French blog about Laura's work (blog en français sur les travaux de Laura)

Chu

Administrator
Administrator
Moderator
FOTCM Member
ENGLISH

Recently, an avid reader of Laura's books sent us a manuscript. It was a summary of The Wave, and he asked if we could publish it. Given that we prefer to give the readers everything, just like Laura intended, we declined. But I had a look, and it seemed like he had really done a nice job, respecting the meaning, not adding his own views, etc. He also promoted her work. So, I suggested that instead, he started a blog. And he did. He just sent me the link: _http://synthesedelonde.canalblog.com/

I don't have time to read it all, but it looks good. Could any of you other French speakers have a look, and give any observations you have? I would like to know if it's worth it to promote it, link to it, etc. He will gladly add advertisements to our publishing company if I ask, I think, so IMO it would be nice if we could promote him a little too. But of course, it has to be good and deserve it! So far, it looks like a nice "introduction" to the material, provided that we still recommend that people read the entire texts. But it could well help some readers who tend to be intimidated by the amount of text that gets published. If they read this and are still interested, I think they will WANT to read the books.

Thanks for your help!

FRENCH

Un lecteur assidu des livres de Laura nous a envoyé un manuscrit récemment. Il s'agissait d'un résumé de L'Onde, et il nous a demandé si nous pouvions le publier. Étant donné que nous préférons donner tout aux lecteurs, tel que Laura l'a voulu, on a refusé. Mais j'y ai jeté un coup d'œil, et il m'a semblé qu'il avait fait un bon travail, en respectant le sens, sans avoir ajouté ses opinions personnelles, etc. Et il promeut le travail de Laura. Alors, je lui ai suggéré de créer un blog. Il l'a fait et vient de m'envoyer le lien: _http://synthesedelonde.canalblog.com/

Je n'ai pas le temps de tout lire attentivement, mais ça m'a l'air bien. Est-ce que certains francophones parmi vous pourraient y jeter un coup d'œil, et partager vos observations ? J'aimerais savoir si cela vaut la peine de le promouvoir, de partager le lien, etc. Il sera ravi d'ajouter une pub vers e site de notre maison d'édition si je le lui demande, je pense. Donc, je crois que ce serait sympa si on pouvait le promouvoir nous aussi. Mais, bien évidemment, il faut que ça soit ok et que ça le mérite ! À priori, cela me semble être une bonne "introduction" au matériel, pourvu qu'on recommande aux gens de lire la totalité des textes. Mais il pourrait bien aider certains lecteurs qui se sentent intimidés par le volume des textes. S'ils lisent ce blog et qu'ils sont intéressés, je pense qu'ils VOUDRONT lire les ouvrages.

Merci de votre aide !
 
It looks extremely good idea. There he has a problem with the address or link, http: //synthesedelonde.canalblog.com? I can not enter it.
 
Kisito said:
It looks extremely good idea. There he has a problem with the address or link, http: //synthesedelonde.canalblog.com? I can not enter it.

Did you copy the entire address? Like below:

Code:
http://synthesedelonde.canalblog.com/
 
Gawan said:
Kisito said:
It looks extremely good idea. There he has a problem with the address or link, http: //synthesedelonde.canalblog.com? I can not enter it.

Did you copy the entire address? Like below:

Code:
http://synthesedelonde.canalblog.com/
It seemed to me, I tried many times, it works now. Thank you :oops:
 
At first glance it seems like a good summary to me.

Au premier coup d'oeil ça me semble être un bon résumé.
 
I browsed through the blog and it seems fine to me as well.
Nothing outside of the material seems to have been added unless I've overlooked something.
 
I went through it, and it seems quite well done to me. I will recommend on some sites i run. The only criticism I would have is the choice of blog engine. CanalBlog is horrible looking compared to what a person can access for free with WordPress or Blogger but i am a stickler for aesthetics and visual design.
 
I look at it and I liked the style, the format also, the presentation and the good, excellent French. :)
 
Hello Chu & others.
Tigersoap said:
I browsed through the blog and it seems fine to me as well.
Nothing outside of the material seems to have been added unless I've overlooked something.

I've just noticed an inappropriate addition in the last (appearing on top) article of the blog, bibliography references :
_http://synthesedelonde.canalblog.com/archives/2015/12/03/33017508.html

Éric said:
Laura KNIGHT-JADCZYK L'Onde tome 1 éditions Pilule Rouge 2006
Laura KNIGHT-JADCZYK L'Onde tome 2 éditions Pilule Rouge 2009
Laura KNIGHT-JADCZYK L'Onde tome 3 éditions Pilule Rouge 2010
Laura KNIGHT-JADCZYK L'Onde tome 4 éditions Pilule Rouge 2012
Laura KNIGHT-JADCZYK L'Onde tome 5 éditions Pilule Rouge 2013
Laura KNIGHT-JADCZYK L'Onde tome 6 éditions Pilule Rouge 2014
Laura KNIGHT-JADCZYK L'Onde tome 7 éditions Pilule Rouge 2015
Laura KNIGHT-JADCZYK & Joe Quinn 11 septembre, l'ultime vérité éditions Pilule Rouge 2002-2008
Laura KNIGHT-JADCZYK Ces mondes qui nous gouvernent éditions Pilule Rouge 2006
Laura KNIGHT-JADCZYK L'Histoire secrète du monde tome 1 éditions Pilule Rouge 2009
Laura KNIGHT-JADCZYK L'Histoire secrète du monde tome 2 éditions Pilule Rouge 2014
Pierre LESCAUDON & Laura K-J Les Changements terrestres et la connexion anthropocosmique (L'Histoire secrète du monde tome 3) éditions Pilule Rouge 2015
Victor CLUBE & Bill NAPIER Hiver cosmique éditions Le Jardin des Livres 2006
Barbara MARCINIAK Les Messagers de l'aube éditions Ariane 1995
Jean SENDY Ces Dieux qui firent le ciel et la terre (le roman de la Bible) éditions Robert Laffont 1969
Stéphane CARDINAUX Bioénergie éditions Trajectoire 2009
JASMUHEEN Vivre de lumière éditions Lanore 2006
P.A. STRAUBINGER Lumière (film) Jupiter Films 2010

Carlos CASTANEDA Le Voyage définitif éditions J'ai lu (éditions du Rocher 2000)
Boris MOURAVIEFF Gnôsis tome 1 à 3 éditions À la Baconnière 1969 et 1996
James REDFIELD La Prophétie des Andes éditions J'ai lu
Lana & Andy WACHOWSKI Matrix (film) 1999
(Bold characters are mine.)

I don't know the first (old) book, by Jean Sendy. It doesn't appear on the list of recommended books, neither in English or French.
On Amazon :
_http://www.amazon.fr/Ces-dieux-firent-ciel-Terre/dp/2277513717/

I know the second book, by S. Cardinaux. Not either on recommended books lists.
It has little in common with Laura's work (but IMHO it may be interesting in itself).
Some infos about this book content can be found there :
_http://newsoftomorrow.org/arts/geobiologie/stephane-cardinaux-synthese-geometries-sacrees-tome-1-2004-tome-2-2006-bioenergie-2009-science-et-conscience-de-linvisible-2012

I know also the third book (surely not on the recommended book lists), by breatharianism priestess "Jasmuheen" (Ellen Greve) famous for her new-agey "Cosmic Internet Academy (CIA)" and a few dead followers...
_https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jasmuheen
...and the documentary movie "Lumière", about breatharianism - presentation in French by the production society :
_http://www.jupiter-films.com/film-lumiere,30.php

Breatharianism is discussed in this thread (among others) :
https://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php/topic,17736.msg160868.html#msg160868

Those two last references alone could be used to discredit the rest ! "The devil is in the details"... ;)


The forth book, Jame Redfield's The Celestine Prophecy, is probably well-known here.
The book's movie is discussed here :
https://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php/topic,7055.msg49741.html#msg49741

EDIT: Redfield added.
 
Aha! Thanks Bastian (and the others for checking). I guess I can let him know about those. If his writings are still good, I guess it won't hurt to "approve". But let's see if y'all find anything else.
 
I just finish to read it and:
Those two last references alone could be used to discredit the rest ! "The devil is in the details"... ;)​

Il est possible que Laura, emportée par le jeu des questions-réponses, ait mal interprété ce que cherchaient à dire les Cassiopéens. Il est possible que les Elohim aient été la première humanité, celle qui vivait sur Terre avant la Chute, et qui fut entraînée vers la physicalité par les SDS reptiliens. C'est le pacte ?

Il est possible aussi que le terme Elohim désigne en réalité une fonction, celle de gardiens/superviseurs de la Terre, celle d'Adam et Ève avant qu'ils ne soient "chassés" du jardin d'Eden. Les Elohim correspondraient aux planificateurs de la Terre tels que décrits par les Pléiadiens de Barbara Marciniak. De fait, la création de la Terre par les Elohim au début de la Genèse les apparente à des bâtisseurs, cumulant les fonctions d'ingénieurs, de biologistes, etc, toutes spécialisations utiles pour remettre en état une planète bouleversée par le passage d'une comète ou d'un groupe d'astéroïdes.

En se laissant séduire par les Reptiliens, l'humanité originelle a changé sa vocation et perdu sa capacité à assumer ses responsabilités vis-à-vis de la gestion et de l'évolution de la vie sur Terre. Un autre groupe d'entités, venus d'ailleurs aurait alors assumé la fonction de gardiens/superviseurs, ce qui expliquerait la réponse des Cassiopéens : « La première manifestation fut humaine, ensuite non-humaine ». Et donc Laura s'est fourvoyée en croyant sur le moment que les Elohim étaient SDS : en fait, la première humanité, qui était d'orientation SDA, a basculé dans l'orientation SDS, et c'est juste ce que disaient les Cassiopéens. Les Elohim actuels, qui doivent toujours exister (en 4e densité?) doivent logiquement toujours être SDA.
It should be expressed in a more fair way, that makes more account of Laura research.

The summary is a good job, and like Chu said, it can be a first step to the Wave.
My 2 drops of Lugol's .
 
Here is an approximate translation of the except cited by zak:

It is possible that Laura, carried away by the questions and answers game, have misinterpreted what the Cassiopaeans were trying to say. It is possible that the Elohim were the first humanity, the one which lived on Earth before the Fall, and was driven to the physicality by STS reptilian. Is it the pact?

It is also possible that the Elohim term actually refers to a function, that of the guardians/supervisors of the Earth, that of Adam and Eve before they were "expelled" from the garden of Eden. The Elohim would correspond to the planners of the Earth as described by Barbara Marciniak's Pleiadians. In fact, the creation of the Earth by the Elohim at the beginning of Genesis makes them akin to be builders, combining the functions of engineers, biologists, etc., all necessary specializations for the rehabilitation of a planet distressed by the passage of a comet or a group of asteroids.

Leaving itself to be seduced by the Reptilians, the original humanity has changed its vocation and lost its ability to assume its responsibilities regarding the management and evolution of life on Earth. Another group of entities, from elsewhere would have thus assumed the function of guardians/supervisors, which might explain the answer of C's: "The first manifestation was human, then non-human." Laura erred in believing at the time that the Elohim were STS: in fact, the first humanity, which was of STO orientation, had swung into the STS orientation, and that is just what the Cassiopaeans were saying. Current Elohim, which must still exist (in 4th density?) must logically still be STO.
 
Hmm, kind of a red flag there.... It may best not to promote it then. People can still find it, and read The Wave if they are interested. If he's speculating too much, that may not be too good. Well, to his credit, he doesn't affirm anything with certainty.
 
In this article about "God" :
_http://synthesedelonde.canalblog.com/archives/2015/12/03/33017418.html

one can read at the end :
Éric said:
C'est pourquoi, de toutes les grandes religions de la planète, le Bouddhisme est celle qui se rapproche le plus de la réalité : cette doctrine ne prône aucun dieu tout-puissant à vénérer, mais la nécessité d'un effort sur soi-même pour s'éveiller à une compréhension plus vaste, afin de réaliser le potentiel qui sommeille en chacun de nous. Cela inclue un respect pour toutes les autres créatures (végétarisme, non-violence, etc), qui est diamétralement à l'opposé de l'intolérance et de la violence engendrées par les religions monothéistes.

Une parole des Évangiles ne dit-elle pas qu'on « reconnaît un arbre à ses fruits » ?..
(In short, Bouddhism is a religion closer from the Truth than others, no God is to be worshipped, and all creatures are respected thanks to vegetarism and non-violence...)

:huh:

To me, globally, his synthesis looks good but his opinions are a lot less interesting !
 
This seems pretty succinct, and it misses in my opinion argonomie. Laura creates followers and disciples, and they can not follow or do not understand the Cassiopéene orthodoxy. There are also texts of" Sand and Jenaël", many people have talked to me on Facebook. It's a French couple who have a blog on spirituality and channeling. They have many texts. Their peculiarity is that they often refer to Laura! Moreover they highlight the seven volumes of "The Wave", the three volumes of "The Secret History of the world" but also his other books, the Sott newspaper. They mention the Paleo diet, the 4DSTS predators, STO. Many similarities with Laura, but the conclusions are not always the same and develop their own theory. If you are interested out of curiosity or to compare, here is a link. (french). http://bienvenussurlanouvelleterre.jimdo.com/dialogues-2015/le-22-11-2015/
 
Back
Top Bottom