Fracking Hell

Dangerous levels of radioactivity found at fracking waste site in Pennsylvania. What a surprise.

http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2013/oct/02/dangerous-radioactivity-fracking-waste-pennsylvania
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ca.
After careful study of the Fracking process, for technically speaking, it's in my backyard, the fact that the process is "self-regulating" is the main culprit for mismanagement.

The link provided states: "Shale gas production is exempt from the Clean Water Act and the industry has pledged to self-monitor its waste production to avoid regulatory oversight.

However, the study clearly showed the need for independent monitoring and regulation, said Vengosh.

"What is happening is the direct result of a lack of any regulation. If the Clean Water Act was applied in 2005 when the shale gas boom started this would have been prevented."

There are various dangerous consequences in the fracking technology.....
http://rt.com/op-edge/fracking-radioactive-uranium-danger-ecology-057/

* One, is the use of Depleted Uranium in the shaped charge head or “gun” blasting device. (Halliburton)

The metal which was formerly employed for the shaped charge head or “gun” was copper. This creates a pressure of 300,000 atmospheres which pushes the rock aside by plastic deformation. But in 1984 a US patent (US 4441428) was filed by one Thomas Wilson, entitled “Conical Shaped Charge Liner of Depleted Uranium.” The patent begins: “this invention relates to a novel blasting device especially adapted for drilling oil and gas wells.” Wilson records that DU is 5-times as efficient as copper in terms of the length of the jetted hole, creating a pressure of 600,000 atmospheres. Because of the uranium’s greater chemical reactivity it actually creates new chemical compounds with the material in the rock (and the oil and gas).

In case you might think this is all scaremongering, academic and unrelated to fracking, another patent was filed more recently in 2011 (US Patent 20110000669) by Halliburton (think: oil, gas, armaments, missiles, Dick Cheney) entitled “Perforating gun assembly and method for controlling wellbore pressure during perforating”. The patent specifically refers to Depleted Uranium.

*Second is radiation exposure and radioactive contamination of the development areas due to toxic chemicals forced down the bore hole and the release of natural substances below the surface trapped by gravity.

Locked up in the strata into which they pump the pressurized process water, to fracture and thus create the huge surface area sponge which will yield up its cargo of gas and oil, is a monstrous amount of natural uranium and its deadly daughter Radium-226. And vast amounts of the radioactive alpha emitting gas Radon-222, and its own daughters Bismuth 214, Lead-210 and the alpha emitter Polonium-210. Remember Polonium-210? That was the material used when a few millionths of a gram poisoned ex-Russian agent Alexander Litvinenko.

Deep down in the earth, there is a lot of radioactivity, which is safe enough, so long as it is not brought up to the surface. The technical term is NORM (Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material). When it is brought to the surface it becomes Technologically Enhanced, or TENORM, and it is a serious health problem near oil wells and gas production sites. It is in the production water, in the oil, in the gas, around the production sites, the groundwater, in the pipes and tanks – and in your kitchen.

So not only is there a lot of natural radioactive material surfacing in the gas or oil stream, and the production water, there is the possibility also a lot of unnatural radioactivity coming up from the DU shaped charges. And besides the fact that Depleted Uranium is the most efficient of these shaped charge metals, let’s not forget the attraction to the US nuclear industry of a way of getting rid of its vast stocks of Depleted Uranium, or even natural Uranium, or even nuclear waste. I mean, who is going to look at the radioactivity in the process water? It will be radioactive from the Radium and Radon daughters anyway. You would need to carry out some sophisticated analysis to see if it contained any nasty man-made radionuclides, especially DU nanoparticles.

Setting a match to the flow of water coming from a kitchen tap (Gasland video) is only one of a multitude of symptoms in cause and effect.

*Third is that the Fracking process consumes vast amounts of water which has led to areas of Arkansas, Colorado, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Texas, Utah and Wyoming facing a dire water crisis. Yet to be named is Pennsylvania, New York, Ohio, Kentucky and Louisiana. Louisiana is also dealing with another environment concern, the Bayou Carnie Sinkhole. http://lasinkhole.wordpress.com/

*Forth is that fracking produces a disproportionate amount of waste, including radioactive water, which then has to be dumped somewhere. Majority of Gas Well Pads are located in fields accompanied by bulldozed dirt roads leading in and out of the area. Reports have surfaced, of gas/oil companies spraying the dirt roads down with water (?) to kept the complaints of dust clouds forming due to constant activity and use by heavy industrial trucks. Type of water used to spray the dirt roads is still in the investigative process - to determine if "waste water" is being used?

Considering the history and use of fluoride in our drinking water, radio active materials including depleted uranium will destroy local wells, streams and community reservoirs. Eventually, water will have to be piped in through another set of pipelines crisscrossing the U.S. from uncontaminated aquifers abroad.
 
Some day, all the junk we have pumped into the ground will become exposed at the surface, and the poor devils who live there will have to deal with it.
 
I have lived in Northeastern Pennsylvania for awhile and about 8-9 years ago, there was alot of talk in the local venues (newspapers, TV, radio and sponsored Conservation Agencies through College and University Environment extensions) in reducing municipalities consumption of water. Zoning laws were enacted to tax homeowner's for inground pools and there was an increase in the Residential tax rate for usage after so many units per gal. Since the Sewer Bill is rated by water usage consumption, there were endless disputes filed in City Counsel meetings by local Residents over payment increases. Many laundromats and car wash business's were affected, some folding up. Dought announcements issued through local media were broadcasted during late July and August, limiting washing cars, watering lawns and gardens and business's asked not to hose down sidewalks leading to their entrances. Golf courses turned brown and many rural homeowners were "sited" for pumping water from creeks and ponds on their properties for watering crops or orchard's.

Then about four years ago, Drought announcements ceased from the local media and weather forecasts would only vaguely refer to certain percentages below normal in rainfall for areas in the viewing area, which is a continuing practice. I made a mental note of it, at the time, for I couldn't understand why they discontinued the practice, when we were hearing weather reports telling us - rainfall was way below normal along with lesser amounts of snowfall?

Then Gas Fracking began in Dimmock, Pa. and extended to the surrounding counties, even to the New York and New Jersey Borders. It is only recently, in the last year, actually since the movie "Gasland" was produced and hit the air waves, that information on the millions of gallions of water needed to perk one Well in the Fracking business and the huge amounts of water needed to continue the practice.

I wonder - if Fracking was introduced - as a way and means to bring about of an ill-fated agenda to contaminate local drilled well water, while stripping Community Reservoirs in the local municipalities, while also drying up local streams and tributaries - for "control" of water?

Fracking is draining water from U.S. Citizens
_http://rt.com/usa/fracking-water-drought-shortages-768/

Some of the most drought-ravaged areas of the US are also heavily targeted for oil and gas development using hydraulic fracturing - a practice that exacerbates water shortages - according to a new report.

Three-quarters of the nearly 40,000 oil and gas wells drilled in the US since 2011 were located in areas of the country facing water scarcity, according to research by the Ceres investor network. Over half of those new wells were in areas experiencing drought conditions.

Hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, in those wells required the use of 97 billion gallons of water, Ceres found.

"Hydraulic fracturing is increasing competitive pressures for water in some of the country's most water-stressed and drought-ridden regions," said Mindy Lubber, president of the Ceres green investors' network.

Lubber warned that the fracking boom across the US puts the industry on a “collision course” with other water users.

Fracking is the highly controversial process of injecting water, sand, and various chemicals into layers of rock, in hopes of releasing oil and gas deep underground. Fracking in a single well can take millions of gallons of freshwater. Much of the drilling has occurred in areas mired in multi-year droughts.

Half of the 97 billion gallons of water used since 2011 for fracking have gone to wells in Texas, a state in the midst of a severe, years-long drought. Meanwhile, oil and gas production through fracking is on track to double in the state over the next five years, the Guardian reported.

The report also found that rural communities in the Lone Star State are being hit hard by the fracking bonanza occurring especially in the Eagle Ford Shale in south Texas.

"Shale producers are having significant impacts at the county level, especially in smaller rural counties with limited water infrastructure capacity," the report said. "With water use requirements for shale producers in the Eagle Ford already high and expected to double in the coming 10 years, these rural counties can expect severe water stress challenges in the years ahead."

Levels of vital aquifers that serve local communities near Eagle Ford have dropped by up to 300 feet in the last few years.

Many small communities in areas of heavy fracking in Texas are in dire need of water, as supplies have run out in some places or will dry up soon in others. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality says 29 communities across the state could run out of water in 90 days, and that many reservoirs in west Texas are at around 25 percent capacity.

In December, the San Antonio Express-News found that fracking was using more water than previously thought. The newspaper reported that in 2012, the industry used around 43,770 acre-feet of water in 3,522 Eagle Ford fracking wells - about the same usage of 153,000 San Antonio households.

“The oil and gas boom is requiring more water than we have,” Hugh Fitzsimons, a Dimmit County rancher and a director of the Wintergarden Groundwater Conservation District, told the Express-News. “Period.”

A separate study published this week found that the industry does a very poor job recycling fracking water in Texas. Researchers at the University of Texas’ Bureau of Economic Geology found that 92 percent of water used in 2011 to frack Barnett Shale in north central Texas was “consumed,” and not recycled. Only about five percent of all water used for fracking in that area has been reused or recycled in the “past few years.”

Other states do not fare well in the Ceres report, either. In Colorado, 97 percent of wells were in areas strapped for water, as demand for fracking water in the state is expected to double to six billion gallons – twice the annual use of the city of Boulder - by 2015.

In California, 96 percent of new wells were located in areas where competition for water is high. A drought emergency for the entire state - which has traditionally dealt with water-sharing and access problems - was declared last month.

The report found similar high percentages of wells built in other states – such as New Mexico, Utah and Wyoming – where water shortages exist.
 
Then the business model of the fracking industry as is currently being exposed in Colorado/Wyoming in which the business declares bankruptcy and lets the state clean up the mess.
 
jupiterbeings said:
Dangerous levels of radioactivity found at fracking waste site...

The Energy industry is behind this 'dilution is the solution' for radioactive waste. Dispersion is a more correct word for the spread of radioactive contamination. As radioactive fracking contaminates the oil/gas, the smog from burning fossil fuels is adding that radioactive burden to the air. Fracking can also contaminate water sources. The ICRP model provides the guidance that industry uses. The ECRR report updates the hazards of low-level radiation. http://www.euradcom.org/2011/ecrr2010.pdf
The Price–Anderson Nuclear Industries Indemnity Act lets big Nuke dump risk onto taxpayers since no one else would insure them. The Energy industry has coerced government to relax laws so that rising background levels become the new normal. Now try and prove you came to harm from their safe levels of contamination.
 
Fracking Gas Well explosion in southwestern Pennsylvania, near the West Virginia border.

_http://www.wtae.com/news/local/explosion-reported-at-gas-well-in-greene-county/24407710?utm_source=hootsuite&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=wtae

Wednesday Feb. 12, 2014 (video - photo's)

DUNKARD TOWNSHIP, Pa. —One worker was injured and another went missing after a natural gas well exploded and caught fire Tuesday in southwestern Pennsylvania, near the West Virginia border.

Chevron spokesman Trip Oliver said the fire was reported about 6:45 a.m. at the Lanco 7H well in Dunkard Township, near Bobtown, about 50 miles south of Pittsburgh. Oliver said one person was hospitalized for minor injuries and another was unaccounted for.

State police established a half-mile perimeter around the well.

"They knew, basically from the get-go, it wasn't going to be something they could extinguish," said Plume. "At that point, their training basically tells them to get out as safely as possible and set up a perimeter."

Plume said there's nothing being done to put out the fire at this point.

"What we're being told from investigators as Pennsylvania State Police is that site itself, that fire will not be contained and we will not have access to that property for at least a few days," she said.

Poister said Chevron had previously completed drilling and hydraulically fracturing, or fracking, the well and was in the final stages of using steel pipe to hook it up to a pipeline distribution network for production.

"We want to find out how this happened and why," Poister said, adding that the explosion was the first serious Marcellus Shale well blowout in western Pennsylvania.

The Marcellus Shale formation lies under large parts of Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Ohio and other neighboring states; it's currently the country's most productive natural gas field.
 
angelburst29 said:
Fracking Gas Well explosion in southwestern Pennsylvania, near the West Virginia border.

_http://www.wtae.com/news/local/explosion-reported-at-gas-well-in-greene-county/24407710?utm_source=hootsuite&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=wtae

Wednesday Feb. 12, 2014 (video - photo's)

DUNKARD TOWNSHIP, Pa. —One worker was injured and another went missing after a natural gas well exploded and caught fire Tuesday in southwestern Pennsylvania, near the West Virginia border.

Chevron spokesman Trip Oliver said the fire was reported about 6:45 a.m. at the Lanco 7H well in Dunkard Township, near Bobtown, about 50 miles south of Pittsburgh. Oliver said one person was hospitalized for minor injuries and another was unaccounted for.

State police established a half-mile perimeter around the well.

"They knew, basically from the get-go, it wasn't going to be something they could extinguish," said Plume. "At that point, their training basically tells them to get out as safely as possible and set up a perimeter."

Plume said there's nothing being done to put out the fire at this point.

"What we're being told from investigators as Pennsylvania State Police is that site itself, that fire will not be contained and we will not have access to that property for at least a few days," she said.

Poister said Chevron had previously completed drilling and hydraulically fracturing, or fracking, the well and was in the final stages of using steel pipe to hook it up to a pipeline distribution network for production.

"We want to find out how this happened and why," Poister said, adding that the explosion was the first serious Marcellus Shale well blowout in western Pennsylvania.

The Marcellus Shale formation lies under large parts of Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Ohio and other neighboring states; it's currently the country's most productive natural gas field.

yep ... and this:

Greene County shale well continues burning (_http://www.post-gazette.com/local/south/2014/02/11/Gas-well-explodes-in-southeastern-Greene-County/stories/201402110126#ixzz2tcI8w24O)
February 12, 2014 12:30 AM
By Molly Born and Sean D. Hamill / Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

It is the worst fear of anyone who works on a natural gas well.

A spark or an error on the job results in a potentially deadly well fire that burns out of control, causing even more danger to the experts who have to be flown in to contain the blaze.

That's the situation in Dunkard, Greene County, after something caused a Marcellus Shale gas well owned by Chevron to catch fire just before 7 a.m. Tuesday, leaving one employee with a minor injury and another worker missing and feared dead.

More than 12 hours after an explosion that "sounded like a jet engine going 5 feet above your house," as one neighbor put it, the fire, fueled by the well's gas, continued to shoot flames and smoke into the air, causing a hissing sound that could be heard a quarter-mile away.

The heat from the blaze -- which caused a tanker truck on site that was full of propane gas to explode -- was so intense that first responders from local fire departments had to pull back rather than risk injury.

"They essentially retreated to let the fire burn," said John Poister, spokesman for the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection, which had three people on site investigating.

State police said they were told it could take days to contain the fire.

"We're being told ... the site itself, that fire, will not be contained and we will not have access to that property for at least a few days," Trooper Stefani Plume said at a news conference Tuesday.

Experts on well fires like this were flown in Tuesday from Houston.

Patti Green, a spokeswoman for Wild Well Control, the company Chevron called in to try to contain the blaze, said it would not be unusual for a response team to let a fire burn before making an attempt to knock it down.

The question that remained unanswered Tuesday was what caused the explosion.

Though the fire was initially thought to be a "blowout" in which there was loss of control at the well head during drilling that resulted in a release of natural gas, Mr. Poister said he has been told that it was not a drilling-related accident.

Instead, he said, the well had long since been drilled and crews were on site early Tuesday morning putting in pipe that would connect the well to Chevron's gas-gathering network -- the final stage before the well goes into production.

DEP records show that Chevron's Lanco 7H well was drilled in March 2012 -- as were two other wells on the same well pad -- and had not yet begun to produce gas.

DEP's online records also show the state had not issued any violations against Chevron for any problems related to the drilling of the three wells on the well pad.

In December, Chevron was given one violation for an incident related to the well site -- for failure to comply with the terms and conditions of the state's site permit -- but no details of that violation were immediately available.

Chevron said the explosion occurred at about 6:45 a.m. Tuesday.

John Kuis, 57, of nearby Dilliner said he heard his dog Riley start growling early in the morning, seconds before he felt rumbling.

"Then the house just sort of shook and there was a big loud bang," he said.

Mr. Kuis, who lives less than a half-mile from the well, said he saw smoke and flames out of his window and at first thought his neighbor's home had blown up.

A contractor working for Chevron had 20 employees on site at the time of the explosion. Beyond the worker who was injured and the one who is missing, the other 18 workers were accounted for by 8:48 a.m., according to Rep. Pam Snyder, D-Greene.

Chevron employees came to the scene after the explosion and immediately decided to call in the experts at Wild Well Control, and police created a half-mile perimeter around the site.

No schools, homes or businesses are inside the state police perimeter, and state officials don't believe the burning natural gas is toxic, Mr. Poister said, and the fire appeared to be contained to the well pad.

Wild Well Control has an office in Southpointe, Washington County, and "prepositioned" equipment to help with well control incidents at an office in Clearfield.

But local offices are not typically staffed with advanced well-control specialists -- which Wild Well calls its "first response teams" -- who would handle a well fire or other well control incident.

Most of those level of employees in the United States are based in Houston for Wild Well, and have to be flown in, Ms. Green said. That team arrived at the Pittsburgh International Airport at about 12:45 p.m.

The team arrived at the well site, after gathering equipment, at about 5 p.m. Tuesday and began "working with us to develop plans to safely address the situation," Chevron spokesman Trip Oliver said in a statement.

Responding to such an incident is rare, even for Wild Well, one of the world's best known well-control response companies. Last year Wild Well only responded to five surface well blowouts accompanied by fires and 25 other surface blowouts that had no fires.

... and to add insult to injury ... this is just insanely surreal :shock: :mad: (saw this on SoTT):

Endure exploding natural gas well, earn free pizza! (Some restrictions apply) (_http://www.sott.net/article/274085-Endure-exploding-natural-gas-well-earn-free-pizza-Some-restrictions-apply)
philly.com
Mon, 17 Feb 2014 12:02 CST

Last Tuesday, the residents of the small rural community of Bobtown in the far southwestern corner of Pennsylvania woke up to a horrible shock -- the sound of a massive explosion in their backyards. The source of the blast and the intensely hot fire that followed was a Chevron fracking well that had been set to begin production, but instead shot orange flames high into the air and gave off loud hissing sounds that could be heard hundreds of yards away.

John Kuis, 57, of nearby Dilliner told the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette that at 6:45 a.m., his dog growled, then the earth rumbled, and finally: "Then the house just sort of shook and there was a big loud bang." Another neighbor told the paper that the fracking explosion "sounded like a jet engine going 5 feet above your house."

It was a horrific event on every level. One worker at the rig was not found and is presumed dead. The fire -- who posed enormous risks to rescue workers and to the surrounding community -- burned intensely for five days before it was finally extinguished. Despite reassurances, neighbors surely worried whether toxins were released in the fiery aftermath.

Of course, living near a fracking rig in Pennsylvania -- the state that Gov. Corbett has promised will become "the Texas of natural gas" -- isn't a picnic under the best of circumstances; scores of neighbors have complained about polluted drinking water or foul odors or ailing pets and livestock, of headaches and nausea and skin rashes.

But the people of Bobtown who endured the Chevron blast got a sweet -- or rather savory -- consolation prize for all that agita.

Pizza, pizza!. OK. actually just...pizza.

Local residents were delivered a note (pictured above), dated Sunday, from the Chevron Community Outreach Team. It states in part:

Chevron recognizes the effect this has had on the community. We value being a responsible member of this community and will continue to strive to achieve incident-free operations. We are committed to taking action to safeguard our neighbors, our employees, our contractors and the environment...

Tucked inside the envelope was a gift certificate to Bobtown Pizza, courtesy of Chevron. It entitles the resident to a free large pizza, and before you say something like, "Boy, is that chintzy," you should know that was just the beginning, that the coupon also entitles the holder to a 2-liter soda.

Is there a catch? Well, sort of - the certificate is good for a "special combo only." Remember, Chevron's yearly profits declined in 2013 and the firm made just barely over $21 billion. You weren't really expected pepperoni, too, were you? (Note: the pizza certificates were first reported by No Fracking Way and Raging Chicken Press -- I called (!!) the pizza shop and confirmed that about 100 of the certificates were distributed by Chevron.)

Of course, a cynic would argue that a lifetime supply of pizza -- even with those cheesy breadsticks thrown in -- wouldn't be worth the health risks of having a massive fracking rig next door. On the other hand, I see a possible new marketing campaign for Chevron: We guarantee your fracking rig won't explode, or your pizza is free!
 

Attachments

  • endure_explosion_earn_free_pizza.png
    endure_explosion_earn_free_pizza.png
    622.7 KB · Views: 204
Priceless ....

Exxon CEO: Don't Frack in MY Backyard
_http://rt.com/usa/exxon-ceo-fracking-lawsuit-180/

The CEO of ExxonMobil – the top producer of natural gas in the US – has joined a lawsuit that challenges the construction of a water tower connected to hydraulic fracturing operations near his Texas home, given that it may reduce the property value.

CEO Rex Tillerson and other plaintiffs claim the hydraulic fracturing – or fracking – project will cause unwanted noise and traffic associated with trucking water from the 160-foot tower to the drilling site, The Wall Street Journal reported.

The tower will provide water “to oil and gas explorers for fracing [sic] shale formations leading to traffic with heavy trucks on FM 407, creating a noise nuisance and traffic hazards,” according to the lawsuit. The water tower is owned by Cross Timbers Water Supply Corporation.

Tillerson’s lawyer claims the noise, traffic, and actual fracking does not bother the ExxonMobil CEO, stating that it is the possible depreciation of his $5 million property in Bartonville, Texas that he is worried about.

Fracking is the controversial process of injecting water, sand, and various chemicals into layers of rock, in hopes of releasing oil and gas deep underground. Fracking in a single well can take millions of gallons of freshwater.

Tillerson himself has excoriated fracking regulations amid the practice’s boom across the country.

“This type of dysfunctional regulation is holding back the American economic recovery, growth, and global competitiveness,” he said in 2012, Reuters reported.

In another 2012 interview – with the Council on Foreign Relations – Tillerson said that natural gas production today has been revamped with new technologies, “so the risks are very manageable.”

Yet fracking’s popularity with energy behemoths like ExxonMobil is finding resistance across the US based on more than property values and noise complaints.

Fracking is exhausting water supplies in areas of the country that are suffering from chronic shortages, including Texas.

The practice has also been linked to an upsurge of earthquakes in many areas of the nation.

A recent study showed that the fetus of pregnant woman living within a 10-mile range of a fracking well is in much greater danger of congenital heart defects (CHD) and neural tube defects (NTD).

Another recent study found that chemicals used in fracking are suspected of being endocrine disruptors, which “could raise the risk of reproductive, metabolic, neurological and other diseases, especially in children who are exposed to” the materials.

On Thursday, a letter signed by over 1,000 doctors and health professionals was sent by Environment America to President Barack Obama, highlighting many other damaging health and environmental effects associated with fracking.

The group’s concerns about fracking included drinking water contamination, carcinogenic air pollution, acute and chronic health effects, and greenhouse gas emissions.

“Given this toll of damage, the prudent and precautionary response would be to stop fracking,” the letter reads. “Instead, the oil and gas industry is seeking to expand fracking at a frenzied pace, even into areas that provide drinking water for millions of Americans.”

Those living within a half-mile of a fracking site “had a higher excess lifetime risk of developing cancer than people living farther away,” the letter says.

For its part, ExxonMobil told The Wall Street Journal that it “has no involvement” in Tillerson’s lawsuit.

As ThinkProgress points out, there is reason to believe that Exxon’s oil and gas development projectshave compromised human health and the environment, much less hurt property values.

One recent example is the company’s spill of up to 7,000 barrels of tar sands oil in a neighborhood of Mayflower, Arkansas nearly one year ago. Locals are still suffering from dizziness, headaches, and nausea – prompting many to move away if their homes aren’t already severely damaged.

“I have friends who still live here. They don’t have a place to go. They have small children…and they’re all sick,” one Mayflower resident told RT recently.

ExxonMobil pays Tillerson $40.3 million a year.
 
Found this while reading about the fracking done near the leaking WIPP facility in New Mexico. Find out if they've fracked your neighborhood.
Map of Oil & Natural Gas Fracking Health & Safety Issues
http://www.drillingmaps.com/fracking.html
 
Fracking waste found. Money gone. How common will this become with WIPP future uncertain and nowhere else to store it?

http://billingsgazette.com/news/state-and-regional/montana/radioactive-dump-site-found-in-abandoned-building-in-remote-n/article_f089b096-ab2e-5d1e-af46-7265e7962de8.html

Radioactive dump site found in abandoned building in remote N.D. town

March 13, 2014 9:14 am • By LAUREN DONOVAN Bismarck Tribune
BISMARCK, N.D. — Police and state health officials are investigating the illegal dumping of radioactive filter socks in an abandoned gas station in the tiny remote town of Noonan in Divide County.
“This is a vacant building filled with toxic waste,” said Divide County Sheriff’s Deputy Zach Schroeder, lead investigator, who said the building’s apparent owner is a fugitive on felony larceny charges in Wyoming and so far not traceable.
The building’s contents were reported two weeks ago to Divide County Emergency Manager Jody Gunlock, who said the situation has been transferred to the State Health Department and Divide County law enforcement.
Health department waste division manager Scott Radig said the building contains at least twice as much filter sock material which is more than twice as radioactive as the open trailers loaded with the socks discovered near Watford City three weeks ago.
Filter socks are used to capture the solids in flowback water during hydraulic fracturing.
Schroeder said six separate rooms in the old Mobil gas station contain industrial-sized black garbage bags of filter socks. He estimates at least 200 bags or more are piled into the dirt-floor structure’s warren of rooms.
Schroeder said he’s trying to track down the building owner so the state could jointly develop a cleanup plan.
He said county records show Ken Ward, or his wife, own the building as of January 2012, though property taxes for the year were paid by his mother, Edie Ward, who sells real estate in Townsend, Mont.
He said Ken Ward, who escaped police custody, has not been located.
From records in the building, Schroeder said he has identified a filter sock supply company, Acceleration Production of Watford City, and hopes that will help identify the oil field service company that used them in oil field operations and ditched them in the building.
He said residents of Noonan, population 120, don’t have information and that it’s likely that whoever dumped the garbage bags did so under cover of darkness.
In the meantime, Gunlock said the building may be fenced off. Gunlock said the bags were dust-covered and may have been there for some time, though it’s hard to tell how long.
“I don’t think this was ignorance, just deliberate,” Gunlock said.
Gunlock said tests done last week on the material show it is low-level radium that emits “big weak” particles that don’t penetrate skin, but would be hazardous to inhale or ingest.
“It’s a pretty big mess,” Gunlock said.
Tests of the Noonan material registered five times the background rate of naturally occurring radiation. The Watford City material was around two times background, Radig said.
He said the people of Noonan are not at risk as long as the building is secure. The building has broken windows and old unsecured doors.
Filter socks used to filter oil production fluids are banned for disposal in North Dakota because they concentrate naturally occurring radiation found in fluids from oil production.
The health department is developing rules for tracking radioactive waste because of dumping incidents like this and because hundreds of them turn up at oil patch landfills, where truckers are fined if the socks are found in a load.
Radig estimates oil production results in 27 tons of the filter socks daily.
He said the department will try to work with the Noonan property owner on clean up and disposal. Barring that, the state may have to tap the Industrial Commission’s clean up funds for abandoned well sites.
“The health department has no cleanup fund,” Radig said.
 
http://bismarcktribune.com/bakken/north-dakota-headed-for-a-superfund-disaster/article_5232a9b2-b5de-11e3-a0c5-001a4bcf887a.html

"Joe Weismann, who heads up radiological operations for U.S. Ecology Inc., with sites in the U.S. and Canada, said North Dakota needs to get the situation under control before it's too late.

Weismann said recent discoveries of radioactive filter socks illegally dumped in an abandoned gas station in Noonan and on trailers outside Watford City are the kind of uncontrolled situations that could lead to an enormously expensive cleanup forced by the federal Environmental Protection Agency.

"This creates a much larger potential problem where portions of North Dakota could screen high enough to qualify as a (superfund) site," Weismann said.

Those are chilling words. They describe exactly what North Dakota health officials, residents and the oil industry never want to see happen.

David Glatt, head of the North Dakota Health Department's environmental health section, said he thinks Weismann's worry paints too drastic a picture.

"That assessment of it being uncontrolled, those are not the facts we have at hand. A fair amount of it is being handled appropriately. The larger companies are doing it right because they don't want the liability and they don't want to have to go in and clean it up," Glatt said. [...]"


This article shows how the messages given out by industry and government don't make any sense to normal people. The waste is either so toxic it could be a superfund site or so safe it can be dumped into a landfill. The waste is dangerous and they have no way of safely handling it. They can move it from place to place, but it will remain dangerous for a long time.
 
Fracking is as disastrous for environment and people as it is not profitable not even in the shortest terms (longer even worse!). Maybe that is the reason why shale gas companies are drilling all over - to drill a winner (lottery anyone?) boring so fracking bubble doesn't burst wright in investors' faces - which could force some tears, at least:

While initial production from most shale gas plays was unusually high, an essential component of the Wall Street shale gas bubble hype, the same gas regions declined dramatically within a year. They found “in general, shale well output tends to drop by 60% or more from the Initial Production rate level over the first 12 months.

The second metric is that the available longer-term production data suggests that levels of production decline in later years are moderate, often less than 20% per year.”

Translated, that means on average after only four years, you have only 20% of your initial gas volume available from a given horizontal drilling investment with fracking. After seven years, only 10%. The real volume shale gas boom appeared in 2009. That means in the fields where significant drilling was present by 2009 are already dramatically depleted by 80% and soon by 90%.

The only way oil or gas drillers have managed to maintain production volume has been to drill ever more wells, spending ever more money, taking on ever more debt in hopes of a sharp rise in the depressed US domestic gas price. As a whole shale energy companies spend more than they are making in net profit, creating a bubble of “junk” bond debt to keep the Ponzi game going. That bubble will pop the second the Fed hints interest rates will rise, or even sooner.

From:_http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/05/14/neo-engdahl-washingtons-shale-boom-going-bust/
 
The area I live in have just successfully protested to stop the fracking by Metgasco on the farmlands, this area is renowned for it's alternate lifestyle population and they defend it however they can. It appears the State Government have decided to suspend the licence of the company as they believe there was 'Insufficient Community Consultation'. More like illegal dealings that will come out in an enquiry about to be put forward.

They certainly don't want a fight with these people, as apart from the 1000 or so protesters who have been living on the land for the last month or more, there was a convoy of cars being organised from around the area to be on site 5am on Monday 19th ready to do battle with 800 police. That is now in limbo with the licence suspension. :thup:

_http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/metgascos-bentley-gas-drilling-suspended-referred-to-icac-20140515-zrd2w.html
 
Fracking for gas in Pa. and high levels of escaping Methane. Also, a report of Health Worker's instructed to not discuss the effects of Fracking side effects to health.

Fracking industry fumes as researchers reveal high levels of leaking methane
_http://rt.com/usa/169592-fracking-pennsylvania-study-scandal/

Tuesday July 1, 2014 - After poring over data from the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection involving more than 41,000 wells, it was determined that more than 6 percent of the active gas wells drilled in the Marcellus region of Pennsylvania “show compromised cement and/or casing integrity,” according to an academic paper published on Monday by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

A team of four scientists – working without federal funding – conducted analysis on more than 75,000 state inspections of gas wells performed in Pennsylvania since 2000.


The results suggest that hazardous leaks of methane could pose potential obstacles for drilling across the nation, said study lead author Cornell University engineering professor Anthony Ingraffea, who leads an environmental activist group that helped subsidize the study.

The leak rate of methane was found in nearly 10 percent of horizontally drilled wells for before and after 2009 in the northeastern part of Pennsylvania, where fracking is a serious business.

"Something is coming out of it that shouldn't, in a place that it shouldn't," said Anthony Ingraffea, Cornell professor of civil and environmental engineering who led the research team, as quoted by AP.


Pennsylvania ordered its health workers to never discuss fracking
_http://grist.org/news/pennsylvania-ordered-its-health-workers-to-never-discuss-fracking/

In the heavily fracked Keystone State, the economic interests of frackers trump the health concerns of residents.

That much is abundantly clear in the wake of an extraordinary story by StateImpact Pennsylvania, which interviewed two retired state health department workers. The former workers say they were ordered to not return the phone calls of residents who complained that nearby fracking was harming their health. Instead, they were told to pass messages on to their superiors, who apparently never returned the calls either. The health workers were also given a list of fracking-related “buzzwords” to watch out for:

“We were absolutely not allowed to talk to [people who called with concerns related to fracking],” said Tammi Stuck, who worked as a community health nurse in Fayette County for nearly 36 years. …

“There was a list of buzzwords we had gotten,” Stuck said. “There were some obvious ones like fracking, gas, soil contamination. There were probably 15 to 20 words and short phrases that were on this list. If anybody from the public called in and that was part of the conversation, we were not allowed to talk to them.” …

Stuck said she has spoken to employees working in other state health centers who received the same list of buzzwords and the same instructions on how to deal with drilling-related calls.

“People were saying: Where’s the Department of Health on all this?” Stuck said. “The bottom line was we weren’t allowed to say anything.”

The office of Gov. Tom Corbett (R) declined to comment on the former employees’ claims, and a state health spokesperson basically called them liars.

Amy Mall, a senior policy analyst at the Natural Resources Defense Council, described the news as “deeply troubling.” From her blog:

This is one of the most troubling — but unfortunately, not surprising — examples of how our leaders at the state and federal levels have been failing to put the health of Americans over profits for powerful oil and gas interests. And if it was happening here unreported for so long, how are we to know it’s not happening in other states?

Our federal leaders have let the American people down as well. EPA dropped an investigation into drinking water contamination in Dimock, PA — as well as in Texas and Wyoming – without sufficient explanation, despite evidence of lingering fracking-related contamination and health concerns.

Avoiding investigation of health complaints provides enough cover for frackers to continue claiming there’s “no proof” of health impacts. This is backwards. It’s the responsibility of our public officials to act in the public interest—not to benefit the oil and gas industry’s bottom line.

Speaking of bottom lines, Pennsylvania has collected more than $600 million in drilling fees during the past three years — but absolutely none of those funds have made their way to the health department to help it monitor or investigate fracking’s impacts on residents.

Something is seriously sick about this situation.
 
Back
Top Bottom