Gender Pay Gap

Brewer

Jedi Council Member
Mrs. Peel said:
I don't think there is any "normal" in this day and age. I work full time and I'll be darn if I'm gonna grocery shop for my husband. He can (and does) do it himself. One of my "programs" is to get really steamed when I see females perpetuating the "little woman" role like back in the 50s when their main purpose was to cater to a man.

IMO, this is one of the reasons women only make $0.77 for every dollar that men earn. We let them get away with it!!! :headbash:

Have you ever considered that the 'gender pay gap' may have something to with the fact that men often do dirty and or dangerous jobs. I believe that men make up about 95% of workplace deaths and accidents. True, women do make that $0.77 of the dollar but they also spend about $0.75 of every dollar made. Go to a shopping mall, look at advertising in the media, largely geared for women's shopping. My girlfriend has three daughters, she knows the score!

Might pay to read a Warren Farrell book on this subject too, it's not as simple as some may think

Cheers
 
Re: Re: Illusions in my marriage

Brewer said:
Have you ever considered that the 'gender pay gap' may have something to with the fact that men often do dirty and or dangerous jobs.

or perhaps the better paying and more influential "dirty and dangerous jobs" are customarily reserved for men. Nothing precludes a woman from being a train engineer, an oil rig worker or an electrician. Some women would make better stevedores than many men. You can also observe over time that in some professions, the average income goes down as the women enter that field. Teaching in schools is one example.


True, women do make that $0.77 of the dollar but they also spend about $0.75 of every dollar made. Go to a shopping mall, look at advertising in the media, largely geared for women's shopping.

You make it sound as if they spend it exclusively on themselves. Rather, the women are more often the dedicated budget keepers who figure out how to spend money on the needs of their families and children, and actually go out and do it. In other words, it is another chore. Of course the companies recognize this and adjust their markting strategies accordingly.
 
Re: Re: Illusions in my marriage

Brewer said:
Have you ever considered that the 'gender pay gap' may have something to with the fact that men often do dirty and or dangerous jobs. I believe that men make up about 95% of workplace deaths and accidents.
So dirty/dangerous jobs should garner more pay than jobs that mainly have to do with taking care of others (which is the position that many women find themselves in)?

Brewer said:
True, women do make that $0.77 of the dollar but they also spend about $0.75 of every dollar made. Go to a shopping mall, look at advertising in the media, largely geared for women's shopping. My girlfriend has three daughters, she knows the score!
There are many men who live beyond their means as well. What does that have to do with the amount they earn? In addition, many women constantly find themselves shopping because if they didn't, it simply wouldn't get done. I'm not referring to those who are spending needlessly on frivolities but rather things that are necessary for the home. Sometimes I do wonder why the malls/stores seem to be constantly filled but when I take a step back and really consider it, often women shop for necessities on their lunch breaks or after work because otherwise they simply wouldn't have the time to do it in addition to raising kids, etc.

Brewer said:
Might pay to read a Warren Farrell book on this subject too, it's not as simple as some may think

Cheers
While you're correct in that the subject is not cut and dried, it seems that some men are programmed to believe that the extent of their responsibilities in the household falls under earning money and perhaps a few other 'manly' duties as opposed to really being engaged with their partner and children. The problem isn't men or women, in my opinion, but rather the ponerization of both due to psychopathic influences that pit both sexes against each other to distract us from the true enemy.

While some of Farrell's ideas are interesting (he seems to understand that both men and women should 'walk a mile in each other shoes'), I think he dropped the ball with his argument that women may want to consider working longer hours and taking hazardous jobs. To me, he fails to recognize the real problem - that we all find ourselves in a situation that simply doesn't work for most. No one should have to make such trade offs in order to earn a living wage. His solutions (that I mentioned) ignore the fact that something is wrong with the world itself and therefore it's not men or women who should have to mold themselves to it, but instead find ways to either change it or do something differently that truly benefits according to individual needs.

edit: clarification
 
Re: Re: Illusions in my marriage

To me, he fails to recognize the real problem - that we all find ourselves in a situation that simply doesn't work for most. No one should have to make such trade offs in order to earn a living wage. His solutions (that I mentioned) ignore the fact that something is wrong with the world itself and therefore it's not men or women who should have to mold themselves to it, but instead find ways to either change it or do something differently that truly benefits according to individual needs.

Precisely--when both parents have to "abandon" their children to others to raise just so a living wage can be brought into the home for the family to live--this is NOT natural--THIS IS WRONG, and an unsustainable way of "living."
 
Re: Re: Illusions in my marriage

Brewer said:
Have you ever considered that the 'gender pay gap' may have something to with the fact that men often do dirty and or dangerous jobs.
That sounds a lot like an oversimplification of data to support a preconceived outcome to me. You are merely talking about blue collar work here and ignoring the fact that women make up but a small percentage of corporate management and executive class. The wage disparity is based on two main factors:
- the highest paying jobs are occupied predominantly by me
- women still don't have wage parity on work of identical, let alone similar skill.

Brewer said:
True, women do make that $0.77 of the dollar but they also spend about $0.75 of every dollar made. Go to a shopping mall, look at advertising in the media, largely geared for women's shopping. My girlfriend has three daughters, she knows the score!
Once again, faulty logic, thinking that, since women seem to be seen making the bulk of retail purchases, it somehow means they are spending disproportionately on themselves. We know the reality is that women have the disproportionate responsibility of not only holding down a full time job, but also being the primary caregiver to children and adults in the family and purveyor of family supplies.

So, not only do they make less money when they are paid to work, the amount of unpaid work they perform outpaces men significantly.

How much of your unpaid time is dedicated to doing things for the rest of your family and not yourself? If you are like most men (not all, but most), your annual income divided by the amount of unpaid work done for the household would yield a considerably higher dollar per hour than your partner's.

As well, most large family purchases (car, for example) are still made largely by men.

I really hope I am misunderstanding your thinking here, otherwise all I can think is the 1950s called and they want their rationalizations back.

Gonzo
 
Re: Re: Illusions in my marriage

Brewer said:
Have you ever considered that the 'gender pay gap' may have something to with the fact that men often do dirty and or dangerous jobs.

And when a woman tries to do them also, she is often harassed and ostracized by her male coworkers. My mother-in-law worked in a nuclear plant, she put on the suit and crawled around doing the exact same "dangerous" job as the men. Yes, she was harassed by men who felt she had no business there and took away the job from a "man" and she was passed over for promotions. Another friend is a construction supervisor. She continually complains the men won't listen to a "woman" and treat her rudely. I could go on.

Brewer said:
True, women do make that $0.77 of the dollar but they also spend about $0.75 of every dollar made. Go to a shopping mall, look at advertising in the media, largely geared for women's shopping. My girlfriend has three daughters, she knows the score!

Hmmmm. Who buys the most electronics and automobiles? Spends the most on sports-related tickets and paraphernalia?

Brewer said:
Might pay to read a Warren Farrell book on this subject too, it's not as simple as some may think

No, you are right. It's not that simple. But the fact remains that the majority of upper management, CEOs, politicians, and those in "power" are men.
 
Re: Re: Illusions in my marriage

Brewer said:
Have you ever considered that the 'gender pay gap' may have something to with the fact that men often do dirty and or dangerous jobs. I believe that men make up about 95% of workplace deaths and accidents. True, women do make that $0.77 of the dollar but they also spend about $0.75 of every dollar made. Go to a shopping mall, look at advertising in the media, largely geared for women's shopping. My girlfriend has three daughters, she knows the score!

Might pay to read a Warren Farrell book on this subject too, it's not as simple as some may think

Cheers

You also seem to be unaware of the "glass ceiling", which would add to the lower income average that women experience in the work place (though, also on average, women are paid less for the same/more work). And, depending upon how that "average" was calculated, it may not be valuing the work that many women do has homemakers and caretakers.

You're right in that the issue is not as simple as some may think, unfortunately you seem to think that it's rather simple.
 
Re: Re: Illusions in my marriage

Mrs. Peel said:
And when a woman tries to do them also, she is often harassed and ostracized by her male coworkers. My mother-in-law worked in a nuclear plant, she put on the suit and crawled around doing the exact same "dangerous" job as the men. Yes, she was harassed by men who felt she had no business there and took away the job from a "man" and she was passed over for promotions. Another friend is a construction supervisor. She continually complains the men won't listen to a "woman" and treat her rudely. I could go on.

I'm not saying this doesn't happen but in my experience many men will take a more paternal approach if they're older than them and the younger ones will want to chase after them! You use personal anecdotes to strengthen your case, your example dates from what time? The 70's? May I give you a contemporary example?

Three months ago I was called to a rescue. A teenaged boy had fallen down a ravine and broken both legs. Our team made it's way to the site 3km of steep winding path with 1 km of thick, muddy, leech infested bush with 25kg backpacks on our backs. We got to the boy and began treating him, the chopper came and blew down branches and saplings all around us. Freezing water from the creek was blown over us, it was challenging! Up until then our team consisted of white, middle-aged anglo-saxon members of the patriarchy. Lowered from the chopper came a female doctor, she was brilliant and took over the boy's treatment. Soon he on his way to safety. During this time another team had arrived, more middle aged patriarchs and 2 young women. Every man there was old enough to be their fathers. These young women carried nothing down, it was carried by the men. We now had to get out, we scrambled, heavily laden, on all fours up the steep, trackless hillside over logs and rocks. I led the way and looking back I noticed that one our young ladies was having difficulty despite being 25 years younger and carrying nothing, not even her own water bottle. On closer inspection the reason she couldn't climb was because she didn't want to break her fingernails! They were liabilities, could we say anything? No, we get labelled misogynists. Same goes for every rescue I've been to, it's mainly men doing all the hard dangerous work. What if, one day, men decided not to show up for work, I think you'd notice it


author=Brewer link=topic=27957.msg354015#msg354015 date=1342083396]
True, women do make that $0.77 of the dollar but they also spend about $0.75 of every dollar made. Go to a shopping mall, look at advertising in the media, largely geared for women's shopping. My girlfriend has three daughters, she knows the score!

Mrs. Peel said:
Hmmmm. Who buys the most electronics and automobiles? Spends the most on sports-related tickets and paraphernalia?

Good, you are aware that there is something to this. Young men do spend much on cars and motorbikes, it's one of the ways they attract young females. They do it because it generally works, it attracts young females, works on older ones too, they wouldn't do it if it didn't. With cars, many men will make an effort to understand how the vehicle works and some make it their life's work which benefits others (mechanics). It's a little more involved than owning a dozen handbags and a wardrobe full of clothes. When a man enters into marriage the choice of vehicle often rests with the woman. Marketers know this and market accordingly. It's the same with houses too.

Electronics, that cellphone that my ladyfriends insist must be updated every three months, the wall sized TV's in their large designer homes. I've seen three types of men interested in electronics. Those that wish to understand the mysteries of the devices and seek to develop their own ideas. Those that play video games and their interest in the technology that drives them and those that buy the stuff to impress others. Once again building and understanding your electronic systems are somewhat more involved than buying two dozen shoes and the latest cosmetics.

I'm not saying here that women lack creativity but there must be many who shop and want oversize houses. Without this there'd be fewer shopping malls, fewer Mc Mansions and the credit industries that support such activities.

As for sports, I can't fully understand the obsession that many men have with it as I've never had much interest in it. It's a big industry and like shopping malls, big houses, gossip mags, daytime TV and so forth it wouldn't exist were it not for the millions of men obsessed with it. I remember at school the sporting types always attracted the girls. Men use their 'knowledge' of sport to impress others and perhaps the monster grew from that.

Brewer said:
Might pay to read a Warren Farrell book on this subject too, it's not as simple as some may think
Mrs. Peel said:
No, you are right. It's not that simple. But the fact remains that the majority of upper management, CEOs, politicians, and those in "power" are men.

True, and how does that benefit men? For every CEO and politician there are millions of men doing everyday jobs that are largely invisible.

It's late, busy day tomorrow, gotta go, good night!
 
Foxx said:
You also seem to be unaware of the "glass ceiling", which would add to the lower income average that women experience in the work place (though, also on average, women are paid less for the same/more work). And, depending upon how that "average" was calculated, it may not be valuing the work that many women do has homemakers and caretakers.

You're right in that the issue is not as simple as some may think, unfortunately you seem to think that it's rather simple.

I seem to think it's rather simple? I did indeed make a simple comment in reply to a simple statement. I could write thousands of words on the subject based on research, personal experience and objective observations and maybe I will one day. In the mean time there are some well researched books written on the subject.

About the 'glass ceiling'. Simply because I don't mention does not mean that I'm unaware of it. Why are there more men above it? It could be that they're prepared to make the effort to get there. Though their reasons for 'getting to the top' are different this applies both for the psychopathic and the regular men. Another thing, for every man that makes it there are many equally capable and deserving that don't. There's a very strong program for men to succeed and be a good provider for their families and many do their best. A successful man generally gets a lot of female attention too. One could argue that it's not men that crave status, wealth power and success but women. Most men crave female attention, you'll always see a successful man get more female attention than his lessers. Have you ever read a romance novel? If set in a hospital the female nurse or doctor never gets off with the janitor or the orderly but the doc. The airline hostess wants the captain, not the baggage handler.

Homemakers, important job, I agree. Men do it to, fix the car, mow the lawn, handyman stuff. I've done it all, worked part-time and stayed at home with my boy and did the house stuff, I'd rather stay at home anyday rather than climb the ladder. My then US raised wife didn't like it, she disliked being a mother and wanted some guy to look after her so she could pursue her hobbies. Chose the wrong guy! :lol: When I visited the US and told family men of my life they were envious. They were working themselves to death doing 80 hour weeks to provide the 'American Dream' to their families. For this they were criticised for being too 'career focused', however if they didn't do so they were deadbeats and underachievers who lacked ambition. Some didn't really see their kids grow up. No middle ground. Pretty much the same over here in Australia.

It's late! Goodnight!
 
Brewer said:
About the 'glass ceiling'. Simply because I don't mention does not mean that I'm unaware of it. Why are there more men above it? It could be that they're prepared to make the effort to get there.

Brewer, honestly, you have some serious blinders on and aren't seeing the bigger picture at all. It's the same formula that always - always - runs. Those in power do things to stay in power and that applies no matter who 'those' are in each situation. 'Those in power' can be men or pathologicals or royalty or corporations or whoever - though in western society they are almost always men. Women have never (in recent western history) been in power nor have (nonpathological) people of color. For you to honestly think that men are in power only because they 'make more effort' is just ludicrous.

I think you might benefit from checking into some books on women's history, rather than reading books that support your already deeply ensconced and unbalanced view. Ultimately, it's a bit of a 'us against them' mindset you seem to be displaying regarding men and women when the only true 'us against them' situation on this planet is normal human beings against pathologicals.
 
Brewer said:
Another thing, for every man that makes it there are many equally capable and deserving that don't.
The same holds true for all people regardless of race, culture, creed or sex.

Brewer said:
There's a very strong program for men to succeed and be a good provider for their families and many do their best. A successful man generally gets a lot of female attention too. One could argue that it's not men that crave status, wealth power and success but women. Most men crave female attention, you'll always see a successful man get more female attention than his lessers. Have you ever read a romance novel? If set in a hospital the female nurse or doctor never gets off with the janitor or the orderly but the doc. The airline hostess wants the captain, not the baggage handler.
If you look at the media in general, you'll see the many ways that all people are objectified - women especially. If a woman chooses to not contort herself into whatever image is currently popular, it's as if she doesn't exist. People in general have been programmed to prefer a certain 'type' that is unrealistic for most if not all.

Brewer said:
My then US raised wife didn't like it, she disliked being a mother and wanted some guy to look after her so she could pursue her hobbies. Chose the wrong guy! :lol:
You did have a choice in that decision, yes? It may be beneficial for you to consider what 'ideal' you may have been seeking as well.

Brewer said:
When I visited the US and told family men of my life they were envious. They were working themselves to death doing 80 hour weeks to provide the 'American Dream' to their families. For this they were criticised for being too 'career focused', however if they didn't do so they were deadbeats and underachievers who lacked ambition. Some didn't really see their kids grow up. No middle ground. Pretty much the same over here in Australia.
I don't get why you seem to keep viewing women as the perpetrators of these ideas when it's the system that's at fault? Is it possible for you see how it's designed to be a lose/lose situation on both sides?
 
Re: Re: Illusions in my marriage

Brewer said:
I'm not saying this doesn't happen but in my experience many men will take a more paternal approach if they're older than them and the younger ones will want to chase after them! You use personal anecdotes to strengthen your case, your example dates from what time? The 70's? May I give you a contemporary example?

Actually, the friend who is the construction supervisor lives in the D.C. area currently works on a lot of restorations of historical buildings. Her complaints are very much "contemporary."

Oh yeah, my mother-in-law retired in the early 90s, not the 70s.
 
This is obviously a case of an entrenched view where the holder is so emotionally invested in the view that they are incapable of seeing beyond it. The selective use of data to support the view and discarding of data that contradicts it, is the hallmark of a sacred cow. As anyone doing the Work knows, such cattle need to be put out to pasture if one is ever to grow. If it were easy, there would be few sacred cows and considerably less polarized thinking. But it isn't easy. It requires an aim to move beyond mechanical thinking, the will and motivation to do so, and the persverance to climb over every obstacle the mechanical mind undoubtedly will put in place to halt any progress. It's hard, it's difficult and it can be a lonely road to travel. This is why it is called the Work.

If one is serious about the Work, the first thing they should do is welcome opposing perspectives and challenge one's own thinking.

Brewer, you have come across as arrogant and narrow minded in this thread. I think it comes down to this: Will you trust the feedback of your fellow members and share in the Work, or will you continue allowing your thinking to go unchallenged? The decision is yours alone, but the result will say a lot about how you value the perspectives of others on this forum, who are well on their way in challenging their beliefs, receptive to feedback and demonstrating great strides in trying to see their reality in an objective way, as well as how much you value your own thinking in its current, unchallenged form.

Gonzo
 
Here it is!

I wondered were it went! Would appreciate someone telling me it was moved! I'll read through these and start replying.

Cheers
 
The subject seemed to be taking [name deleted for privacy] thread way off topic which really wasn't very considerate for them.
 

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom