Another Hit for the Cassiopaeans? - Global Warming

Laura

Administrator
Administrator
Moderator
FOTCM Member
See this article: Sun Warms and Cools the Earth where it says:
"To fit these data into a global carbon cycle IPCC assumed a
speculative lifetime for man-made CO2 in the atmosphere as 50 to 200
years, ignoring observational evidence from 37 studies (based on
natural and nuclear bomb carbon-14, Suess effect, radon-222,
solubility data and carbon-13/carbon-12 mass balance) documenting that
the real lifetime is about 5 years [4]. With CO2 atmospheric lifetime
of about 5 years the maximum amount of man-made CO2 remaining now in
the atmosphere is only 4%
, and not 36% (see review in (Segalstad,
1998) . "
And here's what the Cs said in April, 2007:

Cs said:
Q: What percentage of what we’re seeing today as global warming is
coming from manmade compared to cosmic?

A: 4 percent.

Q: (J) There ya go. So let’s buy a hummer. (laughter) (H) And are the people that are selling us the global warming…a re
they aware that this is all….. all fake?

A: Some.
 

Alejo

The Living Force
FOTCM Member
Re: Another Hit for the Cassiopaeans?

...and it's a hit!! , off course we won't see this 37 studies on CNN or FOX as long as you can keep em' afraid and asleep..they won't even surface on colleges or universities..., thanx for the post laura!
 

consciousnessrep

The Force is Strong With This One
Re: Another Hit for the Cassiopaeans?

I knew it they kept saying it was because of us that all this global warming is going on. And I was thinking about 2012 and all these other things and I said that we could not just be the only solution because if we was just the case then we would probably been had global warming.
 

Marcus-Aurelius

Jedi Master
Re: Another Hit for the Cassiopaeans?

Alejo said:
...and it's a hit!! , off course we won't see this 37 studies on CNN or FOX as long as you can keep em' afraid and asleep..they won't even surface on colleges or universities..., thanx for the post laura!
For sure, we will not! They have done so much to convince us "there was nothing to look there, it was just our gases emissions which are causing all these phenomenons", that they will do their best to cover this!

Thanks Laura for sharing this!
 

Harold

Jedi Council Member
Re: Another Hit for the Cassiopaeans?

Total hit! :clap: :rockon:

Funny how its not front page news.
 

Avala

Dagobah Resident
Re: Another Hit for the Cassiopaeans?

Saw this on Russia Today yesterday. The men said: "No evidence that CO2 do that". Title is: "'Never mind the heat, climate change is hoax by gravy-train scientists":

http://www.youtube.com/user/RussiaToday#p/u/7/eEmUS7PAWFw
 

Redrock12

The Living Force
FOTCM Member
Re: Another Hit for the Cassiopaeans?

Those Cs just keep the hits coming! : :cool: :cool: :cool:
They're smokin' hot! :cool2: :cool2: :cool2:
 

daco

Jedi
"To fit these data into a global carbon cycle IPCC assumed a
speculative lifetime for man-made CO2 in the atmosphere as 50 to 200
years, ignoring observational evidence from 37 studies (based on
natural and nuclear bomb carbon-14, Suess effect, radon-222,
solubility data and carbon-13/carbon-12 mass balance) documenting that
the real lifetime is about 5 years [4]. With CO2 atmospheric lifetime
of about 5 years the maximum amount of man-made CO2 remaining now in
the atmosphere is only 4%, and not 36% (see review in (Segalstad,
1998) . "
This article is from 1998.

What about this
http://www.science.org.au/policy/climatechange2010/index.html

Any comments.

I found that most scientists agree with global warning and dont agree with coming ice age,the question is why,they are not stupid.
Maybe this is not a real hit from Cs or I,m wrong.
 

Richs

Dagobah Resident
daco said:
"To fit these data into a global carbon cycle IPCC assumed a
speculative lifetime for man-made CO2 in the atmosphere as 50 to 200
years, ignoring observational evidence from 37 studies (based on
natural and nuclear bomb carbon-14, Suess effect, radon-222,
solubility data and carbon-13/carbon-12 mass balance) documenting that
the real lifetime is about 5 years [4]. With CO2 atmospheric lifetime
of about 5 years the maximum amount of man-made CO2 remaining now in
the atmosphere is only 4%, and not 36% (see review in (Segalstad,
1998) . "
This article is from 1998.

What about this
http://www.science.org.au/policy/climatechange2010/index.html

Any comments.

I found that most scientists agree with global warning and dont agree with coming ice age,the question is why,they are not stupid.
Maybe this is not a real hit from Cs or I,m wrong.
"most scientists" are funded by the government and know quite well where their income comes from and what they are expected to say and 'believe' about the climate.

If one understands that 'government' lies about everything because they have been proven to be liars over and over, why would anyone in their right mind believe anything they have to say? The "hockey stick" graph purportedly showing the Earth's temperature rising at an exponential rate is the past several decades has been shown unequivocally to be faked! It seems money talks and the rest of us are advised by the powers that be to 'take a walk'.
 

mkrnhr

SuperModerator
Moderator
FOTCM Member
'most scientists' is a very tricky issue. Most scientists are not climate specialists. Most scientists just believe blindly what other scientists from other specialities than their own have to say. I know many scientists who are not climate scientists who believe blindly in the global warming propaganda, because they are as anybody ese, they are scientists in their own speciality and most of them have no time/desire to look at the subtilities of climate, atronomy, history etc. as we do here.
However, many real climate scientists do not agree with global warming and they have data and arguments. They are called 'deniers' and they don't have the opportunity to talk to the public because the press chooses whom to talk to.
 
Top Bottom