shock occurs at the 120 degree mark, and in G’s illustration of where the second shock “should be”, he shows it at this position of 315 degrees.

actualshock.jpg

Where it “should be”

wrongshock.jpg

Where it “shouldn’t be”

G says this about the placement of the second shock (ISOTM p.291):

"The apparent placing of the interval in its wrong place itself shows to those who are able to read the symbol what kind of 'shock' is required for the passage of si to do."

There's definitely a clue in the fact that G’s implied “correct” place for the second shock coincides with the second half-step of the scale. In ISOTM, G also gives his ratios between the frequencies of the notes do-re-mi-fa-sol-la-si-do, where he explains the nature or mathematical position of the second “hidden” shock - I’ll revisit that after touching on the music/color wheel aspect.

The Music/Color Wheel

The music/color wheel is based on the Newtonian color wheel, and constructed in such a way that one can find the dominant and sub-dominant complements (4ths, 5ths) and other harmonics of a scale at specific points on the circle by shifting the tonic to the top position. If you haven’t, I highly recommend reading Reginald Brooks’ paper The Geometry of Music, Art and Structure ... Linking Science, Art and Esthetics - (_http://www.brooksdesign-ps.net/Reginald_Brooks/Code/Html/Gomas/gomas09.htm).

The division of the monochord can be traced back at least to the 27th century B.C., where Ling Lun of China created a five tone pentatonic scale with the intervals of 1/1, 3/2, 9/8, 27/16, 81/64. Pythagoras of Samos delineated a harmonic proportioning of the monochord into simple divisions of 1/2, 1/3, 1/4, 1/5, 1/6, 1/7, 1/8, etc., leading to Pythagorean turning based on perfect fifths.

A variety of tunings have evolved as the monochord is variously divided based on appropriate intervals pleasant to the ear (just temperament) to those given mathematical exactitude (equal temperament where the interval is derived from 12?2).
A common denominator is that all such diatonic tunings approximate the division of the monochord in such a fashion that is equivalent in geometric terms to one of nature's most fundamental laws-the inverse square law. The strength of the forces of gravity and electromagnetism both fall off inverse squarely of the distance of separation.

Geometrically, this may be viewed as the distance is doubled, the area of influence (force field concentration) is reduced by 1/4, as the distance is tripled the area is reduced by 1/9, when quadrupled the reduction is 1/16, and so on. The odd numbers when added in sequence equal the area, i.e. 1+3=4-^1/4, 1+3+5=9-^1/9, 1+3+5+7=16-^1/16, and so on.

Now, when simple harmonic divisions of the monochord are compared, it is found that it is only the same odd numbers of divisions that define the musical intervals. Thus:

1 division is unison, 2 divisions equal the octave
3 is the fifth (3/2), 4 is the next octave
5 is the third (5/4), 6 is the fifth repeated (6/4=3/2),
7 is the seventh (7/4), 8 is the next octave
9 is the second (9/8), 10 is the third repeated (10/8=5/4),
11 is the fourth (11/8=33/24 or 4/3=32/24),
12 is the fifth repeated
13 is the sixth (13/8=39/24 or 5/3=40/24),
14 is the mseventh repeated
15 is the Mseventh (15/8).

Brooks writes about a correlation between the ratios of the frequencies of the musical notes to the wavelengths of the colors. The colors themselves can also be shifted to find complementary (neutral) colors at the same points of the musical resonant harmonics.

Nature's game rule has separate game plans for color and music. In color, complements form neutrals, while in music complements form harmonic resonates. Our limited perception of light (color) to only one octave belies the notion introduced here that every photon of the electromagnetic spectrum has a complementary photon above and below its given wavelength as surely and as explicitly defined as every musical note has a complementary note a perfect fifth above and below.

Both complementary patterns of color (light) and music (sound) are defined by the same game rule, the ISL.

Also worth noting, in Brooks’ calculations, he includes three different tuning systems: Equal Temperament, Just Intonation, and Geometric. The frequencies of each of these tunings fall within a certain range of each note when plotted on the circle. So it's not like 240 degrees of rotation is exactly x hertz, it changes slightly depending on the tuning. This caused me a lot of trouble at first, when I was trying really hard to make the A-432hz tuning fit onto the circle, and F and A were falling about 8 degrees off. I think the overall point is that the ratios of all three tuning systems apply closely enough for horseshoes to make an interesting argument that the ISL ratios have a valid relationship to the frequencies.

These are the ratios of each note to the tonic (1) resulting from the ISL:

C 1
D 9/8
E 5/4
F 11/8
G 3/2
A 5/3
B 15/8
C 2

Regarding G’s ratios of the notes in the do-re-mi scale (that I mentioned earlier), this is what he gives in ISOTM, p.125:

Do 1
Re 9/8
Mi 5/4
Fa 4/3
Sol 3/2
La 5/3
Si 15/8
Do 2

And this is how he explains the semitones that occur in the scale at “fa” and “si” :

between do and re 9/8 : 1 = 9/8
between re and mi 5/4 : 9/8 = 10/9
between mi and fa 4/3 : 5/4 = 16/15 increase retarded
between fa and sol 3/2 : 4/3 = 9/8
between sol and la 5/3 : 3/2 = 10/9
between la and si 15/8 : 5/3 == 9/8
between si and do 2 : 15/8 = 16/15 increase again retarded

The differences in the notes or the differences in the pitch of the notes are called intervals. We see that there are three kinds of intervals in the octave: 9/8, 10/9, and 16/15, which in whole numbers correspond to 405, 400, and 384. The smallest interval 16/15 occurs between mi and fa and between si and do. These are precisely the places of retardation in the octave. […]

In this way the structure of the musical seven-tone scale gives a scheme of the cosmic law of 'intervals,' or absent semitones. In this respect when octaves are spoken of in a 'cosmic' or a 'mechanical' sense, only those intervals between mi-fa and si-do are called 'intervals.'

I can’t help but notice that the discrepancy between the ISL ratios and G’s ratios occurs at the point of the first shock on the octave. The ISL wheel states that F ("fa" musically) is 11/8, while G states that it's 4/3. The difference is very slight, as 11/8=33/24 and 4/3=32/24, but it's there nonetheless.

And interestingly, what should be a second discrepancy between their ratios does not exist, much like the “hidden” second shock which is in the “wrong place.”

This quote seems to imply further the deep connections between the enneagram, the law of octaves, and the unequal 8-part music/color wheel (ISOTM, p.124):

The principle of dividing into eight unequal parts the period, in which the vibrations are doubled, is based upon the observation of the non-uniform increase of vibrations in the entire octave, and separate 'steps' of the octave show acceleration and retardation at different moments of its development.

In the guise of this formula ideas of the octave have been handed down from teacher to pupil, from one school to another. In very remote times one of these schools found that it was possible to apply this formula to music. In this way was obtained the seven-tone musical scale which was known in the most distant antiquity, then forgotten, and then discovered or 'found' again.

The seven-tone scale is the formula of a cosmic law which was worked out by ancient schools and applied to music. At the same time, however, if we study the manifestations of the law of octaves in vibrations of other kinds we shall see that the laws are everywhere the same, and that light, heat, chemical, magnetic, and other vibrations are subject to the same laws as sound vibrations.

With that in mind, I began to see some other interesting similarities.

Densities

The concept of 7 densities appears to fit symbolically into the sections of the wheel. Each of their “natures” seems to be reflected in Gurdjieff’s different levels of creation, as well as reflecting the cyclical nature of reality, or the “Grand Cycle.”
There is one correlation that I find very interesting. When considering reincarnation, or alternatively stated: 3rd density death, 5th density contemplation, 3rd density birth, etc., Gurdjieff’s explanation of the the gap between mi and fa, contains some interesting points. ISOTM p. 291:

The passage fa-mi in the cosmic octave is accomplished mechanically with the help of a special machine which makes it possible for fa, which enters it, to acquire by a series of inner processes the characteristics of sol standing above it, without changing its note, that is, to accumulate, as it were, the inner energy for passing independently into the next note, into mi.

Exactly the same relationship is repeated in all completed processes.

When looking at the circle, one might place 5th Density directly on the 5th note, G, which lies between fa and sol. So, paraphrased, fa (3rd density death) acquires the property of sol (5th density), to accumulate the energy to pass into the note mi (3rd density birth). This is just my own interpretation of how densities may fit onto the circle and tie in with G’s explanations of the shocks and passages.

Alchemical Steps

The 7 steps of Alchemy and their associated metals and symbols also seem to tie into the progression of the enneagram, the musical scale, and the densities themselves. When looking closely at the symbols of the alchemical steps and their components (shown in the legend), one can see that the concepts match up with the concepts or nature of each density. I tried to put that as succinctly as possible into the image itself, so I’ll spare the long-winded explanation.

The Ketogenic Diet

This is explained in a side note on the image, I just think it's interesting that while ketones are the ideal source of fuel for the body, their basic chemical structure reflects the positions of the 3 "Do's" with "The Absolute" at the top.

Eiriu Eolas

This is also explained in a side note - interesting that the in-6, rest-3, out-9 count of the breathing program also coincides with the positions of the 3 "Do's", and their numbers on the enneagram; as well as the Vagus nerve connecting the brain and the gut - symbolically connecting octave 3 (impressions) to octave 1 (food) through octave 2 (breath). Also interesting but perhaps a bit of a stretch, is that the other counts of EE, 12 and 30, are factors of 360...

The Visible Spectrum and Our Reality

This is just one other correlation that jumped out at me. While reading John Keel’s Operation Trojan Horse, I came across this about UFOs on p. 62:

Let us assume that UFOs exist at frequencies beyond visible light but that they can adjust their frequency and descend the electromagnetic spectrum-just as you can turn the dial of your radio and move a variable condenser up and down the scale of radio frequencies. When a UFO's frequency nears that of visible light, it would first appear as a purplish blob of violet. A.s it moves farther down the scale, it would seem to change to blue, and then to cyan (bluish green). In our chapter on meteors we note that they most often appear as bluish-green objects.

I have therefore classified that section of the color spectrum as the UFO entry field. When the objects begin to move into our spatial and time coordinates, they gear down from the higher frequencies, passing progressively from ultraviolet to violet to bluish green. When they stabilize within our dimension, they radiate energy on all frequencies and become a glaring white.

In the white condition the object can traverse distances visibly, but radical maneuvers of ascent or descent require it to alter its frequencies again, and this process produces new color changes. In the majority of all landing reports, the objects were said to have turned orange (red and yellow) or red before descending. When they settle to the ground they "solidify," and light dims or goes out altogether. On takeoff, they begin to glow red again. Sometimes they reportedly turn a brilliant red and vanish. Other times they shift through all of the colors of the spectrum, turn white, and fly off into the night sky until they look like just another star.

Since the color red is so closely associated with the landing and takeoff processes, I term this end of the color spectrum the UFO departure field.


The great mass of observational data fully supports these hypotheses. Our glowing objects change color, size, and form, and this fact indicates that they are comprised of energy can be manipulated to temporarily simulate terrestrial matter. Such energies must be somehow collected together at the invisible frequencies, and then frequency changes are brought about to "lower" them into the visible spectrum. Once they become visible, they can then organize themselves into atoms and produce any desired form.

According to Brooks’ work with frequency ratios, C and Red exist on the same point of the circle because of the relationships of their frequencies to each other, in hertz and in nanometers. I find this color relationship with Keel’s UFO entry and departure fields quite interesting, as if the “UFOnauts” are utilizing the law of octaves to pass in and out of our reality.

There are so many other relationships that can be drawn from the enneagram alone, not to mention when we begin to combine it with other symbols and systems and see their similarities. For me to go on with examples would be long-winded and superfluous.

This illustration is just my own study that resulted in something interesting that I wanted to share here… As I said, I do not think I fully understand the actual technical details of Gurdjieff’s enneagram and the cosmic law of octaves quite yet, but it has been a mind-expanding study and I hope to learn more.

I can also say it's been fascinating during this process to see so clearly that the work of the Chateau crew, of the School, is a direct manifestation of G's three levels of food - Diet, Breathing, and Study. :)

Edit: wrong reference to "mi-fa" corrected
 
I would HIGHLY recommend Russel A. Smith's book "Gurdjieff:Cosmic Secrets" to further study the inner structure of the octave. Of all the literature written delving into G's teaching across which I have come, this is THE best. Quite insightful.

Kris
 
These books also have some insights into the enneagram that I've found helpful:

Keith Buzzell's books (Fifth Way Press)
and Enneagram Studies by J.G. Bennett
 
Jonathan said:
Thanks Approaching Infinity :) I've only so far read excerpts of Bennett...

What I found most useful were the explanations for the inner lines. He gives some really down-to-earth examples that make intuitive sense to me: e.g., light passing through a prism, cooking a meal, and how each step in the process follows the lines of the enneagram.
 

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom