Black Holes do prove 'variability of physicality'?

[OutSky]

Have science (re-)discovered the variability of physicality? The C’s tell us that the “variability of physicality” discovered by Eistein was suppressed by the PTB. In the article bellow is stated that a black hole presents several mass at the same time, as if it behave like some type of quantum particle.​

News Release 30-Oct-2022

Uncovering the massive quantum mysteries of black holes
Peer-Reviewed Publication
University of Queensland

image: An illustration of a mass-quantised black hole, created using NightCafe Creator AI. view more ​

Credit: NightCafe Creator AI

Bizarre quantum properties of black holes – including their mind-bending ability to have different masses simultaneously – have been confirmed by University of Queensland physicists. A UQ-led team of theoretical physicists, headed by PhD candidate Joshua Foo, ran calculations that reveal surprising black hole quantum phenomena.

“Black holes are an incredibly unique and fascinating feature of our universe,” Mr Foo said.

“They’re created when gravity squeezes a vast amount of matter incredibly densely into a tiny space, creating so much gravitational pull that even light cannot escape.

“It’s a phenomenon that can be triggered by a dying star.

“But, until now, we haven’t deeply investigated whether black holes display some of the weird and wonderful behaviours of quantum physics.

“One such behaviour is superposition, where particles on a quantum scale can exist in multiple states at the same time.

“This is most commonly illustrated by Schrödinger’s cat, which can be both dead and alive simultaneously.

“But, for black holes, we wanted to see whether they could have wildly different masses at the same time, and it turns out they do.

“Imagine you’re both broad and tall, as well as short and skinny at the same time – it’s a situation which is intuitively confusing since we’re anchored in the world of traditional physics.

“But this is reality for quantum black holes.”

To reveal this, the team developed a mathematical framework allowing us to “place” a particle outside a theoretical mass-superposed black hole. Mass was looked at specifically, as it is a defining feature of a black hole, and as it is plausible that quantum black holes would naturally have mass superposition.

Research co-supervisor, Dr Magdalena Zych, said that the research in fact reinforces conjectures raised by pioneers of quantum physics.

“Our work shows that the very early theories of Jacob Bekenstein – an American and Israeli theoretical physicist who made fundamental contributions to the foundation of black hole thermodynamics – were on the money,” she said.

“He postulated that black holes can only have masses that are of certain values, that is, they must fall within certain bands or ratios — this is how energy levels of an atom works, for example.

“Our modelling showed that these superposed masses were, in fact, in certain determined bands or ratios – as predicted by Bekenstein.

“We didn’t assume any such pattern going in, so the fact we found this evidence was quite surprising.

“The universe is revealing to us that it’s always more strange, mysterious and fascinating than most of us could have ever imagined.”

The research has been published in Physical Review Letters.​

Also the abstract by Physical Review

Abstract by Physical Review Letters (Published 28 October 2022)

Abstract

We present a new operational framework for studying “superpositions of spacetimes,” which are of fundamental interest in the development of a theory of quantum gravity. Our approach capitalizes on nonlocal correlations in curved spacetime quantum field theory, allowing us to formulate a metric for spacetime superpositions as well as characterizing the coupling of particle detectors to a quantum field.

We apply our approach to analyze the dynamics of a detector (using the Unruh-deWitt model) in a spacetime generated by a Banados-Teitelboim-Zanelli black hole in a superposition of masses. We find that the detector exhibits signatures of quantum-gravitational effects corroborating and extending Bekenstein’s seminal conjecture concerning the quantized mass spectrum of black holes in quantum gravity. Crucially, this result follows directly from our approach, without any additional assumptions about the black hole mass properties.[/URL]

 

[OutSky]

^{(cleaned up)}

Have science (re-)discovered the variability of physicality? The C’s tell us that the “variability of physicality” discovered by Einstein was suppressed by the PTB. In the article bellow is stated that one black hole presents several masses at the same time, as if it behaved like some type of quantum particle.
​

News Release 30-Oct-2022
Uncovering the massive quantum mysteries of black holes​

Peer-Reviewed Publication
University of Queensland

An illustration of a mass-quantised black hole
created using NightCafe Creator AI.​

Bizarre quantum properties of black holes – including their mind-bending ability to have different masses simultaneously – have been confirmed by University of Queensland physicists. A UQ-led team of theoretical physicists, headed by PhD candidate Joshua Foo, ran calculations that reveal surprising black hole quantum phenomena.
..................
..................​

Here it is some of the C’s mentions on ‘variability of physicality’ and Einstein:

May 27, 1995 Session

A: What is your knowledge quotient regarding following: electromagnetism, Einstein’s “unified field theory.” And did he ever complete said theory, or was it completed under the supervision of consortium, and suppressed. And if so, what are the ramifications!!! Also, Roger, are you capable of “filling in the blanks,” we think so! ……
………………………….

May 21, 1997 Session
Q: Here is this purported letter from a Carlos Allende to Dr. Jessup. Now, whether Carlos was a real person or not, what I want to know is if the information is somewhat accurate? Is it a reliable source of information?
A: Is that not obvious?

Q: I thought it was. He said that Einstein did computations on cycles of human civilization and progress, compared to the growth of man’s general character and development, and that this horrified him. Now, this is the very thing you suggested I do to find clues. And, I am doing it. It says here that Einstein was doing the same thing. Is this correct?
A: Yes.

Q: What horrified him?
A: The discovery of variability of physicality, and all that that implies, when one knows all that Einstein knew up to that point.

Q: So, 4th density blew him away!
A: And the other density levels. One begins with the premise that the material realm is the “whole shooting match,” discovers it is not, must rethink everything.
………………………….

August 8, 1998 Session
Q: (A) Einstein. We were told that Einstein discovered UFT, or the possible consequences, and stopped, that the thing that scared him was variability of physicality. I cannot see a trace in his papers. I can’t see which particular year that he discovered that variability of physicality could follow from UFT. Which year was it?
A: 1936.

 

[Olivierlejardinier]

Astronomers Find a Black Hole in Our Cosmic Back Yard​

Just 1,600 light-years away, the black hole is the closest known to Earth. The good news: It’s dormant, at least for now.

Nov. 6, 2022
Almost but not quite in time for Halloween, astronomers announced on Friday that they had discovered the closest known black hole. It is a biggie, a shell of yawning emptiness 10 times as massive as the sun, orbiting as far from its own star as the Earth is from ours.

Not to worry, however: This black hole is 1,600 light-years away, in the constellation Ophiuchus; the next nearest known black hole is about 3,000 light-years away in the constellation Monoceros. What sets this new black hole apart from the 20 or so others already identified in our Milky Way galaxy, besides its proximity, is that it isn’t doing anything — not drawing the nearby star to its doom, not gravitationally consuming everything nearby. Rather, the black hole is dormant, a silent killer waiting for the currents of space to feed it.

Black holes are objects so dense that, according to Einstein’s theory of general relativity, not even light can escape them. This makes them the most intriguing and violent phenomena in nature; when they feed, they can become the most brilliant objects in the universe, as gas, dust and even smaller stars are ripped and heated to incandescence, spewing energy as they approach the gates of eternity.

Most every galaxy has a supermassive black hole millions or billions times more massive than the sun; scientists aren’t sure where they come from. Smaller black holes are thought to form from massive stars that have reached the ends of their thermonuclear lives and collapsed. There are probably millions of black holes in the Milky Way. They typically make themselves known by the X-rays they spit out as they strip gas from their companions in double-star systems.

But what about dormant holes, those that are not currently coughing fire? Kareem El-Badry, an astrophysicist at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, has been searching for such hidden demons for four years. He found this black hole by scrutinizing data from the European Space Agency’s GAIA spacecraft, which has been tracking with exquisite precision the positions, motions and other properties of millions of stars in the Milky Way.

Dr. El-Badry and his team detected a star, virtually identical to our sun, that was jittering strangely, as if under the gravitational influence of an invisible companion. To investigate further, the researchers commandeered the Gemini North telescope atop Mauna Kea in Hawaii, which could measure the speed and period of this wobble and thus determine the relative masses of the objects involved. The technique is identical to the process by which astronomers analyze the wobbles of stars to detect the presence of orbiting exoplanets — except this time the quarry was far bigger.

Their results and subsequent calculations were consistent with a black hole of 10 solar masses being circled by a star similar to our own. They named it Gaia BH1.
“Take the solar system, put a black hole where the sun is and the sun where the Earth is, and you get this system,” Dr. El-Badry said in a news release from the National Optical and InfraRed Laboratory, which runs the Gemini North Telescope.
“This is the nearest known black hole by a factor of three, and its discovery suggests the existence of a sizable population of dormant black holes in binaries,” he and his co-authors wrote in a paper published on Wednesday in the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. Astronomers said that the new discovery raised questions about their presumed knowledge of how such binary star systems evolved. The progenitor of this black hole must have been a star of about 20 solar masses. According to the leading theories, the star’s death and the subsequent black hole formation would have involved a supernova explosion and other processes that would have severely disrupted the other, smaller star in the system. So why does the other star appear so normal?

“It poses many questions about how this binary system was formed,” Dr. El-Badry said in the news release, “as well as how many of these dormant black holes there are out there.”

 

[Olivierlejardinier]

From RT

​

Black hole theory questioned after new star defies rules ​

A newly observed neutron star merger has cast doubt on the accepted model of black hole formation​

Astronomers in the UK have discovered a “hypermassive” neutron star which emitted radiation for far too long before collapsing into a black hole, bringing into question some of the assumptions about the scientific phenomenon. Their observations were published on Thursday.
A team at the University of Bath in Somerset observed a star binary merging and creating a “hypermassive” neutron star, which emitted gamma rays for over a day before it collapsed into a black hole. The result, dubbed GRB 180618A, is about 10.6 billion light-years away and was caught by NASA’s orbiting Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory. A robotic observatory in the Canary Islands then zoomed in on the aftermath.
“Such a massive neutron star with a long life expectancy is not normally thought to be possible,” Dr. Nuria Jordana-Mitjans, head author of the study, told the Guardian. “It is a mystery why this one was so long-lived.”
Jordana-Mitjans and her colleagues interpret the “unusual spectral and temporal properties” of the object “as evidence of a highly magnetized, spinning neutron star,” they wrote in their Astrophysical Journal study. The discovery, they said, “opens a new era for searches of gravitational wave counterparts with fast-cadence surveys.”
Neutron stars are believed to be the collapsed cores of supergiants, created by supernova explosions, with a radius of about 10 kilometers and a mass of about 1.4 of the earth’s sun. They are held together by a phenomenon called “neutron degeneracy pressure” and collapse if their mass exceeds a certain limit.
“They’re such weird exotic objects,” said Professor Carole Mundell, a co-author of the study. “This is the first direct glimpse that we may have of a hypermassive spinning neutron star in nature,” she added. “My hunch is we’ll be finding more of them.”
The gamma-ray bursts that accompany the collapse of neutron stars are the most energetic events in the universe since the Big Bang, according to The Guardian. They were believed to originate from the poles of the newly formed black hole, but the new observations show them emanating from the neutron star itself.

and an excerpt from The Astrophysical Journal 2022 Nov 10

The contemporaneous detection of gravitational waves and gamma rays from GW170817
/GRB 170817A,
followed by kilonova emission a day after, confirmed compact binary neutron star mergers as progenitors of short-duration gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) and cosmic sources of heavy r-process nuclei. However, the nature (and life span)
of the merger remnant and the energy reservoir powering these bright gamma-ray flashes remains debated,
while the first minutes after the merger are unexplored at optical wavelengths. Here, we report the earliest
discovery of bright thermal optical emission associated with short GRB 180618A with extended gamma-ray
emission—with ultraviolet and optical multicolor observations starting as soon as 1.4 minutes post-burst. The
spectrum is consistent with a fast-fading afterglow and emerging thermal optical emission 15 minutes post-burst,
which fades abruptly and chromatically just 35 minutes after the GRB. Our observations from gamma rays to optical wavelengths are consistent with a hot nebula expanding at relativistic speeds, powered by the plasma winds from a newborn, rapidly spinning and highly magnetized neutron star (i.e., a millisecond magnetar), whose rotational energy is released to reheat the unbound
merger-remnant material. These results suggest that such neutron stars can survive the collapse to a black hole on
timescales much larger than a few hundred milliseconds after the merger and power the GRB itself through
accretion. Bright thermal optical counterparts to binary merger gravitational wave sources may be common in
future wide-field fast-cadence sky surveys.