Goat stories for children?

medcan

A Disturbance in the Force
No one seems to ask the question - Why was George Bush reading a story about a pet goat at the time of the WTC disaster? It could have been a story about a pet cat or pet dog. How many people actually have pet goats in America?! The simple reason behind this goat story is the fact that the world elite worship the goat headed deity called Baphomet. Most of the researchers know in detail about this goat god and still no one connected the goat in the goat story to this goat god.

They made sure that their deity was been propitiated in a symbolic manner as the WTC events unfolded and the public (we can include the researchers here as well) once again was completely blind to it.

The Mystery of the Goat God doesn't remain a mystery when we take a look at the symbology inherent in Vedic Astrology. Vedic Astrology divides the 360 degrees of the zodiac into 27 asterisms, besides dividing it into 12 signs (which we all know of). One of these asterisms is known as Purva Bhadra Pada and has a goat headed deity called Aja Ekapada. This is supposed to be a goat headed monster with one leg who forms the entourage of Shiva, the deity presiding over destruction. Nothing is regarded as "evil" or "satanic" in Vedic philosophy , but there is definitely good and bad. The negative expression of this asterism represents most of the bad things related with the dark side. A close look at its significations will reveal a lot as to the working of the global elite. Its theme is being fed to us through all media - in fact 90% of the movies -the Hollywood blockbusters this season were all based on a Purva Bhadra Pada theme - blood, war, metals, knives, weapons, pain, darkness, evil, heavy metal music ...

The entourage(the goat) of the god of destruction(the owl) would appear to be the cabal of congress headed by the great goat himself(?) If this is the case then the muslims as "servants of God" would be in line as the enemy, yes?

The Templars who waged war upon the muslims were slaughtered by the Spanish marshals on Friday 13th, unlucky for who?

And by the way, has anybody noticed that the 6th day of the 6th month of the 6th year is rolling on?

Are we missing something?

Love medcan
 
medcan said:
No one seems to ask the question - Why was George Bush reading a story about a pet goat at the time of the WTC disaster? It could have been a story about a pet cat or pet dog. How many people actually have pet goats in America?! The simple reason behind this goat story is the fact that the world elite worship the goat headed deity called Baphomet. Most of the researchers know in detail about this goat god and still no one connected the goat in the goat story to this goat god.
With respect medcan, occult meanderings can be lots of fun and it may be true that there are a lot of occult devices and symbology dotted around 9/11 and beyond. Perhaps though at this late stage of the game, it is ultimately a distraction from the real work of getting the basic information out there on the ground: i.e. The Bush Government and Zionist were responsible for the 9/11 attacks and the surrounding dearth of lies.

At this stage whether he was reading a story about Bertie the Banana or a goat named Gunter is irrelevant.

J.
 
My guess is that many Americans don't know what the president was doing during the WTC attacks because sadly they have accepted the official story of what happened and, thus far, have had no need to look back at the details. Although I think the circumstances of the goat story were in Michael Moore's 911 film, so maybe a fair number of people know from seeing that movie...
 
medcan said:
No one seems to ask the question - Why was George Bush reading a story about a pet goat at the time of the WTC disaster? It could have been a story about a pet cat or pet dog. How many people actually have pet goats in America?! The simple reason behind this goat story is the fact that the world elite worship the goat headed deity called Baphomet. Most of the researchers know in detail about this goat god and still no one connected the goat in the goat story to this goat god.
After reading your post, I DO think it is interesting that Bush was reading a goat story at the time of WTC, and it is possible - though unlikely - that this was intentional. What is more likely is that the book was selected by the teacher(s) and was part of the ongoing classwork. That's not to say that the selection of the book could not have been "influenced" by certain psychological factors, even a certain subliminal awareness, or even hyperdimensional factors. Anything is possible.

What is really a shame is the absurdity of Baphomet being associated with the Goat God Mendes. That is actually a rather late development and not part of a true tradition. Eliphas Levi, who drew the full figured Goat of Mendes, translated "Baphomet" as a reversed composition of three abbreviations: Tem. Oph. Ab., standing for the Latin Templi omnium hominum pacis abhas (The God of) the Temple of Peace Among All Men." Levi felt this to be a reference to King Solomon's Temple, which he believed had the sole purpose of bringing peace to the world.

Eliphas Lévi, was also the first person to adapt the 2 points up pentagram as symbolic of evil. In the Middle Ages the one point up pentagram represented summer, while the two points up pentagram was a representation of winter.

Eliphas Levi himself was a nutzoid, probably schizoidal. As we now know, there was no "temple of Solomon" and most of what is considered "occult lore" derived from Judaism, is a smokescreeen designed to hide the true, ancient tradition from the seeker.

Dr. Hugh Schonfield, (one of the scholars who worked on the Dead Sea Scrolls) believed the Word Baphomet was "coded with the Knowledge of the Atbash Cipher." This is a Hebrew code which substitutes the first letter of the alphabet for the last and the second letter for the second last and so on. When Baphomet is decoded this way, Greek word Sophia which is translated in English as Wisdom.

Now, notice that this is a Greek word that emerge from a Hebrew text.

Schonfield was interested in the charges of heresy leveled against the Knights Templars and the etymology of the word Baphomet which was why he was inspired to apply the Atbash cipher which he was convinced the Templars were aware of, to the word Baphomet. Applying the Atbash cipher, Schonfield revealed the following:

The word Baphomet: Bet Pe Vav Mem Taf BAPHOMET

With the Atbash Cipher: Shin Vav Pe Yud Alef SOPHIA

Although written in Hebrew it reads as the Greek word Sophia that translates into "Wisdom" in English. In other words, it seems that however you decode this word, what you get is Wisdom whether you use Sophia, Bahu Mid, or Baphemetis. What you do NOT get is the Goat god Mendes or any of the Eliphas Levi nonsense.

Looking at the Greek source: Baphe Metis is semi-Greek and a combination of words that is suggested to mean: Initiation by water (baptismo) and Wisdom of Measurement as by math (metes - metric). "Baphe" is pseudo-Greek, and "Metis" is proper Greek. But here you come to a slightly different issue.

Baphe is not a Greek word, ancient or Biblical, that means Wisdom, Initiation, Holy Spirit, Cleansing, or anything normally related to Baptism in everyday speech. Baphe is a noun in Attic Greek that means "dye" as in coloring. Baptein is the verb "to dye" as in to color something by dipping it. Baphe, used in the sense of "Baptism" or Initiation" came only after the word Baptismo, a word peculiar to those cults that practice ritual immersion. It is related to Bahu, but not linguistically as far as anyone knows.

One theory is that the Templars may have originated the use of the word Baphe and stuck it on Met by which they could encode Sophia with the Atbash Cipher. If you know that they meant Sophia, you can figure out how they came up with Baphomet by using what Schonfield used.

Now, going in a more esoteric direction, a word that means Dye = color is related to truly ancient Orphic Doctrines about Demiurge and colors. Scholars debate the origin of a word that sounds like Baptism but which means "dye" connected to a religious rite that predates Greece by thousands of years. This takes us back to Neolithic times and it is suggested that the Greeks got the idea/word from some other culture. I should note that the Picts were known to dye themselves blue, so a Northern origin is most likely.

It is very possible that the Knights Templar used the image of Baphemetis to indicate this origin.

Sophia is the Goddess of Wisdom from the Hellenic and Pythagorean tradition associated with Gnosis. To some Gnostic traditions, Sophia is also considered to be the Bride of God, i.e. Mary. Note also that Mary, Mar, Mer, is associated with Water.

This suggests that the Templars were followers of a Gnostic Christianity and that they were instrumental in reestablishing the feminine aspect of divinity that had been excised by the church. It should be remembered that their patron, St. Bernard of Clairvaux had an absolute obsession with Mary and was responsible for her being named the Queen of Heaven and the Mother of God. Mary is today considered the Mother of God in Catholicism. Whether the Templars were devoted to the Goddess or simply respectful of Wisdom, it cannot be disputed that Schonfield's Atbash cipher theory is among the most plausible explanations of the etymology of Baphomet.

Now, as to the northern custom of dyeing and immersion in water, we come to a most interesting bit of information that I discuss at some length in my book The Secret History of The World from which I will quote here, beginning with a quote from Geoffrey of Monmouth's History of the Kings of Britain:

In Geoffrey’s story, Merlin suggests to Aurelius that he ought to send an expedition to Ireland to fetch the Giant’s Ring from Mount Killaraus. The King begins to laugh and asks:

“How can such large stones be moved from so far-distant a country?” he asked. “It is hardly as if Britain itself is lacking in stones big enough for the job!”

“Try not to laugh in a foolish way, your Majesty,” answered Merlin. “What I am suggesting has nothing ludicrous about it. These stones are connected with certain secret religious rites and they have various properties that are medicinally important. Many years ago the Giants transported them from the remotest confines of Africa and set them up in Ireland at a time when they inhabited that country. Their plan was that, whenever they felt ill, baths should be prepared at the foot of the stones; for they used to pour water over them and to run this water into baths in which their sick were cured. What is more, they mixed the water with herbal concoctions and so healed their wounds. There is not a single stone among them which hasn’t some medicinal value.” [...]

Cummins remarks astutely that Geoffrey was eight and a half centuries closer to the event than we are, so maybe his account is correspondingly closer? In these few remarks by Geoffrey of Monmouth, referring to the Cloisters of Ambrius, and “baths” at the “foot of the stones”, we find a possible hidden connection between the Cauldron of rebirth, the Holy Grail, and Stonehenge. Merlin’s explanation of the importance of the stones as reported in Geoffrey’s history, is that they were connected to “secret religious rites” that he further explains have to do with “magical healing properties,” an interesting juxtaposition of “stones” and a sort of “elixir of life.”

There is a very ancient Celtic tradition about cauldrons of rebirth, into which wounded, dead or dying soldiers were plunged, and came out healed, whole and reborn. The Holy Grail also bestowed health, healing of battle wounds, and curing of disease upon its bearers. The Celtic cauldrons were also sources of abundance, prophecy, inspiration, and knowledge. Cerridwen, the Welsh Moon Goddess, had a magic cauldron of inspiration. Welsh Bards called themselves Cerddorion (sons of Cerridwen). The Bard Taliesin, founder of their craft, was said to be born of Cerridwen and to have tasted her potion known as “greal,” made from six plants for inspiration and knowledge. Branwen, the sister of Bran the Blessed, was the “Lady of the Cauldron,” as well as the Lady of the Lake. In short, the “Lake” from which the famous Sword emerged, and to which it was returned, was a Cauldron, or the Holy Grail.
Now that we have separated the thread of Baphomet from the Goat of Mendes, let's look at that issue. again from The Secret History of the World:

The peoples of the Andes had no known form of indigenous writing, so the evidence for their activities must come from other sources. The early Spanish chroniclers recorded what had been described to them about life in Inca times; their accounts include frequent references to “sacrifice” and “offering.” Some doubt has been expressed about these accounts, however, accusing the Europeans of a negative, Catholic point of view, suggesting that the chroniclers did not ask the right questions. However, pictorial evidence for sacrifice has long been known. The Incas made little in the way of figurative art, but existing pre-Inca depictions give visual evidence for sacrifice. Examples of archaeological evidence are now accumulating in the data from recent excavations in a number of places. Most of the archaeological evidence for human sacrifice in the Andes - most clearly among the Inca and the Moche - has been discovered only recently.

For many people in the modern Western world, making a sacrifice means either giving without receiving or giving up something valuable for a cause that may benefit others. What seems to be evident about the process of sacrifice in primitive belief systems is that sacrifices of animals and humans were done for the greater good of the group - to appease the anger of the god and prevent disaster. Blood was the symbol of life, of animation, of nourishment, the most important offering that could be given to the natural and supernatural beings. It was thought that the sacrificial nourishing of the “sacred beings” made life possible. It was also thought that the cosmos “ran” on this “nourishment.” It has been suggested that the number and violence of the sacrifices increased as the desperate Moche priests tried to appease the Gods. Unfortunately, such speculations do not fully answer the question as to why any human being ever thought that the death of another human being would satisfy the gods in some way.

In artistic depictions, the Moche are seen to cut the throats of prisoners of war and then drink their blood. Afterwards, the bodies were dismembered. It’s hard to say what the purpose of these endless sacrifices might be. Perhaps the priests thought that they obtained power from drinking the blood. We are reminded of the Biblical injunction that “the blood is the life,” and the Hebrews were forbidden to drink it or to eat meat that had not been thoroughly bled. Perhaps this was because the blood - and the life in it - was supposed to be reserved for the god exclusively. Child sacrifice is a recurrent theme not only in the Andes but also in much of the world.

Returning now to our problem: Yahweh. It seems that, like the Moche and the Aztecs, the Jewish priesthood began with terrifying cannibalistic rituals and sacrifices. Just picture the priest - kohane - standing before the worshippers spattered with dripping, stringy clots of blood, throwing basins of blood on the congregation to “cleanse” them, all the while the subliminal message being conveyed that “if you don’t obey Yahweh, this is what he will do to you!” This may have been what was taking place in the great Temple of Solomon which was very likely a displaced memory of a place so hated, the Temple of Hephaestus - the labyrinth - in Memphis, and was later transferred to the “labyrinth” at Crete. It was then brought to Palestine by the refugees from the eruption of Thera, and combined later with other tales of the cataclysm to produce some of the Old Testament and the rites of Judaism. We begin to understand why the labyrinth of Egypt was, according to Pliny, regarded with “extraordinary hatred” and why so many myths of a human eating Minotaur at the center circulated in the ancient world.

The idea of the ritual sacrifice of the king instead of thousands of virgins, children, or warriors, seems to be the result of the mingling of the Southern Sun god worship with the influence of the Northern Moon worshippers. This seems to be a distortion of the idea that the king was ruler by virtue of his “marriage” to the goddess, or her representative, and that this “marriage” involved a shamanic death in order to be able to transduce the cosmic energies of benevolence and prosperity to the tribe or to defend the tribe against evil spirits.

The northern custom of a king who had lost his vigor voluntarily abdicating and being replaced by the “right heir” who could “marry the goddess” was mixed with the sacrifice customs, and the result was that the priesthood had a weapon to wield over the monarch to keep him in line. Thus arose the idea of the “scape goat” king who was sacrificed in the labyrinth instead of maidens and warriors.

Herodotus tells us what seems to be an already garbled version of this mixing of the two ideas:

Being set free after the reign of the priest of Hephaistos, the Egyptians, since they could not live any time without a king, set up over them twelve kings, having divided all Egypt into twelve parts.
This may be the original story of Jacob and Esau and the 12 tribes.

This shift was also recorded in the myth of Theseus.

What seems to be so is that there was some sort of “object of power” at the center of the myth of the Sons of Aegyptus and the daughters of Danaus. It was a descendant of this “union” - Perseus - who “cleansed the temple” and restored the Goddess to her rightful place as depicted in the story of the slaying of Medusa, the freeing of Pegasus, and the rescue of Andromeda. But again, this is merely the assimilation of later events to the primal myth of Atlantis.

When we examine the evidence, we find many clues, but with the passage of time, the movements of people in migration and/or conquest, it is impossible to say with certainty just “who is on first.” There is, of course, much more to this than the little bit I am able to include here. This will be dealt with in a future volume.

In the Bible the “wise king Solomon” is portrayed as “whoring after” the Tyrian fire and sun god Moloch/Molech. One has to wonder what this means considering the fact that there is no difference between Moloch and Yahweh when one digs beneath the surface. Some “experts” suggest that the priest Melchizedek - who was the purported teacher of Abraham - was a priest of “Moloch,” and that the name means “Righteous Moloch.” However, that is a cross-conceptualization, and a somewhat sly way to trick the reader. If you are going to translate one word into English, you ought to translate the other. Malkiy, or Malak, means simply “king.” Tsedeq means “right” or “just” or benevolent. It carries the abstract suggestion of “prosperity.”
What seems to have happened, once again, is that a possible revelation of truth about our reality was co-opted and diverted by the denizens of hyperdimensional realities who do not wish their nature and agenda to be discerned. In the standard method of disinformation, truth was mixed with lies in order to mislead and divert. Those who wish that everything was either clearly black or clearly white, do not take the time to patiently pick through the threads and separate them so as to discern the truth. My suggestion on this point is that the ancient Priesthood of Melchizedek was designated thus for the express purpose of distinguishing it from the worship of Moloch, the Fire god. [...]

What Herodotus had to say about it is rather fascinating:

Being set free after the reign of the priest of Hephaistos, the Egyptians, since they could not live any time without a king, set up over them twelve kings, having divided all Egypt into twelve parts. These made intermarriages with one another and reigned, making agreement that they would not put down one another by force, nor seek to get an advantage over one another, but would live in perfect friendship: and the reason why they made these agreements, guarding them very strongly from violation, was this, namely that an oracle had been given to them at first when they began to exercise their rule, that he of them who should pour a libation with a bronze cup in the temple of Hephaistos, should be king of all Egypt (for they used to assemble together in all the temples).

Moreover they resolved to join all together and leave a memorial of themselves; and having so resolved they caused to be made a labyrinth situated a little above the lake of Moeris and nearly opposite to that which is called the City of Crocodiles. This I saw myself, and I found it greater than words can say. For if one should put together and reckon up all the buildings and all the great works produced by the Hellenes, they would prove to be inferior in labour and expense to this labyrinth, though it is true that both the temple at Ephesos and that at Samos are works worthy of note. [...]
What was Herodotus describing? He declared all the great architectural works of the Greeks and Egyptians, including the pyramids, to be “inferior in labour and expense to this labyrinth.” We would also like to note that there were no references to bulls hidden in the Egyptian labyrinth; rather, in the hidden underground chambers were the “sepulchres of the kings who had first built this labyrinth and of the sacred crocodiles.”

Diodorus has a slightly different story about who built this famous labyrinth:

When the king died the government was recovered by Egyptians and they appointed a native king Mendes, whom some call Mares. Although he was responsible for no military achievements whatsoever, he did build himself what is called the Labyrinth as a tomb, an edifice which is wonderful not so much for its size as for the inimitable skill with which it was built; for once in, it is impossible to find one’s way out again without difficulty, unless one lights upon a guide who is perfectly acquainted with it. [...]

The upper set of chambers we ourselves saw, going through them, and we tell of them having looked upon them with our own eyes; but the chambers under ground we heard about only; for the Egyptians who had charge of them were not willing on any account to show them, saying that here were the sepulchres of the kings who had first built this labyrinth and of the sacred crocodiles.
So we see a very early association with the name "Mendes" and "sacred crocodiles, or "reptilian" creatures that were "gods." So when, where, and how did the name Mendes become associated with a goat?

Well, again, it's a tricky and convoluted path of what can only be called "cosmic cointelpro."

In Egypt, since Osiris was dead, he was considered to be lord of the dead. Osiris' soul, or rather his Ba, was occasionally worshipped in its own right, almost as if it were a distinct god, especially so in the Delta city of Mendes. .

Ba does not mean soul in the western sense since it has a lot to do with power, reputation, force of character, especially in the case of a god.

This aspect of Osiris was referred to as Banebdjed (also spelt Banebded or Banebdjedet, which is technically feminine) which literally means The ba of the lord of the djed, which roughly means The soul of the lord of the pillar of stability. The djed, a type of pillar, was usually understood as the backbone of Osiris, since the Egyptians had associated death, and the dead, as symbolic of stability. As Banebdjed, Osiris was given epithets such as Lord of the Sky and Life of the (sun god) Ra, since Ra, when he had become identified with Atum, was considered Osiris' ancestor, from whom his regal authority was inherited.

Since the ba was associated with power, and ba also happened to be a word for ram in Egyptian, Banebdjed was depicted as a ram, or as Ram-headed. A living, sacred ram, was even kept at Mendes and worshipped as the incarnation of the god, and upon death, the rams were mummified and buried in a ram-specific necropolis.

In Mendes, they had considered Hatmehit, a local fish-goddess, as the most important god/goddess, and so when the cult of Osiris became more significant, Banebdjed was identified in Mendes as deriving his authority from being married to Hatmehit. ...

In contemporary occult fiction, Banebdjed is often called the goat of Mendes, and identifed with Baphomet; the fact that Banebdjed was a ram (sheep), not a goat, is apparently overlooked.
http://www.theegyptiangods.com/Osiris.htm

Where did the fish goddess come from? Probably from Mesopotamian influences. From The Secret History of the World:

The deity worshipped at Eridu in historic times was the god Enki. Before this, the god of the shrine seems to have been a fish or water god who rose up out of the water exactly like Viracocha, had scales, and was a civilizer-teacher of language and culture. Enki was thought of later as the god of the waters and was described as riding around in his boat. He was also described as “he who rides.” This concept of the fish or water god is similar to one found in a fragment of an Indo-Aryan Hittite tablet which tells of a sun god who rose from the water with fish on his head. [...]

Now, let’s think about this for a moment. We have a god with a fish on his head, thereby associated with scales, and who is described as “he who rides.” This scaly god not only rides, he rose from the water like the sun! Also, he was born from the deaths of the Mother goddess and her son. Mountains of fire are involved, gold, and kingship being “lowered from heaven.” It rather sounds like UFOs coming up out of the water as they have so often been reported to do in more modern times, or descending on mountain tops. [...]

Anu appears as the successor to Alalu in the Hurrian and Hittite Kumarbi myth. But most interesting is his appearance in the later myth of Marduk, “the son of the sun.” Here we learn that Enki was first asked to subdue the Creatress-Goddess, whom they call Tiamat, and was not able, though he did manage to kill her husband Apsu, thus becoming Lord of the Abzu (primeval waters) himself. Anu was then asked to subdue Tiamat, but according to the legend when he confronted Her, he cringed in fear and refused to complete his mission. Finally Marduk, son of Enki, was willing, though only upon the promise of the supreme position among all other deities if he succeeded. This previously secured promise brings to mind the one Indra requested before murdering Danu and Her son Vrtra; both of these myths were probably written down at about the same period (1600-1400 B.C) though they are undoubtedly far older. In passing, I would like to note that the name Tiamat is similar to some of the earliest known names of male deities including Tiu, Tyr, Thor, etc, plus Mat which reminds us of Egyptian Maat, which was a goddess who represented truth, law and universal order. [...]

There is considerable evidence for contact between Egypt and Sumer. “Abundant evidence of Mesopotamian cultural influence is found at this time in Egypt.” Significant is the fact that cylinder seals (a specifically Mesopotamian invention) occur there, together with methods of building in brick foreign to Egypt but typical of the Jemdet Nasr culture of Mesopotamia and the Indus Valley civilization. Mesopotamian motifs and objects also begin to be represented in Egyptian art, such as boats of Mesopotamian type. The idea of writing, though it was expressed quite differently in Egypt, seems to have developed more or less coevally with Mesopotamia. Paintings in early dynastic tombs portray a conical basket type of fish trap, nearly identical to those of the Ertebolle people of northern Europe who were descended from the Maglemosians, a European Mesolithic culture, which links us back to the Akkadians as being from the North. The male deity of Egypt arrived with the invaders, and was portrayed as the sun riding in a boat!

Professor Walter Emery spent some forty-five years excavating the ancient tombs and pyramids of Egypt. Discussing the arrival of these people, he writes:

Whether this incursion took the form of gradual infiltration or horde invasion is uncertain but the balance of evidence... strongly suggests the latter. ...we see a style of art which some think may be Mesopotamian, or even Syrian in origin, and a scene which may represent a battle at sea against invaders... [in these] representations we have typical native ships of Egypt and strange vessels with high prow and stem of unmistakable Mesopotamian origin...
At any rate, towards the close of the fourth millennium BC we find the people known traditionally as the “Followers of Horus” apparently forming an aristocracy or master race ruling over the whole of Egypt. The theory of the existence of this master race is supported by the discovery that graves of the late pre-dynastic period in the northern part of Upper Egypt were found to contain the anatomical remains of a people whose skulls are of greater size and whose bodies were larger than those of the natives, the difference being so marked that any suggestion that these people derived from the earlier stock is impossible.

These invaders were known to the Egyptians as the “Shemsu Hor“, or people of Hor. And, of course, they brought with them their male god, Hor-Wer or Great Hor. By 2900 BC pictures of this sun god show him riding in his “boat of heaven.”

It certainly makes one wonder if a brilliant UFO rising up out of the water would cause the ancient peoples to connect a boat (that goes on water) with flying through the air while looking like the sun! And, over and over again we are finding this image or juxtaposition of images.

According to Emery, the name of the first king of the First Dynasty, known as Narmer or Menes in Manetho’s history of 270 BC, was actually Hor-Aha. Later, the name of Hor appears to have been incorporated into the more ancient goddess religion as the “son who dies.” This has led to a lot of confusion between the two “Hors,” Horus the Elder, god of light of the invaders, and Horus the Younger, the son of the goddess Isis.

Hor later was transmogrified into Horus by the Greeks, and is depicted as fighting a ritual combat with another male deity known as Set. Set is supposed to be his uncle, the brother of his mother Isis and father Osiris. The combat was supposed to symbolize the overcoming of darkness or Set, by light, symbolized by Hor.

In Sanskrit the word ‘sat’ means to destroy by hewing into pieces. In the myth of Osiris, it was Set who killed Osiris and cut his body into fourteen pieces which naturally reminds us of the sacrifices of the Moche. However, the word “set” is also defined as “queen” or “princess” in Egyptian! “Au Set,” known as Isis by the Greeks, means, “exceeding queen!”

In the myth of this ritual combat, Set tried to mate sexually with Horus; this is usually interpreted to have been an extreme insult. But the most primitive identity of the figure Set, before the wavy lines of water or energy became serpents, may be found in the goddess religion, and this combat, just as with the combat of Marduk with Tiamat, may have represented the suppression and destruction of the Goddess religion. Of course, the conquering invaders presented themselves as “saviors” and their conquest as a triumph of light over darkness!

So it has always been.

Nevertheless, the followers of Hor established the institution of kingship in Egypt. And, again, marrying the representative of the goddess in order to “steal her power” was an important part of the assumption of kingship as was recorded in the story of Solomon - he married an Egyptian Princess. We may justifiably compare the name of “Hor” to the Hurrians or Horites who came from India to Sumer.
I think this post is getting long, so I'll continue in the next.
 
gaelen said:
With respect medcan, occult meanderings can be lots of fun and it may be true that there are a lot of occult devices and symbology dotted around 9/11 and beyond.
I agree with you, especially regarding occult symbols consciously inserted in every nook and cranny.

Laura said:
That's not to say that the selection of the book could not have been "influenced" by certain psychological factors, even a certain subliminal awareness, or even hyperdimensional factors. Anything is possible.
This is more likely, IMO, and why it is useful in looking for occult symbols where reason may tell us it is not practical or realistic. I believe this is a synchronistic phenomenon. In other words the very 9/11 event was a charged probablility, and if Bush was a key figure the guy was probably psychically bleeding the real story all over the place. M. Moore tried to explain away the look on his face as blind panic. I think this was misleading.

To me he looked like a child amazed that he had his hand in the cookie jar and no one noticed ("wow! I think I'm actually gonna get away with this!"). The teachers probably subconsciously read what was bleeding out from the illustrious POTUS's energy field, and reflected it back to him in a form of a Freudian slip at a distance, which was the book.

I never really thought about this, or rather when I saw Moore's documentary it crossed my mind, but then got crossed out (much too fast for comfort, as if it was a no-no thought). Looking at the symbolism of the Goat story to understand Bush's subconscious reflected through psychic induction in the teacher(s) that chose the book, is akin to analyzing a dream Bush may have had regarding the event.

If the teachers had chosen the book before-hand, on the other hand, the collective impact of the event it self may have influenced them in a hyperdimensional manner. When there is grand scale and collective death and suffering certain STS influences do tend to congregate around the event itself, including where it happens and around those immediately involved.

It would be nice to develop psychic abilities to be able to read the "event-structure", and in particular such emanations. One might be able to guage the "plans" and intentions of 4D STS and its pathocratic minions in this
manner. If there is one potentially useful ability to have, it is certainly this one.

Another interesting observation is that the word "Tragedy" in Ancient Greek is translated into English as "Goat Song", taken from songs sung by priests in goat masks during certain Dionysian Mysteries.
 
Getting back to where and how a goat came into the picture, we find a clue in Manetho who tells us that the 2nd king of the 2nd Dynasty,

Nebra introduced the worship of the sacred goat of Mendes, of the sacred bull of Mnevis at Heliopolis, and of the sacred Apis bull at Memphis. However, it is now believed that since a stele dating from King Den’s reign during the 1st Dynasty attests to his founding of the Apis cult, the worship of the Apis bull is dated earlier.

Raneb’s name should more appropriately be Nebra, "lord of the sun." He reigned for 39 years, according to Manetho. A granite stele from Abydos with Nebra’s name in serekh. appears today in the Metropolitan Museum. Sealings with his name were also found with those of Hetepsekhemwy in the royal gallery tomb at Saqqara, so Nebra may have overseen the burial of his predecessor in turn. Nebra’s name in serekh also appears cut on a rock near Armant in the western desert, close to an ancient trade route linking the Nile with its western oases.
http://www.touregypt.net/featurestories/earlydyn1.htm

Then we find this:

“Mendes, a he-goat represented usually on monuments as a ram, and identified by Herodotus and other Greeks with Pan, was worshipped in the Egyptian city of Mendes. The cult attained national prominence in the Ptolemaic period. The great Mendes stele (Zeitschrift für ägyptische Sprache und Altertumskunde xiii (1875), 33-40) refers to Ptolomy II ‘son of the great living goat of Mendes’ as having visited the temple ‘as the kings before him had done’. The deceased queen Arsinoë II is called ‘Arsinoë Philadelphus beloved by the goat’ and her deification throughout the land is described. The stele also notes that the province of Mendes paid no taxes to the king but used its revenues for the worship of the god. The completion of the temple and the attendant celebration, the discovery of a new sacred animal, and various feasts and processions are mentioned.” (The Oxford Classical Dictionary. Edited by M. Cary, et al. Oxford at the Clarendon Press 1966: p. 557.)
and this:

“[2.46.1] This is why the Egyptians of whom I have spoken sacrifice no goats, male or female: the Mendesians reckon Pan among the eight gods who, they say, were before the twelve gods. [2.46.2]

Now in their painting and sculpture, the image of Pan is made with the head and the legs of a goat, as among the Greeks; not that he is thought to be in fact such, or unlike other gods; but why they represent him so, I have no wish to say. [2.46.3]

The Mendesians consider all goats sacred, the male even more than the female, and goatherds are held in special estimation: one he-goat is most sacred of all; when he dies, it is ordained that there should be great mourning in all the Mendesian district. [2.46.4]

In the Egyptian language Mendes is the name both for the he-goat and for Pan.” (Herodotus, The Histories [ed. A. D. Godley])
But we come back to this little problem that the original worship was of a RAM not a GOAT.

“Banebdjedet: Ram-god whose name means ‘ba (or ‘soul’) lord of Mendes’, has cult centred in the north-east Delta. He was worshipped there together with his consort Hatmehyt (a local fish-goddess whom he had supplanted in importance) and his son Harpokrates. This site, known today as Tell el-Ruba, has revealed a cemetery with sarcophagi for burial of the sacred rams.” (Hart, George. A Dictionary of Egyptian Gods and Goddesses. London: Routledge, 1986: p. 52-53.)
So it looks like the goats were brought as Pan by the Greeks.

That means we must look at Pan.

The Greek God Pan is perhaps the most familiar form of the Horned God/Wild Man archetype. Our classical imagery of this country-dwelling deity is derived from the Homeric Hymn to Pan. He is an ancient god indeed, harkening back to the old hunter/gatherer societies with their horned or antlered shamanic gods. But with animal domestication Pan became the herdsman's god associated with goats. His original worship was in Arcadian Greece.

The ancient scholars of Alexandria believed that Pan personified the Natural Cosmos, and the word Pantheism is derived from this idea, that all Nature is God and that God is All Nature. He is described as the son of Hermes by the Arcadian Nymph Dryope: "goatfooted, two-horned, noisy, and laughing..." He was also said to possibly be the son of Zeus by Amalthea the Cretan goat-goddess, nursemaid to Dionysus. The attributes of hooves and horns along with a prominent phallus merged together and this association, particularly, gave them their popular identification as the male symbols of sexuality. Many ancient people had no shame around sex and considered it a vital sign of health and divine blessing. Pan had many lovers, both female and male, quite apart from His constant pursuit of the anonymous nymphs of His woodlands.

Pan had a positive side that was portrayed as the laughing, lusty lover and musician; this side of Pan was called "pangenitor" the all-begetter. But like all the Gods of Nature He had a shadow side as well. In this form He is called "panphage" the all-devourer and as such He was perceived as a dangerous protector of the Wilderness. The word "panic" itself derives from Pan; for in this form He could cause sudden irrational wild fear. This dark side of Pan and his rampant sexuality were looked on with such horror and disgust by the Medieval Christian Church that some of their images of the devil were given the horns, hooves and ithyphallic appearance of the Greek God. Nevertheless, images of Pan in His European guise of Robin Goodfellow continued to be the focus of joyous rural celebrations well into the 16th century CE.
http://www.mythicimages.com/printpan.htm

But is Pan, as brought by the Greeks to Egypt the same as the goat worship brought to Egypt by Nebra, the "sacred goat of Mendes" ?

No, it seems that somewhere, somehow, there was a merging of the two. So we still need to understand the goat of Mendes.

Most of what we find on first try is nonsense, but when we look to the sky, we find a clue: Capricorn.

This constellation is one that has retained a mythological explanation which predates the Greeks. Capricorn, the Seagoat, is thought to be the image of a powerful Babylonian deity named Ea. He has the lower half of a fish and the head and torso of a goat. The god lived in the ocean. He came out every day to watch over the land, and he returned to the sea every night. The Greek version of this legend does not match with the physical description of the Seagoat. Greeks thought that the starry figure was Pan, a Greek demigod. Pan had the upper half of a man, but he had the legs of a goat. He was the son of Hermes and a forest nymph. According to legend, when the nymph saw her strange baby, she shrieked in fear and ran away.

Hermes, however, loved his strange son. He took him to Olympus, where the other gods and goddesses also took a liking to Pan. He became the god of shepherds and flocks, taking the responsibility from his father. He did not dwell on Olympus; he preferred to live among the shady trees in the mountains. He amused himself by playing his beloved reed pipes (known as Panpipes), or by chasing nymphs through the woods.
http://www.crystalinks.com/capricorn.html

We suspect that the goat of Mendes, brought to Egypt by Nebra was this Babylonian/Sumerian representation.

It is a complex subject that requires subtle thinking and attention to detail. But most of all we note that Eliphas Levi, and those who have followed after, have adopted the "Christian" view of Pan, when in reality, the actual Mendes goat was the Fish goat, probably representing hyperdimensional STS influences. So, not only did Levi screw-up when he associated the goat to Baphomet, he didn't even have the right goat. But that's cosmic cointelpro for ya!
 
There is a another myth about Capricorn:

Pan was on some beach frolicking with nymphs when the sea monster Leviathan (which may have been the same one to which Andromeda was to be sacrificed in the Perseus story- I am putting this down from memory so the names may be mixed up) showed up. Everyone scattered in terror, and Pan ran toward a river that spilled into the ocean. He turned himself into a fish and Leviathan roared and chased him up the river until it got too shallow for it to follow.

Pan tried to jump out of the river and turn himself back and keep running, but we was so "panicked" that he could only change his upper half, and that not into a human but a goat, while the lower half remained a fish. Eventually, Zeus helped him get back to normal, but he was so amused at the whole spectacle that he took the image of the sea goat and put it in the heavens to give him a good laugh now and then when he looked at it...:)

Interesting...the association with "Panic"...
 
EQ said:
Eventually, Zeus helped him get back to normal, but he was so amused at the whole spectacle that he took the image of the sea goat and put it in the heavens to give him a good laugh now and then when he looked at it...
This is good... evidence of the transpersonification of Pan; a story that was supposed to "explain" the merging of formerly completely opposite representations.
 
I have sort of vested interest here due to being a Capricorn and my name.

Talking things "fishy", there is also the legend of Oannes/Ionnes from Babylon. Robert Temple in his book Sirius Mystery goes into this "fish man" quite a bit.

http://www.mystae.com/restricted/streams/vela/oannes.html

At Babylon there was (in these times) a great resort of people of various nations, who inhabited Chaldaea, and lived in a lawless manner like the beasts of the field. In the first year there appeared, from that part of the Erythraean sea which borders upon Babylonia, an animal destitute of reason [sic], by name Oannes, whose whole body (according to the account of Apollodorus) was that of a fish, that under the fish's head he had another head, with feet also below, similar to those of a man, subjoined to the fish's tail. His voice too, and language, was articulated and human, and a representation of him is preserved even to this day.
"This Being was accustomed to pass the day among men; but took no food at that season; and he gave them an insight into letters and sciences, and arts of every kind. He taught them to construct cities, to found temples, to compile laws, and explained to them the principles of geometrical knowledge. He made them distinguish the seeds of the earth, and shewed them how to collect the fruits; in short, he instructed them in everything which could tend to soften manners and humanize their lives. From that time, nothing material has been added by way of improvement to his instructions. And when the sun had set, this Being Oannes, retired again into the sea, and passed the night in the deep; for he was amphibious. After this there appeared other animals like Oannes."
- Berossus, from Ancient Fragments (Isaac Preston Cory)
I looked up Cohane's "The Key" on things Ionic and he had this to say on the Ionic Greeks.

Aegorius was the son of Ion, legendary ruler of the Ionic Greeks
Strangely enough Aegorius translates to "devourer of goats" according to this page.

My well annoted(by the previous owner) copy of the Key notes that Aegicorus relates to goats tangled by their horns in trees.Or Goats head Gr=aegokoreis.
 
Justin said:
My well annoted(by the previous owner) copy of the Key notes that Aegicorus relates to goats tangled by their horns in trees.Or Goats head Gr=aegokoreis.
Interesting that aegokoreis sounds like Aegokeiros, which is the Greek word for Capricorn. Both these latter words literally mean goat-horn. So the emphasis is on the horns. There are usually three depictions of the male fertility principle ranging from the late Paleolithic to Neolithic times. These were the stag, the bull and the goat, the goat being the latest one. The horn is itself a symbol of the male life principle.

Pan was depicted as half man and half goat with horns. In the myth I mentioned above, the apprearance of the sea monster confronted Pan, the representation of life, with the fact of death and "Panic" (an effect said to be engendered when Pan played a certain tone on his pipes) led to Pan confronting a deeper layer in his nature, that of the fish.

It is as if the emotion of fear dropped Pan a few rungs down the evolutionary ladder, and from a man/goat, he became a goat/fish. In Hebrew Capricorn is Ghedi (transliterated GDI), which can be interpreted as a perpetual motion (Ghimel), a response (Daleth) and being or presence (Yod). In other words, action and reaction in the presence of being. Capricorn, according to the Qabbalistic Sepher Yetzirah is said to manifest Chiim, which is the word for life (or the forces of life).

What is interesting is that in the Neolithic middle east, goat skulls were worn by shamans along with feathered cloaks. Some associate these settlements with the stories of the biblical Nephelim.
As described in

http://www.cyberspaceorbit.com/indexback48.html

A cave known as the Shanidar, located on the Great Zab River in Kurdistan, [was] used for shamanistic practices. Later, archaeologists will find goat skulls and the wings of buzzards, vultures, and eagles. At the same time, early settlements in Palestine and Syria begin. Watcher culture reaches its peak.
Andrew Collins (author of The Gods of Eden) visited the capital of Turkish Kurdistan Diyarbakir, and gives an account of his observations of an ancient settlement called Çayonu. Apparently these communities were organized around psychopathic principles.

http://www.andrewcollins.com/page/articles/kurdistan.htm

Human Sacrifice in the Neolithic

Çayonu is said to have been a centre for the production of beads, mostly of bone, but some of stone, and it was here that some of the earliest known examples of beaten copper objects were found, including a fish hook over 9,000 years old. Also from Çayonu is the earliest known example of a woven piece of fabric, found still attached to an antler bone handle. It too dates to one of the earliest building phases at the site. Yet in the museum’s lower level is a grim reminder of Çayonu’s more sinister past, for on the floor rests the so-called Altar Stone, an enormous flat slab unearthed in a room known as the Skull Building. Here some 500 or more human skulls were found, initially suggesting a veneration for the cult of the dead, yet when blood soaked into the Altar Stone was examined it was found to come from aurochs, sheep and human beings. The discovery close by of a vicious-looking flint dagger seemed to confirm the archaeologists’ worst fears that human sacrifice took place here, a disconcerting realisation which, as I mentioned in GODS OF EDEN, is never lingered on in excavation reports. Further evidence of human sacrifice has emerged from another Neolithic site in the region named Nevali Çori (pronounced nev-ar-li chor-i), which was located on a terrace in the Hilvan district, some 130 kilometres ESE of Diyarbakir, before it was engulfed by the rising waters of the Ataturk reservoir, created by blocking the Euphrates river, back in the mid 1990s.


When I mentioned the clear evidence of human sacrifice at Çayonu to an archaeological student we spent time with that week, she was utterly perplexed, and seemed unable to comprehend what I meant. Not only had she never come across this theory before, but she attempted to dismiss it purely on the basis that it seemed abhorrent to the Kurdish way of life. I explained that human sacrifice, and also to a lesser degree cannibalism, was common in ancient times, especially in Central and South America. This might be so, but why, she asked, did a clearly enlightened culture who paved the way for some of the earliest advances in human civilisation, such as astronomy, agriculture, animal husbandry, building construction, fired pottery, microblade production, writing systems, fabric weaving, metallurgy, temple building, etc, etc., need to stoop so low as to sacrifice the life of other human beings?


The answer, I said, was control, and power. The construction of the various Neolithic temples scattered throughout Upper Mesopotamia would have required some kind of hierarchical system within its basic society. Evidence obtained from the sites implies that there was a ruling elite, preist-shamans, who were seen as the culture’s founders, leaders and spiritual guardians. In records from across the Near East they are described as men or gods associated with birds, who wore coats of feathers, usually those of carrion or scavenger birds, most generally the vulture, buzzard or kite, the earliest avian symbols of the death cult. Moreover, from earliest times this elite group were also associated with the symbol of the snake, or serpent, which regularly appears in early Neolithic art unearthed in the region. Like the feathered serpents of Mesoamerican tradition, these individuals seem to have controlled the development and evolution of the Neolithic communities across the Near East, and this would have been achieved not necessarily through mutual co-operation, but by fear. In other words, they could offer a lifestyle radically different from the existing hunter-gathering tradition, whereby the peoples of the village communities could be assured an abundance of food and free time to develop artisan skills, and yet this came at a high price.


The indigenous peoples would be employed in the construction of the region’s remarkable cult centres, or temples, and I surmise that every year, or every so often, individuals would be chosen as sacrificial victims. Who exactly was chosen was dependent on how well the workforce achieved their aims, or adhered to the creed or insistences of their elders. In other words, if you were good, then others less fortunate would lose their lives, but fail in your duties and you would be next in line to disappear. In this way, they could install in people a real belief that working for them would ensure the security not just of their own life, but also those who depended upon them.


As abhorrent and amoral as this practice might seem, it can be compared almost exactly with the achievements of the Anasazi of the Four Corners country of the southern United States. They built cities with buildings aligned to celestial events, and were considered the most advanced peoples in the country. The Anasazi (Navajo for ‘ancient ones’) were also the direct antecedents of the Hopi, one of the most enlightened peoples of the New World. However, ample evidence is now available to show that the Anasazi made most of their advancements under the control of a ruling elite of probable Meso-American origin, who practised human sacrifice and cannibalism, meaning that the tribe’s entire society was built on fear and not necessarily mutual co-operation. Unfortunately, fear and control are awesome but terrible weapons which have probably been behind much of humanity’s advancements in this world.
From goats, buzzards and serpents to psychopaths and back again. This may have nothing to do with the life affirming origins of the goat-god and fish-goat. Then again, like in many other areas, psychopaths love to pervert...It may also be that the association of "evil" with the horned devil may relate to Neolithic psychopathic cults perverting natural principles of transcendence.

It seems there are people in power today who want to revive the "good old days"...
 
Here is another interesting quote from Collins, regarding the goat's relation to the biblical Watchers, http://www.andrewcollins.com/page/events/pagandayer2.htm#rule

To Christian scholars of the Middle Ages the Serpent of Eve was viewed as Satan in disguise, while the devil was seen as the leader of the fallen angels in the Book of Revelation. We can conclude therefore that it was this same deity that was worshipped by the witches. Moreover, his form as a goat derives not simply from the connection between Dionysus and the Witches’ Sabbat, but because one of the other main animal forms of the Watchers is the goat. One of their two leaders, Azazel, takes his name from the Akkadian az, or uz, meaning ‘goat’. Moreover, in Jewish mysticism the name Azazel was given to the scapegoat on which the sins of the Israelites was heaped before being pushed over a precipice to its death. Early cylinder seals from 3500 BC and found at the site of the ancient city of Elam on the southern slopes of the Zagros mountains, show goat men holding ritual instruments and controlling diving vultures. This seems to demonstrate the importance of the mountain goat in shamanic practices connected with the Neolithic cult of the dead, and later absorbed into Jewish mysticism.
 
Woah long threat, very interesting read thou - i actually got through it all!

So gods come from the heavens, install a hierarchical structure giving priests/elite power over the masses, they demand human sacrafices that somehow benefit them. Any indication if the deaths were slow/painful? Isn't that how the lizzies get their nourishment? Odd stuff.
 
Session 970726:

Q: What is the definition of the god 'Baphomet,' if they did, indeed,
worship such?
A: The holder of the Trent.
Q: What is THAT?
A: Seek.

Session 980620:

Q: What was the head worshipped by the Templars that was supposed to have been called "Baphomet?"
A: Seer of the passage.
Q: What does that mean?
A: Remember, secrets of Knights Templar were kept in caves guided by eternally burning lamps.
Q: Okay, next question, is this Ophiuchus, the serpent holder, the same as what you have called 'the holder of Trent?'
A: Close.

Trent is not an english word. There are two similar words in Latin and German.

Here is the German:

trennt
disassociate, disconnects, disjoins, dissociate, disunites, secedes, segregates, separates, severs, sunders

The name Trent is a Latin baby name. In Latin the meaning of the name Trent is: Swift.
The name Trent is also a Welsh baby name. In Welsh the meaning of the name Trent is: Dwells near the rapid stream.
The Latin origin of "Trent" means "torrent".

Considering that Baphomet was a head without the body, that being knighted involves being touched on both shoulders by a sword to symbolize decapitation, and that esoterically decapitation means having your mind liberated from mortal constraints through knowledge.

So the "holder of the Trent" would translate to "holder of that which esoterically decapitates" - that which imparts wisdom and clarity through a fast lane.

But the Latin meaning is interesting because initiation via download would indeed result in enlightenment through a "torrent" of knowledge.

tor ·rent Pronunciation Key (tôrnt, tr-) n.
1. A turbulent, swift-flowing stream.
2. A heavy downpour; a deluge.
3. A heavy, uncontrolled outpouring: a torrent of insults; torrents of mail.

The eternal flame is primarily a sigil of those who aim to preserve key knowledge through ages of darkness and ignorance.

Session 970726
Q: Okay. I have several books on the subject. I will start
tomorrow. Now, when the Templars were arrested, they
were accused of worshipping a head, or skull, and also the
god Baphomet. Were these spurious accusations designed to
defame them?
A: Skull was of pure crystal.

Session 941102

Q: (L) Who carved the crystal skull found in Central
America?
A: Mayans.
Q: (L) What was the purpose of that skull?
A: Study brain. Long message follows pause: Now: skull was
to learn about soul; reflective remolecularization imaging.
Grays do this with abductees.
Q: (L) Through what kind of instrument.
A: Energy focusing.

If the head of Baphomet "worshipped" by the Templars was a crystal skull, then that fits with the interpretation of "Holder of the Trent" because crystal skulls are information storage's and learning devices. Tap into those psychically and you get instant knowledge download and illumination, and thus power.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FqfVEE--ySA

Bringers of the Dawn:


Sound is another way to carry information because it is part of light. To you it may seem that sound and
light are two separate things, because from your point of view you perceive light with your eyes and
sound with your ears. Because you use two separate areas of perception on your body, it seems that
sound and light are separated as well. In actuality, they are very connected. They wind themselves
around one another because they both carry information.
Many of the structures built on this planet, particularly ancient sacred sites, have information stored
within stone. In the same way, you have information stored within the bones of your skeletal form.
When you allow sound to move through you, it unlocks a doorway and allows information to flood into
your body. It also penetrates the ground, affecting the vibrations of Earth and allowing a rearrangement
of a molecular alignment of information to take place. Those of you who use sound when you are
working on others' bodies bring about a rearrangement of the molecular structure and create an opening
for information to flood in. This kind of work will become more and more profound.
In Tibet, when a master who was able to transcend realities passed over, the body was kept and allowed
to move into its own natural deterioration because the skeletal form held a sensibility to frequencies.
informatioin is stored in bone and stone. In some places in Tibet where the lines of continuity in sects of
monks can be traced back for thousands and thousands of years, people have kept the skulls of different
masters. They have very secret crypts and rooms filled with these skulls.. When one walks into these
places, one can, through sound, access the intelligence factors of the humans who once occupied those
skulls.
Do you understand why crystal skulls were designed? Crystalline structures are like holographic
computers: they can transmit to the evolved or plugged-in human a tremendous amount of information.
They are designed like skulls to act as a code for understanding your own skull and understanding that
the bone in your body is very valuable.

You can see evidence of this today in a corrupted form via the Skull and Bones society. Their sign is the Templar naval flag(pirate flag appearing approximately 150 years after their "fall", the very individuals it was used to ward off were now using it as their very own symbol! This stands to reason. Privateers and pirates adopted ways, means, and ideals that worked. Pirates were the first to practice true democracy. Each hand had a vote and all votes were equal. They were also the first organization to implement a retirement program should a sailor be hurt on the job. Pirates incorporated the use of the most efficient weapons and tactics available to them. Further, they were masters of deception! ) and they "worship" Geronimo's skull. Their rituals with this skull involves, among other things, screeching prolongedly at it.

In the Bringers excerpt above, it was sound that accessed such information from skulls, stones, and crystals via the vocal technique of "toning" - which, if you study up on it, goes by the name of "overtone singing" which involves isolating certain harmonics of the voice to create a high pitched ringing sound, which degenerated into screeching in today's Skull'n'Bones rituals.
 
Carrying on from some previous thinking http://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php/topic,42008.msg657809.html#msg657809 ...



If human kind is divided loosely between those trying to cope with today's reality using solutions appropriate for herding creatures, and those appropriate for more fully embodied 3D residents, we wind up with a paradigm of Authoritarians and Non-Authoritarians.

Sheep and... those who are not sheep.

Those who are not sheep are going to be smarter and wiser than sheep; those who have decided to learn new rules which provide more complex coping strategies better suited to the human position in 3rd Density, and thus greater opportunities for successfully navigating Reality.

And yet we occupy the same basic human forms. We share the same environment and many of the same challenges. Our lives and fates are linked. Some of those who are not sheep will naturally be suited to becoming leaders of sheep.

-People who want to be told what to do and what to believe, and those charged with protecting the flocks. Sheep and Shepherds. (The psychopaths might be considered Wolves.)

When the Wolves become Shepherds, as they appear to have done in our reality, then we end up with problems.

As an aside wrt to the Sheep/Shepherd relationship, (speaking of actual sheep now),

In a world where 3D residents to find their greatest power, need to eat meat and saturated fats, animal products, and where herding animals are best suited psychologically to being provided safety through authoritarian means and whose coping strategy is to allow some of their number to be consumed in return for safety of the larger flock, then it becomes incumbent upon the Shepherds to make a decision. -To decide whether to act out their roles in an other-serving or in a self-serving manner. If one realizes his or her connection to the creation, that we are all One, then you treat your flocks with respect and love. If you are in denial wrt your connection to God, then you do not.

I don't think there was any deliberate occult significance in the book George Bush Jr. was reading to the children (kids?) in that classroom. But I DO think that reality being one giant quilted metaphor, we can certainly read, or perhaps perform a sort of dream analysis, upon the situation.

If the classroom represents teaching kids the sheep rules, and Bush was leading the class in the position of the Shepherd, then I see significance in the fact that he was holding the book upside down.
 
As an aside and a bit of humour, GHOTI is pronounced FISH.

Why so? well in English, we have:
GH as in 'enough' pronounced F.
O as in 'women' pronounced I.
TI as in 'action' pronounced SH.

Just another Goat / Fish connection, although stretched somewhat.. :-)
 
Back
Top Bottom