ESTUDIO OBSERVACIONAL EN MICROSCOPIA ÓPTICA Y ELECTRÓNICA.

Jandrim

A Disturbance in the Force
Hola:-)

La universidad de Almeria-España , ha mirado con microscopio lo que hay dentro de ciertos frasquitos.

Salu2.
 

Attachments

  • MICROSCOPIA_DE_VIAL_CORMINATY_DR_CAMPRA_FIRMA_E_1_fusionado.pdf
    8.7 MB · Views: 23

Alejo

Ambassador
Ambassador
FOTCM Member
Hola Jandrim,

¿Nos puedes contar que concluye el estudio? o ¿qué te pareció interesante sobre el y que conclusiones te gustarían compartir? También me di cuenta que es tu primer mensaje en el foro y no te has presentado. Es una costumbre que los nuevos miembros del foro escriban una corta presentación contándonos como llegaron al foro y lo que se sientan cómodos en compartir sobre si mismos y demás.

Te dejo el enlace aqui hacia la sección para miembros nuevos, puedes fijarte en las presentaciones de otras personas para darte una idea de como funciona. Tambien, si te gustaría participar en otras secciones del foro y en otras discusiones, deberías saber que allí se comunican la mayoría en ingles y se le facilitaría mucho a los demás entender lo que deseas compartir si traduces tus mensajes al ingles. Uno de los traductores mas usados es el DeepL

Muchas gracias y bienvenido al foro!

======

Hi Jandrim,

Can you tell us what the study concludes or what you found interesting about it and what conclusions you would like to share? I also noticed that this is your first post on the forum and you have not introduced yourself. It is customary for new forum members to write a short introduction telling us how they came to find the forum and whatever they may feel comfortable sharing about themselves and things as such.

Here's the link here to the new member section, you can look at other people's introductions to get an idea of how it works. Also, if you would like to participate in other sections of the forum and other discussions, you should know that most of the communication there is in English and it would make it much easier for others to understand what you want to share if you translate your messages into English. One of the most used translators is DeepL.

Thank you very much and welcome to the forum!
 
R

Resistense

Guest
Estudiarlo con sus ojos:

Apply 3% hydrogen peroxide (h2o2) over your skin or scalp, and let it work for 5 to 10 minutes, there should be little effect.

Next, take a shower to wash off. After getting wet use, step out of the water and use 1/2-1c. borax detergent (natural mineral) to scrub the skin thoroughly, then rinse off. This is safe stuff.


There are many diversionary tactics, but a reason that you can not breathe may be that your skin is covered. A stealth (hidden, undetected) bacteria infection is much more functional than things like "Graphene Oxide" or "RNA virus", which have no brains of their own whatsoever.
 
R

Resistense

Guest
Aplique peróxido de hidrógeno al 3% (h2o2) sobre su piel o cuero cabelludo, y déjelo trabajar durante 5 a 10 minutos, debe haber poco efecto.

Entonces, tome una ducha para lavarse. Después de mojarse, salga del agua y use 1/2-1c. detergente de bórax o borax (mineral natural) para fregar la piel a fondo, luego enjuagar.Esto es algo seguro.

Hay muchas tácticas de distracción, pero una razón por la que no puede respirar puede ser que su piel está cubierta.Una infección por bacterias sigilosa (oculta, no detectada) es mucho más funcional que cosas como el "Oxido de Grafeno" o el "virus RNA/arn", que no tienen cabeza propio.
 

Tristan

Jedi Council Member
FOTCM Member
From what I have heard and from what the person asserts (one of the founders of the La Quinta Columna, Fith Column) : See reference below. Who took the vial for analysis, guarded by a policeman according to him. However, it is a preliminary report stating that the content of the vial is compatible with a large quantity of graphene components, or more precisely, graphene oxide.

It is expected that more vials will be taken for analysis, as this study is not conclusive.

Ricardo Delgado Martín

Graduate in Statistics from the University of Seville. Master of specialization in Biostatistics. Postgraduate degree in Health Biology: Clinical Microbiology, Epidemiology and Applied Clinical Immunology from the European University Miguel de Cervantes. University Expert in Clinical Genetics from the University Antonio de Nebrija. Certificate of Scientific Contribution by the University of Seville and the S.I.P.I.E. Postgraduate Master in Child Psychology. Master in Banking and Finance by Instituto Superior de Técnicas y Prácticas Bancarias. Master in Personal Training

LA QUINTA COLUMNA is a movement of FREE THOUGHT, a web of REFLECTION, of creative critical thinking, current news and diffusion of topics of interest outside the current indiscriminate CENSORSHIP.

 
R

Resistense

Guest
[...] the content of the vial is compatible with a large quantity of graphene components, or more precisely, graphene oxide.

It is expected that more vials will be taken for analysis, as this study is not conclusive.

Ricardo Delgado Martín
have they quantified if it is in nano or pico grams as of yet?

I was wondering if this would get to this board. I think that this is a small amount of carbon ring sheets , a small part of the dose. I think this is a distraction. A bit of graphene or graphene oxide in a cell culture might show danger. Avoid the vaccine is my advice, but do not worry about a small amount of carbon ring sheet injected if you had to get the vaccine.

For all we know, Ricardo Delgado Martin is a "hired gun": doing a job he was paid to do.
 

Ina

Jedi Council Member
Any study on a single sample requires replication of results on subsequent identical samples.
 

Tristan

Jedi Council Member
FOTCM Member
Yes, it could possibly be another distraction or manipulation.
This analysis is not conclusive, of course, there is a deception program for everyone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ina
R

Resistense

Guest
I read the information to say they have a concentrated vial which is used to produced 6 doses. By diluting the vial with saline (?) to prepare a 'dose'.

Before being diluted, however, it appears that the contents of the vial are largely graphene oxide, with only a small amount of mRNA. To me, this makes sense from a vaccine design viewpoint -- the adjuvant, or an irritating factor, as graphene oxide is sent in alongside the small amount of mRNA, and the mixture should get a reaction from the receiver's system, to get it to recognize the "antigen presented" by the mRNA.

From June, 30, 2021, La Quinta Columna / Orwell.city: Official interim report of Pfizer's vaccination vial analysis explained by La Quinta Columna

Official interim report in english (universityu of almeria).pdf ---- docdroid.net

La Quinta Columna: '98% to 99% of the vaccination vial is graphene oxide' --- Orwell.city


There needs to be simple math done: 6 doses are made from each vial: how much saline (or preparation liquid) is used relative to the 1/6th amount that is pulled from the vial? This creates an effective dilution, reducing the relative amount of graphene oxide. Looks like graphene oxide is an adjuvant, yes, but I don't think this is such a big story...

Apologies for the english --> spanish.


--------------------------------



Leí la información para decir que tienen un vial concentrado que se utiliza para producir 6 dosis. Diluyendo el vial con solución salina (?) para preparar una 'dosis'.



Antes de ser diluido, sin embargo, parece que el contenido del vial es en gran parte óxido de grafeno, con solo una pequeña cantidad de ARNm. Para mí, esto tiene sentido desde el punto de vista del diseño de la vacuna the el adyuvante, o un factor irritante, como el óxido de grafeno se envía junto con la pequeña cantidad de ARNm, y la mezcla debe obtener una reacción del sistema del receptor, para que reconozca el "antígeno presentado" por el ARNm.

A partir del 30 de junio de 2021, La Quinta Columna / Orwell.ciudad: Informe provisional oficial del análisis del vial de vacunación de Pfizer explicado por La Quinta Columna



Informe provisional oficial en inglés (universidad de almería).pdf ---- docdroid.net



La Quinta Columna:' 98% a 99% del vial de vacunación es óxido de grafeno ' - - - Orwell.ciudad





Es necesario hacer cálculos simples: se hacen 6 dosis de cada vial: ¿cuánta solución salina (o líquido de preparación) se usa en relación con la 1/6 cantidad que se extrae del vial? Esto crea una dilución efectiva, reduciendo la cantidad relativa de óxido de grafeno. Parece que el óxido de grafeno es un adyuvante, sí, pero no creo que esto sea una gran historia...

Disculpas por el inglés - > español.


[translate.yandex.com]
 
R

Resistense

Guest
From "Official interim report" docdroid.pdf cited above:


UV absorption spectrum of the aqueous phase of the RD1 sample (Nanodrop team)
Maximum absorption of SAMPLE RD1 (260-270 nm)
- RNA. It presents usual maximums at 260 nm. Total concentration estimated by QUBIT2.0
fluorometry: 6 ng / ul
- The spectrum reveals the presence of a high quantity of substances or substances other than Rna
with maximum absorption in the
same region, with a total estimated at 747 ng / ul (uncalibrated estimate)

- Reduced graphene oxide (RGO) has absorption maxima at 270 nm, compatible with the spectrum
obtained
(Thema et al, 2013. Journal of Chemistry ID 150536)
- The maximum absorption obtained DOES NOT ALLOW TO DISCARD the presence of
graphene in the sample. The minimum amount of RNA detected by QUBIT2.0 only explains a
residual percentage of the total UV absorption of the sample.

So the "98-99% graphene oxide" is more like "98-99% of the absorption spectrum" between 260-270nm could be explained by graphene oxide (absorption at 270nm).

OTHER SUBSTANCES at 747 NANO grams / MICRO liter (ng/uL ; a concentration measurement; probably PICO GRAMS if you make it milliliters instead of micro liters ;-D ); speaks nonsense to 98-99% w%/v% claim.
To me these people look either criminally ignorant or intentionally criminal.

-----


De" Official interim report " docdroid.pdf citado anteriormente:



Espectro de absorción UV de la fase acuosa de la muestra RD1 (equipo Nanodrop)
Absorción máxima de la MUESTRA RD1 (260-270 nm)
- ARN. Presenta máximos habituales a 260 nm. Concentración total estimada en QUBIT2. 0
fluorometría: 6 ng / ul
- El espectro revela la presencia de una alta cantidad de sustancias o sustancias distintas del Arn
con máxima absorción en el
misma región, con un total estimado en 747 ng / ul (estimación no calibrada)
- El óxido de grafeno reducido (RGO) tiene un máximo de absorción a 270 nm, compatible con el espectro
obtenido (Thema et al, 2013. Revista de Química ID 150536)
- La máxima absorción obtenida NO PERMITE DESCARTAR la presencia de
grafeno en la muestra. La cantidad mínima de ARN detectado por QUBIT2.0 sólo explica una
porcentaje residual de la absorción UV total de la muestra.


Por lo tanto, el" 98-99% de óxido de grafeno "se parece más al" 98-99% del espectro de absorción " entre 260-270 nm podría explicarse por el óxido de grafeno (absorción a 270 nm).



OTRAS SUSTANCIAS a 747 NANO gramos / MICRO litro (ng/uL ; una medida de concentración; probablemente PICO GRAMOS si lo haces mililitros en lugar de micro litros ;-D ); habla sin sentido a 98-99% w%/v% reclamación.

Para mí, estas personas parecen ignorantes criminalmente o intencionalmente criminales.

[translate.yandex .com]
 
Top Bottom