Briefly here (and hope to conclude in more detail later), has been the initial reading of Lowry's work - oh it has been interesting thus far, with so many aspects not though about; connections made with evil deeds at every turn by political and economic scoundrels that have shaped the times to come. All this among people who were striving to build up a republic based on natural laws and better living from within their built up Charters by the men who first arrived in America - the backbone of independence. As said above, this kicked off in the year 1630, and I'm only at 1715; post Queen Anne's death.
The first realization to come out of this reading was in the work - from the very steps (and American's really should understand this of the foundation of America) made by people like Jonathan Swift - Swift who was instrumental for the cause of the republic against the oligarchs of the day, the Junto Whigs (as he later coined them, the Whiggarchy - aka the Venetian bankers who spun up the Bank of England in a 1694 coup to drain both England and France by means of perpetual warfare and debt...and so it continues).
Both Queen Anne and Swift are left out of history today for clear reasons, for reasons that their memories are to be verboten as dangerous reminders. Today, what do most know of Swift, let alone Queen Anne, other than his
Gulliver's Travels; an insider’s tale of the oligarchs - while not knowing of his prolific writings nor his hidden pen in the name of Isaac Brickerstaff (astrologist) and the Brickerstaff Papers that he used against the Venetian oligarchs - used against political corruptness and thieves at every level, calling them out for people’s. The other side had their Junto Whig journalists, who Lowry compares to their brethren, the "latter-day heirs at the
New York Times and
Washington Post, where consistently striving for new levels of the art of sheer fabrication." All this and more comes out in the section 'The Art of Political Lying,' which Swift outlines.
So, from Boston, Virginia, Massachusetts - to Albany and Quebec, Canada - governed by agents of the British and French oligarchs, or as was intended, chartered visionaries for a new republics beginning. Swift's hand was very much there in America from the background of England and Ireland helping Queen Anne become released from the vile poison of Sarah Churchill (daughter of Richard Jenyns - St.Albans - a real case and a half), who controlled the back staircase to the Queen Anne's chamber, and her evil husband, John - commander of most all (the oligarchs front man), the Duke of Marlborough. This Duke comes out from within the pages of political ponerology, and was likely a 'double-high' authoritarian who controlled the military front door, the whole of the military financial wheels (which he siphoned off like a drunkard), while also being instrumental in the placement of key positions of titles and court seats of many names known (if not their ill deeds as history has watered down or build up). This Duke ensured that multi-front wars were kept on a continuous footing that amounted to nothing other than slaughter and debt - there was no aim, just agreements by oligarchs for subservient control, loss of life and financial ruin for citizens and state; this is what oligarchs do when they control armies. Later, there was Winston of the same Churchill line who took up the cause of the former clansman in WWII. As Lowry states of the Churchill's (John particularly in the telling), the "whole spawned generations of everything from genocidal colonialism and international drug trafficking to Winston Churchill, the misvenerated encyclopedia of all their vices."
From the Royal Society, which was moved (under the protest from members) into the City of London's banking lair, into the lap of their new presidency, Sir Isaac Newton (who was hand-picked after dumping the more able as he offered up his “own” niece to Montagu and Locke in prostitution), wherein Lowry does not spare Newton in his telling - the Newtonian plagiarism off the back of Gottfried Wilhelm von Leibniz, his ideas of science - who the Royal Society attacked unrelentingly during Newton - with Newton writing his own summary of charges made against him, and other low deeds. Things devolved more from the Whig cult who then seemed to have moved hands for outright assassinations and suggested murderous acts against genealogical lines of the monarchies (in France and Britain) that the Venetians tried to control the linage outcomes. In this, while Queen Anne was alive, Swift and his friend, Leibniz, had what was called the Leibniz Card (e.g. the next in line legitimately to Queen Anne, might be worse for the oligarchs who, for a while, were checked in this regard by the existence of the Electress Sophia of Hanover). Unfortunately, the Electress Sophia of Hanover was older than Anne. The conclusion at the time of Queen Anne’s death says much more.
Of Leibniz, he had written "Grand Design for an 'harmonia universalis' of sovereign republic” (critical for America), and there was no end to the scorn by the elite when it came to Leibniz.
Note on the Royal Society, it became a society that would 'keep an eye out for breakaway science,' especially in America, designed to reel it back in and control it. Think back the short time to when even Velikovsky was targeted.
Of Swift, Lowry cites that he was "A brilliant satirist in the tradition of Erasmus and Rabelais, and a devastating polemicist against the peddlers of "Man is a Beast; the universe is dead" as Hobbes, Descartes, Newton, and Locke subscribed. Swift wrote
Tale of the Tub and
Battle of the Books, which "makes Swift as a dangerous man in the eyes of those who sought to impose a cultural dark age."
Meanwhile, in America there is Cotton Mather (and Increase Mather) who in 1710 published anonymously "one of the most important books in American History,
Essay to Do Good - a book that became a rallying cry for the American revolution-for the task of creating a republic based on natural law, in which each citizen could realize his potential for good, and his immortality, through his contributions to prosperity."
On Rulers, Cotton Mather said:
Rulers who make no other use of their high station, than to swagger over their neighbors, and command their obsequious flatteries, and enrich themselves with the spoils of which they are able to pillage them, and wallow in sensual and brutal pleasures; these are, The Beasts of Men.
Of the
Essay to Do Good (just 1 of 455 of Mather's works), Benjamin Franklin said that it was "the foremost influence on his life".
A note on John Locke, a favorite of the 1694 Montagu arranged Bank of England, who was their:
in-house propagandist - same Locke who used to impose policies as a constitutional model of 'liberty,' same Locke who sat on the Board of Trade, who advanced revoking the charters of all American colonies, a royal dictatorship over the economic activity, and a ban on their manufacturing of finished goods, the same John Locke as an 'enlightened' philosopher, insisted that human mind was nothing more than the animal register of 'sensations'.
American's have the advantage here of knowing the names from the 1630 onward from their own history, and yet they may not all know what each name stood for and what they were doing in the background, depending on the historical telling (Lowry brings up general historical understandings made), while British folks will have a handle on the other side of the pond in history, yet the same may apply (Queen Anne example?). If Canadian, people may well begin to understand how well they have been duped by the French, the British (yet not to forget the powers that lay behind them) through their oligarchs’ network, and even the Jesuits who lead at least a half dozen native tribes against the colonists in warring slaughters, Jesuits who had no masters other than the oligarchs who helped create them - who went back and forth between the French and British with a purpose.
The black cassock dressed priests come up a great deal, and there is always some controversy to how they fit the bill. Here, the British and French (with a likely node from oligarchs’ in a calculated treaty with the Iroquois Five Nations that ends with providing them with 'neutrality' which was then used, conveniently, by the Jesuits to lead northern tribes through the neutral zone against the chartered American colonists. Later, under Queen Anne's new command, the battle of Quebec was to take place, primarily to rid the Jesuits control over their proxy raiders upon colonists. However, the whole planned battle was a blunder before it even really got started (thus it never happened), with sabotage and leaked information a given – the hand of the Duke was always near. One example being that the might of the 'colonist funded' naval expedition (given a green light by Queen Anne who had no funds to offer) down into the St. Lawrence River, concluded in certain military people, who had other leanings, to suddenly steer the fleet north to the rocks of the seaway 70 miles to the North and to further complain that to go further, to continue in August, was to place the troops in the extremes of the northern environment (that people lived there all year long was never said).
Concerning the Jesuits control of the Indians, one note alludes to their ability for “instilling them with synthetic belief structures, to direct them in savage attacks…” More on this may come up later.
Queen Anne's Death
Lowry notes:
"But of all the Stuarts on the throne of England, only the last one, Queen Anne, deserves to be remembered. For all her faults, and for all her compromises with the evil around her, she nonetheless mustered the will to do good during her lifetime. Yet for all her willingness, during her final years, to oppose the monstrous policies earlier controlling her reign, she had no citizenry to appeal to. She had only British subjects, and the rules of court were defined without them. Jonathan Swift had learned the rules, and he knew there was no hope in changing them."
1791 Poem review of the last years of Queen Anne:
And oh! How short are human schemes!
Here ends all our golden dreams.
What St. John's skill in state affairs,
What Ormonds's valour, Oxford's cares,
To save their sinking country lent,
Was all destroyed by one event.
Too soon the precious life was ended,
On which alone, our weal depended.
- Jonathan Swift
A couple of notes here, Lowry can’t completely unravel her illness starting on the 27th of July to her final death, August 1st. He offers up historical nuances – a best possible chronology, including the coming coup from the Duke and his pals, and George 1 King in waiting, and references to the 1711, 1712 and 1713 deaths of the French line of kings who happened to share the same MO illness as Queen Anne. Her death, however prevented the building coup that was in the works, which may have been more problematical had she not died, and yet her death guaranteed a better outcome for the oligarchs regardless. Just before she died, once again the Whigs magically ran to her side wherein (it was said) she could speak no words, and yet she handed the Staff of lord treasurer taken days before from Oxford (although if a new lord was not appointed by the Queen he would retain it) and given to Shrewsbury – “So weak was she that Harcourt had to direct her hand as she gave the Staff to the Duke of Shrewsbury.”
Another aspect of her death was in the attending physician/chemist (the Royal apothecary) in none other than Daniel Malthus, whose later grandson was the population control guy, Thomas Malthus, hand in glove with some of the radical Darwinist.
Of her death, something else needs to be said. The Whigs came running and declared her dead and then set about filling spots and persecuting others who had held them, yet all through this time Queen Anne lay to rot in her bed for three weeks wherein she was finally buried under her great-great grandmother, Mary, Queen of Scots. She lay there as King George 1 had refused to come to England until she was in the ground. Queen Anne received “no monument, no stone, no tablet has ever marked her resting place. In the entire small abbey {Chapel of Henry V11}, only a small plaque on a distant wall mentions her name.” This only came in 1966 from New York’s Trinity Church.
Of Queen Anne's remembering, American's may know that indeed she was placed in some reverence by Virginia's Governor Alexander Spotswood, the great architect who 'transformed' Virginia and rebuilt the Collage of William and Mary from its ruins - using "classical constructive geometry - circular actions and the Golden Section." Queen Anne's portrait hung in the banquet hall "in the place of honor."
It was Queen Anne, who in her later years, had reappointed governors in America from earlier times having been appointed under the evil Duke of Marlborough and company. Her support and her appointments helped the growing republic of American – through to independence, while at the same time infuriating the Venetian bankers and oligarchs of the day - in France, Britain and in some of the American chartered territories (industrialists and land owners supported by previous governors). Is it any wonder why no one breathes her name today – or cites Swift's work? Some of the people back in time indeed certainly tried very hard to "Do Good".
Benjamin Franklin comes in during the second half of this book; post 1715, so more later. However, whether American, Brit, Irish, Scot, German, Dutch or Canadian (etc.), what took place during this time has great bearing on our current times and places of residence – are freedoms or enslavement, for the war for power and control continues, and it is as lopsided today as can be.
It seems a certainty, that while being bounced between the body politic, as we most all are, answering to their wars, polices and crafted ideologies, the oligarchs; call them what one wants, move all sides to a potency for them alone. They are truly psychopathic and obviously cause great harm to many.
